RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Jackson writes: "Besides Solyndra, three other subsidized companies went bust at a cost of $780 million. Critics, especially Republicans in Congress, seized on it as an example of government waste. But roughly six years on, there are more signs that the program is working."

Solar panels. (photo: Scott/Flickr)
Solar panels. (photo: Scott/Flickr)


Clean Energy Program Hated by the GOP Is Projecting a $5 Billion Profit

By Henry Jackson, Talking Points Memo

30 December 14

 

t the RV Park he owns in a remote corner of southwestern Kansas, Jan Leonard is seeing the benefits of one of the federal government's most contentious programs.

Development is booming in tiny Hugoton, a town of roughly 3,900 people. The town is the site of a new cellulosic ethanol refinery that was funded in part by a loan guarantee from the Department of Energy. The same program funded high profile flops like Solyndra, the California-based solar company that filed for bankruptcy and led to hearings over the Barack Obama administration's backing of unproven green-energy projects.

But in Hugoton, which Leonard describes as "pretty far from nothing," more trailers rolling in to his park and new businesses are popping up.

"There's a Dollar General getting built, a new motel getting built. Another grocery store getting built," Leonard said in a phone interview. "There's a lot of different people coming to town. It's been big."

The plant has a work force of 75 and an annual payroll of $5 million. When it was established in 2009, as part of Obama's stimulus package, the clean energy loan guarantee program was billed as a two-fer: It would provide billions of dollars for environment-friendly energy and it would create jobs.

Instead, the program became synonymous with failure and a regular talking point for conservatives.

Besides Solyndra, three other subsidized companies went bust at a cost of $780 million. Critics, especially Republicans in Congress, seized on it as an example of government waste.

But roughly six years on, there are more signs that the program is working. In California, Tesla Motors has flourished, paying back a $465 million loan nearly 10 years early. A handful of companies have opened solar energy sites and signed long term contracts to sell power to utility companies.

And then there is the Abengoa biorefinery in Hugoton, where Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz came in October for the opening. He was joined by two Kansas officials who voted against the stimulus package: Republicans Sen. Pat Roberts and Gov. Sam Brownback, a former senator.

"This program, let me say, not only here in Hugoton, but across the board has been a tremendous success," Moniz said. "I mentioned $30 billion in loans with a 2 percent default rate — that is a pretty enviable in any portfolio."

Roberts and Brownback say they voted against the stimulus package for other reasons.

"The governor strongly supports the Abengoa project," said Eileen Hawley, a spokeswoman for Brownback.

Despite the program's failures, the department now projects a profit of between $5 billion and $6 billion over the next 20 to 25 years. Overall, 20 of the program's 30 enterprises are operating and generating revenues so far, according to the department.

The successful projects include a site in Alamosa, Colorado, that is the world's largest generator of high concentration photovalic energy, which is a type of solar power. The operator, power company Cogentrix, has 10 permanent operations positions in addition to supply line jobs.

Overall, the Department of Energy claims the program has created or saved roughly 35,000 permanent jobs.

Republicans have argued that the investments are risky and the program mismanaged, as Solyndra demonstrated, though improvements have been made.

"We are not out of the woods by any stretch," said Michigan Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. "Our oversight efforts will continue as problems still persist, and more needs to be done to protect billions of dollars in taxpayer interests."

But supporters say government investment is necessary for innovative energy enterprises.

"It's very hard to get commercial scale financing, especially for these types of projects," said Nancy Pfund, a managing partner with DBL Investor, a San Francisco-based venture capital company with holdings in two companies backed by the program. "It's been a very positive force in that respect."

Mike Garland, CEO of Pattern Energy Group, a company focused on wind energy investments, said he was turned down by the program in part because he could get other financing.

"I kind of respected that about the program," said Garland. "I would have liked to have had a lower cost of capital, lower cost of debt. But it is run in a way that said, 'your deal is too good. You don't need it.'"

The loan program's director, Peter Davidson, said the program had a specific target.

"Commercial lenders are often unwilling to finance the first few commercial-scale projects that use a new technology because there is not yet a history of performance or operation," he said.

The refinery in Hugoton, built by Seville, Spain-based Abengoa, is the largest cellulosic biorefinery in the world, producing up to 25 million gallons ethanol fueled by non-edible waste. About $132 million of the plant's $500 million cost was backed by the loan guarantee program.

Abengoa buys biomass from local farmers that would otherwise be useless and sells the refined biofuels through trading companies in the U.S., Europe and parts of Asia.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+47 # Reductio Ad Absurdum 2014-12-30 10:55
As history has shown us again and again, that's the difference between liberals and conservatives — innovative, forward-looking vision versus a hidebound fear of the future that manifests itself as an atavistic death-grip on the status quo and the past.
 
 
-46 # lnason@umassd.edu 2014-12-30 11:22
These "green" programs were pure crony capitalism. Many, many other "green" subsidized companies also went out of business and a few are seeking more taxpayer money to prop them up.

In one of these programs, over 90% of the money went to Obama donors. Isn't anyone following the money here?

Probably worst of all, promising green technologies (e.g., geothermal) are bypassed completely while the money goes to projects that make the world less green (i.e. ethanol or electric cars). And all of them increase consumer energy bills while providing few or no offsetting benefits.

There is a very good reason that Canada, Germany, Spain, and others have dramatically cut back or eliminated these programs.

Lee Nason
New Bedford, Massachusetts
 
 
+34 # rayb-baby 2014-12-30 13:00
"In one of these programs, over 90% of the money went to Obama donors(donees). Isn't anyone following the money here?"
And 100% of fossil fuel companies are donating primarily to Repugs. Aren't you following the money? At least those 90% are trying to make a difference, as opposed to the 100% that just want to stagnate, maintain their power and get richer while doing NOTHING to help the environment.

"International geothermal market growth was up, while stateside growth held steady; 85 MW of the total global 530 MW of new geothermal capacity in 2013 was in the U.S., according to the new GEA report. U.S. growth was flat because of policy barriers, gridlock at the federal level, low natural gas prices and inadequate transmission infrastructure. " While nearly 30% of geothermal production is in the US. Also, lack of adequate water sources is holding back production, but states are stepping in to fill in the gap.

http://geoenergy.org/pressReleases/2014/New%20GEA%20Report%20Global%20Geothermal%20Market.aspx

http://rethinkingprosperity.org/2014/09/08/the-growth-of-geothermal-power/

"There is a very good reason that Canada, Germany, Spain, and others have dramatically cut back or eliminated these programs."
Yeah, the industries have become profitable and don't need the subsidies as we do.

Are you paid by ALEC for all of the crap that you spew on rsn on a regular basis?
 
 
+6 # rayb-baby 2014-12-30 13:00
"In one of these programs, over 90% of the money went to Obama donors(donees). Isn't anyone following the money here?"
And 100% of fossil fuel companies are donating primarily to Repugs. Aren't you following the money? At least those 90% are trying to make a difference, as opposed to the 100% that just want to stagnate, maintain their power and get richer while doing NOTHING to help the environment.

"International geothermal market growth was up, while stateside growth held steady; 85 MW of the total global 530 MW of new geothermal capacity in 2013 was in the U.S., according to the new GEA report. U.S. growth was flat because of policy barriers, gridlock at the federal level, low natural gas prices and inadequate transmission infrastructure. " While nearly 30% of geothermal production is in the US. Also. lack of adequate water sources is holding back production, but states are stepping in to fill in the gap.

http://geoenergy.org/pressReleases/2014/New%20GEA%20Report%20Global%20Geothermal%20Market.aspx

http://rethinkingprosperity.org/2014/09/08/the-growth-of-geothermal-power/

"There is a very good reason that Canada, Germany, Spain, and others have dramatically cut back or eliminated these programs."
Yeah, the industries have become profitable and don't need the subsidies as we do.

Are you paid by ALEC for all of the crap that you spew on rsn on a regular basis?
 
 
+6 # rayb-baby 2014-12-30 13:00
"In one of these programs, over 90% of the money went to Obama donors(donees). Isn't anyone following the money here?"
And 100% of fossil fuel companies are donating primarily to Repugs. Aren't you following the money? At least those 90% are trying to make a difference, as opposed to the 100% that just want to stagnate, maintain their power and get richer while doing NOTHING to help the environment.

"International geothermal market growth was up, while stateside growth held steady; 85 MW of the total global 530 MW of new geothermal capacity in 2013 was in the U.S., according to the new GEA report. U.S. growth was flat because of policy barriers, gridlock at the federal level, low natural gas prices and inadequate transmission infrastructure. " While nearly 30% of geothermal production is in the US. Also. lack of adequate water sources is holding back production, but states are stepping in to fill in the gap.

http://geoenergy.org/pressReleases/2014/New%20GEA%20Report%20Global%20Geothermal%20Market.aspx

http://rethinkingprosperity.org/2014/09/08/the-growth-of-geothermal-power/

"There is a very good reason that Canada, Germany, Spain, and others have dramatically cut back or eliminated these programs."
Yeah, the industries have become profitable and don't need the subsidies as we do.

Are you paid by ALEC for all of the crap that you spew on rsn on a regular basis?
 
 
+11 # rayb-baby 2014-12-30 14:00
Sorry! I edited my first comment and it reposted leaving the first one there. Then I tried to delete the first and it just reposted again.
rsn, please do something about this so I can end up with just one posted comment, rather than 3.
 
 
+1 # Passing Through 2015-01-02 12:47
As always, pure and utter nonsense, written as though you have facts to back it up but not providing any. You are nothing if not predictable, Lee.
 
 
+39 # jussayin 2014-12-30 11:26
said Michigan Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. "Our oversight efforts will continue as problems still persist, and more needs to be done to protect billions of dollars in taxpayer interests."

Why do their memories fail them every time the Pentagon comes begging or fossil fuel companies want their tax breaks to continue operations that put us in peril?
 
 
+30 # rayb-baby 2014-12-30 12:12
Oh, their memories don't fail them! Simply put, the MIC (military industrial complex) and giant fossil fuel companies have the money and power to bribe them into compliance and those "arrogant" little upstarts don't. I mean, who do they think they are? Hrumph Hrumph!
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN