RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Boardman writes: "Even before Donald trump announced his candidacy for the presidency, anyone who was paying attention knew he was unfit for office in more ways than one would want to count."

Donald and Melania Trump in Houston. (photo: Getty Images)
Donald and Melania Trump in Houston. (photo: Getty Images)

Why Expect Justice for Children From a Category 5 Presidency?

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

11 September 17

Why isn’t innocence enough to protect any child from the law?

istorically, bigotry has served as the basis for US policy and law often enough that no one should be surprised that we’re at it again, targeting people who had no meaningful choice when they were brought to this country as children. To mask our bigotry, we call these innocent young people “childhood arrivals.” We pretend they broke the law as minors by accompanying their parents who brought them to our country in violation of our constitutionally squalid immigration statutes. But we also pretend we are big-hearted because we will hold off on “deferred action” against these criminals in our midst. Yes, that’s DACA, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the 2012 executive program that is fundamentally a moral hoax and a legal joke, neither of which is among the reasons President Trump has given for throwing the program into deferred chaos.

In fact, President Trump has offered no rational explanation for his decision to punt the problem to Congress for six months while promising to revisit it later if Congress doesn’t act to his liking (whatever that turns out to be). That re-visitation is a reasonable likelihood, since Congress hasn’t acted since August 2001 when the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, known acronymically as the DREAM Act, was introduced as a bipartisan proposal from Senators Dick Durbin of Illinois and Orrin Hatch of Utah and 16 co-sponsors of both parties. The legislative history of the DREAM Act’s multiple failures to treat innocent children with something like fairness and decency is a story of dysfunctional government now in its third presidency. The standards in the DREAM Act are truly double standards, expecting these forced immigrant children to be paragons of virtue that some native-born citizen children would have a hard time meeting.

Well, never mind, that’s what America does to its masses of immigrants — it treats them harshly to see if they’re tough enough to become real Americans. There are two obvious exceptions to that rule. The rich or talented immigrant has a much softer ride. And those brought here as slaves are never forgiven.

Like all hurricanes, Hurricane Trump spins in circles with random chaos

The president’s moral vacuity regarding “childhood arrivals” was underlined by his chickening out on announcing it himself. These DACA children arrived in the US when they were an average age of six (now they’re 26 on average, but their children are citizens). So for the president to pass the announcement of this bigoted decision to serial hater Attorney General Jeff Sessions was a neat Trumpian ploy to get to see himself as dissociated from his own inhumanity. At a press conference last February, the president rambled semi-coherently, as if he were trying to persuade himself of his own decency:

We’re going to show great heart. DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me. I will tell you. To me, it's one of the most difficult subjects I have…. But you have some absolutely incredible kids — I would say mostly. They were brought here in such a way. It's a very — it's a very very tough subject. We are going to deal with DACA with heart. I have to deal with a lot of politicians, don't forget. And I have to convince them that what I'm saying is, is right. And I appreciate your understanding on that…. But the DACA situation is a very very, it's a very difficult thing for me because you know, I love these kids. I love kids. I have kids and grandkids and I find it very, very hard doing what the law says exactly to do.

Announcing that DACA would end in six months or so, the US attorney general both lied about the program and misrepresented it in a ritual Republican manner. Most egregiously, he called them “adult illegal aliens” and said they could participate in the Social Security program. Responding to the predictable outcry against his decision, President Trump tweeted, without substance: “Congress now has 6 months to legalize DACA…. If they can’t, I will revisit the issue!” The next day the president was widely reported as saying he had no second thoughts about cancelling DACA.

Even before Donald trump announced his candidacy for the presidency, anyone who was paying attention knew he was unfit for office in more ways than one would want to count. So he wasn’t taken seriously. With major media playing the Trump Campaign for comedy ratings, Trump ran roughshod over Republican candidates made to look like pallid clowns, whether more qualified than Trump or not. And still he was not taken all that seriously by a Democratic Party and candidate that stood for little more than being not-Trump. Now we are where we are, wherever that really is, and the leaders of the country in both parties, in business and the arts, in media and academia, in whatever field, mostly resemble chickens in the barnyard with the fox, scrambling to let the fox catch some other chicken first, as if the slaughter would come to a natural end in due course, after which the blood on the ground would dry and be covered over by dust and feces as usual.

There are some exceptions to our widespread barnyard panic

Fifteen states and the District of Columbia filed suit September 6 to block Trump’ DACA plan the day after it was announced. New York attorney general Eric Schneiderman, who is part of the suit against the Trump administration, told an anti-Trump rally:

We understand what’s going on in Washington. And we know that when bullies step up, you have to step to them and step to them quickly. And that’s what we’re here to do today.… By definition, DREAMers play by the rules. DREAMers work hard. DREAMers pay taxes. For most, America is the only home they’ve ever known. They deserve to stay here.

This is the essence of what makes DACA a moral hoax and a legal joke. Just to qualify for deferred action as a childhood arrival, DREAMers are required to provide evidence that they are better than average people. Roughly 800,000 of them have done just that. These are children who are being punished for being good children. They did not break the law, yet the law holds them accountable for the sins of their parents. Innocence should be enough to protect a child from the government.

And there is a Gordian Knot solution to this largely imaginary problem. It’s a mystery why President Obama didn’t do this instead of crafting another Rube Goldberg structure destined to be a problem as long as it lasted (the immigration equivalent of Obamacare). That Gordian Knot solution is simple and constitutional. These DREAMers, for reasons that defy human decency, are charged with violating immigration law, an offense against the United States. The Constitution (Article II, Section 2) gives the president the “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States.” President Obama could have pardoned these innocent “criminals,” but big gestures have not been his style and, as a lawyer, he presumably could list a bunch of complications flowing from such pardons. But so what? They would have been fair and just and decent. They would have served the intent of the Constitution’s preamble to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and promote the general welfare. Pardons would have transformed the debate from seeming to be about rounding up imaginary aliens to actually being about legally lynching innocent children.

The pardon option remains on the table. If Joe Arpaio is pardonable for committing crimes against humanity, why not pardon DREAMers for doing nothing more wrong than making a bad choice of parents? President Trump could do it tomorrow. Or the tomorrow after that. Or the tomorrow after that…. What are the odds?

William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

-27 # babaregi 2017-09-11 12:47
Looters, who are they?
+3 # Michaeljohn 2017-09-11 19:09
Hey man, think you're riding the wrong horse; the discussion isn't about kids from poor black neighborhoods who made bad choices.
+31 # PABLO DIABLO 2017-09-11 13:57
Immigrants take jobs no one else want, like Melania did.
+4 # Art947 2017-09-11 17:04
The ONLY job that the illegal alien Melania took was being the "other woman" to that philanderer, DJT. Any other jobs, modeling for example, had many other suitable candidates.
+3 # ReconFire 2017-09-11 21:37
Wow, you made my day. Thanks.
+26 # lorenbliss 2017-09-11 14:19
The always thought-provoki ng Mr. Boardman at his humanitarian best.

If such pardons are legally feasible (which obviously I don't know), Mr. Boardman's proposal is brilliant from at least two perspectives.

It puts the Trump/Pence Regime in a deliciously Machiavellian bind. Trump will be damned by his malevolently white nativist JesuNazi supporters if he grants the pardons, exposed as a heartless brute if he does not.

And such pardons would boldly rescue 800,000 humans from the potentially deadly disruption of their lives.

Which leads to another question: can citizenship be granted by executive order?

Again I don't know the answer, but were Trump to thusly naturalize the Dreamers, it would indeed be a heroic act, a giant step toward fulfillment of his promise to "make America great again."
+2 # WBoardman 2017-09-11 18:05
Citizenship is a real solution, but it seems to be
beyond executive authority to grant.

The Constitution, 14th Amendment, Section one says:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The Chicago Tribune said this on Sept 10:

If you don't marry a U.S. citizen, find an employer to sponsor you for a green card and its fees, or have a lot of cash — as much as $500,000 to $1 million — there is no simple way to obtain citizenship or even get into a meaningful line to be considered. An alternative route is to be so exceptionally gifted or skilled at something that you qualify as an "alien of extraordinary ability." Or, if your home country is eligible, you could be one of 50,000 winners in the annual green card lottery , according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

USCIS (US Citizenship and Immigration) advises on how to get naturalized through military service:
+3 # Floridatexan 2017-09-12 09:45
It's a mistake to expect heroism from a coward.
-8 # Thinking 2017-09-11 17:40
What does Boardman want done with immigration law? Is the whole thing to be ignored or repealed? Are we still to have a border with Mexico?
+5 # elkingo 2017-09-11 21:39
Child abuse at the national level. Recall this asshole.
+3 # ericlipps 2017-09-12 04:44
Trump is president today in part because the media refused to take him seriously until too late . . . because they were too busy slashing at Hillary Clinton.
0 # ChrisCurrie 2017-09-12 14:26
Can our President "pardon" people who have committed no crime to begin with?
+1 # LandLady 2017-09-12 19:04
I submitted a comment on this article at 9:45 this morning. It's not here at 9PM, although several more comments have appeared. It was not rude or obscene, although I did take some issue with the author. I donate regularly to RSN. Is there an explanation for this?
"Land Lady"

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.