RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Cunningham writes: "I was drawn to Ayn Rand because her politics are almost exactly the opposite of my own. I tend to take the side of the underdog and I have a keen sense of injustice. She cared little for those crushed under the wheels of capitalism and considered economic failure to be your own fault if it happened to you."

Ayn Rand's influence spans 60 years, with Alan Greenspan, Ronald Reagan, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) among her notable acolytes and devotees. (photo: Barnes & Noble Review)
Ayn Rand's influence spans 60 years, with Alan Greenspan, Ronald Reagan, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) among her notable acolytes and devotees. (photo: Barnes & Noble Review)


Why Ayn Rand Is Still Relevant (and Dangerous)

By Darryl Cunningham, New Statesman

01 November 14

Hers is the spirit of the age: the age of selfishness. An age of greed, financial crime, and indifference to the poor, sick, and disabled.

can�t remember how I first came across Ayn Rand. I know I was already aware of Rand when news broke of her death in 1982. This suggests that I was a teenager when I initially came across the First Lady of Logic. Back then I was dimly aware that she had some dubious political views and was a hate figure to those on the left, but beyond that I knew nothing. Yet, she�s gone on to have a profound influence on me, not because I share her philosophy, but because I don�t.

I was drawn to Ayn Rand because her politics are almost exactly the opposite of my own. I tend to take the side of the underdog and I have a keen sense of injustice. She cared little for those crushed under the wheels of capitalism and considered economic failure to be your own fault if it happened to you. To help another just for the sake of it with no benefit to yourself, was in her eyes, a moral weakness. She developed a whole philosophy � the philosophy of Objectivism, in order to justify her own selfishness and contempt for the needy.

Rand is little known in Europe, but in the States, 30 years after her death, she still has a huge following. Her books, especially Atlas Shrugged, sell in their thousands. Top businessmen and politicians name her as an influence. Objectivism is a very convenient philosophy if you�re someone who venerates your own needs over everyone else�s.

My book on the 2008 financial crisis, Supercrash, starts with Ayn Rand. I wanted to write about Rand, because I felt if I could understand her, I could get to the heart of what has gone wrong in Western politics over the past three decades, and at the same time, define my own beliefs more thoroughly.

Ayn Rand�s hand in the 2008 financial crisis, through her influence on the chair of the US Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, has been well documented. Rand was Greenspan�s mentor in the years before he reached high office when he completely bought the Objectivist line, that the free market was entirely good and government regulation entirely bad. As a result, his zero touch approach to mortgage and banking regulation led directly to the financial crisis. He felt, as Rand did, that business could regulate itself more effectively than any government could. After all, banking CEOs were hardly likely to destroy their own businessess, were they? In short, Greenspan took his hands off the steering wheel, allowing the car to veer off a cliff.

Rand�s fear of government control stemmed from her youthful experiences in Russia during the revolution. She was born in Saint Petersburg in the early years of the 20th century and emigrated to the US in the 1920s. She�d seen the horrors of totalitarianism first hand, and she forever-after associated government regulation, no matter how benign, to be a sign of creeping communism. She saw how her father�s business had been appropriated by the Bolsheviks, "for the good of the people". This, in her view, was altruism being used as a cover for theft. It marked the beginning of her distrust of altruism as a concept and her embracing of selfishness as a virtue.

In Rand�s philosophy an individual�s needs matter more than the needs of the majority, taxation is theft, and the welfare system should be allowed to wither away (along, presumably, with the poor).

So a world of low taxes, low business regulation, welfare state rollback, and government reduced only to matters of policing and the military, while all else is farmed out to giant corporations, is a world Rand would much approve of. If this picture looks familiar, it�s because it�s the world that those on the political right have been moving us towards for the last thirty years.

All of the above shows us why Ayn Rand is still relevant. Hers is the spirit of the age: the age of selfishness. An age of greed, financial crime, and indifference to the poor, sick, and disabled. Where most work harder for less and a tiny percentage of people at the top of society own the majority of all wealth.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
0 # Walter J Smith 2013-08-04 08:17
The empire's satrapies revolt!

Springtime may come to the US after all.

Obama or Nobama.
 
 
+8 # 666 2013-08-04 08:37
"A Realist would say, if you want a friend, buy a dog! Clearly Putin knows this."

-- we've already got a pack of pet dogs, they're called the EU
 
 
+15 # RLF 2013-08-04 13:08
Italy is not too happy since we refused to extradite a bunch of kidnappers just because they happen to work for the CIA! The nerve!
 
 
-4 # Mohanraj 2013-08-04 08:51
'A Realist would say, if you want a friend, buy a dig! Clearly Putin knows this. What does he know? He knows that America has a dog -- then a ferocious bulldog; now a bootlicking poodle.
V.M.Mohanraj
 
 
+6 # JJMK3 2013-08-04 08:55
I hate to say this but ( MEANING I CAN HARDLY WAIT TO BLURT IT OUT FOR YOUR EARS) Russia has been around for some time folks, the U.S.A. is a new gathering stop on this "Smallish Planet we call Home. Earth." Living in a few small communities over the years I have repeatedly seen New Comers move in and try to change/fix things more toward their liking. Lastest is a guy trying to have a LOCAL limestone quarry closed down. He thinks it too noisy. One of the only employer here; been on going for near 100 years but it he has no stake there sooooooo go......... "ones Perspective, Over-rides ONES BRAIN- OFTEN."
 
 
0 # slocan 2013-08-04 09:03
Jaun Cole sneaky apologist for the United States government. This guy is another variation of the beltway journalist. Russia gives asylum to Snowden and it hits the government like a "hydrogen bomb". Really like many of the poor fools in the two houses thought the Russians would send Snowden back-because the US gov asked nicely (no torture and death penalty) and because they both screw the rest of the world when they can. Sort of good buddies at the frat house? Juan Cole spins the same stories and never digs down into them at all. Compare his writing to Glen Greenwald's. Yup not even close. Juan never mentions Obama in the same breath as the sort of bad things other people are accusing the US government of. His writing in the end comes across as naive and purposely manipulative.
 
 
-4 # Rick Levy 2013-08-04 19:32
Juan Cole the radical being criticized as an apologist for the U.S. government? And so it begins: liberal/ progressives start eating their own children.
 
 
+8 # Red Malibu 2013-08-04 10:00
And also, countries consist of groups (oligarchs, if you like) sharing power whose interests may sometimes be at odds. The Snowden Affair is fascinating in that it leads us to wonder who and what these groups are, and to look at broader alignments than "national interests".
It's possible that the real value of Snowdens leaks are the revelations during the political aftermath- and isn't it possible that he knows this?
 
 
+9 # Johnny 2013-08-04 10:17
Many of the observations by Juan Cole, the Mossad mole, are misleading. Clearly, financial sanctions against Iran, support for the terrorist attack against Syria, and saber rattling against North Korea do not serve any interests of the United States. They serve only the multinational banking elite whose hegemony depends on perpetuating a world of war and chaos.
 
 
+10 # Douglas Jack 2013-08-04 10:33
Good article & evaluations, but add # 6. LIBYA, as a better place of analysis for what is going down in US-Russian relations as a future guide to US-Can-NATO-Isr ael plans for Syria & Iran.

The US, Canada, NATO & Israel Finance-Media-M ilitary-Industr ial Complex are arming dissidents in over 80 countries worldwide for the purposes of war & resource acquisition. 40% of our export economies are tied to arms, munitions & security. We are making a killing worldwide through a generally held religious belief in confrontation & biblical armageddon.

Russia, China & the world's non-aligned nations are becoming increasingly concerned about our death-spiral economy bringing the whole world to economic & ecological collapse. Libya is a point of horror, with mainstream media never inquiring or reporting about Libya's role as Africa's #1 development aid investor & donor as well as instigator of irrigation, satellite, universal health-care, employment & education.

Libya's leadership in implementing the African gold-based Dinar as a challenger to US Dollar dominance caused the FMMIC to bomb 40 years of popular Libyan development. 3 Nobel Peace Prize laureates gave their support to Muammar Gaddafi & Libya's Green Party's national & international labours, yet our FMMIC media was completely one sided & the popular mind carries lies unquestioned. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/structure/1-converting-social-media-from-mono-to-dialogue
 
 
+6 # Activista 2013-08-04 12:16
"LIBYA, as a better place of analysis for what is going down in US-Russian relations as a future guide to US-Can-NATO-Isr ael plans for Syria & Iran."
agree - look at Libya now and see how the scenarios of New World Order will play out - destruction and civil war - of course mass media are now quiet when the destruction of Libya is completed ...
 
 
+9 # RLF 2013-08-04 13:11
We don't want any oil producers to be overly stabile. If they hate each other they don't organize to raise prices or change to the Euro.
 
 
+5 # wrknight 2013-08-04 20:51
No Doug. You are overly complicating things. This is all about profit. Nothing more, nothing less. The arms and other war supporting industries around the world and their governments profit from world ferment. Just so long as it stays on other countries' soil.

All the world's warmongers are the sons of the profits.
 
 
+1 # Douglas Jack 2013-08-05 19:32
wrknight, Profit is the driving force but is only shared by very few nations & elites. Arms production is not a worldwide phenomena. Consumption is but determined by producer seeding of wars. You'll be surprised when you look at tables of the leading arms, components, munitions, security (raw materials included) world producers, about how far ahead US, Canada, NATO & Israel are per capita. Tables in Wiki for example don't calculate raw materials & particularly the ownership of corporations involved. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry

The key indicators of vicious populations are how much per capita is dependent upon war & death. My own analysis when components (eg. electronics / digital etc) & raw materials are properly calculated is that seemingly innocent Canadian corporations are the biggest players (per capita) in the world. I don't say this with pride, but with alarm because they are making a killing silently & no press is reporting on them. This includes Canadian workers who are making their killing & feeding their families on death. When Whistleblowers such as Manning, Snowden & Assange are risking their lives to save the world, Canadian war, mining, logging, depleted uranium, engineering firms, electronics (eg CAE), aircraft, component manufacturing etc corporations are making a killing as well as destroying the biosphere. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/relational-economy/7-canada-1-war-mongeror
 
 
+13 # luvdoc 2013-08-04 11:01
Realists! Wow! The US would hang every whistleblower by the short hairs if they could.

Thank you Mr Putin
luvdoc
 
 
+2 # Malcolm 2013-08-04 11:04
Obombya to Putin, following a drubbing at St. Andrews:

"You are mean! I'm taking my balls, and going home!"
 
 
+10 # Activista 2013-08-04 11:58
"Charles Schumer, the U.S. Senate's third ranking Democrat and a close Obama ally, accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of trying to antagonize the United States by granting American fugitive Edward Snowden asylum for one year."
these AIPAC drones like Scumer are looking more and more pathetic
 
 
+11 # RLF 2013-08-04 13:12
Schumer is a Wall Street stooge and unfortunately, my senator.
 
 
+8 # wrknight 2013-08-04 20:53
It is viewed by many that granting Snowden temporary asylum in Russia was a hostile act toward the U.S. But to many of us, Russia did us a favor. Many of us view Snowden's action as a brave act of patriotism that should be rewarded rather than condemned.

Clearly, what Snowden did was a whistleblower action. The information released was of little consequence other than to expose the extent to which NSA is abusing its surveillance powers. That NSA is abusing its authority to spy on American citizens is beyond doubt. The exposure of this abuse is nothing more than an embarrassment to the administration that has no impact on national security. By any other name, government abuse is abuse. It is surprising that on the one hand, the government promotes whistleblowing on waste, fraud and abuse, but on the other hand goes to extremes to prosecute anyone who blows the whistle. Who is rewarded and who is punished for whistleblowing is primarily determined not by merit but by politics.

There is no doubt that Snowden could not receive a fair trial in the U.S. and that he would become a political victim if returned to the U.S. Many of us don't want to see that happen.
 
 
+3 # RMDC 2013-08-05 06:10
One of the mantras of top US regime members is "the US has no permanent friends or permanent enemies. Only permanent interests."

If I were Russian I would give up on the US and turn my interests to the SCO and BRICS. The SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) and the BRICS nations are the future of the world. They not only include most of the world's people, but they are nations that have left the old concepts of colonialism behind. Europe and the US are still stuck in the colonialism/imp erialism phase of national development. both of these are grounded in ideas of racial or national supremacy.

Cole is much too skeptical of Putin. Putin is smart and honest. He knows the US intends no good for any nation on earth, particularly Russia. He knows the US is run by pyschopaths like Obama, Cheney, and Bush. No one can deal with psychopaths.

Snowden has a human right to asylum in a nation which will protect him from the illegal punishment by the government of his home state. There is no doubt in anyone's mind that if the US can get its hands on Snowden, he will be tortured and subject to a kangaroo trial just like Manning. Snowden will spend the rest of his life in prison and will be tortured there.

Russia is categorically right to protect Snowden. All of the pissing and moaning from people like McCain or Graham should be ignored. That is what they always do. They are irrelevant. The law is on Putin's side.
 
 
+1 # Jack Gibson 2013-08-06 01:59
Snowden is far from safe in Russia. Recall, the Russian courts and government not too long ago sent one or two of the Pussy Riot young women defendants to the worst gulag slave labor prison camp(s) in Siberia. Putin is a KGB-"al CIAduh(!)" cold warrior, and he and his government are still just as entirely untrustworthy as the U.S. government is. They've got some cards up their sleeve(s), and God only knows what they're going to do with Snowden; but I'd guess that they'll probably help "disappear" him for "al CIAduh(!)"; and, after they've "softened him up" through torture at some black site prison, he'll reappear on U.S. soil, and be falsely tried for what Manning was primarily tried for, "espionage"; even though neither of them did any spying or anything to sell their country out to a foreign power.

The U.S. corporate-fasci st, "Fourth Reich" national "security", totalitarian militarized police state die is cast; and, as far as the psychopaths who run the U.S. government are concerned, Snowden has to be taken down completely, like Manning was. It's all almost over but the next kangaroo "espionage" trial of Snowden, and who knows who else next. A great many of us, it very much looks like. Certainly all those who seek to save the U.S., that's likely. And, in addition to opening up the "new" concentration camps they've built all over the fifty states, they'll get rid of all the real criminal prisoners, and lock up the dissenters in the maximum security "SHU" prisons as well.
 
 
+2 # Jack Gibson 2013-08-06 12:46
But U.S. dissenters probably won't get trials (other than in kangaroo military commissions courts, if that). Most likely we'll only get "hearings"; that will, of course, "justify" and rubberstamp our indefinite detention without trial(s).
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN