RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

David writes: "If you care about animal welfare or food safety, this news will concern you: the nationwide expansion of a risky US Department of Agriculture (USDA) high-speed slaughter program is imminent. But the good news is there is still time to stop it."

A risky U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) high-speed slaughter program would allow facilities to increase slaughter speeds and shift responsibility of food safety oversight into the hands of slaughter plant employees. (photo: Gerry Broome/AP)
A risky U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) high-speed slaughter program would allow facilities to increase slaughter speeds and shift responsibility of food safety oversight into the hands of slaughter plant employees. (photo: Gerry Broome/AP)


I've Seen the Hidden Horrors of High-Speed Slaughterhouses

By Scott David, Guardian UK

06 March 18


There is still time to stop an imminent program that would allow facilities to increase slaughter speeds, while reducing the number of trained government inspectors

f you care about animal welfare or food safety, this news will concern you: The nationwide expansion of a risky US Department of Agriculture (USDA) high-speed slaughter program is imminent. But the good news is there is still time to stop it.

The USDA is now accepting public comments on its proposed rule that it euphemistically dubbed the “Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection”. As a former undercover investigator who worked inside a pig slaughterhouse operating under the pilot project that was, at the time, called HIMP,” I’ve seen firsthand the hazardous and cruel nature of this controversial program and can say with certainty that it’s anything but “modern”.

This expanded program, formally called the New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS), would allow facilities to increase slaughter speeds, while reducing the number of trained government inspectors on the lines. In other words, the responsibility of food safety oversight is largely shifted into the hands of slaughter plant employees. Combine this with faster speeds on the kill floor and the result is problems that can – and do – go unnoticed.

For nearly six months, I worked undercover inside Quality Pork Processors (QPP), no typical pig slaughterhouse. An exclusive Hormel Foods supplier, QPP kills about 1,300 pigs every hour operating under the high-speed pilot program. That’s more than 21 pigs per minute, making QPP one of the fastest pig-killing facilities in the nation.

QPP has widely been considered a model for the USDA’s nationwide expansion of the pilot program through NSIS, but when no one thought the public or USDA was watching, behind the slaughterhouse’s closed doors, I documented pig carcasses covered in feces and abscesses being processed for human consumption, and workers – under intense pressure to keep up with high line speeds – beating, dragging, and electrically prodding pigs to make them move faster.

NSIS may also allow higher numbers of sick and injured pigs too weak even to stand (known as “downers”) to be slaughtered for food. As documented on my hidden camera, these animals endured particularly horrific abuses as they were forced to the kill floor in a desperate attempt to keep the slaughter lines moving as fast as possible.

I even documented a supervisor sleeping on the job when he was in charge of overseeing the stunning process to ensure pigs were effectively rendered unconscious before their throats were slit.

One QPP employee even said to me on camera, “If the USDA is around, they could shut us down.”

That, in a nutshell, is the underlying problem with this initiative: it’s a program that largely allows the slaughterhouse to police itself.

Though I’ve witnessed these horrors firsthand, I’m far from the only one warning of the dangers of NSIS. USDA whistleblowers, labor unions, and even members of Congress have expressed their objections to this program.

A 2013 report by the USDA’s own Office of the Inspector General stated that “since FSIS did not provide adequate oversight, HIMP plants may have a higher potential for food safety risks,” concluding that this “program has shown no measurable improvement to the inspection process”.

In 2016, a letter from 60 members of Congress to the USDA stated “the available evidence suggests the hog HIMP will undermine food safety,” and that “rapid line speeds present some of the greatest risks of inhumane treatment as workers are often pressured to take violent shortcuts to keep up.” The letter further states: “We are concerned that these new rules are being pushed by the industry to increase profits at the expense of public health.”

More than a quarter of a million people have signed a petition against the pilot program’s expansion through NSIS, and earlier this month, a coalition of 35 animal, worker, environmental, and consumer protection organizations also urged the USDA to drop the proposal.

At a time when consumers are rightfully demanding more transparency in the food industry, the USDA’s so-called “Modernization” program is a big step backward.

Halting the expansion of the dangerous pilot program and bringing it to an immediate end is the only conscientious and compassionate choice for the USDA, a federal agency that has the opportunity, and the responsibility, to put animals, consumers, and workers above powerful pork industry interests.

To sum it all up in the words of a USDA whistleblower who worked as an inspector at QPP: “It’s no longer meaningful for consumers to see that mark indicating that their product has been USDA-inspected.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+14 # ddd-rrr 2018-03-06 11:49
WHY do we not learn from history to avoid repeating the same mistakes?!
SAFE and HUMANELY-OBTAIN ED food is the object, NOT finding yet
more ways to "cut corners", risking our own well-being and that
of the animals involved, just to make a bit more profit!
 
 
+17 # chrisconno 2018-03-06 12:08
Capitalism had made us too cruel for words and too stupid to recognize the danger these processes put us in.
 
 
+9 # tsyganka 2018-03-06 16:05
This speeding-up of slaughter and inspection coupled with reduction of governmental inspectors was done earlier with chickens. Cases of E. coli and salmonella rose.

MILLIONS of people had sent formal comments to USDA about that process. USDA sneered at us and went ahead with attacking public health - mine, yours, all Americans'. As far as I'm concerned, that's terrorism.

Every time "Modernization" appears in an act, we get screwed - e.g., the fascist 2010 bill that 'modernized' food safety, sales, and sharing.

As all the governmental agencies are now apparently captured by insanely greedy corporatists, we need a prolonged general strike and boycott as soon as possible.
 
 
+3 # krazykwiltkatt 2018-03-06 21:37
It's 'Back To The Future'. Read Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle' and enjoy your breakfast. This country is founded, built and maintained on cruelty and it isn't changing anytime soon.
 
 
+3 # bread and butter 2018-03-07 09:19
This is what Republican "deregulation" means.

It's a sterile word, until you actually apply it to real situations.

This is just another one of those situations.

"Deregulation" inevitably leads to cruelty with human victims as well.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN