" ... Radiation levels remain high and no one knows for sure how to bring them down, or even if they can be brought down by any means other than waiting for however long it takes."
Radiation levels at Fukushima are rising. (photo: AP)
Fukushima Radiation Leaks Rise Sharply
11 July 13
Bad as the situation is at Fukushima, Japan, it's gotten worse.
Perhaps you've heard that radiation levels of the water leaving the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and flowing into the Pacific Ocean have risen by roughly 9,000 per cent. Turns out, that's probably putting a good face on it.
By official measurement, the water coming out of Fukushima is currently 90,000 times more radioactive than officially "safe" drinking water.
These are the highest radiation levels measured at Fukusmima since March 2011, when an earthquake-triggered tsunami destroyed the plant's four nuclear reactors, three of which melted down.
As with all nuclear reporting, precise and reliable details are hard to come by, but the current picture as of July 10 seems to be something like this:
- On July 5, radiation levels at Fukushima were what passes for "normal," which means elevated and dangerous, but stable, according to measurements by the owner, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).
- On July 8, radiation levels had jumped about 90 times higher, as typically reported. TEPCO had no explanation for the increase.
- On July 9, radiation levels were up again from the previous day, but at a slower rate, about 22 per cent. TEPCO still had no explanation.
- On July 10, Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) issued a statement saying that the NRA strongly suspects the radioactive water is coming from Fukushima's Reactor #1 and is going into the Pacific.
We Must Do Something About This Thing with No Impact
"We must find the cause of the contamination … and put the highest priority on implementing countermeasures," NRA Chairman Shunichi Tanaka told an NRA meeting, according to Japan Times.
As for TEPCO, the paper reported, "The utility has claimed it has detected 'no significant impact' on the environment."
Neither the NRA nor TEPCO has determined why the level of radioactivity has been increasing. Both characterize the increase as a "spike," but so far this is a "spike" that has not yet started to come down.
Here's another perspective on the same situation:
10 becquerels per liter - The officially "safe" level for radioactivity in drinking water, as set by the NRA.
A becquerel is a standard scientific measure of radioactivity, similar in some ways to a rad or a rem or a roentgen or a sievert or a curie, but not equivalent to any of them. But you don't have to understand the nuances of nuclear physics to get a reasonable idea of what's going on in Fukushima. Just keep the measure of that safe drinking water in mind, that liter of water, less than a quart, with 10 becquerels of radioactivity.
- 60 becquerels per liter - For nuclear power plants, the safety limit for drinking water is 60 becquerels, as set by the NRA, with less concern for nuclear plant workers than ordinary civilians.
- 60-90 becquerels per liter - For waste water at nuclear power plants, the NRA sets a maximum standard of 90 becquerels per liter for Cesium-137 and 60 becquerels per liter of Cesium-134.
At some of Fukushima's monitoring wells, radiation levels were in fractions of a becquerel on July 8 and 9. At the well (or wells) that are proving problematical, TEPCO has provided no baseline readings.
- 9,000 becquerels per liter - On July 8, according to TEPCO, the company measured radioactive Cesium-134 at 9,000 becquerels per liter. Since TEPCO characterized this as 90 times higher than on July 5, the implication is that the earlier reading (about 100) was less than twice as toxic as the allowable limit and only 10 times more toxic than drinking water for civilians.
- 11,000 becquerels per liter - TEPCO's measurement of Cesium-134 on July 9.
- 18,000 becquerels per liter - TEPCO's measurement of Cesium-137 on July 8.
- 22,000 becquerels per liter - TEPCO's measurement of Cesium-137 on July 9.
- 900,000 becquerels per liter - TEPCO's measurement of the total radioactivity in the water leaking from Reactor #1. This radiation load includes both Cesium isotopes, as well as Tritium, Strontium and other beta emitters. There are more than 60 radioactive substances that have been identified at the Fukushima site.
A becquerel is a measure of the radioactivity a substance is emitting, a measure of the potential danger. There is no real danger from radiation unless you get too close to it - or it gets too close to you, especially from inhalation or ingestion.
Nobody Knows if It Will Get Worse, Get Better, or Just Stay Bad
The water flow through the Fukushima accident site is substantial and constant, both from groundwater and from water pumped into the reactors and fuel pools to prevent further meltdowns.
In an effort to prevent the water from reaching the ocean, TEPCO is building what amounts to a huge, underground dike, "a deeply sunken coastal containment wall." The NRA is calling on TEPCO to finish the project before its scheduled 2015 completion date.
Meanwhile, radiation levels remain high and no one knows for sure how to bring them down, or even if they can be brought down by any means other than waiting for however long it takes.
William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
 18 February 2019
|
 20 February 2019
|
 17 February 2019
|
 17 February 2019
|
 18 February 2019
|
 19 February 2019
|
 17 February 2019
|
 17 February 2019
|
 19 February 2019
|
Comments
A note of caution regarding our comment sections:
For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.
It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.
We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.
It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.
Adapt and overcome.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
But I must admit your hedonism is of about the same character as our bipartisan political elite's.
Good luck.
What kind of madness is this when so many of these reactors have been built in locations that are vulnerable to earthquakes and other natural dangers?
Seems like the nuclear industry, like the oil industry, has too much power in D.C. I wonder who is getting paid off and who is so short-sighted and stupid enough to think he or she will not be affected should a disaster happen on our soil?
That does not mean nuclear power will not work.
Look at what happened and it is easily fixable, that is the tragedy ... how idiotic of Japan and the world no to engineer a nuclear plant that can be shut down ... because that is the problem.
Start putting people in jail who contributed to this, and start demanding transparency in business, particularly strategic business like food, energy, medicine, etc.
Nothing is going to change until we demand it.
The U.S. company, General Electric, designed the reactors at Fukushima, and they've been known faulty since at least 1972. Faulty meaning that their containments cannot contain! They CAN be shutdown, and were. But they must be cooled for weeks afterwards and they lost all ability to cool them (despite having 8 hours of battery backup whereas many U.S. reactors operated with just 4.
You're right, it doesn't mean nuclear can't work - but it's track record is abysmal (>1% of reactors have suffered catastrophic accidents) considering the cost of failure. And this despite 7 decades of heavy subsidies in the U.S.
When I say they cannot be shutdown, I mean you cannot shut down a nuclear plant and evacuate it with no people, and no inputs, ie. water, electricity, etc.
The track record is pretty damn stellar if you ask me. Look at the roughly 20% of national power nuclear supplies and then total up deaths in all the other energy generation methods I think nuclear is on a par if not better, including victims of accidents.
We subsidized everything national in this country, we have to.
I don't know what can be done about nuclear. I don't dismiss your concerns, I just think there is no way this should have happened ... so why did it?
What really needs to happen is what happens in airlines when there are too many crashes, or medicine, or any dangerous process, it needs to be publicly investigated and reported on, and it might help to get out all the people who have worked there, or do an inventory of them and their accomplishments.
Nuclear has too much potential to let the argument go to the wackos on either extreme. We need to stop putting CO2 into the air on a massive scale, and nuclear is about the only way to do that.
Oh, no. Japan will not try to put a guilt trip on its own mega-buck businesses.
It is well past time for We, the PEOPLE, worldwide, to take our world back from the corrupt and psychopathic "leaders" and begin the process of cleaning up and repairing the mess' we have made of Nature, and the living diverse Natural systems called life.
Tikkun is a great word and concept. Look it up and begin to embody it folks. Any future life will give thanks....
Are we up to the task, or will we fail to protect, preserve, steward, and create a future worth living in?
We know the score.....
Oops?
We create the future, with every waking dollar, with every flip of the switch, and turn of the key. Are we consumers, or active conservers and creators?
This is the heart of the question..thank you for putting it into words.
It is becoming the only go-to source for news for me, I support monthly as much as I can -- my stomach is churning at the thought that these great people might have to close up shop.
WHO THE HELL ELSE IS PURSUING THE BRADLEY MANNING STORY, possibly one of the most important stories of this century? (The thread began to be tugged by him, setting the precedent for Edward Snowden and Glenn Greenwald...)
Please, everyone -- cough up what you ca and support this emerging pillar of journalistic integrity. On a monthly basis, please, so we don't have to see the agonizing pleas for support...don't know where I'd be without it...
THANK YOU !
In fact, I just now doubled my monthly donation (and I'm about to do the same for TruthOut.)
Thanks, blozmo1
His name was Tatsuichiro Akizuki. It is really hard to find anything about him any more (hmmm... I wonder why?) but you can find out about it at http://meditationexpert.com/RadiationDetoxDraft.pdf
or
http://www.simplehealthguide.com/anti-radiation-diet/
or
http://www.macrobiotic.org/Miso.htm
Try digging around the internet for more about Dr. Akizuki and his diet.
None. All Boardman's talk of becquerels and rads and rems is a "snow job" to fool you into thinking that he knows what he is talking about.
And yes, we DO know how long it will take for all the radioactive isotopes at Fukushima to decay. It is no secret: BILLIONS OF YEARS. Complete radioactive decay is generally accepted to be TEN HALF-LIVES. So, if the half-life of caesium-137 is approximately 30.17 years, the total time it will take for ALL the radioactivity to be emitted is about 300 years.
But caesium-137 is only one of dozens of radioactive isotopes emitted at Fukushima and other nuclear power plants, and some of them, like tellurium-128 and Te-130 have half-lives of 2.2 SEPTILLION and 790 QUINTILLION years.
And that's only their half-lives.
Another element, which CANNOT be removed from waste water, is tritium, with a half-life considered to be about 12 years, thus requiring more than 120 years for it to completely decay.
There's no suggestion in my article that I think
there is any safe lefel of radiation --
because I don't, and there isn't.
Why do you suppose the phrase
"the officially 'safe ' level"
has "safe" in quotes?
I did it twice, in fact.
Personal, ad hominem attacks are not arguments.
Most of what you say is what I assume a reasonably
well-informed person already knows and will use to inform
a careful reading of what I reported about specifics
of Fukushima at the moment.
As far as I can tell, none of what you said
contradicts anything factual in my piece.
And the hostility just mystifies me.
FYI:
Becquerel - disintegration per second.
rad - energy absorbed per mass.
rem - stochastic biological risk.
-Health Physicist
Radiation levels had to fall for eons before life on earth
was even possible. To speak of background radiation or
environmental radiation as "safe" is really only to say the exposure is low enough that most of us won't live long enough to suffer the damage it causes.
The background level has been rising slowly since 1945,
in part because humans have been adding to it.
So the question is real enough, although perhaps
unanswerable till we're looking back on it -- how much
ionizing radiation can we absorb before we can no longer
expect to die before it takes its toll in numbers no longer
as acceptable as the current level of collateral damage
the human culture tolerates, mostly in ignorance?
Perhaps I should have used a different phrase -- no safe radiation dose or some such -- but the reality of the danger would be unchanged.
Most people can probably get away with "Be happy, don't worry" lifestyles, but that's partly because an essentially dishonest nuclear industry still hasn't moved very far from saying radiation measured in "sunshine units" is good for you.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/18292-focus-fukushima-continues
RSS feed for comments to this post