RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Honduras: Hearing the Call for Democracy Print
Wednesday, 21 February 2018 09:46

Holland writes: "Less than 800 miles from our shores, Hondurans protesting against a fraudulent presidential election have been clubbed, shot at, terrorized, and arbitrarily arrested by the hundreds. Yet this crisis has hardly produced a blip on the radar screen of mainstream U.S. news."

A soldier in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
A soldier in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)


Honduras: Hearing the Call for Democracy

By Lynn Holland, Carnegie Council

21 February 18

 

ess than 800 miles from our shores, Hondurans protesting against a fraudulent presidential election have been clubbed, shot at, terrorized, and arbitrarily arrested by the hundreds. Yet this crisis has hardly produced a blip on the radar screen of mainstream U.S. news.  

Widespread protest broke out soon after the results of the November 26 election were declared. Despite a number of irregularities in the electoral process, opposition candidate Salvador Nasralla had initially taken the lead over incumbent Juan Orlando Hernández. With 58 percent of the vote in and Nasralla ahead by 5 percent, the electoral tribunal updating system abruptly crashed and did not resume until 36 hours later. After it came back on, Hernández had miraculously gained on his opponent and was eventually declared the winner by just 1 percent. While the U.S. congratulated Hernández as the winner, the Organization of American States (OAS) denounced the electoral process citing irregularities and deficiencies, and described it as being of "very low technical quality and lacking integrity."

A few days before the Honduran election, the Economist magazine published an article titled, "Is Honduras's Ruling Party Planning to Rig an Election?" In it, the author described a recording of what appeared to be a training session for National Party members who were planning to serve as polling place officials. The members were being instructed in several tactics for distorting the election results including the purchasing of credentials from small party delegates, spoiling votes for other candidates, allowing supporters to vote more than once, and damaging tally sheets favoring the opponent. While the secretary of the National Party has said he doubts the authenticity of the tape, he agreed to investigate the matter.

In all events, Hernández was inaugurated on January 27, 2018 while, outside the sparsely filled stadium, the Armed Forces and police lobbed tear gas to disperse crowds of protestors. In all since the election, at least 36 protestors have been killed, hundreds have been injured, and nearly 2,000 have been detained though many of these have since been released. According to a resident journalist, most of the injuries have been caused by police firing into crowds when they believe no foreigners are around to observe. She contends that the actual number of those killed is larger than the official figure.

This is not the first time doubts have been raised about the validity of Hernández's election. In his first "win" in 2013, the election was marked by fraud, widespread violence, and the killing of numerous candidates, most of whom were opposing the National Party. In 2015, Hernández admitted that his presidential campaign had taken money from companies linked to a $300 million corruption scandal involving the Honduran Institute of Social Security, though he denied knowing where the money had come from. The resulting dearth of health care funds led to a massive protest as patients in need of hospital beds and life-saving medicine lay dying.

For months, thousands of protestors marched through the streets of Tegucigalpa to the local United Nations office to demand that Hernández and his cronies in the National Party be investigated. The UN responded by forming a commission to work with the attorney general's office in investigating the theft of public funds. While significant progress was made, it came to a virtual halt by the recent passage of a law prohibiting the prosecution of current or former members of Congress or public servants. The law effectively blocks the investigation of up to 60 current and former legislators as well as the president of Congress and other close allies of Hernández. A judge has already dismissed five cases involving the embezzlement of government funds by five former legislators as a result.

Even prior to his first term as president, Hernández was steadily concentrating power in the hands of the presidency. As president of Congress, he made certain that the Supreme Court, elections tribunal, and other technically independent institutions were stacked with allies in the National Party. He made it possible for Congress to dismiss members of the Supreme Court. He also gave the president discretionary power over funds designated for separate Congressional districts, making it possible to bring congressional representatives to heel.

Under pressure from the National Party in 2015, the Supreme Court struck down a constitutional ban against any president seeking a second term of office. All five members of the Supreme Court panel responsible for the decision had been appointees of Hernández or his proxies. In subsequently seeking reelection, Hernández became the first beneficiary of this ruling. Ironically, it was this very constitutional prohibition which had been used to justify the ousting of President Manuel Zelaya in a military coup in 2009, although it was never apparent that this had been Zelaya's goal.

During his first term as president, Hernández was credited with having increased the rate of economic growth. This has been derived in part from larger shrimp and coffee harvests and higher prices for bananas. He also slashed government spending allowing credit-rating agencies to upgrade Honduras's debt. Hernández also takes credit for having cut the murder rate nearly in half, from 79 per 100,000 people in 2013 to 42 in 2017. This was accomplished through a doubling of the budget for security and dispatching of the Armed Forces into the most troubled neighborhoods. He also introduced the process of extraditing accused criminals to the U.S. which has reached a rate of about five per week. As a result, a certain amount of drug traffic has been shifted to routes in El Salvador, Jamaica, and Mexico. (See The Economist, "A Would-be Strongman? Juan Orlando Hernández Looks Headed for Re-election in Honduras," November 25, 2017.)

While the murder rate may have fallen, the rate of extrajudicial killings of social and environmental activists, indigenous people, lawyers, and human rights defenders has greatly increased. Further, between 80 and 96 percent of these cases continue to go unpunished. Of particular note is the assassination of Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader and winner of the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize for her work in opposing a hydroelectric dam in the Lenca community that would have destroyed the surrounding environment. While a recent report by an international panel of lawyers has shown that government officials and businessmen colluded with gangs in the killing, the case continues to go unresolved.

It should also be noted that Hernández recently appointed Jose David Aguilar Moran, accused of colluding with drug trafficking as the national chief of police. In 2013, Chief Aguilar was accused of helping a cartel leader traffic nearly a ton of cocaine valued at up to $20 million to the U.S. Aguilar is said to have called off local police who had just arrested traffickers escorted by another contingent of police officers.

Hernández's intensified use of the Armed Forces in matters of internal security is cited as the reason for the increasing level of human rights violations in Honduras. In an interview regarding the pro-democracy protests, former Armed Forces Captain Santos Orellana Rodríguez describes a system through which military agents have worked to suppress the mass protests that emerged after the election.

…I can assure you that every act of vandalism, everything that has taken place, buildings being burned and all that, has been provoked by counterintelligence in the Armed Forces…. Anyone would be justified in asking why we have Armed Forces—to carry out repression, to terrorize people in the streets, to teargas people, to create chaos, because all of this is planned by military intelligence and counterintelligence. In all the protests there are 30 or 40 intelligence agents marching alongside protestors, and they are the ones provoking confrontations with the police. They want to make it look like it is the Alliance that is hurting the country, not the government.

The recent arrest and imprisonment of pro-democracy activist Edwin Espinal foreshadows the coming of an even more brutal and militaristic regime. Journalist and filmmaker,Jesse Freeston, reports that Mr. Espinal is the first civilian who will be put on trial inside a military base since the authoritarian period of the 1980s. His legal representatives were given just one day to prepare his defense prior to his hearing. Afterward, he was sent to La Tolva, a high-security prison under military supervision, to await trial, which could take years. His family has not been allowed to see him nor have journalists or human rights workers been allowed to talk with him.

Espinal is no criminal. He is a longtime pro-democracy activist, making him a target in the crackdown against the movement. Since the coup in 2009, Espinal has been repeatedly subjected to the sort of harassment, violence, and threats that are well known to the regime's political opponents. He has been detained over a dozen times, beaten by security forces, and on one occasion, abducted and tortured by Honduran police who were later acquitted of the charges. In recognition of his vulnerability to abuse by government forces, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) granted Edwin protective measures in 2010, and again in 2013.

Edwin Espinal is just one of dozens of Hondurans now imprisoned for acting on their political convictions. As the crackdown on demonstrators continues, they languish in their cells for having publicly opposed corruption, electoral fraud, and harsh government policies. The judicial system, steeped in corruption, cannot be counted on to protect their rights.

As I write, my hope is that we can build international pressure on the Honduran government to release all political prisoners in that country and end the use of military tribunals for civilian crimes. Hondurans are calling on us to support their goal of achieving real democracy, a dream for which many are paying a terrible price. As progressives, human rights advocates, and defenders of democracy, let us hear that call.

Lynn Holland
Denver Justice and Peace Committee (DJPC), Denver, Colorado


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The World's Efforts to Slow Climate Change Aren't Working Print
Wednesday, 21 February 2018 09:37

Excerpt: "Global emissions of carbon dioxide are rising again after several years of remaining flat. The United States, under President Trump, is planning to withdraw from the Paris accord and is expected to see emissions increase by 1.8 percent this year, after a three-year string of declines. Other countries, too, are showing signs they might fail to live up to the pledges they made in Paris."

The Eiffel Tower lights up in December 2015 with an advocacy message for the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris. (photo: Michel Euler/AP)
The Eiffel Tower lights up in December 2015 with an advocacy message for the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris. (photo: Michel Euler/AP)


The World's Efforts to Slow Climate Change Aren't Working

By Brady Dennis and Chris Mooney, The Washington Post

21 February 18

 

arely two years ago, after weeks of intense bargaining in Paris, leaders from 195 countries announced a global agreement that once had seemed impossible. For the first time, the nations of the world would band together to reduce humanity’s reliance on fossil fuels in an effort to hold off the most devastating effects of climate change.

“History will remember this day,” the secretary general of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, said amid a backdrop of diplomats cheering and hugging.

Two years later, the euphoria of Paris is colliding with the reality of the present.

Global emissions of carbon dioxide are rising again after several years of remaining flat. The United States, under President Trump, is planning to withdraw from the Paris accord and is expected to see emissions increase by 1.8 percent this year, after a three-year string of declines. Other countries, too, are showing signs they might fail to live up to the pledges they made in Paris.

In short, the world is off target.

“It’s not fast enough. It’s not big enough,” said Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research in England. “There’s not enough action.”

Even as renewable energy grows cheaper and automakers churn out battery-powered and more efficient cars, many nations around the world are nonetheless struggling to hit the relatively modest goals set in Paris.

The reasons vary. Brazil has struggled to rein in deforestation, which fuels greenhouse gas emissions. In Turkey, Indonesia and other countries with growing economies, new coal plants are being planned to meet the demand for electricity. In the United States, the federal government has scaled back its support for clean energy and ramped up support for fossil fuels.

There’s still time for the world to set itself on a more sustainable track; many countries have until 2030 to meet their initial targets. But when policymakers from around the world gather at a key U.N. climate meeting in Poland later this year, countries will be forced to reckon with the difference between how much they say they want to limit the warming of the planet and how little they actually are doing to make that happen.

(photo: washingtonpost.com)

Because the Paris agreement does not legally force countries to cut emissions, world leaders in Poland will have to rely on political and moral persuasion to push for more action.

“More than two decades ago, the world agreed to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in our air to prevent dangerous climate outcomes,” said Rob Jackson, an energy and climate expert at Stanford University, referring to the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change that set international negotiations in motion. “To date, we have failed.”

“Tremendous gains in energy efficiency and renewable power aren’t yet reducing our global hunger for fossil fuels, especially oil and natural gas,” he added. “Until they do, greenhouse gas concentrations will keep rising.”

The Paris agreement laid out ambitious goals to limit the planet’s warming — world leaders knew they would be difficult to achieve. The deal called for finding ways to remain “well below” a rise of 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels, and if possible, not above 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit). A rise of about 1 degree Celsius already has occurred.

But at the same time, the emissions-cutting pledges that countries brought to the table in Paris were nowhere near sufficient to meet such goals, which world leaders acknowledged at the time. The plan was for nations to ramp up their ambition over time.

“There’s this inherent conflict between the global goals and the national contributions,” said Niklas Höhne, a founder of the NewClimate Institute and professor at Wageningen University in the Netherlands.

Now, after the United States has said it will withdraw from the process and as many other nations struggle to meet even the modest pledges they made, the world must begin to wrestle with the forces that have so far prevented climate action from matching climate rhetoric.

In many corners of the world, emissions have continued virtually unabated, raising questions about how countries — even well-intentioned ones — can make bolder promises down the line when they have so far been unable to follow through on their current ones.

The struggles of Germany, one of the globe’s most progressive nations when it comes to embracing renewable energy, illustrates the problem.

The country’s “Energiewende,” or “energy transition,” aims to generate 80 percent of energy from renewable sources by 2050. The country also has set an aggressive near-term goal of cutting greenhouses gas emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020.

But Germany is struggling to meet its goals. The county’s emissions actually rose slightly in 2015 and 2016 because of continued coal burning and emissions growth in the transportation sector. That failing trajectory won’t change without “massive and rapid efforts,” according to the German Environment Agency.

The European Union faces a similar quandary. Third after China and the United States in total world emissions, the bloc has pledged a 40 percent cut below 1990 levels by 2030. Time remains for the E.U. to meet that promise, but according to the European Environment Agency, it is on track to fall well short of its goal.

Then, of course, comes Trump’s rejection of the Obama administration’s pledge in Paris to cut the nation’s emissions by more than a quarter below its 2005 level by 2025. Instead, the Trump administration has encouraged the ramping up of oil and gas drilling while slapping tariffs on imports of solar panels.

Largely because of the United States’ dramatic changes in policy, a group called the Climate Action Tracker recently raised its prediction for how much the planet will warm even with the current Paris promises — upping it by 0.3 degrees Celsius, or more than half a degree Fahrenheit. In other words, the United States’ rejection of its pledge could push the entire globe backward on its goal of lowering temperatures.

The news isn’t all bad. China and India, which together produce about 24 percent of the world’s emissions, have encouraged the rapidly growing renewable energy markets in their countries. If they exceed their emissions-cutting targets, that could offset failures elsewhere around the world, Höhne said.

Yet another major developing nation, Brazil, has struggled to further reduce deforestation of the Amazon — one of the top ways in which the nation contributes to climate change — amid economic struggles that have weakened law enforcement in the world’s largest rain forest. Deforestation has actually risen since the record-low year of 2012, with 2016’s total of almost 8,000 square kilometers close to double the level seen four years earlier.

As for other challenges, there are fast-growing nations such as Turkey, with a population almost equal to Germany’s (about 80 million) but only about half the emissions. That won’t last, though. Turkey is expected to roughly double its emissions by 2030 as it continues to grow. Much of that could come in the form of building new coal plants, according to the Climate Action Tracker.

The U.N. Environment Program found in its latest “emissions gap” report that a large number of Group of 20 countries would require further steps to meet their Paris pledges. The list included the United States, Japan and Australia. The Climate Action Tracker, meanwhile, lists a number of major countries that have both insufficiently strong pledges and too little action to meet them. That includes the United States, Mexico, Brazil, South Africa and Turkey, among others.

Erik Solheim, UNEP’s executive director, said world leaders can be a major impediment to more rapid action.

“Political resoluteness is the main obstacle. .?.?. Change is always difficult, and politicians are risk-averse,” Solheim said. “Some people still believe going green creates fewer jobs, when the opposite is actually the case. .?.?. It comes from this old-fashioned thinking that you have less jobs and economic growth if you change, when the opposite is the case.”

That said, he remains optimistic that the world can bend its trajectory in the right direction — and in time.

“There’s a much more rapid shift than people tend to believe,” Solheim said, citing the falling price of wind and solar technologies, as well as climate action on the part of states, cities and some of the world’s largest corporations. “The good news is the changes are happening much faster than anyone thought. .?.?. [But] we have a long way to go. The challenge is huge, and if we fail, the consequences for people will be dramatic.”

This year, countries will officially begin to grapple with how off target they are through the “Talanoa dialogue,” which refers to a process used in Fiji and other Pacific islands for finding consensus and building trust without laying blame. Culminating at the December U.N. meeting in Poland, the dialogue will nudge world leaders to assess where they stand on the need to cut emissions and how far they have to go.

By 2020, countries are expected to actually ramp up the promises they made in Paris.

The problem, experts say, is that if the world’s emissions don’t start declining decisively by then — and declining fast — it may be too late to stave off devastating sea level rise, crippling droughts and storms, and other catastrophic effects of climate change.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: From Racist Black Characters to 'Black Panther,' We've Come So Far Print
Tuesday, 20 February 2018 13:39

Crews writes: "I've often said that history doesn't give a damn if it's true or not, what matters is who's telling it. The same goes for mythology."

Actor and former NFL player Terry Crews. (photo: FilmMagic)
Actor and former NFL player Terry Crews. (photo: FilmMagic)


From Racist Black Characters to 'Black Panther,' We've Come So Far

By Terry Crews, USA TODAY

20 February 18

 

n 1915, D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of A Nation (originally titled The Clansmen) was the first American motion picture screened at the White House. The film featured a romanticized, heroic view of the Ku Klux Klan, while blacks, in particular, were presented as evil, conniving, violent rapists.

Portrayed with righteous fervor by white actors, some in blackface, the film was enthusiastically praised by President Woodrow Wilson, who is reported to have gushed, “It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true.”

I’ve often said that history doesn’t give a damn if it’s true or not, what matters is who’s telling it. The same goes for mythology. The first modern comic book, Action Comics, featuring Superman, was created in 1938, smack dab in the middle of American segregation, and popular myths created by these books were never kind to blacks. Read and consumed by children, these books infected the culture of the day with racist black characters like Ebony White, Whitewash Jones and Steamboat.

Which brings us to Marvel’s Black Panther, an unapologetically black superhero movie depicting an African warrior/king from the fictional country of Wakanda. There have been successful films characterizing black superheroes before, notably Blade with Wesley Snipes, but none with a mostly black cast, black director and, amazingly, a black writer. Even the soundtrack is executive produced by a black record label.

It doesn’t disappoint, tackling action, humor and intense drama that finally, to my relief, wasn’t race-related. It was extremely satisfying to witness African-themed costumes, technology and warfare, but most of all, to see black people onscreen as full-fledged human beings, not just a sidekick or comic relief until the real hero shows up. Also, the film’s empowerment of its fierce female heroes rivals last year’s ground-breaking Wonder Woman, handling two sides of the typically marginalized coin with polished grace.

Listen to USA TODAY's geek culture podcast, The Mothership, break down ‘Black Panther’ and what it means for representation — both in superhero films and Hollywood at large.

As a black man growing up in the comic-book era, I remember seeing Christopher Reeve as Superman in 1978 and how happy I was to see a hero from those pages on the silver screen for the first time. “You will believe a man can fly” was the movie’s marketing tagline, and I was hooked.

One by one, I showed up for them all — Batman, Captain America, X-Men, Spider-Man — but I wondered, "How can black people be included in any of these movies, especially since their presence in the comic books that created them was so minimal?" When I was a teen, the main ones — Captain America’s sidekick The Falcon, Luke Cage and Black Panther — weren’t getting their own movie anytime soon.

I made do for years with black sports and music stars fulfilling the roles that were left out of the comics. My favorite book was Superman vs. Muhammad Ali, in which Ali actually beats Superman in a fair fight because Superman loses his superpowers. I had posters of Michael Jordan flying through the air, along with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s skyhook. In a knowledgeable nod to my experience as a teen, the poster of the album cover to Public Enemy’s It Takes A Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back is prominently featured several times in Black Panther. I could not hold back a smile, as I had that poster in my room as a teen and it even hangs in my office today. These men became our superheroes.

Seeing Black Panther in all its glory fulfills so many hopes and dreams I had as child. Adding this experience to things I wondered if I would ever see, like America having a black president, I smile again. 

Change may be slow and hard-fought, but as long as we never give up, it is inevitable.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The 3 Choices When It Comes to Trump Print
Tuesday, 20 February 2018 11:51

Reich writes: "You can bury your head in the sand. Pretend he's not there. Stop reading the news."

Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)


The 3 Choices When It Comes to Trump

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

20 February 18

 

irst, you can complain. Yell. Bang on the dinner table. Tell your family and friends the man is a dangerous fool. Explode every time you read something about him. Swear every time you see him on TV. Go ballistic when you listen to him or about him on the radio. 

Complaining may feel good, but it won’t help.  

Your second choice: You can bury your head in the sand. Pretend he’s not there. Stop reading the news. Turn off the TV and radio. No longer visit political Internet sites. When family or friends bring up his name, change the subject. 

Burying your head in the sand may also feel good, but it certainly won’t help, either.

You have a third choice. You can get active, and make it harder for Trump to damage America. This coming November 6, 34 senate seats, all 435 seats in the House of Representatives, and 36 governorships will be up for election or re-election.

Support primary candidates who will resist Trump. Mobilize to get out the vote. Organize so that November 6 becomes a total repudiation of Donald Trump and all he stands for. 

Start right now. Find an Indivisible group near you. Go Indivisible.org and become part of the solution. If you’re already in a blue state and want to reach out to purple or red parts of the country, visit swingleft.org or sisterdistrict.com.

Democracy is fragile, it requires all of us to protect it. 


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump's Miss Universe Gambit Print
Tuesday, 20 February 2018 09:41

Toobin writes: "For years, he used his beauty pageants to boost business interests abroad. A 2013 contest, in Moscow, may also have helped give him the Presidency."

From 1996 to 2015, Donald Trump co-owned the Miss Universe Organization, which also included the Miss U.S.A. and Miss Teen U.S.A. pageants. (photo: AP)
From 1996 to 2015, Donald Trump co-owned the Miss Universe Organization, which also included the Miss U.S.A. and Miss Teen U.S.A. pageants. (photo: AP)


Trump's Miss Universe Gambit

By Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker

20 February 18


For years, he used his beauty pageants to boost business interests abroad. A 2013 contest, in Moscow, may also have helped give him the Presidency.

he first-round results of the 2013 Miss Universe pageant seem to have come as a surprise to some of the competition’s judges, who thought that they would declare the finalists. The seven judges of the pageant’s preliminary round were charged with winnowing eighty-six contestants to fifteen finalists. Divided into two groups, they had brief conversations with each of the contestants, who then paraded onstage, first in bathing suits, then in evening gowns. The judges—including public-relations professionals, a modelling entrepreneur, and a fashion reporter—rated each woman on such qualities as “appearance” and “personality,” after which the ballots were whisked away. “They told us not to share how we voted with each other, but we did anyway,” one of the preliminary judges told me. When the finalists were announced, he said, the winners included several who hadn’t been selected. “I was shocked,” the judge told me. “I didn’t know what had happened. I felt ridiculous.” The contestants were not so naïve—they understood who was in charge.

From 1996 to 2015, Donald Trump co-owned the Miss Universe Organization, which also included the Miss U.S.A. and Miss Teen U.S.A. pageants. A day or two before a pageant began, Trump would casually visit the contestants while they conducted their final rehearsals. Former contestants told me that Trump would circulate among the young women, shaking hands and chatting with each of them, periodically turning to speak with Paula Shugart, the president of the Miss Universe Organization, who followed him at a discreet distance. (Paula Shugart declined to comment.) Adwoa Yamoah, who competed as Miss Canada in 2012, told me, “He made comments about every girl: ‘I’ve been to that country.’ ‘We’re building a Trump Tower there.’ It was clear the countries that he liked did well. He’d whisper to Paula about the girls, and she’d write it down. He basically told us he picked nine of the top fifteen.” Kerrie Baylis, who was Miss Jamaica in 2013, described a similar scene and added that, when the finalists were announced, “the list looked like the countries that Donald Trump did business with, or wanted to do business with.” Shi Lim, who competed that year as Miss Singapore, told me, “The finalists were picked by Trump. He was really in charge. We called it the Trump card.” (A Miss Universe spokeswoman said that the pageant rules allowed the company’s staff, including Trump, to participate in naming the finalists.)

Trump has long viewed his businesses as mutually reinforcing, with all the products—from hotels to steak, vodka to golf resorts—complementing one another. As he said in the introduction to the first episode of “The Apprentice,” the reality-television show that made him a global celebrity, “I’ve mastered the art of the deal and have turned the name Trump into the highest-quality brand.” Trump often staged the Miss Universe pageant in cities where he had other business interests, and finalists usually came from countries where Miss Universe had strong television ratings. Under Trump, the pageant was held twice in Las Vegas, twice in Florida, and twice in Puerto Rico. In the other years, Trump kept the pageant true to its origins as a swimsuit competition by setting the ceremony in warm-weather locations like Panama City, São Paulo, Quito, and Mexico City. (Although interest in beauty pageants has faded in the United States, it remains high in Latin America.) Only once did Trump steer the pageant away from temperate environments—in November, 2013, when Miss Universe took place in Russia.

Today, the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow looks like a harbinger of the Trump campaign and Presidency, featuring some of the same themes and characters. Miss Universe represents a paradigmatic example of Trump’s business style in action—the exaggerations that teeter into lies, the willingness to embrace dubious partners, the hunger for glamour and recognition. Trump got away with this kind of behavior for decades, and he played by the same rules during his run for the Presidency.

Last Friday, Robert Mueller, the special counsel, unveiled the indictment of thirteen Russian nationals, and three Russian organizations, on charges that they conspired to throw the 2016 election to Trump. Their main method, the indictment contends, was the manipulation of social media through posts by Russians operating under stolen identities. The Russians’ diction was sometimes imperfect—one Instagram post said a “particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and forcing Blacks to vote Killary”—but their goal was apparent. In the words of the indictment, the conspirators sought to provide information to the American public “supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaging Hillary Clinton.”

The indictment does not explicitly assert that Trump or his campaign knowingly participated in the Russian conspiracy. On Friday afternoon, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, said that the President took this omission as vindication, noting that Trump “is glad to see the Special Counsel’s investigation further indicates—that there was NO COLLUSION between the Trump campaign and Russia and that the outcome of the election was not changed or affected.” In fact, Mueller’s charges suggest the opposite. The undertaking had more than eighty employees and a budget of more than a million dollars a month.

The indictment does not address several other efforts that American intelligence agencies have tied to Russia, such as the hacking of e-mail accounts linked to prominent Democrats. And Mueller has not yet made public his findings on the clearest link between the Trump campaign and Russian interests: the link that emerged from the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow. The ever-more-pressing question is whether Trump and the Russians used the relationships cemented at the pageant to advance Trump’s goal of becoming President of the United States.

***

Shortly after Yolande Betbeze was named Miss America 1951, she precipitated a crisis. An aspiring opera singer, Betbeze announced that she would not pose in a bathing suit when she went on tour. Executives at Catalina swimwear, a sponsor of the pageant, were offended, and the company decided to create competing events, which came to be called Miss Universe and Miss U.S.A. (Miss U.S.A., not Miss America, advances to the Miss Universe competition.) That rift still defines the differences between the pageants. Miss America, with its earnest talent competitions and its scholarships for winners, purports to reward a multidimensional female ideal. Not so Miss Universe. As Candace Savage put it, in “Beauty Queens,” her amusing history of the pageants, “The new competitions were to emphasize ‘beauty,’ pure and simple, with none of the ridiculous folderol about talent.”

By the late nineteen-sixties, ownership of the Miss Universe Organization had passed to a lingerie company called Kayser-Roth. Cindy Adams, who was an assistant at the company, and her husband, the comedian Joey Adams, were friends of Roy Cohn, the New York lawyer and fixer who had been a close aide to Senator Joseph McCarthy. “Roy used to invite us everywhere, and once we went to a party on Long Island, where I happened to be seated at a small table with this tall young guy with blond hair,” Adams told me recently. “Roy told me at that dinner that one day Donald would own New York. I said, ‘Yeah, pass the gravy.’ ”

In 1971, Adams arranged for the Miss Universe contestants to walk down Seventh Avenue as a publicity stunt for the pageant, which was to take place in Miami that year. “Cops studded the route. Nobody was allowed near the contestants in the line of march,” Adams wrote later, in the New York Post, where she is a columnist. “I look over. Who’s alongside some nifty beauty from some Who-Knows-Where-Country? My brand-new Best Friend. He wasn’t The Donald then.” Adams concluded, “I also knew then that he loved beauty, loved blondes, and loved the Miss Universe Pageant.”

In 1996, Trump attended the Miss Universe pageant, which was being co-hosted in Paradise, Nevada, by the second of his three wives, Marla Maples. Trump heard that the owner of the organization was putting the business up for sale. “How could I pass up the opportunity to own the world’s premiere beauty pageant?” he later wrote. As with so much regarding Trump’s finances, the price he paid for it is something of a mystery. In “The Art of the Comeback,” he wrote that he beat out several competitors with a bid of ten million dollars; in subsequent interviews, he said that he had paid only two million.

From the beginning, Trump did little to conceal his attitude toward women. As he told Howard Stern in an interview, when he bought the pageant he found that it had strayed from its roots as a beauty contest. “They had a person who was extremely proud that a number of the women had become doctors,” Trump said. “And I wasn’t interested.” In 1997, during his first year as owner, Trump became embroiled in a conflict involving Alicia Machado, of Venezuela, who was the reigning Miss Universe at the time and had gained weight during her tenure. Trump went on a public crusade to shame her. Wearing a suit and tie, and trailed by cameras, he followed Machado into a gym to watch her work out. “This is somebody that likes to eat,” Trump told the reporters. The controversy resurfaced during the 2016 campaign, when Hillary Clinton, in the first Presidential debate, said, “He called this woman ‘Miss Piggy.’ Then he called her ‘Miss Housekeeping,’ because she was Latina.” After a pause, Clinton said, “Donald, she has a name: Her name is Alicia Machado.” (Trump was unrepentant, telling Fox News, “She gained a massive amount of weight, and it was a real problem.”)

Trump also boasted about ogling Miss Universe contestants during the events. “I’ll go backstage before a show and everyone’s getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it,” he told Stern. “You know, they’re standing there with no clothes.” Over the years, when asked about his management of the pageants, he has often replied with some version of the quip “The bathing suits got smaller and the heels got higher and the ratings went up.” The part about ratings isn’t true. As the book “Trump Revealed,” by Michael Kranish and Marc Fisher, noted, when Trump bought Miss Universe the viewership in the United States had declined from around thirty-five million in 1984 to twelve million in 1997. The numbers kept falling during Trump’s ownership, and the American audience for the 2013 pageant consisted of fewer than four million. Still, Trump recognized that the pageant was a useful vehicle for expanding his reach overseas, and no country so consistently kindled his ambitions as Russia.

***

Trump’s interest in the country goes back to the days of the Soviet Union. His first book, “The Art of the Deal,” published in 1987, begins with an account of a typical day in his life, including a phone call with an acquaintance who conducted a lot of business with the Soviet Union. “I’m talking about building a large luxury hotel, across the street from the Kremlin, in partnership with the Soviet government,” Trump wrote. “They have asked me to go to Moscow in July.” Later that year, he did go to Moscow and what was then Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), but his plans to build there never came to fruition.

Trump returned to Moscow in each of the following decades, hoping to add one of his eponymous towers to the city’s skyline. His regular visits have led some to speculate that Trump had a kind of obsession with the country, but he looked for deals all over the world, and he returned to Russia because that’s where the money was. A longtime adviser to Trump told me, “It’s a major metropolitan city, and around the years of 2000, give or take, with the privatization, there was a lot of money in Moscow.”

The atmosphere of post-Soviet Russia also seemed to suit Trump. He travelled to the city again in November, 1996, during the raucous “Wild East” days following the collapse of Communism and the Soviet system. His arrival in Moscow came after a plunge in his financial fortunes. (His 1995 tax return, published in part by the Times in 2016, showed losses of nine hundred and sixteen million dollars.) He had lost the trust of American banks and was forced to search for credit and business opportunities abroad. In a news conference shortly after his arrival in Moscow, he said that he planned to invest two hundred and fifty million dollars to build a pair of luxury apartment towers in the city, one to be called Trump International and the other Trump Tower. In addition, he said that he was looking into renovating and running two famous hotels from the Soviet era. As Trump said in a Mark Singer profile in The New Yorker, published a few months later, “We’re looking at the Moskva Hotel. We’re also looking at the Rossiya. That’s a very big project; I think it’s the largest hotel in the world. And we’re working with the local government, the mayor of Moscow and the mayor’s people.”

The Moskva, steps from Red Square and the Kremlin, was the subject of a bizarre legend. The story goes that during the early thirties, in the midst of Stalin’s purges, the architect submitted a set of plans to Stalin for the dictator’s approval. Stalin didn’t notice that the architect had provided two versions of the front façade. Rather than risk Stalin’s wrath by pointing this out, the architect used both designs, one on the left side of the building, the other on the right. The architect survived the ordeal, but, by 1996, the building was falling apart, and city authorities were looking for investors to renovate it.

During this trip, Trump was accompanied by a prominent American businessman—Bennett LeBow, the chairman of the Vector Group, a holding company with investments in tobacco and real estate. LeBow and Trump arranged to meet with representatives of Boris Yeltsin’s government in a conference room at the Moskva to discuss taking over the hotel.

An expatriate businessman who attended the event that day told me, “I was just a kid, and I was supposed to help out at the meeting. LeBow was upstairs, in a room called ‘the library,’ but Trump was late. So they sent me downstairs to wait for him.” When Trump arrived, he was accompanied by two young Russian women. The businessman said, “I had never met Trump before, and I was nervous as hell. So I started panicking. I mean, this was a serious meeting. So I suggested to Trump that I wait downstairs at the bar with them. I’d keep them company until he was finished. He said no way. He thought it was hilarious. He wanted to go upstairs with them. So what could I do? The three of them went up to the meeting together.”

As with Trump’s previous visit, nothing came of this mission to Moscow. (LeBow declined to comment. A White House spokesperson indicated that the President has “absolutely no memory of any women attending a meeting with him while there and disputes any suggestion to the contrary.”) Later, the Rossiya was torn down and replaced with a park. The Moskva was eventually renovated and converted into a Four Seasons Hotel.

***

By the turn of the century, Trump had moved away from the capital demands of developing real estate and begun leveraging his celebrity into franchise deals. He had experienced repeated bankruptcies in Atlantic City, and was cut off from traditional sources of funding. As a result, he began to welcome less reputable partners, as long as they had access to cash.

His ambition of putting his name on a building in Russia persisted. A source in Moscow told me that “Trump was always trying to get in touch with Russian money,” adding that in 2007 the source brought a Russian real-estate developer to meet with Trump at Trump Tower, in New York, to discuss a franchise project in Moscow. “The deals were always the same,” the source said. “Trump would lend his name, and the local guy would put up the money, build, and manage. Nothing came of it.”

Trump made his first foray into the Russian market when he lent his name to Trump vodka. “By the summer of ’06,” Trump said in a news release, “I fully expect the most called-for cocktail in America to be the ‘T&T,’ or the ‘Trump and tonic.’ ” The product was launched at a series of parties in New York, Miami Beach, and Hollywood. Among the guests, according to news reports, were Stormy Daniels, the porn actress, and the former Playmate Karen McDougal, both of whom were reportedly later paid to conceal their relationships with Trump. In 2007, with similar fanfare, Trump announced that his vodka would expand its distribution into Russia, with a $1.5 million deal for ten thousand cases. The vodka flopped, in Russia and elsewhere. A longtime vodka executive in Russia told me, “Trump vodka never even showed up on our sales reports—that’s how little it sold.” Production ceased in 2011.

The 2008 recession shattered the real-estate market, but Trump’s position was cushioned by the success of “The Apprentice,” which was being syndicated around the world. Trump SoHo, a hotel and condominium in New York, had already begun selling space. His partners in the project included Felix Sater and Tevfik Arif, two real-estate operators who were born in the Soviet Union and maintained strong ties to Russia. Sater, the son of a Russian mobster, had immigrated to the United States as a child. In 1993, he went to prison for fifteen months after stabbing a man in the face with the stem of a broken margarita glass during a barroom confrontation; and in 1998 he pleaded guilty for his role in a forty-million-dollar stock-fraud scheme carried out with mobsters. In 2010, Arif, who had worked at the Soviet Ministry of Trade, was arrested in Turkey with ten others aboard a luxury yacht and accused of being part of a prostitution ring. (He was later acquitted.) Sater and Arif were principals in the Bayrock Group, which invested in Trump real-estate ventures from its offices on the twenty-fourth floor of Trump Tower.

The extent of Trump’s financial ties to Russia remains unclear, but he appears to have had a number of investors and business partners from the former Soviet Union. In 2008, Donald Trump, Jr., told the audience at a real-estate conference, “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. . . . We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.” He also said that he had made six trips to Russia during the previous eighteen months. In 2013, Trump’s son Eric told the sportswriter James Dodson, “We don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.” (On Twitter, Eric Trump denied having made the remark.)

***

In 2013, Trump’s prospects in Russia began to look more sanguine, thanks to a music video featuring a pop star named Emin Agalarov. Emin’s father, Aras, had made a fortune as a real-estate developer in Moscow, and Emin had put the family fortune to work for the benefit of his singing career. The Moscow music scene favors hard-edged rap, but Emin found a degree of success as a crooner in the mold of Enrique Iglesias. In 2013, he had high expectations for a danceable tune called “Amor,” and he wanted an especially beautiful woman to star in the accompanying music video. Emin and his publicist, Rob Goldstone, a former tabloid journalist from Great Britain who was hired to promote Emin’s singing career outside Russia, approached the Miss Universe Organization and asked if the men could cast the reigning champion, Olivia Culpo, the former Miss U.S.A. Emin and Goldstone also suggested that the Agalarovs host Miss Universe in Moscow in 2013, so that Emin could perform for the pageant’s global audience. That June, Emin and Aras travelled to Las Vegas to close the deal with Trump.

In some ways, the alliance between the Agalarovs and Trump seems preordained. The Russian family’s mingled interests in real estate and show business led some to call them the Trumps of Russia. Unlike Trump, Aras came from a family of modest means, but he had roots in Azerbaijan, where work was under way on a Trump hotel and residence tower in Baku, the capital. Emin was married to the daughter of Ilham Aliyev, the longtime Azerbaijani President. (They have since divorced.) Christopher Steele, the former British spy who examined Trump’s ties to Russia, may have hinted at a darker explanation for the Agalarovs’ interest in Miss Universe. Retained by the research firm Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, Steele asserted that the “Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years.” Even if Steele is wrong and Russia was not cultivating Trump as an asset, it seems clear that by this point Trump would do business with just about anyone. No licensing deal was too demeaning; he would attach his name to steak, water bottles, neckties, mattresses, lamps, and vodka.

On the trip to Las Vegas, Aras and Emin Agalarov were accompanied by Goldstone and came to an agreement with Trump that the Agalarovs would host the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow that year. With his characteristic salesman’s bravado, Trump later said that there had been eighteen other bidders vying for the pageant; in fact, it’s not clear that there were any others. According to various reports, the Agalarovs invested twenty million dollars to bring the event to Moscow. “Twenty million dollars is not even close,” Scott Balber, a lawyer for Emin and Aras Agalarov who has also represented Trump, told me. “The site fee to Miss Universe was a couple of million dollars at most.”

In 2002, Trump had sold half of the Miss Universe Organization to NBC, which broadcast the pageant, and the network had representatives on the organization’s board. “Trump didn’t decide alone that the pageant would take place in Russia,” Michael Cohen, a former executive vice-president of the Trump Organization and a personal attorney to the President who also served on the Miss Universe board of directors, told me. “The board unanimously agreed that the package the Agalarovs put forward was best for the company and best for the contestants, so we approved it. I suspect that one of the Agalarovs’ motivations was to advance Emin’s career.”

Trump, though eager to take his pageant to Moscow, likely had an exaggerated idea of the Agalarovs’ place in Russian society. “I remember when we first came to him for a meeting, he was sitting in the lobby of his own hotel, which, of course, is called ‘Trump,’ ” Aras Agalarov told the Russian magazine Snob. Trump, Aras continued, “began to shout, ‘Look who came to me! This is the richest person in Russia!’ ” According to Forbes’s ranking of the wealthiest people in Russia, Agalarov placed fifty-first, with a net worth of about $1.7 billion. Anders Aslund, an expert on the Russian economy at the Atlantic Council, in Washington, told me, “Most of the great Russian fortunes come from natural resources, like oil, and the real-estate developers are distinctly second-class in the pecking order. And Agalarov’s stuff is mostly on the outskirts, in what’s called the Moscow region, on the way to the airport.” Nor does Agalarov wield outsized clout with Putin. “Real-estate developers like Agalarov are under the thumb of the government, and they are expected to do as they are told,” Aslund said. “Agalarov is building two stadiums for the World Cup this summer, not because he’ll make much money doing it but because it’s what the government expects of him. Agalarov surely had met Putin, but in 2013 neither he nor Trump would have mattered much to Putin.”

Trump’s mistaken impression of Agalarov seems to have given him an exaggerated expectation of meeting Putin, which was one of his goals in taking Miss Universe to Moscow. On June 18, 2013, just after Trump announced that the Miss Universe pageant would take place in Russia, he tweeted, with a kind of desperate giddiness, “Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow—if so, will he become my new best friend?” That fall, before the pageant, David Letterman asked Trump, on “Late Night,” if he had ever met Putin. “I met him once,” Trump replied, falsely.

***

On Friday, November 8, 2013, Trump travelled to Moscow with Phil Ruffin, his business partner in Las Vegas. Ruffin is married to Oleksandra Nikolayenko, a former Miss Universe from Ukraine, who is forty-six years Ruffin’s junior. After they arrived, Trump attended a morning meeting about the pageant at his hotel, the Ritz-Carlton. Keith Schiller, a former New York City police officer who had long served as Trump’s bodyguard, sat on one side of the room. At some point during the session, Schiller testified to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, someone offered to send five women to Trump’s hotel room. Schiller said that he took the offer as a joke, rejected it, and told Trump of the invitation, which he said the two men laughed about.

Later that day, the Agalarovs hosted a reception for Trump at a Moscow outpost of the Nobu restaurant chain. Emin Agalarov owns several restaurants run by the Los Angeles-based chef Nobu Matsuhisa, who was also in Moscow to serve as a judge in the final round of Miss Universe the next day. About a dozen people attended, including Herman Gref, the former Minister of Economic Development and Trade under Putin and the president of Sberbank, the largest bank in Russia. From there, the Agalarovs took Trump to Crocus City, their shopping mall, west of the city, where the pageant would take place. Aras Agalarov hosted a fifty-eighth-birthday party for himself at which the contestants gathered to sing “Happy Birthday.” The event may have been Trump’s chance to inspect the women and render his judgments about who should advance to the finals.

The following morning, Emin, who had asked Trump to shoot a scene for his music video, brought a camera crew to the Ritz-Carlton. In a conference room, Trump recited his famous line—“You’re fired”—in one take. He also held a news conference and sat for an interview with Thomas Roberts, an MSNBC anchorman who would serve as the television host of the finals, along with Mel B., the British singer better known as Scary Spice. (Andy Cohen, the television personality, had co-hosted the previous year’s pageant but withdrew from the 2013 contest because Russia had passed an anti-gay law that year. Roberts—who, like Cohen, is gay—agreed to take his place.) Asked by Roberts about his relationship with Putin, Trump again dissembled, saying, “I do have a relationship, and I can tell you that he’s very interested in what we’re doing here today.” Trump went on, “He’s probably very interested in what you and I are saying today, and I’m sure he’s going to be seeing it in some form, but I do have a relationship with him.” He told Roberts that Putin had “done an amazing job. . . . A lot of people would say he’s put himself at the forefront of the world as a leader.” Maria Abakumova, a Moscow-based journalist who worked for the Russian edition of Forbes at the time and covered Aras Agalarov, told me that people thought Putin would attend the pageant, but he never showed up. Later, Aras told the Washington Post that Putin had sent Trump a sort of consolation prize—a note along with a decorative box.

***

The faux triumphal arch that greets visitors to Crocus City establishes the grandiosity of the Agalarovs’ commercial complex. It is three separate but connected malls. One, dubbed “Vegas,” features moderately priced retailers. A second consists of dozens of luxury shops, and a third offers home-improvement products. There is also an aquarium, a hotel, a heliport, and Crocus City Hall, the six-thousand-seat theatre where the Miss Universe pageant would be staged.

To accommodate the international television audience, the live broadcast in Moscow began late on the night of Saturday, November 9th. Trump and Aras Agalarov sat next to each other in the front row. One judge, an Italian wristwatch designer named Italo Fontana, told me, by e-mail, that Trump “greeted me like we were friends since ages and with a smile and a pat on my shoulder he told me: ‘I recommend you, vote the most beautiful one!’ ”

The judges included Steven Tyler, of Aerosmith; the supermodel Carol Alt, who had been a contestant on “Celebrity Apprentice”; and the ice-skater Tara Lipinski. An announcer provided a few facts about each finalist—“She never wears flats because she feels she is made to be a beauty queen”—until only Miss Venezuela and Miss Spain remained. (The contestants were referred to by their countries, not by name.) At the end of the show, Olivia Culpo handed her crown to Gabriela Isler, of Venezuela, who became the seventh winner from that country since 1979.

Trump later boasted about how many important people he met during the weekend, telling Real Estate Weekly, a trade publication, “Almost all of the oligarchs were in the room.” This was far from true––very few attended––but photographs and news reports show that Trump did cross paths with some wealthy Muscovites and a variety of prospective business partners. Perhaps the most notorious guest was Alimzhan Tokhtakhounov, a Russian businessman widely suspected of fixing an ice-dancing competition at the 2002 Winter Olympics. At the time of the pageant, he was a fugitive from justice in the United States, where he had been charged with running an organized-crime money-laundering operation from an apartment at Trump Tower, three floors below Trump’s penthouse. (He denies the allegations.)

The after-party for several hundred guests took place in a large meeting room on the Crocus City campus. Trump and the Agalarovs presided in one of the V.I.P. boxes, receiving guests and taking photographs. Timati, a leading Russian rapper, came to pay his respects. “It was a pretty sedate affair in their box,” one guest recalled, adding that, in the next box, Roustam Tariko, the founder of the business empire Russian Standard, which was an official partner of the pageant, held a livelier celebration, with about a dozen young women, including numerous Miss Russia contestants. (Russian Standard also sponsors the Miss Russia pageant, a feeder event for Miss Universe.) The parties wound down at around four in the morning.

Trump stayed at the Ritz-Carlton for only two nights, but his presence there has given rise to the most sensational accusation about his time in Moscow. The Steele dossier claims that Russian authorities had exploited Trump’s “personal obsessions and sexual perversion in order to obtain suitable ‘kompromat’ (compromising material) on him.” A source allegedly present at the scene said that Trump had rented the Presidential Suite at the hotel, where Barack and Michelle Obama had stayed, and that he had employed “a number of prostitutes to perform a ‘golden showers’ (urination) show in front of him,” as a way of defiling the bed in which the former First Couple had slept. The accusation seems unlikely, though not impossible, and Trump has denied the validity of the dossier. In any case, he seems to have been in high spirits when he left Moscow. Shortly after his departure, he tweeted to Aras Agalarov’s account, “I had a great weekend with you and your family. You have done a FANTASTIC job. TRUMP TOWER-MOSCOW is next. EMIN was WOW!”

***

If Trump had simply gone back to his career in business, the Miss Universe pageant in Moscow would today rank as little more than a footnote in the colorful saga of a flamboyant New York real-estate developer. But a year and a half later, in June, 2015, Trump declared his candidacy for President in a notorious speech at Trump Tower, in which he accused Mexico of exporting criminals and rapists and called for the building of a border wall. Outrage followed, especially in the Spanish-speaking world, and Trump quickly made a deal to sell his ownership of the Miss Universe Organization, to the WME-IMG talent agency. Neither the sale price nor Trump’s profit on the deal, if any, has been disclosed.

In the Presidential campaign, Trump continued his embrace of Moscow with a roundelay of ingratiation and deference to Putin. He had also kept in touch with the Agalarovs. A year after the pageant, he appeared in another of Emin’s videos, to celebrate his thirty-fifth birthday. (“Emin, I can’t believe you’re turning thirty-five,” Trump said. “You’re a winner, you’re a champ!”) In April of 2016, Emin told the Washington Post, “I consider him a friend. We exchange correspondence. We see each other a few times a year.”

As a Presidential candidate, Trump continued working on a plan to build in Russia. In October, 2015, based on a proposal by Felix Sater, Trump signed a non-binding letter of intent to license the Trump name to a potential office tower in Moscow. In an e-mail sent at the time to Michael Cohen, Sater wrote, “I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected. . . . Buddy our boy can become President of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putins team to buy in on this.” Cohen, who negotiated on Trump’s behalf, recalled, “The licensee was intent on developing the tallest building in the world, a hundred and twenty stories or so, with commercial space, a hotel, and residential. But the most important requirement we had was that Felix find the right piece of real estate for it, because the Trump brand is all about location, location, location. By January, 2016, I saw that he couldn’t come up with any location, so I told him the deal was dead.”

The scope of Russian meddling in the election remains unknown, but it appears to have included hacking e-mail accounts affiliated with prominent Democrats, seeding social media with pro-Trump and anti-Clinton items, and, perhaps, directing financial assistance to pro-Trump organizations. According to six U.S. intelligence chiefs, Russia is building on its 2016 efforts by launching a new round of attacks aimed at undermining the 2018 elections. On February 13th, Dan Coats, the director of National Intelligence, warned the Senate Intelligence Committee, “We expect Russia to continue using propaganda, social media, false-flag personas, sympathetic spokesmen, and other means of influence to try to build on its wide range of operations and exacerbate social and political fissures in the United States.” In the same hearing, Christopher Wray, the director of the F.B.I., acknowledged that the President had not asked his intelligence officials to take specific measures to address Russian interference. “We need to inform the American public that this is real,” Coats said, in what sounded as much like an appeal to the President as to the public. “We are not going to allow some Russian to tell us how to vote and how to run our country. I think there needs to be a national cry for that.”

Trump, it seems, has never asked his top intelligence officials for an accounting of Russian activities during the campaign or for a plan to stop such efforts from continuing in the future. As a result, the quest for accountability rests largely with the Mueller investigation, which is trying to determine whether Trump and his campaign staff knew about, encouraged, or sponsored the Russian efforts. To date, the most direct evidence that they did is a result of connections forged in the lead-up to the 2013 Miss Universe contest. On June 3, 2016, Rob Goldstone, Emin Agalarov’s publicist, e-mailed Donald Trump, Jr., offering damaging information about Hillary Clinton as “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.” Donald, Jr., replied, “If it’s what you say I love it.” Six days later, Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, the candidate’s son-in-law, and Paul Manafort, then the chairman of the campaign, welcomed a group of visitors to Trump Tower led by a Russian attorney named Natalia Veselnitskaya. In July, 2017, the Times informed the White House that it was working on a story about that meeting. The President and his advisers, who were returning from a trip to Europe aboard Air Force One, prepared a misleading statement about the purpose of the meeting, asserting that it had been a harmless discussion of adoption policy.

Mueller’s prosecutors have taken a close look at the meeting, and at the President’s public response to its exposure. It is illegal for foreign nationals to contribute to American campaigns, including through in-kind contributions, such as opposition research. The misleading statement may become evidence of obstruction of justice. And the indictments of the Russians on Friday showed Mueller’s determination to reveal the extent of foreign influence in the election and to hold accountable those who facilitated it. For decades, in Trump’s business dealings, he never paid a price for his salesman’s hype, which repeatedly edged into falsehood. The Mueller investigation may now bring an unprecedented and overdue moment of reckoning.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 Next > End >>

Page 1335 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN