RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Michaelson writes: "Georgia is poised to pass the nation's harshest 'religious freedom' law, allowing discrimination, judicial obstruction, and even domestic violence."

Georgia's 'Religious Freedom Restoration Act' could legalize domestic violence. (photo: Shutterstock.com)
Georgia's 'Religious Freedom Restoration Act' could legalize domestic violence. (photo: Shutterstock.com)


Georgia Bill Helps Wife Beaters

By Jay Michaelson, The Daily Beast

15 March 15

 

Georgia’s “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” is among the worst in the nation. So why are pro-gay companies doing nothing about it?

eorgia is poised to pass the nation’s harshest “religious freedom” law, allowing discrimination, judicial obstruction, and even domestic violence. Yet while the bill is far worse than Arizona’s notorious “Turn the Gays Away” bill, it’s attracted far less attention from national advocacy groups and businesses.

The bill, the “Georgia Religious Freedom Restoration Act,” is one of a raft of similar bills (RFRAs, for short) wending their way through state legislatures across the country. The bills are part of the backlash against same-sex marriage, but they go much farther than that. Like the Hobby Lobby decision, which allows closely-held corporations to opt out of part of Obamacare, these laws carve out exemptions to all kinds of laws if a person (or corporation) offers a religious reason for not obeying them.

For example? Restaurants could refuse to serve gay or interracial couples, city clerks could refuse to marry interfaith couples, hotels could keep out Jews, housing developments could keep out black people (Genesis 9:18-27), pharmacies could refuse to dispense birth control, banquet halls could turn away gay weddings, schools could specifically allow anti-gay bullying, and employers could fire anyone for any “religious” reason.

The national movement to pass these laws is well-funded and well-coordinated; most of the laws are written by the same handful of conservative legal hacks in Washington, working for organizations like the Alliance Defending Freedom and Ralph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Coalition, both of which have had a hand in the Georgia bill.

Jeff Graham, executive director of Georgia Equality, said in an interview with The Daily Beast that “in the last two years, there have been 35 bills introduced around the country to establish or expand a RFRA. And there have been over 80 bills filed that specifically allow for discrimination against gay and trans communities.”

As worrisome as these laws are, however, Georgia’s is worse than most.

First, the language is the strictest possible. As with other RFRAs, Georgia’s act says that the government cannot “substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion” without a “compelling governmental interest” and the “least restrictive means of furthering” that interest. This is the classic three-prong test that was at issue in Hobby Lobby, and is considered extremely difficult to meet.

Georgia’s RFRA also specifies that “exercise of religion” can be just about any “practice or observance of religion, whether or not compelled by or central to a system of religious belief.”

In other words, if I say it’s my religious exercise, it is.

Second, the Senate version of the bill was passed by its sponsor, State Senator Josh McKoon, with all kinds of shenanigans. He rammed it through the judiciary committee, which he chairs, while opposition members were in the bathroom.

Then, on dubious procedural grounds, he refused an amendment by a fellow Republican that would have specified that the “religious freedom” could not be used to discriminate against others.

Ironically, says Graham, Georgia doesn’t have that many protections for LGBT people in the first place.

“This is a preemptive strike against the LGBT community,” he says. “If this bill is not intended to allow discrimination, why were its sponsors so adamant about refusing to say so?”

McKoon’s bill passed the Republican-dominated State Senate on March 5, and now heads to the State House, where Republicans have a 2:1 advantage over Democrats, and where representatives have shelved their own version of the bill to try to pass McKoon’s version.

The combination of these factors has led to a curious result: a law so strict that it will lead to a host of unintended consequences—and has even led some Republicans to oppose it.

Some legal commentators have said that the law would give a pass to spousal and child abusers, as long as the husband (or father) has a religious pretext. Which is easy to provide; the Christian Domestic Discipline Network, for example, offers a host of rationales for “wife spanking.” And let’s not forget Proverbs 13:24: “He who spares his rod hates his son. But he who loves him disciplines him diligently.”

Georgia has numerous laws protecting child welfare, which is arguably a compelling state interest. But are such laws really the “least restrictive means” of protecting it? Not necessarily. At the very least, the laws offer a novel defense against assault and battery.

Or maybe not so novel. Graham says, “We have found cases where people used their religious views as an excuse to impede an investigation into child-endangerment and child-abuse charges. They were not ultimately successful, but they did slow down the investigations.”

With the new law, they would be far better armed. In fact, says Graham, conservative district attorneys in Macon and Marietta have said that the bill would impede investigations and prosecutions of child abuse.

Indeed, Georgia’s RFRA recently gained an unlikely opponent: Mike Bowers, the former attorney general of Bowers v. Hardwick fame. As some may recall, that was the Supreme Court case that upheld Georgia’s anti-sodomy law—and Bowers was the named plaintiff.

In an open letter to Graham (PDF), Bowers said that the law is “unequivocally an excuse to discriminate….[P]ermitting citizens to opt-out of laws because of a so-called burden on the exercise of religion in effect ‘would permit every citizen to become a law unto himself.’”

This perhaps is one reason why conservatives like Bowers and the D.A.s in Macon and Marietta stand opposed to it. As Bowers wrote, “this legislation is not about gay marriage, or contraception, or even so-called ‘religious freedom.’ It is more important than all of these, because it ultimately involves the rule of law.”

What is the future of Georgia’s RFRA?

The Georgia State House ends its session on April 2, and Graham predicts a tight vote. “This will probably go all the way to the final hours” of the session, he said.

Oddly, the most effective forces in killing Arizona’s “Turn The Gays Away” bill—corporations and the Chamber of Commerce—seem to be sitting this battle out. Maybe it’s because Arizona was bidding on a Super Bowl and Georgia isn’t. Or maybe it’s because no one is paying attention. But for whatever reason, the corporate silence is deafening.

This is especially the case for Coca-Cola, which has spent millions to brand itself as pro-gay (remember that Super Bowl ad?) but has been mum on the Georgia bill.

“For now, it appears that Coca-Cola has a relationship of convenience with the gay community,” said Bryan Long, executive director of the progressive organization Better Georgia, in an email to The Daily Beast. “The company promotes equality when it serves the brand but won’t stand up for us when we need it most.”

If big business, national media, and national LGBT organizations continue to sit on the sidelines, the bill’s fate may be a matter of vote-counting. The House bill had 59 cosponsors, out of 180 total members. But Graham pointed out that a pending non-discrimination bill has 78, including 19 Republicans. So it is up for grabs.

On the other hand, maybe those who claim to speak for “equality” will decide to actually do something about it.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+33 # lewagner 2015-03-15 23:08
LReligious freedom", but no need to ask if it will applies to all religions (Islam, for example).
Obviously, it's only "freedom" for right-wing Christo-fascist s to practice their hate -- while pretending to worship Jesus.
BTW, I think that's what Jesus called "blasphemy against the holy spirit, the only sin that will never be forgiven".
 
 
+20 # Majikman 2015-03-15 23:41
Now I see why the xtians hate the muslims for their sharia law...the muslims beat them to it.
 
 
+15 # MJnevetS 2015-03-16 02:42
Typical dimwitted short sighted southern, Republican legislation. Since they don't think beyond their gleeful hand slapping, over how clever their bill is, they never thought of the fact that under Muslim Sharia law, they may not like the consequences of this legislation. As I have no intention to visit Georgia, I hope the bill passes. Then let the fun start!
 
 
+10 # ericlipps 2015-03-16 05:06
Quoting MJnevetS:
Typical dimwitted short sighted southern, Republican legislation. Since they don't think beyond their gleeful hand slapping, over how clever their bill is, they never thought of the fact that under Muslim Sharia law, they may not like the consequences of this legislation. As I have no intention to visit Georgia, I hope the bill passes. Then let the fun start!

And just when would Georgia ever be under Sharia law? They'd be more likely to be hunting Muslims with dogs.
 
 
+8 # pbbrodie 2015-03-16 08:26
ericlipps,
I think what they meant was that those believing in sharia law can use their beliefs to justify their sharia law actions. The bill does not say which religious beliefs can be used to justify ones actions.
 
 
+18 # JJS 2015-03-16 04:50
If this passes then people in jails and prisons can claim the "crime" they were convicted of was actually the exercising of their religious beliefs and they should now be exonerated.
 
 
+9 # cyd 2015-03-16 06:36
they don't educate those people
 
 
+20 # nogardflow 2015-03-16 07:13
I think it's time to start pressing for 'Freedom From Religion' laws. The Constitution has been interpreted to provide against discrimination of all religions. By the same token, the Constitution should provide against discrimination by all groups, including religions. Belief in a religion is a private matter, when dealing with the public no matter the circumstance, you should not be allowed to discriminate, whatever your professed religious beliefs are.
 
 
+2 # fredboy 2015-03-16 09:49
Someone needs to chip that start right off the map and float it out so sea.
 
 
0 # LAellie33 2015-03-24 15:40
I recognize you meant to say "state" instead of "start," and I totally agree with you. I go one step further -- Death to all men who even lay a finger on ANYONE. These neanderthals cite "Freedom, Liberty, Amendment This and Amendment That. Create an Amendment to go directly to prison, or worse.
 
 
+4 # elizabethblock 2015-03-16 10:39
Hendrick Herzberg invented the word "Christianist" some years ago. It never caught on. Let's start using it. These people are Christianists.
 
 
+2 # JJS 2015-03-16 18:29
Christianistas!
 
 
+8 # Jackpine 2015-03-16 11:21
Uh--did they just legalize drugs?

If the state doesn't have a "compelling interest" in reducing domestic violence or racial discrimination, how could they object to someone ingesting or inhaling some substance for spiritual purposes?
 
 
+7 # Cassandra2012 2015-03-16 11:55
Disgusting self-congratula tory misogynists exist in all religions, but the Christianists and the Muslims seem to wallow in their self-righteousn ess.
 
 
+11 # fredboy 2015-03-16 12:21
Brilliant Georgia: This legislation would permit and indeed legalize violent Islamic jihad. Are they fucking crazy?

Easy answer: Yes, they are.
 
 
+8 # bckrd1 2015-03-16 17:20
I think for those of us who disagree strongly with this disgusting attempt to disregard the rights of others based on intolerant religious beliefs, that we should be able to discriminate against them. Know someone who is a religious, intolerant, bigoted, homophobe and they sit down at a restaurant for service, well I say don't wait on them. They offend your religion of acceptance and tolerance (don't worry, the irony will be lost on them)and you refuse to wait on them and send them on their way to a pot luck at their "church".

What will it take to see how disgusting these laws are? A paramedic refusing life saving assistance? A doctor? Police? Fireman?

The hatred these people have is beyond normal and they really need to be removed from any position of power.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN