RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "If it's [the CIA] acting like a military organization, shouldn't it have the (relative) transparency and accountability of a military organization? Most members of Congress don't have the security clearances necessary to know anything at all about CIA operations, preempting effective oversight. Congress is basically reliant on the CIA to check its own work, content to believe the CIA director when he says that the drones kill terrorists, not innocent people."

Precision targeting provided by unmanned drones has become a favored strike weapon in Afghanistan, and could help NATO pinpoint Gaddafi forces in Libya. (photo: Rex Features/Sipa Press)
Precision targeting provided by unmanned drones has become a favored strike weapon in Afghanistan, and could help NATO pinpoint Gaddafi forces in Libya. (photo: Rex Features/Sipa Press)



How the CIA Became 'One Hell of a Killing Machine'

Spencer Ackerman, Wired Magazine

03 September 11

 

n April 14, 2004, CIA Director George Tenet looked so impotent he might have starred in a Viagra commercial. Tenet had come before the 9/11 Commission for what was sure to be a public flogging. In response, he alternately apologized for the agency's failure to stop 9/11 and explained it away. Finally, the exhausted panelists posed him a bottom-line question: how long would it take Tenet to get the CIA in a position to counterattack al-Qaida?

"It's going to take another five years," Tenet confessed, "to build the clandestine service the way the human intelligence capability of this country needs to be run."

Seven years later, no one views the CIA as anything resembling impotent. The drone strikes it operates are the most important counterterrorism tool the Obama administration uses, battering a relatively small section of Pakistan so intensely that in 2010 they struck an average of once every three days. Osama bin Laden is dead as the result of a military operation the CIA commanded, highlighting the unprecedented coordination between CIA and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC). In the words of the head of CIA's Counterterrorism Center, its central nervous system for counterterrorism: "We are killing these sons of bitches faster than they can grow them now."

9/11 Commission Chairman Thomas Kean judged Tenet's admission "one of the most appalling comments we heard." But as it turned out, Tenet's timetable was prescient. A remarkable Washington Post story explores the rejuvenated CIA, which one veteran calls "one hell of a killing machine."

CIA's fleet of 30 Predators and Reapers - the Post gives the total - get the most attention, and understandably so. But it's easy to forget that the drones are a lagging indicator. Every intelligence operation, even the ones that go wrong and kill civilians, is the result of the CIA's cultivation of a network of spies it didn't possess back during Tenet's testimony. Drone strikes need spotters; the CIA has them in a group of Pashtun informants who cross the Afghanistan-Pakistan border with news of militant activity.

It's never been publicly acknowledged. But without that network, it's impossible to understand the massive and sustained rise in drone strikes. The Post reports that the program "has killed more than 2,000 militants and civilians since 2001." That's not really the whole story. The vast majority of those kills have come since 2008, according to data collected by the New America Foundation, with only 112 estimated deaths maximum occurring between 2004 and 2007. Last year, the drones killed as many as 993 people; the body count is as high as 453 so far in 2011.

Why? Two reasons. First, President George W. Bush relaxed secret restrictions on special operations and intelligence activities in Pakistan. And second, the spy network that Tenet didn't have came to fruition. Waziristan tribesmen described getting money to plant homing beacons for drones in the houses of targeted militants. al-Qaida and Pakistani Taliban mouthpieces started sounding paranoid about infrared devices powered by 9-volt batteries and tattletale chips planted in SIM cards. Unlike earlier in the decade, the CIA had data about where the terrorists were and their "patterns of life" - or, at least, data about people it thought were terrorists.

Touring the Counterterrorism Center's Pakistan-Afghanistan Department - note the listed order of those countries - the Post observes, "Every paid informant is given a unique crypt' that starts with a two-letter digraph designating spies who are paid sources of the CTC." It's replicating that bureau's work with an "equivalent department for Yemen and Somalia," the major centers of the U.S.' expanding shadow wars - which have already featured drone strikes.

Then comes the tight collaboration with JSOC. So-called "Omega" or "Cross Matrix" teams comprised of CIA and JSOC operators travel Afghanistan and Iraq in civilian clothes and cars. Mostly they meet with their local sources of information. But on "at least five occasions," the Post reports, they've tested their ability to sneak into Pakistan undetected to execute raids - "early rehearsals" of the bin Laden hit.

They're also not so into apprehending terrorists. While the CIA still maintains secret prisons like the one Danger Room pal Jeremy Scahill exposed in Somalia, President Obama ordered most of the "black sites" closed in 2009. As former JSOC commander William McRaven recently testified, there aren't any long-term detention facilities for terrorists anymore, leading to improvised solutions like the brigs of U.S. warships. When the CIA's Pashtun snitches get used for attacking terrorists, they're "'more kill-capture' than capture-kill," the Post reports.

That raises the biggest question of all surrounding the new post-9/11 CIA. If it's acting like a military organization, shouldn't it have the (relative) transparency and accountability of a military organization? Most members of Congress don't have the security clearances necessary to know anything at all about CIA operations, preempting effective oversight. Congress is basically reliant on the CIA to check its own work, content to believe the CIA director when he says that the drones kill terrorists, not innocent people. Meanwhile, the Post reports that CIA proxies have "used more indiscriminate means, including land mines, to disrupt insurgent networks."

Two analysts who've closely studied the drone program, Peter Bergen and Katherine Tiedemann, recently argued in Foreign Affairs that the military should take over the drones in order to introduce accountability into their operations. It wouldn't impact the drone operations at all: Air Force pilots fly them for the CIA, the Post confirms. But it would bring the shadow wars at least marginally out of the shadows.

At the same time, the 2011-era CIA is the direct descendent of the CIA that existed on April 14, 2004. It was a moment of abject humiliation for the agency, called to account for 9/11 even after warning the Bush White House in the spring and summer of 2001 that it was perceiving an imminent, unspecified terrorist attack. The 9/11 Commission accurately channeled a sense of outrage around the country over the fact that the CIA lacked - to strip it of euphemism - a killing machine. Now the agency has built one. Will new director David Petraeus be willing to give it up?

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+21 # pirwin 2011-09-03 18:46
No the biggest question is, why are we there? Personally I am sure 911 was an inside job, but even if you are not, can you seriously argue these drone strikes have anything to do with a "terrorist" threat to the US?
 
 
+7 # motamanx 2011-09-03 23:55
Hasn't anyone the foresight to see that one day a drone will be captured by those we are bombing? And that soon there will be drones flying over the US? Drones, at best, are a cowards' way to wage war.
 
 
+10 # stannadel 2011-09-04 05:00
This is just a high tech version of the Vietnam era operation Phoenix--an assassination program that killed some 20,000 Vietnamese who were supposed to have been "Viet Cong." Mass murder then and now.
 
 
+9 # Glen 2011-09-04 05:34
The CIA has never been impotent, regardless of reports. The organization has evolved according to the needs and dictates of the Pentagon and any given administration. Its new stage includes new machinery but its spy capabilities and meddling in the affairs of other countries has been in place for decades.

I'm with pirwin on the "inside job", which would mean the CIA was either in partnership or kept totally out of the plan. And yes, "why are we there?" is the one question we'd all like answered, but I'm fearful we already know that answer.
 
 
+14 # jimsenter 2011-09-04 05:36
What's really remarkable about this story is the way that we have become a nation capable of only one thing-- blowing up stuff and killing people. OK I guess that's TWO things. We cant bring Wall St. criminals to justice. We can't address climate change. We can't do anything about wealth and income inequality that's ripping this country apart. We can't stop people from getting thrown out of their houses by fraudulent foreclosure processes. We can't keep our bridges from falling down. We can't replace the hurricane tracking satellite reaching the end of its useful life. But boy howdy, we sure do know how to build neat ways to blow up stuff.
 
 
+12 # futhark 2011-09-04 05:57
"Intelligence" connotes some degree of ability to conduct oneself in a rational, if not in an ethical manner. Visiting death and terror on people from the clear blue sky is not likely to enamor them with the American ideals of liberty and justice. So we stupidly use a tool that was originally created to gather information as a weapon that creates more enemies each time it is used. The perpetual war machine will never run out of targets as long as this insanity persists!

It's not personal, it's just business.
 
 
+14 # TerryM43 2011-09-04 09:07
President John Kennedy had the right idea to break the CIA up and make it accountable for only intelligence not making war. Obviously he paid the price for that decision.
 
 
0 # terrym33 2011-09-10 21:31
Mr C should not be accusing bin laden of anything
america had every chance to capture and kidnap the man and bring him to trial instead of killing him and dumping his body overboard in the middle of the ocean...Mr c should not be talking as if it is bin laden's crime...a bit more honesty mr C
 
 
0 # terrym33 2011-09-10 21:32
the cia did not become a killing machine
it was created as one.
nuff said
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN