RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Kucinich writes: "Those who call for immediate military action rarely have a long-term strategy. That is why America's march of folly from Iraq to Libya has been a recruiting tool for jihadist forces, including ISIS."

Dennis Kucinich. (photo: Getty Images)
Dennis Kucinich. (photo: Getty Images)

ISIS, Libya, NATO and Preventing the Next 9/11

By Dennis Kucinich, Reader Supported News

07 September 14


hose who call for immediate military action rarely have a long-term strategy. That is why America's march of folly from Iraq to Libya has been a recruiting tool for jihadist forces, including ISIS.

As a member of Congress before and after 9/11, I took (and continue to take) the threat of terrorism seriously, and therefore I vociferously warned against military actions in Iraq and Libya; military actions which ultimately undermined our national security.

The West launched an attack against Libya, amid false claims about an impending massacre in Benghazi, to justify regime change. However, it was obvious to me, and a vocal minority at the time, that military strikes and the arming of unknown rebels (i.e. non-state actors: terrorists) would the result in instability, hurt innocent civilians, and create regional chaos, empowering extremists.

President Obama made the decision to attack Libya without the permission of Congress. I led the effort to organize a bipartisan coalition in Congress which almost stopped the Obama administration and NATO from continued bombing of Libya.

On March 31, 2011, I delivered this address on the floor of the House warning against the dangerous mistake of dropping bombs on Libyan cities under the guise of humanitarian assistance:

Our effort in Congress went against the lobbying power of the White House, the State Department, the Pentagon, NATO, NATO member country diplomatic corps, and many other hefty institutions. Unfortunately, the White House and Congressional leadership came to a political deal which enabled the war against Libya to continue.

While Libya may not make the front page on a daily basis, it stands as the latest example of blowback, the adverse consequences of our reflexive military intervention. Did you know that just a few weeks ago, Libyan jihadists captured 11 jetliners when they took control of the Tripoli International Airport?

Today, thanks to NATO action in Libya, terrorists are taking selfies with the planes they captured. They now hold a list of aircraft with flight ranges (in nautical miles, or nm) that make it possible to reach London, Paris, Washington DC, and New York City: Airbus 319s (3,700 nm), Airbus 320s (3,300 nm), Airbus 330s (4,000-7,000 nm), and one Airbus 340 (7,900 nm).

It is little wonder why, about the time the planes went unaccounted, British Prime Minister David Cameron declared that his nation is facing "its greatest and deepest" terror threat. Ironically, the actions of his government, and ours, created that threat under the umbrella of NATO.

Right after the sacking of Libya, NATO's leader, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, declared, "Together, we succeeded. Libya is finally free." His declaration joins President George W. Bush's pronouncement of victory in Iraq -- "Mission Accomplished" -- as a tragic example of individual hubris, which becomes the burden of nations.

Delegates from 28 countries are now meeting in Wales to hear NATO's plan for aggressively responding to Russia. Since there is no evidence that NATO learned anything from its misadventure in Libya, the world community should give pause when this unaccountable organization prepares to lead it into another conflict.

Now ISIS is making headlines, and the US, in response, is plotting a new expansion of the "war on terror" -- which has been the very mechanism through which these terror organizations have flourished.

As provocative and gruesome as ISIS' tactics are, we must make sure that our response to violent groups around the world does not send us spinning into another disastrous cycle of intervention, occupation, insurgency, deaths of innocent civilians, and the subsequent emboldening of more terrorism.

Backing terrorists to help bring about regime change results in perpetual war and a staggering national debt.

We must resist the illusion that the only "decisive" response to terrorism is bombing. Instead, we should begin to confront ISIS by drying up its sources of revenue from places like Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Allies in the region must share responsibility.

It has been thirteen years since 9/11. It has been thirteen years since President Bush's instigation of the "Global War on Terror" (GWOT). This failed strategy has brought chaos and terror to countries which had no capability of attacking us. The GWOT subsequently created more, not less, risk to America's long term security.

Here is what we need to do:

  • Stop creating wars.
  • Stop funding and arming mercenaries.
  • Stop causing abject chaos by "liberating" countries and delivering them to illegitimate non-state actors, i.e. terrorists.
  • Stop NATO and other Western front groups from promoting neo-conservative agendas which lust for empire, for control of oil and gas resources, and which bait countries into conflict to cause an increase in arms trade.
  • Stop playing the na├»ve fool and falling for the theater of propaganda while interest groups and arms dealers stand at the cash register.

America must transition to a new domestic economic model that does not rely on a military industrial complex and arms manufacturing in every Congressional district in order to function.

Only then can we embark on a new path of strong and patient diplomacy, working together with the community of nations to address security challenges, letting our allies take responsibility for regional security, being willing to talk to anyone in the cause of stability, and setting aside stale, ideological doctrines of intervention.

In the weeks and months ahead, when our leaders are calling for military strikes, without considering the consequences or knowing the end game, let's remember our recent history.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+20 # riverhouse 2014-09-07 10:13
He speaks the truth but few want to listen. We are addicted to war and more war.
-2 # secular 2014-09-07 15:33
Much of what he says is true, but while he would have been drying up funding for ISIS, Kurdistan would have been overrun and thousands more Yazidis would have been murdered and taken as slaves. Sometimes immediate action is required.
+14 # Malcolm 2014-09-07 10:15
I'd love to vote for Dennis Kucinich for President again, but not at the head of the Democratic Party ticket. There are too many Democrats already. Duh.

How about the Sanity Party? Fact is, the Dems and Rethugs are certifiably INSANE.
+11 # MidwesTom 2014-09-07 10:16
I wonder where the money for the opponent that defeated Dennis came from?

He frequently makes a lot of sense; but common sense is missing in Washington.
+12 # tedrey 2014-09-07 11:00
As I recall, his district was intentionally gerrymandered to eliminate a statesman who embarrassed both the Republican and Democratic party machines.
+4 # RnR 2014-09-07 20:41
which makes him one of my favorite guys :)
+6 # futhark 2014-09-07 11:02
Prevent the next 9/11? The best way is to really investigate the first 9/11 and bring the criminals to justice.

The New York High Rise Safety Initiative, which, if passed by the voters in November, will lead to an official inquiry into the collapse of World Trade Center 7, a crucial first step in establishing that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition explosives. From that point, it will become incumbent on law enforcement to determine who planted the explosives and begin steps in prosecution.

The New York High Rise Safety Initiative has just been certified by the authorities as having the required number of qualified signatures to appear on the ballot, but is now facing a legal challenge as to its validity. For more information see
+1 # Nel 2014-09-07 11:52
Amen brother.
+10 # wantrealdemocracy 2014-09-07 11:23
We need to END THE AMERICAN EMPIRE! All of these terrorist groups that we use as an excuse to bomb cities in the middle east are created, trained and funded by our very own CIA. Shut down the CIA. Shut down HOMELAND SECURITY and bring ALL OF OUR TROOPS HOME NOW. We have no business telling other nations what to do or give them democracy --- what a joke!! We don't have any democracy here---how can we give them what we don't have? We give other nations all kinds of money that we don't have!! We are broke as a nation because the rich don't pay taxes and the corrupt government is not heeding the voice of the people. The people say, "End the wars! Tax the rich! take care of the people and protect the environment!"

Fighting terrorists! What a joke. WE are the terrorists! "We" in this case is not the people of this nation. WE is the wealthy few who have purchased our government and killed our democracy. That 'we' is getting richer and richer and now threatening all life on earth by not getting off fossil fuels. All these wars are for oil. Get off the oil!
+10 # Archie1954 2014-09-07 11:31
Kucinich is my choice for president!
+2 # geraldom 2014-09-07 17:13
I would like to see Cynthia McKinney run again for president. She would have the same chance as Dennis Kucinich in winning, and I know that she means everything she says.

Unfortunately, like Dennis Kucinich, she has a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
+3 # Roger Kotila 2014-09-07 20:52
Dennis Kucinich understands how the neo-con agenda of propaganda,war, and Empire is endangering America.

Mr. Kucinich has a history of being outspoken, even fearless in this regard.

But the solution to stop aggression and wars? We must change the "modern" geopolitical system which world federalists describe as a war system.

Mr. Kucinich must acknowledge that the existing geopolitical system, which includes the United Nations, has failed us. Wars and world crimes erupt with relentless regularity.

The Earth Federation Movement's Earth Constitution provides a new geopolitical system, one which returns power and authority to "we, the people".

The Earth Constitution provides for a democratically elected World Parliament. Its design includes a world judiciary system with the authority to prosecute those who commit world crimes.

The heart of the new geopolitics is the Earth Constitution. It draws our attention to the fact that we cannot succeed with the goals for America outlined by Mr. Kucinich without also establishing a new global system.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.