RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: Conservatives Hate That the Mueller Probe Is Taking So Long - but Love When Investigations Into Police Brutality Drag On Forever Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48257"><span class="small">Shaun King, The Intercept</span></a>   
Thursday, 26 July 2018 10:59

King writes: "Whether you like it or not, Mueller's investigation is both methodical and productive. They're not just spinning their wheels. I get the feeling that his entire team is actually working day and night to uncover and prosecute wrongdoing."

Protesters gather in New York following the Grand Jury's decision not to charge the officer who killed Eric Garner with a chokehold. (photo: Andrew Burton/Getty)
Protesters gather in New York following the Grand Jury's decision not to charge the officer who killed Eric Garner with a chokehold. (photo: Andrew Burton/Getty)


Conservatives Hate That the Mueller Probe Is Taking So Long - but Love When Investigations Into Police Brutality Drag On Forever

By Shaun King, The Intercept

26 July 18

bout 14 months ago, former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed as special counsel to investigate the role of Russian interference in the 2016 election. On a daily basis, conservatives moan and groan about how long the investigation is taking and publicly demand that he wraps it up.

Never mind the fact that the investigation has yielded dozens of felony indictments, guilty pleas, and cooperating witnesses. Never mind the fact that President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser and campaign manager have been swept up in this probe. Never mind the fact that it has unearthed evidence of a conspiracy to undermine the 2016 presidential election to tilt it Trump’s favor.

What I’m saying is this: Whether you like it or not, Mueller’s investigation is both methodical and productive. They’re not just spinning their wheels. I get the feeling that his entire team is actually working day and night to uncover and prosecute wrongdoing.

And this clearly irritates conservatives. In a poll earlier this year, nearly 80 percent of Republicans said that the investigation should end soon, and another poll found that around 30 percent of voters said that the investigation is unfair.

As an activist and organizer for families who’ve been affected by police brutality, this sudden frustration with long, meandering investigations from conservatives surprises me. Over four years ago, on the morning of July 17, 2014, New York Police Department Officer Daniel Pantaleo choked Eric Garner to death on a Staten Island sidewalk. The public medical examiner determined that Garner’s death was by asphyxiation. It was in broad daylight for dozens of witnesses to see. It was caught on film from start to finish. The chokehold was banned by the NYPD years before this incident ever took place. And yet, here we are, in month 48 of the “investigation” into Garner’s death. It’s been almost 1,500 days.

And I have to put quotation marks around “investigation,” because, unlike the Mueller probe, you’d struggle to find a single credible person in the country that actually believes that the city, state, or federal government has actually been investigating the Garner case for 48 months. Want to talk about “fake news”? That’s fake news.

I’d love to see the actual minutes and transcripts of what everybody has been investigating for the past 1,500 days. What did you do on day 301, day 643, day 897, day 1,044, day 1,250? It’s all bogus. This investigation should’ve been over in 2014. It’s all local. Every witness was local. It was filmed. It had a beginning, middle, and fatal end that are all clear and known.

Yet Pantaleo has not even been fired.

And I don’t know if I’ve seen a single conservative come out and say, “You know what, this investigation is dragging on. It needs to come to an end.”

In fact, I don’t think I’ve seen a single conservative say that about any one of the thousands and thousands of killings by police over the past several years. Without fail, the investigations go on for years and years, causing tremendous pain and anguish for the families of the victims, only for the end result to almost always be absolutely nothing.

It is increasingly clear to me that when it comes to investigations into police shootings in this country, the entire law enforcement community, from police departments and prosecutors, to state attorney generals, and the Department, along with all of their backers, aren’t actually leading complex, multiyear investigations into these cases. They are simply using the word “investigation” as a delay tactic to stonewall activists, organizers, and even the scrutiny of local and national media, so that when they finally announce that they aren’t planning to do anything significant about the injustice, the response will be muted.

What’s increasingly clear to me is this: Conservatives don’t have an actual problem with long investigations. They don’t have a real problem with them going on for years and years on end — when they are over the wrongful deaths of black people. Emmett Till was murdered in 1955, a full 63 years ago, and our government just reopened its “investigation.” No — long investigations have never bothered them.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: On Clownfish and the Orange Octopus Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=27921"><span class="small">Mort Rosenblum, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Thursday, 26 July 2018 08:42

Rosenblum writes: "My global ocean saga will have to wait. I got sidetracked by TV, watching a blow-dried clownfish interview an orange octopus who seems oblivious to the hammerhead shark circling around, sizing him up as a lunchtime snack."

Fox News host Tucker Carlson. (photo: Fox News)
Fox News host Tucker Carlson. (photo: Fox News)


On Clownfish and the Orange Octopus

By Mort Rosenblum, Reader Supported News

26 July 18

 

RAGUIGNAN, France – My global ocean saga will have to wait. I got sidetracked by TV, watching a blow-dried clownfish interview an orange octopus who seems oblivious to the hammerhead shark circling around, sizing him up as a lunchtime snack.

As Tucker Carlson tossed puffballs at Donald Trump on Fox “News” last week, their exchange on tiny Montenegro shed harsh light on how isolated so many Americans have become from the actual world – and how few seem troubled by the perils of ignorance.

Stick with me; this is about much more than Montenegro. But let’s start there.

“They’re very aggressive people,” Trump said. Prime Minister Dusko Markovic, in fact, was gently accommodating when Trump aggressively shoved him aside without a word or even a glance to bull forward for a group photo at the Brussels NATO summit last year.

But Montenegrins are no pushovers. Partisans rose up against the Axis in 1941 and nearly ran Mussolini’s troops back over their border. After the war, as part of Yugoslavia, they helped convince Stalin to back off and let Marshal Tito remain outside the Iron Curtain.

I toured Montenegro in 1992 when it stood by Serbia as Yugoslavia fell apart. Croatia had been invaded. Bosnia would be next. Police grilled me for a grim hour about the Croatian plates on my rental car. But I loved the place, from its old mountaintop royal capital at Cetinje to gorgeous beaches in a province half the size of Connecticut.

Today, Montenegro deserves that cliché: tourist paradise. With a 2,000-man army, it is not likely to invade Russia. Nor is it eager for Vladimir Putin to topple the government, as Russians attempted to do in 2014, and take control of its Adriatic naval base opposite Italy.

Carlson opined that NATO is outmoded these days. “Why,” he asked, “should my son go to war to defend Montenegro?”

For starters, he wouldn’t have to. Military service is voluntary in America. In any case, U.S. troops mostly do logistics, intelligence, and air operations. In Bosnia, NATO partners and poor sods like ill-equipped Nigerians in blue U.N. helmets did the “harm’s way” part.

Carlson, as usual, made the story about him and missed the point. Like any old proverb – a stitch in time, for instance – defense is about discouraging aggressors from starting with a small appetizer before digging into the main course. Hence NATO and Putin’s antipathy toward it.

Europeans have learned the hard way how easily wars start. In 1914, a Serb hothead shot an Austrian archduke in Sarajevo down the road from Montenegro. Within four years, 11 million soldiers and six million civilians were dead. In 1938, Britain’s prime minister appeased Hitler and told Parliament he had made peace.

The potential threat from Moscow is not outright war. Both sides have enough nukes to destroy the planet. But Trump, because of his own sycophantic non-diplomacy, hasn’t got a chance against Vladimir Putin if it comes down to Russian roulette.

In Helsinki, Trump skipped over Crimea, the first European land grab since the Soviet Union annexed Eastern Europe and the Baltic states. That, he said, was on Obama’s watch. The presidency is about him, not the nation he is sworn to protect. He dismisses Russian influence in elections, which Robert Mueller and U.S. intelligence agencies make blindingly clear.

As Clint Eastwood’s Dirty Harry put it indelicately but aptly, “Opinions are like assholes; everybody’s got one.” These days, when facts in broad context are so crucial, clownfish like Carlson skew the national agenda, striking much of America blind, deaf and dumb.

It gets worse. For too many, news is now drama heightened by argument. Even quality newspapers cut corners to survive. Television executives focus on what drives up viewership and profit. And in a wired world of karaoke journalism, anyone can chime in.

That cave in Thailand was a huge story, a tribute to the human spirit and comforting proof that a world can come together against horrendous odds. But for nine days, it was almost the only story Americans heard about beyond their own down-the-rabbit-hole politics.

During that time, at least 135,000 kids died elsewhere for lack of a little food or simple medicine. At least seven million children die that way each year. Countless others fall victim to conflict. But the Trump administration is slashing aid and turning away refugees – yet another reason why an unspecified “they” hate us.

Last week, BBC’s program “The Reporters” profiled the feted Thai survivors. But first Orla Guerin focused on an 11-year-old boy, Ramsey, among eight million Yemenis near starvation after three years of U.S.-backed Saudi bombing. His father was blown to unrecognizable bits. Now he is the man of what’s left of his family.

It then had an update on 28 Qatari royals captured last year while hunting in Iraq. Qatar, BBC reported, is paying a ransom of close to $1 billion to Hezbollah. That is a story to worry about, deeply, now that Trump has directed fire-and-fury threats at Iran.

Trump attempts to intimidate Iran by capitalizing his tweets. (Mike Pompeo calls it a mafia-run state, tone deaf to the irony of his boss’s mobbed-up past.)

Iranian students seized 52 hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held them for 444 days. Jimmy Carter’s failed rescue (foiled by a sandstorm – shit that happens in the Middle East) cost an under-sung good president a second term. Instead, we got Reaganomics.

Saddam Hussein, exploiting the hostage crisis, invaded Iran. Eight years later, after human waves turned back Iraq’s elite troops, war ended in stalemate with a million fighters and innocents dead. Warning Iran’s hardline theocrats they “will suffer” is not a smart approach.

Trump cultists miss the other side of Iran, a rich and enlightened society that goes back 2,500 years. They want peaceable interplay with the rest of the world. And they were headed toward that with the nuclear accord. Now “Death to the Great Satan” signs are out again.

That is one flashpoint. North Korea, despite Trump’s premature lust for a Nobel Prize, is so far still another one. China? Don’t get me started.

Meantime, we all but ignore the long-term challenges, such as the Empty Seas series still on hold. Climatic disasters get covered, but without the why and what next. Japan, after deadly floods it has never known, now faces killer heat that is cool compared to soaring temperatures elsewhere. Biblical deluges, crop failure and icebergs ramming Greenland ought to be a clue.

And we overlook the contempt abroad for a nation that makes excuses for a president who blasts past every synonym for reprehensible. Trump is a shark in the realm of real estate, but in the wider world octopus is a better metaphor.

BBC’s “Panorama” last week broadcast a carefully reported half hour on how his tentacles probed and grabbed unwilling young women, just as he boasted in the Hollywood Access video. Sex in high office is nothing new, but his hypocrisy reveals a total absence of character.

Trump raised the issue by bringing Bill Clinton’s accusers to a campaign debate with Hillary. He said she abetted his disgusting adultery.

BBC showed convincing testimony of Trump’s depredations. After women spoke, video showed him denying everything, right hand raised as if in court. He mocked one as too ugly for his attention. Another produced a distraught email she’d sent her parents at the time. Others told how he ogled undressed girls as young as 15 at a teenage beauty pageant.

But Republicans stick with him. Approval for his foreign policy grows with each reckless move, despite almost unanimous warnings from non-partisan economists that his trade war and tariffs portend a coming collapse.

The most disturbing polls suggest that only a third to half of eligible voters under 25 will bother to cast ballots in November. I teach a smart sampling of those who will, and they are worried. Mostly, they say, their apathetic friends simply don’t understand why it matters.

When “news” is skewed by clownfish who spend more time with their hairdresser than history books, that is hardly surprising. And when people believe whatever bullshit appeals to their prejudices and dismiss actual reporting as fake, demagogic con men rule.



Mort Rosenblum has reported from seven continents as Associated Press special correspondent, edited the International Herald Tribune in Paris, and written 14 books on subjects ranging from global geopolitics to chocolate. He now runs MortReport.org.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Alex Jones Should Be Cross-Examined in Front of the Nation Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Wednesday, 25 July 2018 13:29

Pierce writes: "The crazy train has opened a new depot in Hartford."

Host of Infowars radio and web show, Alex Jones. (photo: Brooks Craft/Getty)
Host of Infowars radio and web show, Alex Jones. (photo: Brooks Craft/Getty)


Alex Jones Should Be Cross-Examined in Front of the Nation

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

25 July 18

 

he crazy train has opened a new depot in Hartford. Back in April, families who lost children in the Sandy Hook massacre in 2012 filed a defamation suit against radio crazy person Alex Jones for initially saying on his crazy person’s electric radio program that the massacre was a hoax and that their children were not really dead, but, rather, “crisis actors” in a drama aimed at grabbing all the guns. (Later, Jones copped to believing that the massacre actually happened. What a guy.)

The lawsuit has progressed now to an attempt by Jones and his interesting legal team to dismiss the suit. This means that Jones and his interesting legal team have to present documents supporting their motion. This means fun! From CBS News:

"Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein relied on allegations from 'Deep Throat' to link the Nixon Administration to the Watergate break-in," his lawyers wrote in filing for a dismissal. "Such journalism, questioning official narratives, would be chilled if reporters were subject to liability if they turned out to be wrong,"

There are also lawsuits filed in Texas, where Jones’ crazy person’s electric radio program is based. There, an interesting character named Wolfgang Halbig is also named as a defendant.

Halbig, a former police officer who lives in Sorrento, Florida, said in April that he believes people died in the shooting, but that authorities refuse to clear up what he believes are discrepancies in the official story. Jones acknowledged allowing Halbig and others to question the shooting on his show, but said he has a constitutional right to do that. "To stifle the press (by making them liable for merely interviewing people who have strange theories) will simply turn this human tragedy into a Constitutional one," his attorneys wrote.

To be entirely honest, this case does contain some interesting constitutional questions. It will test the constitutional limits on things like talk radio, pundit TV, and the wilder fringes of Internet broadcasting.

And Jones’ interesting legal team has defended not only neo-Nazi goons, but also perennial New Hampshire primary character Vermin Supreme. From HuffPost:

Marc Randazza has represented a gay porn producer, far-right conspiracy theorist Mike Cernovich, civil rights lawyer Lisa Bloom, performance artist and activist Vermin Supreme, and the Satanic Temple, among others. He’s also appeared on Infowars in the past. Currently, the firm is representing Andrew Anglin, co-founder of the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer.
“If you’re a First Amendment attorney, and you say, ’This person’s speech is good enough for me, but this person’s isn’t,’ you’re doing it wrong,” Randazza recently told The Daily Beast. Anglin is being sued by Tanya Gersh after Anglin allegedly directed his followers to harass and intimidate the Montana woman. Gersh said that she has received more than 700 threatening and harassing communications because of Anglin’s actions ? which allegedly began after she got into a feud with the mother of white supremacist Richard Spencer.

The question seems to be whether or not Jones’s program defamed Adam Lanza’s victims by claiming that they were participants in a hoax—namely, that they weren’t really dead. My guess is that, if they survive the motion to dismiss, these suits will be settled quietly somewhere down the line. But, if there were any true justice to be found here, Jones would have to go all the way through the legal mill, testifying publicly and squirming under cross-examination, all with the entire nation watching him sweat and holler. It would be great TV.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | "Reject the Evidence of Your Ears": Trump, Orwell, and Cohen Bunny Tape Print
Wednesday, 25 July 2018 11:24

Cole writes: "Trump's success stems in large part from his hucksterism, from his disregard for facts and his ability to pull the wool over the eyes of his cultists. It also stems from a shrewd use of logical fallacies in argument."

Michael Cohen, longtime personal lawyer for President Trump. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty)
Michael Cohen, longtime personal lawyer for President Trump. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty)


"Reject the Evidence of Your Ears": Trump, Orwell, and Cohen Bunny Tape

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

25 July 18

 

rump’s success stems in large part from his hucksterism, from his disregard for facts and his ability to pull the wool over the eyes of his cultists. It also stems from a shrewd use of logical fallacies in argument.

After the catastrophic Helsinki summit, the question was, ‘Is he Putin’s poodle?’

That is a good thing, his flacks say, since peace with a nuclear power is much better than conflict.

This way of thinking is a logical fallacy, known as the False Dilemma. There just are other possibilities that fall between nuclear Armageddon and sucking up to Putin. For instance, you could even have a summit with him, and seek cooperation where there is overlap in interests, but just be forthright that you don’t think his unilateral annexation of Crimea and attempt to usurp other Ukrainian territory is right.

Speaking to the Veterans of Foreign Wars yesterday, Trump cautioned his audience about the reporting on Helsinki and on the Mueller investigation,

“Just remember, what you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”

Twitter knew what to do with this unhinged remark. People quoted George Orwell’s 1984:

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

As the great science fiction writer Cory Doctorow pointed out, Eric “George Orwell” Blair, the anarcho-syndicalist journalist who fought in the Spanish Civil War, did not write 1984 as a prediction of the future but as a critique of his own present:

“Orwell didn’t worry about a future dominated by the view-screens from 1984, he worried about a present in which technology was changing the balance of power, creating opportunities for the state to enforce its power over individuals at ever-more-granular levels.”

Then, when on Tuesday night the Cohen tape was leaked to CNN, the Trump team actually attempted to dictate how it was heard by releasing an obviously doctored transcript of it.

Cohen sets up a dummy corporation for buying Playboy bunny Karen McDougal’s silence about their year-long affair, to reimburse David Pecker (yes!) of the National Enquirer for offering her an op-ed contract on condition she not reveal the affair.

Here’s the transcript according to WaPo:

COHEN: … Um, I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend, David, you know, so that — I’m going to do that right away. I’ve actually come up and I’ve spoken —

TRUMP: Give it to me and get me a [UNINTELLIGIBLE].

COHEN: And, I’ve spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with …

TRUMP: So, what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?

COHEN: … Funding .?.?. Yes. Um, and it’s all the stuff.

TRUMP: Yeah, I was thinking about that.

COHEN: All the stuff. Because — here, you never know where that company — you never know what he’s —

TRUMP: Maybe he gets hit by a truck.

COHEN: Correct. So, I’m all over that. And, I spoke to Allen about it, when it comes time for the financing, which will be —

TRUMP: Wait a sec, what financing?

COHEN: Well, I’ll have to pay him something.

TRUMP: [UNINTELLIGIBLE] pay with cash.

COHEN: No, no, no, no, no. I got it.

TRUMP: Check.

The Trump team, however, released their own version of the transcript, in which they maintain that Trump wasn’t suggesting that Cohen pay with cash but rather was insisting that Cohen pay by check.

Dispassionate news sources have not agreed with Giuliani’s spin.

In fact, Trump sent Hope Hicks out to deny any knowledge at all of the “catch and kill” contract between the National Enquirer and McDougal. “We have no knowledge of any of this,” she said.

But the tape shows that Trump knew all about it down to discussing how exactly to reimburse Mr. Pecker for the McDougal hush money.

“I’ll have to pay him something,” Cohen told Trump.

Trump wanted it all to be off the books. “Pay with cash,” he instructed.

Cohen knew he was taping himself qnd knew what paying with cash would make the whole thing look like. “No, no, no…” he protested.

It is not actually clear to me whether it is Cohen who then says “check” or Trump. If the latter, he is caving to Cohen’s refusal to pay Pecker cash.

In the end, the dummy corporation did not actually make a payment to Mr. Pecker. It is not clear that anything very illegal happened here.

It is not illegality that is of concern here. It is Trump’s instruction to Hope Hicks to deny it all. “We have no knowledge…”

The same denials have attended the numerous meetings of Trump associates with Russian contacts.

Back when Bush & Co. invaded Iraq, one of them, perhaps Karl Rove, gave an interview with Ron Suskind about criticism of the war of aggression on Iraq:

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality–judiciously, as you will–we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

At the time, I called this way of thinking “Right Maoism,” after the Chinese leader’s insistence that he could industrialize China by sheer force of will, a fantasy that led to millions of deaths.

Likewise, of course, the Bushies were not “an empire” in Iraq but just incompetents who helped destroy the Middle East.

The response to the Suskind interview was the internet meme of the “reality-based community.”

Now Right Maoism has reemerged under Trump, even more virulently than under Bush. Just as Bush attempted to shape American perceptions of Iraq by constantly declaring the US occupation a shining beacon on a hill, so Trump attempts to portray his presidency as a march from victory to victory. why, he has denuclearized South Korea and cowed Iran, destroyed ISIL and put China in its place.

The US public was invested for perhaps 3 years in the Iraq War before they started rethinking the calamity, as evidenced in the 2006 midterms. In the case of Trump, they don’t have the luxury of mulling it all over for 3 years or more.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Without the Russians, Trump Wouldn't Have Won Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48740"><span class="small">Max Boot, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Wednesday, 25 July 2018 10:22

Boot writes: "Even if the Russians had failed, they still attacked our democracy. Yet they didn't fail: Trump won."

Russian president Vladimir Putin. (photo: Reuters)
Russian president Vladimir Putin. (photo: Reuters)


Without the Russians, Trump Wouldn't Have Won

By Max Boot, The Washington Post

25 July 18

 

resident Trump is willing, under duress, to briefly and begrudgingly admit that Russian “meddling” took place in 2016 before reverting to calling it a “big hoax.” But he always maintains that the plot against America had no impact; he describes it as a “Democrat excuse for losing the ’16 Election.” Faithfully echoing the president, other Republicans, such as House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), say it’s “clear” that the Russian interference “didn’t have a material effect on our elections.” White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders even claims that the U.S. intelligence community reached that conclusion.

Not quite. Here is the intelligence community’s assessment, partially declassified in January 2017: “We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.” When then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo claimed last fall that “the intelligence community's assessment is that the Russian meddling that took place did not affect the outcome of the election,” his own agency rebuked him.

While the intelligence agencies are silent on the impact of Russia’s attack, outside experts who have examined the Kremlin campaign — which included stealing and sharing Democratic Party emails, spreading propaganda online and hacking state voter rolls — have concluded that it did affect an extremely close election decided by fewer than 80,000 votes in three states. Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, writes in his recent book, “Messing with the Enemy,” that “Russia absolutely influenced the U.S. presidential election,” especially in Michigan and Wisconsin, where Trump’s winning margin was less than 1 percent in each state.

We still don’t know the full extent of the Russian interference, but we know its propaganda reached 126 million people via Facebook alone. A BuzzFeed analysis found that fake news stories on Facebook generated more social engagement in the last three months of the campaign than did legitimate articles: The “20 top-performing false election stories from hoax sites and hyperpartisan blogs generated 8,711,000 shares, reactions, and comments on Facebook.” Almost all of this “fake news” was either started or spread by Russian bots, including claims that the pope had endorsed Trump and that Hillary Clinton had sold weapons to the Islamic State.

Elsewhere on social media, tens of thousands of Russian bots spread pro-Trump messages on Twitter, which has already notified about 1.4 million users that they interacted with Russian accounts. The Russian disinformation, propagating hashtags such as #Hillary4Prison and #MAGA, reflected what the Trump campaign was saying. The Russian bots even claimed after every presidential debate that Trump had won, whereas objective viewers gave each one to Clinton.

Russia also hacked voting systems in at least 39 states, and while there is no evidence that vote tallies were changed, Russians may have used the stolen data to target their social media or shared the results with the Trump campaign. The Senate Intelligence Committee found that “in a small number of states” the Russians may have been able to “alter or delete voter registration data,” potentially disenfranchising Clinton voters.

And then there was the crucial impact of the Russian hacks of Democratic documents disseminated primarily by WikiLeaks. The first tranche of stolen documents — more than 19,000 emails and 8,000 attachments — was strategically released on July 22, 2016, three days before the Democratic convention. The resulting news coverage disrupted the Clinton campaign’s plans by creating the impression that the Democratic National Committee was biased against Bernie Sanders and forcing DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to resign.

The second tranche of stolen documents was released on Oct. 7, just 29 minutes after The Post reported on the “Access Hollywood” videotape in which Trump is heard boasting about grabbing women by the genitals. These emails, stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, distracted voter attention by revealing the transcripts of lucrative speeches Clinton had given to Goldman Sachs, a populist boogeyman.

A third release of stolen emails, on Oct. 11, revealed that Democratic operative Donna Brazile, while working at CNN, had provided debate questions to Clinton during the primaries and that senior Democratic operatives, who were themselves Catholics, had exchanged emails disparaging Republicans who cherry-picked their faith for political gain. This fueled Trump’s narrative that the election was “rigged” and that the “Clinton team” was, as he said, “viciously attacking Catholics and Evangelicals.” The latter charge, unfair as it was, proved especially important in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania — swing states with lots of Catholic voters.

Little wonder that Trump said “I love WikiLeaks” and mentioned its revelations 164 times in the last month of the campaign. “This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable,” Trump said on Oct. 12. Eight days later, he marveled, “Boy, that WikiLeaks has done a job on her, hasn’t it?”

Now, by contrast, Trump and his apologists pretend that the Russian intervention — including the WikiLeaks revelations — was no big deal. That beggars belief. Even if the Russians had failed, they still attacked our democracy. Yet they didn’t fail: Trump won. Russian disinformation wasn’t the only factor in the outcome and was probably less important in the end than FBI Director James B. Comey’s announcement 11 days before the election that he was reopening the Clinton email investigation. But Watts concludes: “Without the Russian influence effort, I believe Trump would not have even been within striking distance of Clinton on Election Day.” That is the inconvenient truth the Putin Republicans won’t admit.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 Next > End >>

Page 1184 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN