RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Slaughter writes: "Something that has gone overlooked and under-discussed is the fact that the TPP will tie the United States to countries that do not value the rights of women."

Activists protest the TPP. (photo: The Hill)
Activists protest the TPP. (photo: The Hill)

Supporting Women Includes Opposing TPP

By Louise Slaughter, The Hill

08 March 16


illary Clinton stood before the United Nations in 1995 and proclaimed that “human rights are women’s rights and women’s rights are human rights.” More than 20 years later, our nation is leading the way in helping live up to that ideal by strengthening the rights of women in countries around the world. As we mark International Women’s Day on March 8, we should take this opportunity to reflect on the extraordinary achievements women are making. This year’s theme, Pledge for Parity, is a call that we should all rally around. Our pledge to support women across the world should include the promise to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

There are hundreds of reasons why the TPP is a mistake. As the representative for Rochester, New York, I have never seen a trade agreement that benefited the American manufacturer or American worker. We were decimated by NAFTA and have lost tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs in my area since it went into effect, culminating in one of the highest poverty rates in the country. For that reason alone, we cannot afford another NAFTA-style trade agreement like the TPP. It’s a bad deal for jobs, wages and environmental protections.

But something that has gone overlooked and under-discussed is the fact that the TPP will tie the United States to countries that do not value the rights of women.

One of those countries is Brunei Darussalam. Even while Brunei was participating in the TPP negotiations, that country was passing laws that harm women. Brunei’s new penal laws proscribe imprisonment for women who have an abortion or who have a child out of wedlock. The penalty for being found guilty of adultery or extramarital sex is flogging or death by stoning. Rather than condemn these repressive acts, the TPP would bring the United States in partnership with Brunei, a country that adopted Sharia law in 2014, causing condemnation from human rights groups.

The case of Malaysia is just as distressing. That country has a troubling and well-documented history of slave labor and serious human trafficking abuses. Every year, millions of people are forced into unpaid labor, with teenage girls forced to become domestic workers in unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Sadly, many also suffer sexual abuse or are driven into Malaysia’s sex trade, and mass graves were also recently discovered.

For years, Malaysia was on the list of worst countries for human trafficking but has shown no real progress in changing its ways. According to our own State Department’s 2014 trafficking report, Malaysia “made limited and inadequate efforts to improve its flawed victim protection regime,” and authorities there detained victims for over a year in some cases, all while decreasing trafficking enforcement.

In May 2015, authorities near the border with Thailand discovered 139 bodies in shallow graves, most likely the remains of trafficked migrants trying to escape persecution in Burma and Bangladesh. Yet, just a few short weeks later, the State Department actually upgraded Malaysia’s status. Questions have since been raised about whether this was done because the fast-track bill passed by Congress said the administration couldn’t rubber stamp any trade agreement with countries in the worst trafficking category.

Appallingly, just a month after the administration rewarded Malaysia with this upgraded trafficking status despite its abysmal record, authorities found dozens more bodies in the Malaysian jungle.

Malaysia is also in the midst of a serious corruption scandal. Investigators have found that $700 million from the country’s sovereign wealth fund was transferred into the prime minister’s bank account. The New York Times recently reported that a Swiss government investigation found $4 billion has been misappropriated as well, with much of it transferred into Swiss bank accounts held by former Malaysian public officials.

The TPP presented an opportunity for the United States to encourage our trading partners to bring their standards up to meet the rest of the international community. Instead, we have given countries like Malaysia and Brunei preferential access to the world’s greatest economy with no assurances that they will address these fundamental problems.

International Women’s Day should be marked by celebrations of women’s progress, not by entering into agreements with countries hostile to their basic human rights. The Trans-Pacific Partnership isn’t just a bad deal for our workers and our environment; it’s a threat to women and a compromise of our American values. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+8 # joeybagofdonuts 2016-03-08 10:50
Representative Slaughter, you are a hypocrite. Hillary Clinton pushed for the TPP as Secretary of State, called it the gold standard of trade deals, and stood by in silence and did nothing to prevent it from being fast-tracked. Then YOU endorsed HER, she flipped under pressure from Bernie Sanders on her stance on the TPP, and then you have the balls to write this piece. Bravo - you belong in the most useless congress in history.
+5 # Anonymot 2016-03-08 11:16
Get it straight. Jimmy Carter was the first President to claim America was for something called Human Rights. As President, Carter was a bumbler and though the phrase caught on, it only got in the way of a functioning America.

Carter was put straight by his successor, Reagan who put America back on its rails: The ONLY measure of success is Money! Women's rights, minority rights, Human Rights, civil rights were good lip service subjects.

Then Pappa Bush put the CIA in the Oval Office. Men with square jaws, square heads, and square minds are not big on Rights. Right, yes, Rights, No. They see women as horizontals.

Then the Arkansas HillBillies showed up. They both had the same interests in women - lip service and seegars.

Bush? He got Riced. Obama at least appointed a whole squad of raucus, abrasive neocons like the Clinton, Powers, and another Rice tokens who destroyed our foreign relations. I suspect the Secretary of State actually picked them.

America has been, is, and will be about Money until something real changes. This country has been in love with fascists, dictators, and assassins, Presidents and Kings, even Kindly Ones - so long as there's money in it.

The guy with the golden pants suit whose lips say "women, women" is really saying "Me me!" to the mirror that hangs at the end of her nose!
-1 # Shades of gray matter 2016-03-08 11:22
While Slaughter may deserve to be publicly challenged, this is not a 1 issue election. Wait. Maybe it is: Stop Trump. A "Godless Socialist," ONCE EXPOSED, BLA$TED, may not be able to do that.
+8 # MidwestTom 2016-03-08 11:23
The Clinton's gave us NAFTA, and they are campaigning now for TPP, even though Hillary says that she does not like it and wants it changed. Another lie as I see it.
+7 # reiverpacific 2016-03-08 11:26
What never ceases to baffle me is that every "trade agreement" from NAFTA (or more correctly "SHAFTA") to the current travesty in the form of TPP, has been supported -in fact promoted- by EVERY president from Wullie Clinton to Obama, backed by both Democrats and TeaThuglicans -Sanders and a few isolated others being exceptions.
Indeed MOST if not ALL TPP nations (AUSTRALIA, Brunei Darussalam, CANADA, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, NEW ZEALAND, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam and JAPAN {United States omitted for some reason}) -exceptions in Capitals- are sweatshop, economies and I'm pretty sure that Australia and New Zealand take advantage of the proximity of many but not to the same extent.
Dunno how Indonesia was left out of the list; I remember seeing cattle-truckloa ds of mostly Indian women seamstresses being carted past my office in Bandung, to their long workdays.
So again, how can any President of any allegedly "civilized" country justify a trade link with such feudalist slave-based economies?
0 # MsAnnaNOLA 2016-03-10 17:20
Supported by both sides because it benefits corporations and oligarchs. TPP and its ilk are evidence to me of Fascism already existing in America. Fascism does not have to be dressed up in anti-muslim or anti-immigrant rhetoric to be fascist.

Fascism is the merging of state and corporate power. The power structure we have in the country today is best described by the word Fascism.
+1 # Texas Aggie 2016-03-08 18:37
our nation is leading the way in helping live up to that ideal by strengthening the rights of women in countries around the world.

No, it most certainly is not!

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.