RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Trump Orders Replica Nobel Peace Prize to Display on His Desk Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Friday, 18 May 2018 13:54

Borowitz writes: "Donald J. Trump has ordered a replica of the Nobel Peace Prize and is displaying it prominently on his desk in the Oval Office, the White House confirmed on Wednesday."

Donald Trump. (photo: T.J. Kirkpatrick/Bloomberg)
Donald Trump. (photo: T.J. Kirkpatrick/Bloomberg)


Trump Orders Replica Nobel Peace Prize to Display on His Desk

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

18 May 18


The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."


onald J. Trump has ordered a replica of the Nobel Peace Prize and is displaying it prominently on his desk in the Oval Office, the White House confirmed on Wednesday.

The replica of the Nobel medallion is mounted on what the White House described as a “tasteful black-velvet background” with an engraved plaque reading, “Donald J. Trump, 2018 Winner.”

At the daily White House briefing, the press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said that Trump “took the initiative” to award himself the Peace Prize rather than “waiting around” for the Nobel committee, in Oslo, to bestow it on him.

“What with his successes in Syria, Iran, North Korea, and whatnot, the President already knows he’s a lock for the Nobel,” she said. “It’s just a formality at this point."

The fake Nobel was first spotted by Henry Klugian, a student who was on a White House tour with his seventh-grade class from Bethesda, Maryland.

“I thought it was kind of weird that he’d have something like that made up for himself, but whatever,” he said.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Why Are For-Profit US Prisons Subjecting Detainees to Forced Labor? Print
Friday, 18 May 2018 13:43

Shahshahani writes: "Private prisons have for years enriched themselves by exploiting detained immigrant labor. They must be held accountable."

Inmates stand in the yard at the privately-run Arizona State Prison-Kingman in Golden Valley, Ariz. (photo: Patrick Breen/AP)
Inmates stand in the yard at the privately-run Arizona State Prison-Kingman in Golden Valley, Ariz. (photo: Patrick Breen/AP)


Why Are For-Profit US Prisons Subjecting Detainees to Forced Labor?

By Azadeh Shahshahani, Guardian UK

18 May 18


Private prisons have for years enriched themselves by exploiting detained immigrant labor. They must be held accountable

n 2017, officials at the Stewart immigration detention center in Georgia placed Shoaib Ahmed, a 24-year-old immigrant from Bangladesh, in solitary confinement for encouraging fellow workers to stop working.

Ahmed, who was paid 50 cents per hour to work within the facility, was upset because his $20 paycheck was delayed. His punishment was solitary confinement for 10 days, where he was subject to deplorable conditions – a cell with no access to other workers, only an hour of out of cell time per day and showers only three times per week. Detailing the impact that severe isolation has had on his mental health, Ahmed said: “I think the segregation will kill me.”

Stewart is operated by the largest prison corporation in the US, CoreCivic (formerly Corrections Corporation of America), under a contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). The corporation’s net income last year was $178m.

Ahmed’s experience mirrors that of a growing number of detained immigrants at facilities across the US who are subjected to forced labor.

In April, we filed a lawsuit on behalf of Shoaib Ahmed and others against CoreCivic, alleging that the prison corporation violates human trafficking laws and employs a deprivation scheme to force immigrants detained at Stewart to work for sub-minimum wages, and then threatens to punish them for refusing to work through solitary confinement or loss of access to necessities. A lawsuit against Geo Group, another prison corporation, is moving forward for using similar practices at the Aurora Detention Center in Colorado, violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

Stewart relies on the labor of detained immigrants to keep the cooking and cleaning and other basic operations going. How convenient and profitable for the largest and wealthiest prison corporation to exploit detained immigrant labor rather than hire regularly waged employees.

CoreCivic’s abuse and exploitation of detained immigrants’ labor as part of its profit-making schemes constitute a contemporary form of slavery as we detailed in a submission to the UN special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (which the US has ratified) states, “slavery … in all [its] forms shall be prohibited,” and that no one, including detained immigrants, “shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labor”.

Stewart employs a deprivation system in which officials provide immigrants with inadequate food and basic living supplies and require immigrants to purchase them at exorbitant costs at the commissary. While officials portray the labor program as “voluntary” in light of the 13th amendment of the US constitution, detained immigrants are often penalized for refusing to work. Officials at Stewart take advantage of immigrants for cheap labor and overuse solitary confinement to punish immigrants, oftentimes for the mere act of speaking up and demanding their rights, as happened to Shoaib Ahmed.

Adding to the deprivation system, Stewart officials enforce unreasonably strict eating schedules and provide immigrants with inadequate food portions, forcing many immigrants to purchase additional food from overpriced commissaries, as detailed in a report released last year. Almost all immigrants detained at Stewart say they are given insufficient food. As one detained immigrant from Mexico stated: “I believe the reason why the facility gives the detainees so little food is so we will have to buy food from the commissary. Everything in the commissary is expensive. I spend $80 a week, $320 a month, in the commissary.”

None of this bothered a group of 18 Republican lawmakers including three from Georgia who sent a letter to Jeff Sessions, Ice, and the Department of Labor asking them to help the private prison company Geo Group defend itself against the lawsuits. They actually alleged that the labor programs are good for the detained individuals as they “reduce the negative impact of confinement through decreased idleness, improved morale, and [lead to] fewer disciplinary incidents”.

Improved morale? Shoaib Ahmed, who has since been deported and still suffers from psychological trauma and distress, would beg to differ.

These legislators’ support for the prison corporations perhaps should not come as a surprise. CoreCivic gave $295,642 in federal political contributions during the 2016 election cycle. Ninety-six percent of that money went to Republicans, including Lamar Smith of Texas, one of the signatories of the letter.

Private prison companies contributed $1.6m during the 2016 federal election cycle.

Immigrants who choose to work at the detention facilities should be paid a living wage. It goes without saying that they should not be pressured into working. Prison corporations that have for years enriched themselves by exploiting detained immigrant labor should be held accountable. So should the politicians who support this inhumane and illegal scheme.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
I Live in Gaza. I Want You to Know Why We're Protesting. Print
Friday, 18 May 2018 13:40

Alsdudi writes: "The international media keeps warping our demands for their own purposes."

A Palestinian woman documents the situation at the border fence with Israel. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty)
A Palestinian woman documents the situation at the border fence with Israel. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty)


ALSO SEE: UN Votes to Send
War Crimes Investigators to Gaza

I Live in Gaza. I Want You to Know Why We're Protesting.

By Intimaa Alsdudi, ThinkProgress

18 May 18


The international media keeps warping our demands for their own purposes.

aheyya, 70 years old and tired after a long walk from Saladin Road to the “no-go” zone, looked among the huge crowd of protesters for a place to rest as she carried a Palestinian flag and her embroidered bag over her shoulder.

When I approached Zaheyya on Monday and asked if I could interview her to find out why she is participating in the Great Return March in spite of her age and sickness, she replied, “Shame on you, for asking me this question! I will come every day until U.N. Resolution 194 is implemented.”

The resolution Zaheyya recalled was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1948, and it called for the return of all Palestinian refugees to their lands. It was never adopted by the U.N. Security Council, and so it was never enforced. But Palestinians have not forgotten.

“I am a refugee from Huliqat village that was ethnically cleansed in 1948 by the hands of the Haganah [the Zionist paramilitary organization] and I have the right to go back,” said Zaheyya. “This is our day to show Israel that the old will die, but the young will never forget… Yes, I will join my people and shout with all my strength, move on people, go back to your homeland, the land is waiting for you.”

It was inspiring, but then Zaheyya started shouting something else. “Tear gas, gas, gas! Run people, run!”

Tear gas cans began rolling between us and the crowds. Everyone ran from the area, while Israeli snipers on top of the hills and watchtowers started shooting randomly at the people protesting.  At one point, I lost sight of my mom. I could not see her, because there was dark smoke everywhere. Do you know what that feels like? To not know if your mother is okay as snipers are shooting at you and everyone around you?

It took me half an hour to find her again — when the air cleared out from the tear gas bombs. After we did, my mom, as always, hugged me. “Calm down. I am okay,” she said. We started laughing and cursing the snipers.

Monday was hard, and it was heartbreaking. After a long day, I found out that my brother Mustafa, who is 29 years old, was shot. He was lucky, the bullet that penetrated his leg was not explosive.

At least 62 people were killed that day, and nearly 3,200 wounded, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza. Those injured included journalists, medics, and dozens of women.

Since then, all of the victims have been painted in the international media as martyrs for Hamas. All the protesters – me, my family, Zaheyya, thousands of others like us – have had our demands warped and our voices silenced by others for political purposes.

So let me be clear with you. Gaza is the biggest open-air prison on earth. Nearly two million people are denied the basic freedom of movement. Ninety-seven percent of the water here is undrinkable. The unemployment rate is 44 percent.

We have said over and over again that the right of return is the solution to all of our miserable problems. That is why we protested on Monday. That is why we have been protesting since March 30. Two-thirds of Palestinians in Gaza are refugees from lands stolen by Israel in 1948.

The Great Return March is the first time in my life that I have seen a huge number of people uniting and calling for right of return. It is the decision of ordinary Palestinians in Gaza, and it is the call for everyone who is concerned about humanity. There is only one flag that has been rising up in the marches, carried by kids, the elderly, journalists, nurses, doctors, and teachers. It is Palestine’s.

Issam, a 15 year-old boy from Khan-Younis, was injured with a tear gas canister that was dropped on his head on Monday. He rejoined the march the next day, while his head was still bandaged.

Asked whether he is already healed or still in pain he replied, “I am in pain, but I cannot leave my friends alone today, and we will fly our kites. We spent last night preparing it. We wrote on it: ‘Palestine, we are coming back.’” These are the kites that children fly near the buffer zone, the ones that have been deemed strategic threats by Israel and used as excuses to shoot children.

Last week, my 11-year-old brother Mohammed decided to take his bird to set him free at the buffer zone. He wanted his bird to cross the fence, even when he couldn’t.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Democrats Join In to Make Torture a Bipartisan Affair Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Friday, 18 May 2018 11:49

Pierce writes: "Sometimes, you just want to give up. Or at least, shake the country by its exceptionalism and tell it to look in a mirror."

Gina Haspel is sworn in to testify at her confirmation hearing before the Senate intelligence committee. (photo: Alex Branson/AP)
Gina Haspel is sworn in to testify at her confirmation hearing before the Senate intelligence committee. (photo: Alex Branson/AP)


Democrats Join In to Make Torture a Bipartisan Affair

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

18 May 18


And, still, a great career move.

ometimes, you just want to give up. Or at least, shake the country by its exceptionalism and tell it to look in a mirror. From CNN:

Haspel was confirmed in a 54-45 vote, the culmination of a roller-coaster nominationthat appeared to be in danger at several points after she was abruptly selected by President Donald Trump in March. Three Republicans opposed Haspel's nomination: Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Jeff Flake of Arizona and John McCain of Arizona, although McCain did not vote because he's battling brain cancer at home. But Haspel secured enough votes to win confirmation with the backing of six Democrats, including Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Most of the Democratic votes in favor of Haspel came from senators who are up for re-election in November in states that Trump won in 2016, including Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Bill Nelson of Florida. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire also voted in favor of Haspel's confirmation.

There remain senators who are not convinced that Haspel has been honest about what happened on her watch, in Thailand and elsewhere.

"What I can say is her classified comments about her background have been as troubling as her public testimony," Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on the Senate floor Thursday.

The excuses are about what you’d expect.

Democrats who backed Haspel pointed to her 33-year CIA career, 32 years of which was spent undercover, as well as her broad support from former intelligence officials, including many senior Obama administration officials. "Gina Haspel is among one of the most qualified people to be nominated to be director of the CIA," Warner said. "I feel safer knowing the CIA has Miss Haspel at the helm. ... I believe Gina Haspel should be confirmed. I look forward to supporting her."

And The Washington Post has nailed the bipartisan enthusiasm for someone who does not yet appear to have been honest about what she did when she was just following orders.

She appears to have been helped by some last-minute arm-twisting by former CIA directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta, who contacted at least five of the six Democrats who endorsed her bid to join President Trump’s Cabinet, according to people with knowledge of the interactions.

Torture is now forgivable. Torture is now a career move. Torture is now a weapon in abeyance. Torture is now bipartisan, and everybody’s happy to put it behind us. Until the next time.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: 365 Days Later, Trump Is Still Terrified of Mueller Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48249"><span class="small">Ryan Bort, Rolling Stone</span></a>   
Friday, 18 May 2018 11:04

Bort writes: "Today marks the one-year anniversary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's appointment to investigate a possible connection between the Trump campaign and Russian meddling in the 2016 election."

President Trump. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)
President Trump. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)


365 Days Later, Trump Is Still Terrified of Mueller

By Ryan Bort, Rolling Stone

18 May 18


Happy anniversary, special counsel

oday marks the one-year anniversary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s appointment to investigate a possible connection between the Trump campaign and Russian meddling in the 2016 election. So far, the investigation has yielded eight indictments against 22 individuals and businesses. Campaign aide Rick Gates, former foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos and former national security adviser Michael Flynn have all pled guilty to charges stemming from the investigation. Though he has pled not guilty, former campaign chairman Paul Manafort has been indicted for a vast array of financial crimes. But despite the criminality surrounding his campaign, Donald Trump is still president of the United States, and on Thursday morning he took to Twitter to "celebrate."

Trump sort-of-lawyer Rudy Giuliani took the opportunity to go on Fox News and gloat about how Mueller's investigators told Trump's legal team that the special counsel could not indict the president (which is basically true). Giuliani also reiterated his steadfast belief that Mueller would also not be able to subpoena the president (which is debatable). "If we’re in for a long investigation, we’ll fight every single thing," Giuliani, eyes bulging, said. "If you’re innocent, you’ve got to fight back, and the president is completely innocent." He capped it off with the refrain that the investigation is "a damn witch hunt."

Though Trump and his legal team seem confident they can withstand any punches Mueller may try to throw at them, as long as the investigation continues, so too will the dogged effort to discredit it. On Thursday morning, Team Witch Hunt seized on a detail from a New York Times piece about the investigation's origins. According to officials interviewed by the Times, "at least one government informant met several times" with Trump advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos prior to the election. Because of their ties to Russia, Page and Papadopoulos – along with Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn – were being investigated as the FBI sought to determine whether Trump's campaign was colluding with Russia. The investigation, dubbed Crossfire Hurricane, was set off after the FBI learned that a "wine-fueled" Papadopoulos indicated to an Australian ambassador that the campaign had knowledge of Russian meddling before it occurred. This was deemed significant.

The Times piece goes on to note how the informant or informants meeting with Page and Papadopolous has become "a politically contentious point, with Mr. Trump’s allies questioning whether the F.B.I. was spying on the Trump campaign or trying to entrap campaign officials."

Fox News and Trump's team took this as an invitation to question the FBI further, and with more vehemence. Giuliani called it "the biggest scandal in the history of this town" and said that it could "challenge the legitimacy of the entire investigation." He also said that "it would suggest they were out to frame him," a claim which asks the word "suggest" to do an undue amount of heavy lifting.

Trump followed Giuliani's lead, tweeting that it could be "bigger than Watergate!"

In the Fox News segment to which Trump is referring, McCarthy claims that because this was a counterintelligence investigation, they shouldn’t have been looking into the Trump campaign, as there was no hard evidence of collusion. Instead, he argues, they should have investigated Russia. But investigating counterintelligence is part of what the FBI does, especially if it has led agents to believe a presidential campaign may have knowledge that a foreign adversary is meddling in the election. Take it from Marco Rubio, who reviewed the case as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "There was a growing body of evidence that a foreign government was attempting to interfere in both the process and the debate surrounding our elections, and their job is to investigate counterintelligence," he said. "That’s what they did."

The Times piece bring up several questions about the how the investigation was conducted. The FBI had just wrapped up the case on Hillary Clinton's emails, and James Comey and company wanted to make sure their investigation into Trump's campaign didn't leak to the press, as they were worried it would lend credence to Trump's claims that the election was rigged. When many officials began to sense that Trump likely would not win the election, they pumped the brakes even more. Officials interviewed by the Times agree the FBI could have been more aggressive.

"There is always a high degree of caution before taking overt steps in a counterintelligence investigation," Mary McCord, a Justice Department veteran who served as a top national security prosecutor during much of the first nine months of the investigation, told the Times. "And that could have worked to the president’s benefit here." McCord added that she "never saw anything that resembled a witch hunt or suggested that the bureau’s approach to the investigation was politically driven."

The actual biggest instance of the FBI breaking with tradition prior to the election came on October 28th, when Comey sent a letter to Congress about the existence emails that could be pertinent to the Clinton investigation. They, of course, turned out not to be pertinent, and Clinton went on to lose the election. By contrast, the Times notes that the FBI "hewed closely to the rules" while investigating the Trump campaign.

This is all irrelevant to Giuliani and Trump, who will likely never cease to claim to cry foul. After Trump's Thursday morning tweet about the "Obama FBI" alleged spying practices, the president's Twitter feed returned to its regularly scheduled programming.

Happy birthday, Witch Hunt.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 Next > End >>

Page 1250 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN