RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Boardman writes: "After a year in Yemen, the US/Saudi coalition has managed to reduce the region's poorest country to an almost unthinkable condition, where some 20 million Yemenis - about 80% of the population - need humanitarian assistance."

Emiratis welcoming a UAE military convoy as it travels from the Al-Hamra military base to Zayed city after returning from Yemen, on 7 November, 2015. (photo: AFP/HO/WAM)
Emiratis welcoming a UAE military convoy as it travels from the Al-Hamra military base to Zayed city after returning from Yemen, on 7 November, 2015. (photo: AFP/HO/WAM)


US/Saudi Aggression in Yemen Celebrated by Co-Aggressor UAE

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

18 April 16

 

he National is an English-language publication owned and operated by Abu Dhabi Media, the government-run media organization of Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). There is no press freedom in the UAE. Government media report the government point of view, which rarely includes criticism of the government.

On March 26, the first anniversary of the UAE’s unprovoked attack on Yemen as part of the Saudi-led coalition of mostly Arab states, the UAE’s official media published a document about the carnage in Yemen illustrative of George Orwell’s observation: “If you want to keep a secret, you must also hide it from yourself.” The truth about the war in Yemen is a largely unreported secret. The UAE officially hides that truth from itself in an editorial in The National (which follows in its entirety, section by section). It begins with the headline:

After a year in Yemen, our resolve is firm

After a year in Yemen, the US/Saudi coalition has managed to reduce the region’s poorest country to an almost unthinkable condition, where some 20 million Yemenis – about 80% of the population – need humanitarian assistance. In a country both under attack and on the verge of mass famine, what does “our resolve is firm” really mean if not continued crimes against humanity? The UAE editorial’s first sentence has no discernible meaning at all:

The start one year ago of Operation Decisive Storm comes as a reminder of the importance of the war in Yemen.

The anniversary of an aggression – that the Saudis proclaimed would be brief and decisive – is important mostly for its irony. An official Saudi press release of March 25, 2015, quoted the Saudi ambassador to the US saying: “The operation will be limited in nature, and designed to protect the people of Yemen and its legitimate government from a takeover by the Houthis. A violent extremist militia.” By then the “legitimate” government of Yemen had fled to the Saudi capital of Riyadh. Not only has more than a year of US/Saudi-led war failed to achieve any significant military success, it has produced collateral damage on a massive scale, making the country of 25 million people perhaps the worst humanitarian crisis in the world today. This reality makes a mockery of the UAE editorial's next assertion:

The UAE joined the Saudi-led coalition campaign driven by its commitment and dedication to maintaining security and establishing peace in the region.

This is, almost literally, Orwellian in its “war is peace” mindset. From the start, the US/Saudi aggression has violated international law and committed war crimes against Yemeni civilians, using cluster bombs made in the USA (and sold to the Saudis with US taxpayer subsidies). The recently-released US State Department annual human rights report on Saudi Arabia for 2015 soft-pedals the allies’ slaughter of civilians in Yemen, and omits Saudi-dropped US cluster bombs entirely (perhaps because their lingering impact killing children over years and decades is deucedly hard to assess accurately, whereas profits can be tallied almost immediately). The full despicability of the Obama administration’s position on these inhumanities is revealed in its official unwillingness to speak on the record about the blatant hypocrisy of its morally indefensible defense of the murder of civilians for profit, as reported in The Intercept:

A State Department spokesperson, who would only comment on background, pointed out that the U.S. has called on both sides of the conflict to protect civilians. He also claimed that the use of cluster munitions is not a human rights violation because the United States has not signed the ban on cluster munitions.

The State Department spokesperson did not acknowledge that only one side bombs civilians (in schools, hospitals, markets, and homes) with US-made planes dropping US-made munitions. This follows a years-long US campaign in Yemen to kill civilians with US-made drones (still in use from outside the country).

Yemen is drawn as a coherent state on maps, but most of the Yemeni-Saudi border has never been officially defined. Yemen has an ancient culture in the western part of the country, but it has never been a coherent state. The Saudis and Yemenis have engaged in sporadic, armed conflict for decades. In particular, the Saudis and the Houthis have fought over northwest Yemen and neighboring southwest Saudi Arabia, which is home to a large Houthi population. Security in the region is not directly threatened by the Yemeni civil war. For any Arab state to talk like the UAE of establishing “peace in the region” is fundamentally hilarious.

The UAE has long been a source of support for the Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh), as have Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait – all part of the coalition waging war on Yemen. Editorially, the UAE cloaks itself in the mantle of state legitimacy:

The coalition responded to the call by Yemen’s president Abd Rabbu Mansour Hadi to restore his internationally recognised government to power.

To call the Hadi government “internationally recognized” is to fudge the reality that the Hadi government has only limited recognition among Yemenis. Hadi came to power through what US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power called, somewhat falsely, the “peaceful, inclusive, and consensus-driven political transition under the leadership of the legitimate President of Yemen, Abdo Rabbo Mansour Hadi.” One problem with this US formulation is that Hadi’s “legitimacy” derives from his being installed as president by an international diplomatic coup, followed by his election in a race in which he was the sole candidate. Essentially, there is no legitimate government of Yemen and has not been for decades at least. The present war of aggression by outside powers intervening in a multifaceted civil war relies for its justification on a variety of dishonest fictions. The Houthis are a sub-group of the Shi’ite Zaidis, who number about eight million in Yemen. The Zaidis governed northwest Yemen for 1,000 years, until 1962. The UAE editorial invents a different historical identity:

Houthi rebels had captured the capital of Sanaa, with the support of Iran and loyalists to former president Ali Abdullah Saleh, and were advancing towards the southern city of Aden. On the way, they had killed civilians and destroyed neighbourhoods, leading to a vast humanitarian crisis.

Iran is widely scapegoated as a nefarious influence in Yemen, but there is little or no evidence of Iranian involvement on a scale that could possibly make a difference on the ground in Yemen. Iran’s support of the Houthis, their fellow Shi’ites, has been largely diplomatic, political, and presumably financial. Former president Saleh, who has a wide following of non-Houthis, was deposed in the coup that installed Hadi. When Saleh was president of Yemen, he also fought a Houthi insurrection. While there is little doubt that all sides in the Yemen civil war (including al Qaeda and ISIS) have committed war crimes of various degree, only the US/Saudi coalition has bombed defenseless civilian populations. There is a special deceit in the UAE suggestion that the Houthis in 2015 are the cause of the Yemen humanitarian crisis in 2016. A year of largely indiscriminate bombing by the US/Saudi forces is the more proximate and powerful cause, as is the year-long US/Saudi naval blockade that keeps Yemenis caught in the bomb range while at the same time denying them food, medicine, and other essentials for survival. Nevertheless, according to the UAE editorial, the Houthis – who have suffered attacks by ISIL – are somehow responsible for ISIL attacking coalition forces in the south:

The Houthis’ disregard for Yemen’s security created fertile ground for extremism to thrive, leading to the latest attacks by ISIL that killed 20 people in Aden on Friday.

Whatever “security” Yemen has had in recent years has been largely illusory. The US drone program in Yemen spent years creating insecurity and killing civilians until the US withdrew just ahead of the fall of the Hadi government (president Saleh had also sanctioned the lethal US military presence in Yemen). And why was the US there? Because Yemen was already “fertile ground for extremism,” in particular AQAP, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which now controls roughly half of Yemen’s southern coast, about 370 miles including the port city of Mukalla, with a 500,000 population. The effective allies in the US/Saudi war on the Houthis include not only the UAE and other coalition members, but also al Qaeda and ISIS – not in the sense that these “allies” share the same goals, but in the sense that the US/Saudi genocidal obsession with the Houthis has allowed and helped both ISIS and especially al Qaeda to expand and solidify positions in Yemen.

All the same, the UAE tries to blame the ISIL (ISIS) suicide bomb attacks in Aden on March 14, 2016, on the Houthis, when Aden is more or less under the military control of the Hadi government. Saudi and UAE forces have been deployed to Aden at least since July 2015, in limited numbers, to protect the Hadi government. The UAE has also secretly deployed hundreds of Colombian mercenary soldiers to Yemen, along with other mercenaries from Panama, El Salvador, and Chile, frequently commanded by Australians. During this same time period, neither Saudi Arabia nor the UAE deployed any troops to fight ISIS in Syria. UAE troop strength in Yemen reportedly peaked in the fall of 2015 at about 5,000 troops of one nationality or another. Currently the UAE is estimated to have about 2,500 troops in Yemen as well as other deployments in Libya and Afghanistan. The UAE, with a population of about 6 million, has a military of some 65,000 active frontline personnel.

The UAE’s editorial summary of its year of war-making in Yemen relies on an imaginary threat of a wider war that would somehow have magically emerged from the possibility that the Houthis might secure their own country, or just part of it:

The precarious situation last year required swift intervention to guard against a wider conflict in the region. Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Cooperation Council allies, including the UAE, realised that the security of Yemen was critical for the Arabian Peninsula at large and that a military operation would be required. Iran, which has a history of meddling in regional affairs, has been backing the Shiite Houthi group to fulfil its own nefarious agenda of expanding its footprint in the Middle East. Quite simply, unless we had taken firm action, our security would have been at risk. This has come at a great cost, including the lives of more than 80 UAE martyrs.

More than a year after collaborating in an aggressive war against Yemen, the UAE can cite no credible or rational or legal basis for joining the attack – unless “a nefarious agenda” turns out to be an obscure casus belli under international law. Worse, the UAE doesn’t even acknowledge, much less try to justify, the criminal brutality of its war.

This criminal brutality has been documented over and over by non-governmental organizations. Most recently, on April 7, Human Rights Watch issued a report centered on the war crime of bombing a civilian market, killing 97 civilians, 25 of them children. This is no isolated incident. The responsibility and guilt for these atrocities extends to those who sell the weapons as well as those who use them. As Human Rights Watch reported in part:

Since March 26, 2015, the UN and nongovernmental organizations have documented numerous airstrikes by coalition forces that violate the laws of war. The UN Panel of Experts on Yemen, established under UN Security Council Resolution 2140 (2013), in a report made public on January 26, “documented 119 coalition sorties relating to violations” of the laws of war.

Human Rights Watch has documented 36 unlawful airstrikes – some of which may amount to war crimes – which have killed at least 550 civilians. Human Rights Watch has also documented 15 attacks in which internationally banned cluster munitions were used in or near cities and villages, wounding or killing civilians…. The coalition has used at least six types of cluster munitions, three delivered by air-dropped bombs and three by ground-launched rockets….

None of these war crimes could possibly be committed by the Houthis and their allies, since they have no air force. Whatever the atrocities committed by Houthis, Saleh’s forces, or others, the humanitarian suffering in Yemen is overwhelmingly the responsibility of the US/Saudi coalition, however the UAE editorial may spin it:

The UAE has also contributed greatly to humanitarian efforts in Yemen, especially as Operation Restoring Hope got under way. More than Dh1.6 billion has been spent on infrastructure and aid programmes to provide our brothers and sisters there with electricity, food, health services, water, sanitation, fuel and transport. We will continue to help the civilian population. Of course, the ultimate goal is a political solution that restores the legitimate government.

In late April a year ago, the Saudis announced that Operation Decisive Storm was over and had achieved its goals. Saudis also announced the beginning of Operation Restoring Hope, which included airstrikes and other military actions, as well as some relief missions.

The claim that the UAE has spent more than 1.6 billion Dirham ($436 million) in and on Yemen is misleading. In 2015, the UAE apparently contributed that amount to United Nations humanitarian programs in Yemen, an amount exceeded only by Saudi Arabia. A contribution in the hundreds of millions of dollars appears generous, but represents only a couple of days of the cost of the war. Saudi Arabia is reportedly picking up most of the cost of the war: $200 million per day ($6 billion per month).

Joining a military campaign is never an easy decision to make, but in this case it was a necessary one. As the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Dr Anwar Gargash, said on Friday, the UAE is more powerful today with the sacrifice of its martyrs, and history will remember the important role Operation Decisive Storm has played in drawing “a line between acceptance and submission, and determination and will.”

So ends the official UAE version of its Yemen adventure, a version that imagines with complete falsity that the Houthi rebellion somehow put the UAE under threat of having to accept and submit. Accept and submit to what? The Houthi rebellion was a thousand miles from the UAE and has yet to go beyond Yemeni borders (except for the sporadic fighting along the Saudi border in the northwest). In reality, the US/Saudi coalition has long demanded that the Houthis accept and submit to domination by their Sunni enemies of a thousand years. Now, in mid-April 2015, an open-ended ceasefire of sorts is settling over Yemen, with the Houthis still in control of much of the country, and the Saudis continuing to bomb at will. Ironically, if anyone has so far shown true determination and will, it is the Houthis, in their resistance to a ruthless and relentless international coalition.

As for “joining a military campaign,” which the UAE officially says is “never an easy decision to make,” the UAE has apparently managed the difficult choice once again. Now the UAE has reportedly asked the US for significant increases in military support in order to escalate the war in Yemen against AQAP, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. Officials in the US and the UAE refuse to comment on the report, which would be an expansion of fighting long under way. According to Iranian Press TV, tensions between Saudi Arabia and the UAE emerged after the UAE withdrew large numbers of troops following defeats in late 2015, leading to a recent plan by the Saudis to replace UAE troops with Jordanians.

On April 15, despite the five-day old truce, US drone strikes and US-made apache helicopters attacked the city of al-Houta, near Aden in south Yemen. Coalition officials said al Qaeda forces had withdrawn and the government controlled the city, with five soldiers reportedly killed in an operation that took four hours.

The ceasefire that started April 10 has continued to remain in effect around most of the country, despite some violations. In the Yemeni capital of Sanaa, more than 100 miles north of al-Houta and still under Houthi control, tens of thousands of demonstrators turned out on April 15 for peaceful protest against continued airstrikes by the US/Saudi coalition.

The UN special envoy leading the peace talks scheduled to begin in Kuwait says peace has never been as close as it is today. Those talks include only “government” and “rebel” representatives. Most of the belligerents, including the US/Saudi coalition, al Qaeda, and ISIS, will not be taking part.



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+20 # WBoardman 2016-04-18 17:53
US at war against Yemen for over a year now
(not counting earlier drone war)
and NO presidential candidate talks about it.

Is that amazing?
 
 
+8 # RMDC 2016-04-19 06:29
No, it is not amazing. The US is at war in Africa and no one mentions it. The US is gearing up for wars in the Asia Pacific and no one mentions it. The US is provoking Russia all along its western border and no one mentions it.

The neo-cons' manifesto about rebuilding America's defenses is fully on schedule toward world military conquest. The most vulnerable nations like Yemen are being wiped off the map first. The US has allies like Saudi Arabia and UAE and they will partition and annex what used to be Yemen.

No one talks about World War 4 because they all want it and they don't want the opinions of the american people (probably not Sanders). The people will be led into war just as sheep are led to slaughter.
 
 
-9 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-18 22:18
Sunnis & Shiites must think one another to be "Western Imperialist Infidels" the way so many of them want to eliminate one another. I think they hate each other's freedoms. Which would be...?
 
 
+10 # jdd 2016-04-19 02:55
The answer is on the table. While Obama prepares for his upcoming trip to Riyadh to kiss the behind of his fellow criminals, Sen Gillibrand and Nancy Pellosi have renewed the call for the release of the 28 pages in the wake of the segment on 60 Minutes. Those 28
pages of the 911 Joint Inquiry Report were redacted and classified by the Bush Administration to protect the Saudi Royals from being held accountable for their complicity in that atrocity. And, as the NYT recently reported, President Obama, who has upheld the Bush ban, is actively intervening into Congress to block a bill which would allow lawsuits against the Saudis by the families of the 911 victims to go forward.
 
 
-3 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-19 08:59
Absurdly overpopulated, underdeveloped Muslim regions pit Sunnis vs. Shiites for scarce resources, bragging & dominating "rites." Pentagon should airlift in condoms, pills. etc. West cannot absorb surplus of backward peoples' Population Bomb BILLIONs, especially the potentially dangerous components? We're talking BILLIONS of people here, not capable of population management, even on their own behalf. We can't even properly care for our own populations, including the unemployable.
 
 
+4 # RMDC 2016-04-19 10:00
Shades -- ignorant comment. you can do better than this. or if you can't, just live with a not of negative comments about you.
 
 
0 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-19 10:42
Population BOMBS biggest threat out there. Blows up climate change, along with other excesses. Unemployed, unmarried, sex challenged, high testosterone males a world wide threat, especially in deadly ideology regions. Suppressed female influence is loss of containment. Behold the WORLDWIDE Saudi Wahhabi financed education-free Madrassah graduates, bearing arms, suicide vests. YUUGE Indonesian Muslim POPULATION at risk of being radicalized, added to Pakistan, etc. Obama should tell Saudi Sunni Wahhabis to back off on financing terrorism or face missiles in their shoreline oil depots. And please don't drone on imprisoned in Political Correctness. This site NEEDS alternative voices.
 
 
-3 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-19 10:48
RM-DC, Rather than just LAZILY labeling something "ignorant," why not respond point by point? IF you're capable. Tell us all the good things about a BILLION or so "radicalized," uneducated, unemployed, sexually frustrated, ridiculously machismo young males worldwide. Hitler loved 'em.
 
 
+5 # dbrize 2016-04-19 14:33
Quoting Shades of gray matter:
RM-DC, Rather than just LAZILY labeling something "ignorant," why not respond point by point? IF you're capable. Tell us all the good things about a BILLION or so "radicalized," uneducated, unemployed, sexually frustrated, ridiculously machismo young males worldwide. Hitler loved 'em.


Not speaking for anyone but myself.

First, there are not "about a BILLION or so "radicalized," uneducated, unemployed, sexually frustrated, ridiculously machismo young males worldwide". Hysterics seldom contributes to a solution for anything.

As for Sunni/Shiite differences in the region, they existed well before 9-11 and our interventions in the region. In fact, a sensible examination of our activities since show we have done much more to inflame the difficulties than to assuage them.

These Muslim internal differences can and should be settled by the participants themselves, something much more likely, not to mention safer for the west and us, if we butt out. These folks are quite capable of negotiating with each other. Deal making has a long history there. If, if "they" want to settle them by killing each other in wars of attrition so be it. Our presence merely gives "them" more excuses to recruit. We don't want that...or do we?

We failed in the 60's to heed MacArthur and others when they warned us against a ground war in Asia.

Now we have a repeat with our interventions in the Mideast and sadly, Africa.
 
 
-3 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-19 15:20
I think there may well be nearly a billion relatively young males worldwide not regularly employed. But let's say it's closer to 600 MILLION. Or 550 MILLION. Or 500 MILLION. That changes things HOW? The Indonesians are scared to death of what's going to happen with their +100 MILLION restless young males.
Then there's Pakistan, India (LOTS of Muslims), Bangladesh, Egypt, etc. And I'm not just talking about Muslims. I'm talking about INSANE Overpopulation, combined with Underdevelopmen t, disappearing fresh water, Climate Change, tribalism, etc. A REALLY YUUGE deal. Asia, Africa, Latin America, even parts of Europe.
 
 
+2 # dbrize 2016-04-19 16:18
Quoting Shades of gray matter:
I think there may well be nearly a billion relatively young males worldwide not regularly employed. But let's say it's closer to 600 MILLION. Or 550 MILLION. Or 500 MILLION. That changes things HOW? The Indonesians are scared to death of what's going to happen with their +100 MILLION restless young males.
Then there's Pakistan, India (LOTS of Muslims), Bangladesh, Egypt, etc. And I'm not just talking about Muslims. I'm talking about INSANE Overpopulation, combined with Underdevelopment, disappearing fresh water, Climate Change, tribalism, etc. A REALLY YUUGE deal. Asia, Africa, Latin America, even parts of Europe.


So many problems. Reminds of the old joke about how to eat an elephant? One bite at a time.

You can conflate any number of problems into an argument for end of times but the fact is humans have faced many existential threats over the centuries and here we are.

Pessimism sells well but optimists solve problems.

First recognize this: we (the USA) cannot unilaterally solve the worlds problems Recognition would be a great start for a new beginning.

The assumption that any or all of the people in the regions you mention can't or won't contribute to solutions is at best stupid, at worst the "Ugly American Syndrome" on parade.

We (homo sapiens) are venal, selfish and self indulgent. We are also highly intelligent, creative and problem solvers.

We will muddle through because we have no other choice.
 
 
-3 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-19 18:47
I can't find where I supposedly said "Billion Radicalized." I certainly didn't mean to. "Radicalized" isn't the only issue. Saying Pakistan's, etc., populations are out of control is Ugly Truth, not Ugly American. What happened to Freedom of Choice in Asia, Africa, Latin America, Middle East? Patriarchy is suicide, once someone decides to knock off your SURPLUS warriors, in VERY LARGE #s.
 
 
+3 # dbrize 2016-04-19 19:06
Quoting Shades of gray matter:
I can't find where I supposedly said "Billion Radicalized." I certainly didn't mean to. "Radicalized" isn't the only issue. Saying Pakistan's, etc., populations are out of control is Ugly Truth, not Ugly American. What happened to Freedom of Choice in Asia, Africa, Latin America, Middle East? Patriarchy is suicide, once someone decides to knock off your SURPLUS warriors, in VERY LARGE #s.


I can find where you said it so I'm sure you can as well.

"Freedom of choice" is an idea with lofty pretense and limited functionality. Even in the liberal western nations it varies in degree and meaning.

What makes you think it is the responsibility of the USA to define it and impose it elsewhere?
 
 
-3 # Shades of gray matter 2016-04-20 07:46
I was hoping you would show us where I said "a billion radicalized." Please.
"Impose" a definition of freedom of choice? Not rocket surgery.
 
 
+1 # dbrize 2016-04-20 09:22
Quoting Shades of gray matter:
I was hoping you would show us where I said "a billion radicalized." Please.
"Impose" a definition of freedom of choice? Not rocket surgery.


It's in quotation marks from your own post...how difficult is this for you? Read your own comment to rmdc.

You are still evading my question. Let me rephrase it for you:

Do you believe it is the responsibility of the US to define and impose "freedom of choice" on other nations?
 
 
0 # WBoardman 2016-04-20 12:14
Quoting Shades of gray matter:
I was hoping you would show us where I said "a billion radicalized." Please.
"Impose" a definition of freedom of choice? Not rocket surgery.


Shades of gray matter is correct.
Shades did not say "a billion radicalized" exactly.
What Shades said was:

Quoting Shades of gray matter:
RM-DC, Rather than just LAZILY labeling something "ignorant," why not respond point by point? IF you're capable. Tell us all the good things about a BILLION or so "radicalized," uneducated, unemployed, sexually frustrated, ridiculously machismo young males worldwide. Hitler loved 'em.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN