RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Porn Industry Irrevocably Damaged by Association With Ted Cruz Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Wednesday, 13 September 2017 13:40

Borowitz writes: "The pornography industry has likely suffered permanent damage as a result of its unfortunate association with the Texas senator Ted Cruz, industry sources said on Tuesday."

Sen. Cruz. (photo: Mark Peterson/Redux)
Sen. Cruz. (photo: Mark Peterson/Redux)


Porn Industry Irrevocably Damaged by Association With Ted Cruz

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

13 September 17

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


he pornography industry has likely suffered permanent damage as a result of its unfortunate association with the Texas senator Ted Cruz, industry sources said on Tuesday.

Porn, which takes in annual profits of fifteen billion dollars, could see those revenues decimated if, as some industry experts fear, users begin to have intrusive thoughts involving Senator Cruz.

“For porn producers, this is a crisis with no simple solution,” Harland Dorrinson, an industry insider, said. “If you warn viewers not to think about Ted Cruz, there’s a real danger that that’s all they’ll think about.”

In the hours since porn first became associated with the Texas senator, traffic to porn sites has plummeted in what industry sources are ruefully calling “the Cruz effect.”

“I’ve enjoyed porn for years and never dreamed that anything could ruin the experience for me,” Davis Logsdon, a porn user from Minnesota, said. “Thanks a lot, Ted Cruz.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Democrats Fought for 25 Years Over Single-Payer. Now Many Back Medicare-for-All Print
Wednesday, 13 September 2017 13:32

Excerpt: "When U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders' introduces his Medicare-for-All legislation on Wednesday, advocates of a single-payer, government-sponsored health care hope it will be the end of a bitterly fought policy battle that has roiled the Democratic Party for generations."

Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)


ALSO SEE: This Is How Bernie Sanders Wants
to Implement Single-Payer Health Care

Democrats Fought for 25 Years Over Single-Payer. Now Many Back Medicare-for-All

By Alex Kotch and David Sirota, The International Business Times

13 September 17

 

hen U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ introduces his Medicare-for-All legislation on Wednesday, advocates of a single-payer, government-sponsored health care hope it will be the end of a bitterly fought policy battle that has roiled the Democratic Party for generations.

Since Democratic President Harry Truman first proposed a government-sponsored universal health care system in 1945 — and since a Democratic president and Democratic congress first enacted Medicare and Medicaid in the mid-1960s — progressives have hoped that the United States would follow other industrialized countries by guaranteeing health care to all citizens. Indeed, many of the original proponents of Medicare hoped the system would ultimately be expanded to cover the entire country — as former Social Security commissioner Robert Ball wrote, “We expected Medicare to be a first step toward universal national health insurance.”

And although the intervening years saw the rise of Republican President Ronald Reagan, who derided “socialized medicine,” some Democrats continued to champion the idea. The party’s 1992 presidential contender Jerry Brown ran for the White House promising to support single-payer. But when Bill Clinton defeated him and won the presidency, the Clinton administration opted to back health care reforms that preserved the existing private insurance system — even as Hillary Clinton made favorable comments about single-payer. A generation later, Barack Obama also retreated from single-payer, and instead pushed the Affordable Care Act, which subsidizes the private insurance system.

Now, things appear once again to be shifting. Even as Sanders has declared that his Medicare-for-All bill is not a litmus test, Democrats from across the party’s ideological spectrum are flocking to his legislation. On the progressive side, Democratic senators such as Elizabeth Warren (MA), Jeff Merkley (OR) and Al Franken (MN) have signed onto the legislation. Within the party establishment, former Vice President Al Gore has expressed support, as has conservative former Sen. Max Baucus — one of the architects of the Affordable Care Act whom single-payer advocates saw as a nemesis.

With polls showing rising support for government-sponsored health care, the party’s long civil war over the issue may be over, potentially allowing a more unified party to campaign on Medicare-for-All in 2018.

Here’s how the Democrats’ struggle played out.

1992: Jerry Brown Promises Single-Payer 

During his campaign for president, California Gov. Jerry Brown was unequivocal in his support for a government-sponsored, single-payer health care system. During a Democratic primary debate with Bill Clinton, Brown declared : “My preference is that we create a single system, put everyone under a universal health care system. We treat health care not as a commodity to be played with for profit but rather the right of every American citizen when they’re born.”

“And since you have only one source of income in the whole medical establishment, you can drive down the cost,” he said. “With the holding down of the cost, you can eliminate the intermediary, the middle man, the bureaucracy.”

1993: Hillary Clinton Praises Single-Payer, Then Shuns It

When Bill Clinton assumed the presidency in 1993, he tasked then-First Lady Hillary Clinton to come up with a health care reform proposal. That year, she acknowledged a “convincing case” for single-payer. The following year, Hillary Clinton said that if Congress didn’t pass health care reform, “I believe that by the year 2000 we will have a single-payer system. I don’t think it’s — I don’t even think it’s a close call politically.”

The 1993 health care plan focused on the idea of “managed competition,” which relied on markets, not the government, to bring down the cost of health care, and included a mandate that employers provide insurance to their employees.

2003: Obama Unequivocally Backs Single-Payer

As a third-term state senator in Illinois, Barack Obama voiced his support for single-payer during a 2003 speech.

"I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care plan,” he said. “I see no reason why the United States of America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, spending 14 percent of its Gross National Product on health care, cannot provide basic health insurance to everybody... A single-payer health care plan, a universal health care plan — that's what I'd like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we’ve got to take back the White House, and we’ve got to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House."

The next year, Obama became the principal sponsor of the Health Care Justice Act of 2004 in Illinois, which created a commission to recommend ways to provide “uniform benefits for all Illinois residents.” Republicans at the time “saw it as a back-door attempt to bring universal, single-payer coverage to Illinois.”

2006: California Democrats Pass Single-Payer Bill. It's Vetoed

The Democratic-controlled California legislature passed a bill to create a government-sponsored single-payer system. The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Sheila Kuehl, was vetoed by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R), who said, “Socialized medicine is not the solution to our state’s health care problems.”

2006: Obama Says He Supports Single-Payer In Concept, But Not Necessarily In Practice

In an interview with David Sirota for a profile in The Nation magazine, then-Sen. Obama appeared to back off his previous support for single-payer.

“I would not shy away from a debate about single-payer health care,” he said. “Right now I am not convinced that single-payer health care is the best way to achieve universal health care.”

He added: “It might be the best way if you started completely from scratch — if you had no legacies. Let’s just take a real simple example. Everybody who supports single-payer health care says, look at all this money we would be saving from insurance and paperwork. That represents 1 million, 2 million, 3 million jobs of people who are working at Blue Cross Blue Shield or Kaiser... What are we doing with them? Where are we employing them?”

2008: Obama Denies Ever Supporting Single-Payer; Clinton Slams Him

Despite his previous support, Obama at a 2008 presidential debate declared, “I never said that we should try to go ahead and get single-payer.” Clinton replied, “When Senator Obama ran for the Senate, he was for single-payer and said he was for single-payer if we could get a Democratic president and Democratic Congress... As time went on, the last four or so years, he said he was for single-payer in principle, then he was for universal health care. And then his policy is not, it is not universal.”

2008: Schwarzenegger Vetoes Democrats’ Single-Payer Bill Again

Kuehl’s bill once again passed, and the Republican governor once again rejected it.


2009: Obama’s Affordable Care Act Prevents Single-Payer

Though Obama in 2003 had said a Democratic House, Senate and White House could bring about single-payer, his administration quashed the idea once he and the new Democratic Congress were sworn in. During a June interview with National Public Radio, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius declared that single-payer would not be on the table.

“This is not a trick, this is not single-payer,” Sebelius said. “ As you know, there've been a lot of congressional advocates who say why not. Why can't we have a single-payer? That's not what anyone is talking about — mostly because the president feels strongly, as I do, that dismantling private health coverage for the 180 million Americans that have it, discouraging more employers from coming into the marketplace, is really the bad direction to go.”

When NPR host Steve Inskeep asked Sebelius if the Affordable Care Act was being deliberately sculpted to prevent single-payer, Sebelius said: “I think that's very much the case. And again, if you want anybody to convince people of that, talk to the single-payer proponents, who are furious that the single-payer idea is not part of the discussion.”

2011: Vermont Enacts Single-Payer Legislation

Before the Affordable Care Act had been fully implemented, Vermont — which Sen. Sanders (I) represents in Washington — passed the first single-payer plan in the country. Reuters reported at the time that the 2011 legislation, signed by then-Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin, would involve a new exchange “managed by a five-member board [that] will set reimbursement rates for health care providers and streamline administration into a single, unified system... The goal is an eventual state-funded and operated single-payer system.”

2014: Vermont’s Democratic Governor Kills Single-Payer

By late 2014, Democratic Gov. Pete Shumlin abandoned the Vermont plan, calling it “the biggest disappointment of his career.” The tax increases were too much for the state to bear, he said.

2016: Sanders Touts Medicare-for-All, Clinton Slams Him

Sanders campaigned in 2016 on a promise to expand Medicare to cover all Americans. His plan was slammed for its allegedly exorbitant price tag — though defenders said the initiative would benefit the economy. Clinton, meanwhile, criticized Sanders for pushing the proposal, dismissing it as unrealistic.

"People who have health emergencies can't wait for us to have a theoretical debate about some better idea that will never, ever come to pass,” she said.

2017: California Passes Single Payer Again, Brown Blocks It

Brown, serving his fourth term as governor of California, differs from the Brown of 1992. The California state Senate passed a single-payer bill, but Brown and California House Speaker Anthony Rendon opposed and helped shelve it. Brown questioned where the money would come from, saying that the single-payer concept “is called ‘the unknown by means of the more unknown’... In other words, you take a problem and say, ‘I am going to solve it by something that’s...a bigger problem,’ which makes no sense.”

2017: With Increasing Support, Medicare-for-all Arrives At The Senate

As some Democrats continue to oppose single-payer, popular support for the idea is rising: 53 percent of Americans support “a national health plan in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan,” according to a June Kaiser Health survey.

The idea have become more popular with liberal U.S. House members as well. Rep. John Conyers has a Medicare-for-all bill in the House with a remarkable 117 co-sponsors — roughly 60 percent of the Democratic caucus and the first time a House majority of Democrats has supported a Medicare-for-All bill — but House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is not among them.

Pelosi said Tuesday that she would not endorse Sanders’ Medicare-for-All bill and that she is focusing on protecting the Affordable Care Act. Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, has also said that in the current political climate, “preserving the Affordable Care Act is a major victory.” Clinton’s 2016 running mate, Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine, told Jeff Stein of Vox that he won’t support Medicare-for-All and prefers “more choice in the marketplace.”

Still, late Tuesday, on the eve of the Senate bill’s introduction, lawmakers were racing to announce on Twitter and Facebook that they would co-sponsor Sanders’ legislation. Supporting the bill may become a litmus test for future Democratic presidential candidates.

Current Democratic senators who have signed on as co-sponsors of the Sanders bill as of 8:00 pm on Tuesday:

  • Tammy Baldwin (WI)

  • Richard Blumenthal (CT)

  • Cory Booker (NJ)

  • Al Franken (WI)

  • Kamala Harris (CA)

  • Mazie Hirono (HI)

  • Martin Heinrich (NM)

  • Kirsten Gillibrand (NY)

  • Ed Markey (MA)

  • Jeff Merkley (OR)

  • Brian Schatz (HI)

  • Tom Udall (NM)

  • Elizabeth Warren (MA)

  • Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The 2020 Race for President Has Begun Print
Wednesday, 13 September 2017 12:43

Galindez writes: "I know it’s only 2017, but the testing of the waters has begun in Iowa and New Hampshire."

Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Getty)


The 2020 Race for President Has Begun

By Scott Galindez, Reader Supported News

13 September 17

 

know it’s only 2017, but the testing of the waters has begun in Iowa and New Hampshire. Progress Iowa, at its annual corn feed event, hosted Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend. Did Martin O’Malley ever leave Iowa? Bernie has been to Iowa twice in the last month and a half and spent Labor Day in New Hampshire. Representative Tim Ryan — yes, the one who challenged Nancy Pelosi for leadership in the House — will be in Iowa in a couple of weeks. I am also hearing that Representative Tulsi Gabbard is coming to Iowa next month.

It’s just the beginning. We know that Senators Kamala Harris and Cory Booker, and the most speculated non-candidate of 2016, Senator Elizabeth Warren, may be sticking their toes in the water soon. And when since 1988 has former vice president Joe Biden not been rumored as a possibility?

I hope Bernie signals his intentions early, so candidates like Merkley, Warren, and Gabbard avoid splitting the progressive vote. As for the rest? The more, the merrier. Harris, Ryan, Booker, Biden, and whoever else wants to can run to split the beauty contest vote. You know the voters who vote based on the package.

I have to admit that before I heard him, I thought Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend was the ultimate, perfectly packaged candidate who I was afraid would be an empty suit. When he ran for Democratic Party Chair, I heard all of the rising star praise and became skeptical.

He would be the first openly gay president, which would be a good thing.

His speech Sunday hit all the right notes, and he impressed me with his ability to articulate a vision, something our last nominee struggled to do. I will take a closer look at him if he decides to run.

The senator from Oregon was the one I went to see. Senator Jeff Merkley was the only senator to endorse Bernie Sanders in 2016. During a meeting with Sanders supporters on Sunday evening, Merkley said there was fear then among many of his colleagues that if they didn’t back Hillary Clinton, there would be years of retribution. The senator said he doesn’t play that game, and he endorsed Bernie. So right away I applaud Jeff Merkley’s independence.

Pete D’Alessandro, who ran several states including Iowa for Sanders, introduced Merkley to the group, reminding everyone that the senator endorsed Bernie at a time when it wasn’t popular. Clinton was on a roll and Bernie was slumping. It would have been an easy time to stay neutral like Elizabeth Warren and not anger the Clinton camp. But Merkley stuck his neck out, which says a lot about his character.

I didn’t know much about the senator other than his endorsement of Sanders and his filibuster of Trump’s Supreme Court nominee. I was impressed with his story. Too many politicians are in office because they feel that their wealth and privilege give them the right to the title of Senator or Governor. Not Jeff Merkley — he said he was tired of trying to get politicians to vote the right way, so he ran for office so he could do what is right.

I am still 100% behind Bernie Sanders, but in the event that he doesn’t run in 2020, we have an excellent bench of candidates lining up. Jeff Merkley is one of them. Mayor Pete, as they call him in South Bend, has potential as well; I need to take a closer look at his record. I’m always skeptical when party leaders call someone a rising star.

I am not among those who are angry with Elizabeth Warren for staying on the sidelines. I have reservations when it comes to Tulsi Gabbard’s foreign policy, but she is part of an impressive bench of progressives who would make great presidents. Our job is to keep the movement growing that Bernie started and get one of them into the White House in 2020. I still hope it’s Bernie.



Scott Galindez attended Syracuse University, where he first became politically active. The writings of El Salvador's slain archbishop Oscar Romero and the on-campus South Africa divestment movement converted him from a Reagan supporter to an activist for Peace and Justice. Over the years he has been influenced by the likes of Philip Berrigan, William Thomas, Mitch Snyder, Don White, Lisa Fithian, and Paul Wellstone. Scott met Marc Ash while organizing counterinaugural events after George W. Bush's first stolen election. Scott moved to Des Moines in 2015 to cover the Iowa Caucus.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Excuse Me Mr. Pruitt, Please Spare Me the Sensitivity Training Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=40776"><span class="small">Dan Rather, Dan Rather's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Wednesday, 13 September 2017 10:30

Rather writes: "Excuse me Mr. Pruitt, please spare me the sensitivity training. Leadership is about seeing the big picture as well as the crisis. Talking about climate change around these hurricanes isn't insensitive, it's intelligent."

Dan Rather. (photo: USA Today)
Dan Rather. (photo: USA Today)


Excuse Me Mr. Pruitt, Please Spare Me the Sensitivity Training

By Dan Rather, Dan Rather's Facebook Page

13 September 17

 

xcuse me Mr. Pruitt, please spare me the sensitivity training.

Leadership is about seeing the big picture as well as the crisis. Talking about climate change around these hurricanes isn't insensitive, it's intelligent.

My heart goes out to those who are suffering. We are all indebted to the public officials, first responders, and average citizens who are reaching out to their fellow Americans in a time of great need. But these storms (and the fires in the West) will not be the last natural disaster exacerbated by climate change. We are at the dawn of a new and ever more dangerous era.

But there was Mr. Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (let the name of that department sink in for a moment) telling CNN “To have any kind of focus on the cause and effect of the storm versus helping people, or actually facing the effect of the storm, is misplaced.” He added, “to use time and effort to address it at this point is very, very insensitive to this people in Florida.”

He can tell that to the Republican mayor of Miami - a city that may be unsustainable with rising sea waters. Tomás Regalado told the Miami Herald "This is the time to talk about climate change. This is the time that the president and the E.P.A. and whoever makes decisions needs to talk about climate change,” Mr. Regalado does not have the luxury of denying reality. “If this isn’t climate change, I don’t know what is. This is a truly, truly poster child for what is to come.”

Do you think this will finally change the minds of any of our elected officials who have denied or diminished the threat of climate change in the past?


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
It's Time to End the Myth That Black Voters Don't Like Bernie Sanders Print
Wednesday, 13 September 2017 08:46

Sanders writes: "My biggest regret from the time I spent on the Sanders campaign as his national press secretary is the fact that we allowed this false narrative to fester and did not effectively combat claims that the senator's economic message somehow didn't speak to people of color."

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) hugs a supporter after announcing a bill with Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) (photo: Matt McClain/AP)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) hugs a supporter after announcing a bill with Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) (photo: Matt McClain/AP)


It's Time to End the Myth That Black Voters Don't Like Bernie Sanders

By Symone D. Sanders, The Washington Post

13 September 17

 

ast month, just days after the tragedy in Charlottesville, the Rev. Wendell Anthony of Fellowship Chapel in Detroit gave a fiery introduction at a town hall led by Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). It may have been a Tuesday, but watching it felt like Sunday service.

In his speech, Anthony praised Sanders’s effort to “take down the tributes to racism and division” through his work standing up for universal health care, jobs for everybody, a higher minimum wage, tuition-free education, and fair treatment and respect from law enforcement. Anthony called the senator someone who “stands up, speaks up, and keeps his eyes on the prize of freedom and justice and equity.”

You probably didn’t see his speech, because it doesn’t fit the narrative persistently pushed by the senator’s opponents: that black Democrats tend to be more socially conservative and “pragmatic” and thus don’t like Bernie Sanders. Last year saw a slew of such articles looking to explain “why black voters don’t feel the Bern” and what his “real problem with black and Hispanic voters” was. The trend is still going strong: This summer, Terrell Starr explored “Bernie Sanders’ black women problem” in the Root.

My biggest regret from the time I spent on the Sanders campaign as his national press secretary is the fact that we allowed this false narrative to fester and did not effectively combat claims that the senator’s economic message somehow didn’t speak to people of color. Jobs and the economy are “everybody” issues. As Democrats work to craft our message to voters for upcoming elections, we cannot allow this narrative to continue unchallenged.

Last spring, a Harvard-Harris poll found Sanders to be the most popular active politician in the country. African Americans gave the senator the highest favorables at 73 percent — vs. 68 percent among Latinos, 62 percent among Asian Americans and 52 percent among white voters. It wasn’t a fluke: This August, black voters again reported a 73 percent favorability rating for Sanders. Critics, such as Starr, continue to point to the senator’s 2016 primary numbers among older African American voters to claim that his message somehow doesn’t resonate with people of color as a whole — and continue to ignore that, according to GenForward, Sanders won the black millennial vote in the primaries.

So why does the myth that black voters don’t like Sanders persist? It certainly isn’t because black voters can’t relate to his focus on the working class. According to the Economic Policy Institute, people of color will form the majority of the American working class by 2032. In other words, the white working class does not have a monopoly on economic marginalization.

Folks in McDowell County, W.Va., and inner-city St. Louis are encountering many of the same challenges. So, an economic message that includes advancing policies that will close the wage gap, raise the minimum wage, ensure equal pay for equal work, create jobs, make education affordable and ensure health care as a human right is a message that cuts across demographics.

Thus Democrats should be careful not to continue the false association of working class issues strictly with the white working class — a major fixation after last year’s election and an assumption of many criticisms of Sanders’s message. As someone who traveled across the country with Sanders during his campaign, I know firsthand that the narrative of working-class politics as exclusively white erases the stories of so many of the people who believed in and fought for a political revolution — and a government that works for all of us, not just a wealthy or connected few.

The senator’s message still resonates — perhaps now more than ever. Just look at the fight to expand health care: Poll after poll shows that Americans across the board are ready for “Medicare for all” — something the senator championed when it wasn’t politically popular to do so. Indeed, Pew polling found this year that 85 percent of blacks and 84 percent of Hispanics support single-payer health care — while whites are split on the issue roughly 50-50. Now, Medicare for all has the support of legislators such as rising star Sen. Kamala D. Harris (D-Calif.), who recently announced she will co-sponsor Sanders’s upcoming single-payer bill. As Harris said, “It’s just the right thing to do.”

There is no doubt we on Sanders’s 2016 campaign could have better communicated how the senator’s fight against a rigged economy held in place by a corrupt system of campaign finance specifically affected different communities. But let’s not pretend there isn’t broad-based support for the policies he’s fighting for. Instead of attacking Bernie, folks should follow his journey and witness the work. Whether it’s been standing with black union workers in Mississippi, standing with Conyers and Anthony in Detroit, or putting himself on the front lines of the fight to save the Affordable Care Act, the senator is using his voice and the weight of his popularity to fight for the policies that will benefit us all. And the polls show that people get it.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 Next > End >>

Page 1512 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN