RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Trump's Attempt to Strongarm Europe on Iran Crashes and Burns Print
Sunday, 17 February 2019 09:38

Cole writes: "On Friday at a Munich security meeting, Germany's foreign minister, Heiko Maas, replied to the chiding of Vice President Mike Pence that Iran is destabilizing the region."

Mike Pence. (photo: Cengiz Yar/AFP/Getty Images)
Mike Pence. (photo: Cengiz Yar/AFP/Getty Images)


Trump's Attempt to Strongarm Europe on Iran Crashes and Burns

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

17 February 19

 

rance24 reports that Trump’s attempt to dissuade the Europeans from continuing their support for the 2015 Iran nuclear deal has backfired.

On Friday at a Munich security meeting, Germany’s foreign minister, Heiko Maas, replied to the chiding of Vice President Mike Pence that Iran is destabilizing the region. Maas remarked that “Together with the British, the French and the entire European Union, we have found a means to allow Iran to remain in the nuclear accord. Our objective remains the lack of nuclear weapons, precisely because Iran destablizes the region.” Without the accord, “the region will not be more secure, but would in fact take a further step toward open confrontation.”

Frederica Mogherini, the European Union’s High Representative for foreign affairs, said, “We think that [this accord] is fundamental and crucial for our security.” The agreement “is a basic pillar of the architecture of nuclear non-proliferation at the global level.”

Pence had, after a visit to the Holocaust death camp at Auschwitz, accused Iran of fomenting a virulent anti-Semitism reminiscent of that of the Nazis.

[Iran has a small Jewish community with a representative in Parliament, which is not very much like Nazism. In contrast, Donald Trump called the Neonazis who shouted “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville “very fine people.” Pence has never spoken out about the dangers of white nationalism in the United States. – JC]

The French foreign minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian, was asked Friday about US policies in northeast Syria, remarking on the “mystery” that Trump’s decision to pull US troops out could only have the result of helping Iran.

“How can you be extremely firm with regard to Iran and at the same time abandon the northwest of Syria, when you know that at the end of the story you are thereby favoring the Iranian presence in the region.” Le Drian said, “For me, it is a mystery.”

The European rebuke, with the sardonic raising of a single eyebrow in which French foreign ministers specialize, came in the wake of the US-sponsored anti-Iran conference in Warsaw. Most countries sent low-level delegations and the mete was widely considered a failure.

At Warsaw, the foreign minister of the Yemeni government in exile of President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi was seated next to Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu. It was a major propaganda victory for the Houthi rebels who control much of north Yemen, inasmuch as most Yemenis view Israel with suspicion and denounce its Occupation of the Palestinians. Trump has managed to tie an Israel connection around the neck of the beleaugured Mansour Hadi government.

Not only could Trump not rally Europe to his anti-Iran crusade, but even the anti-Iran states of the Gulf have split because of the Saudi-led boycott of Qatar. With a deep fissure in the Gulf Cooperation Council and an AWOL Europe, Trump’s grand coalition against Iran has fallen almost completely apart.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
A Few Words From a Top Executive Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=47905"><span class="small">Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website</span></a>   
Saturday, 16 February 2019 13:38

Keillor writes: "Now that Executive Time has taken root at the top level of government, I am working more of it into my own busy schedule, leaving the Rectangular Office and holing up in the family quarters for what some might call daydreaming, but who cares what they think?"

Garrison Keillor. (photo: WPPB)
Garrison Keillor. (photo: WPPB)


A Few Words From a Top Executive

By Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website

16 February 19

 

ow that Executive Time has taken root at the top level of government, I am working more of it into my own busy schedule, leaving the Rectangular Office and holing up in the family quarters for what some might call daydreaming, but who cares what they think? They’re losers. Six hours a day of letting the mind wander freely, forgetting about my obligations, and simply roaming the Internet and picking up bits of information that my staff would probably never clue me in on.

Did you know that when Douglas MacArthur became a general, he hired his own public relations firm to promote his image back home? Did you know Paul McCartney heard “Yesterday” in a dream? And McAllen, Texas, in the Rio Grande Valley, is known as the City of Palms but also has a good deal of mesquite and deciduous trees. And the McCarran Act prohibited the picketing of federal courthouses. You learn these things roaming around freely rather than at a table with a bunch of smarty-pants sitting behind their name cards and each with his own glass of water. But the information is out there. All you need to do is connect the dots.

My Executive Time has been crucial to me ever since I was 16 and I hit the wall in mathematics and it looked like I was headed for a career in dishwashing, but sixty years later, look what happened. The math whizzes got good jobs that turned out to be treadmills to obsolescence. New Math came in, smarter people took over, many of them from foreign countries, and now I see those old whizzes taking tickets at parking ramps, whereas I’ve become a huge success. People stop me on the street all the time and say, “You have changed my life. You say things I’ve been thinking for years. How do you speak for the common man the way you do?”

The secret is Executive Time. For six hours a day, I remove myself from so-called experts and wise guys who think they got all the answers and I trust in my own instincts. I am smarter about most things than people are who’ve been studying them all their lives. I can run circles around those people.

The only math I did today was to tote up the tip on my steak sandwich, 10 percent. Just move the decimal point. The waiter wept. “A thousand thanks, sir. I have student loans to pay off, from fifteen years working for my Ph.D. in brain surgery.” The guy is an international authority on the multifocal cerebral infarcts along the left palpebral fissure of the lapsarian cortex and he’s warming up my coffee.

People ask if I’m going to run for president. I tell them, “I’m looking into it.” It looks like a good job to me. The helicopter service is incredible, there are beautiful motorcades, and wherever you go, all the microphones are pointed at you. Highly educated journalists, trying to catch every word you say.

The only thing keeping me from running is the fact that I’m Canadian. I walked across the border in northern Minnesota, no wall, nothing but an ordinary barbed wire fence, you just duck between the top and middle wires and you’re in. I learned to pronounce “about” as “about” and not “aboot,” and I was all set. There are millions of us here, escapees from harsh winter and socialized medicine. I bought my passport in Buffalo for $50. Nobody can tell except that I’m a little bowlegged from playing hockey and I get teary-eyed when I hear “O Canada.”

I settled in Minneapolis and joined the Mondale gang that controlled the supply of coffee coming into the state. He sold decaffeinated coffee to Lutherans, which made them passive and inattentive and that was the secret of his power. We took a cut of the collection and owned the green Jell-O concession. Him and me were all set.

So the phone rings and this lady says, “You can’t say ‘him and me.’” And I say, “I just said it and I meant it.” There are people like her in Minnesota who make a person feel small and that’s why Executive Time is so important: you get away from those people. For six hours a day, it’s just me and my hair. It’s beautiful hair and it’s intelligent. It speaks very quietly. It says, “Stick with me and you’ll be amazed where we wind up.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Guns, Crime, and Corruption: Bolsonaro's First Month in Office Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50176"><span class="small">Ian Merkel and Mariella Pittari, NACLA</span></a>   
Saturday, 16 February 2019 13:38

Excerpt: "In his first month in office, Jair Bolsonaro's administration in Brazil has managed to construct a government that will make good on many of its militaristic, anti-environmental, homophobic, and misogynistic promises, diffusing any doubt that his campaign rhetoric was merely hot air to rile up his base."

Jair Bolsonaro. (photo: Evaristo SA/Getty Images)
Jair Bolsonaro. (photo: Evaristo SA/Getty Images)


Guns, Crime, and Corruption: Bolsonaro's First Month in Office

By Ian Merkel and Mariella Pittari, NACLA

16 February 19


Jair Bolsonaro’s first month in office has been even worse than imagined, as the administration moves to loosen gun laws and pass a hardline penal reform amid corruption allegations against incoming senator Flávio Bolsonaro.

n his first month in office, Jair Bolsonaro’s administration in Brazil has managed to construct a government that will make good on many of its militaristic, anti-environmental, homophobic, and misogynistic promises, diffusing any doubt that his campaign rhetoric was merely hot air to rile up his base. A slew of executive decrees and legislative projects have demonstrated that Brazil’s new government intends to deliver on its platform of militarizing the police, easing access to firearms, undermining environmental regulation, dispossessing Indigenous lands, and inaugurating a new era of domestic and foreign affairs in Latin America that seeks to banish the Left from its ranks. With pro-government leadership stacking both the House and Senate, Bolsonaro’s legislative path, too, is clearer than many would have imagined.

To be sure, the government is tarnished by scandals that may ultimately undermine its ability to govern in the long term. The Brumadinho dam collapse, the growing revelations of the Bolsonaro family’s connections to militias in Rio de Janeiro, and the corruption allegations that grow ever-nearer to the self-identified anti-corruption president will pose considerable public relations, if not legal challenges, for the government. It is, however, just the beginning of the new government, which has thus far seemed able to form more alliances than initially seemed likely. The speed at which his administration will enact orthodox neoliberal economic reforms under Economic Minister Paulo Guedes, including pension reform and privatizations, remains to be seen. As for the rest, a month in, the situation in Brazil is as bad as its darkest promises, if not worse.

Now, nearly all adult Brazilians without a criminal background will be allowed to own weapons.One of Bolsonaro’s first measures as president was to loosen restrictions on gun ownership. In an executive decree, an effective form of legislation as alliances took shape in Congress, the president single-handedly made purchasing arms possible for millions more Brazilians when it had previously required police authorization demonstrating professional need or risk. Now, nearly all adult Brazilians without a criminal background will be allowed to own weapons. With the “Bancada-de-Bala” (“Bullet Caucus”) working closely with Minister of Justice Sérgio Moro, it seems likely that further legislation to make owning and carrying weapons will follow.

Moro, of course, has aligned himself with the forces of “the rule of law” after having prosecuted and convicted former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva for corrupt acts with limited evidence, making him unable to run for president in 2018. Operation Lava Jato, which Moro oversaw, targeted members of the left-wing Workers’ Party (PT) and left numerous politicians from the center and right-wing PMDB and PSDB unscathed, under the seemingly non-partisan justification of anti-corruption. But as Minister of Justice, Moro has focused less on anti-corruption and more on new measures that strengthen criminal law. The metaphorical “bleeding” of corruption that PMDB Senator Romero Jucá infamously sought to stop during the height of the Lava Jato has now been brought to a trickle.

This week, Moro presented a comprehensive proposal for reforming Brazil’s criminal and penal codes. The proposed changes include substantive reduction of punishment, or even its non-application, to police officers who commit manslaughter while on duty. It will enshrine in law a widened notion of legitimate defense in a country with one of the highest rates of police killings. In the state of Rio de Janeiro, some 1,444 people were killed by police in the first three quarters of 2018 alone.

As for those convicted, the proposed criminal reforms would make sentencing more severe and with fewer possibilities for commutation.As for those convicted, the proposed criminal reforms would make sentencing more severe and with fewer possibilities for commutation. With Brazil’s prison system already in a state of emergency, characterized by massive human rights violations and increasing mutinies, any increase in the prison population is bound to exacerbate the situation. All evidence suggests, too, that the ongoing privatization of the Brazilian prison system, already underway in São Paulo under João Doria’s governership, will soon occur at a national scale. The privatization of prison systems in countries such as the United States have led to decreased oversight and increased repression and abuses of prisoners, and is likely to carry similar results if enacted in Brazil.  

Moro’s anti-crime proposals come at the very moment that Flávio Bolsonaro, Jair Bolsonaro’s son and a Senator-elect, has been shown to have indirect connections with Rio de Janeiro’s infamous death squad, the Escritório do Crime (The Crime Bureau). According to a recent report in one of Brazil’s major news outlets, Flávio employed the mother and wife of former police captain Adriano Magalhães da Nóbrega—the strongman behind the Crime Bureau, and one of the suspects in the murder of socialist city councilwoman Marielle Franco last March. Mrs. And Ms. da Nóbrega were on the payroll for ten years in Flávio Bolsonaro’s office in Rio, where he was a state representative, until November 2018.

Flávio Bolsonaro has repeatedly praised Nóbrega for his “brilliance and gallantry” and for his “service to society performed with absolute swiftness and exceptional behavior,” despite—or perhaps because of—his long history of criminal involvement, including homicides. Though Flávio Bolsonaro claims no responsibility for Nóbrega’s actions, his proximity to the former police captain raises alarm not only about possible dealings with organized crime but also with political crime, as Sérgio Ramalho has written in The Intercept.

As is now notorious, during his campaign Bolsonaro pledged to purge left-wing “outlaws” and has claimed that the military dictatorship’s only mistake was not killing more people. Furthermore, his supporters have intimated, attacked, and even killed those who have expressed opposition to the new government’s agenda. In fact, the long-known but now-proven proximity of the Bolsonaros to militias in Rio prompted socialist LGBT congressman Jean Wyllys to flee Brazil after receiving death threats.

Beyond using intimidation to take down opposition, the Bolsonaro government is attempting to silence accusations surrounding Flávio’s financial dealings. The investigations against Flávio, temporarily suspended by Brazil’s Supreme Court, have been reopened. But the organ responsible for reporting unusual payments, the Council for Financial Activities Control, now falls under Moro’s control, so it is doubtful that future transactions will be made public. For the 58 million Brazilians who voted for Jair Bolsonaro, however, these scandals are most often seen as an attempt to unjustly derail the president.

The Bolsonaro government has also taken measures to enable greater surveillance and control of NGOs and civil society. At the same time, it has also sought to minimize transparency for its own actions. A provisional measure carrying the force of law—medida provisória 870— has granted low-ranking bureaucrats the authority to declare documents as top secret, removing them from citizens' view and therefore violating laws guaranteeing access to public information. This is worrying, of course, both in terms of holding the Bolsonaros and Brazil’s cabinet accountable for individual acts of corruption, but also for holding the government accountable for broader public problems.

Without a broader reckoning, companies such as Vale, which operates the Brumadinho dam, will continue to extract rapaciously and with impunity, preferring to pay fines for damage caused to the environment and society rather than change their practices, as the government abets their actions.Meanwhile, the ongoing tragedy in Brumadinho, Minas Gerais, the second major dam to collapse in Brazil since 2015, shows no signs of changing Bolsonaro’s language of environmental deregulation, even as the death toll now stands at 134 with close to 200 missing. Brumadinho, like other public infrastructure, was privatized during the 1990s under president Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Beyond constituting a natural disaster, it is a case in point for how privatizations have contributed to the ineffective and irresponsible management of public resources with profit superseding all other considerations. Without a broader reckoning, companies such as Vale, which operates the Brumadinho dam, will continue to extract rapaciously and with impunity, preferring to pay fines for damage caused to the environment and society rather than change their practices, as the government abets their actions.

In any case, the much weakened Environmental Ministry, many of whose competencies have been transferred to the Ministry of Agriculture, will serve industry more than regulate it. In this sense, climate change denier Ricardo de Aquino Salles promises to do very little. Even if Brazil has not yet officially withdrawn from the Paris Climate Agreement, it is sure to disregard many of its measures in practice.

Though Bolsonaro’s response to Brumadinho was negligent and ineffective, he used the tragedy as an opportunity to bring his administration closer to Israel. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu sent 136 soldiers to help with search and rescue operations. Justified by the alleged superiority of Israeli search technology, the mission was for most impartial observers a public relations affair meant to encourage Brazil to move its embassy, like the U.S. already did, to Jerusalem. It remains to be seen, however, whether Bolsonaro’s promise to Netanyahu will be able to overcome the potential loss of trade with the Muslim world.

Both domestically and internationally, the first month of Bolsonaro’s presidency has consolidated Brazil’s shift from a counterweight to Washington in the Western hemisphere to its most significant ally in reshaping Latin America. Predecessor Michel Temer, of course, had already begun the process of dismantling Brazil’s labor protections and independentist foreign policy under Lula and Dilma Rousseff. Brazil’s chancellor (the equivalent of secretary of state) is forthright in his support of Venezuela’s self-proclaimed president Juan Guaidó, even though he denied that Brazil would either troops or allow American troops to be deployed to Venezuela through Brazil. The Brazilian right has long supported toppling Maduro— even prior to the May 2018 elections— and Bolsonaro’s government has made it clear that it will work with the U.S. in using humanitarian aid and economic policy to effect regime change.

The particularity of Bolsonaro’s nationalism, as Perry Anderson has analyzed, is that he is no enemy to foreign capital. And with an increasingly likely coalition in the Brazilian House and Senate, pension reform now looks “inevitable,” according to House president Rodrigo Maia. Indeed, with an emerging privatization plan that includes airports, highways, energy resources, and the aforementioned prisons, Brazil’s public infrastructure threatens to become a skeleton of itself in no time at all.

Not all of Bolsonaro’s reforms will come easy, but his team is better organized and the government’s alliances stronger than initially expected. With the Democratas (successors of the military dictatorship’s party ARENA) leading both chambers of Congress, and a powerful right-wing social media overpowering more traditional liberal outlets, support for Bolsonaro seems only to have consolidated since he took office. Furthermore, the political establishment seems to have no qualms about supporting him as long as its interests are served. Shock treatment, smokescreens, and fake news will steamroll through the growing scandals until Brazil is remade.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Colin Kaepernick Won Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50174"><span class="small">Jason Reid, The Undefeated</span></a>   
Saturday, 16 February 2019 12:45

Reid writes: "Facing the most formidable foe of his career, Kaepernick stood his ground - and the NFL backed down."

Colin Kaepernick. (photo: Jake Roth/Reuters)
Colin Kaepernick. (photo: Jake Roth/Reuters)


Colin Kaepernick Won

By Jason Reid, The Undefeated

16 February 19

 

ake no mistake: Colin Kaepernick won.

Facing the most formidable foe of his career, Kaepernick stood his ground — and the NFL backed down. Although the terms of the league’s settlement with Kaepernick and Eric Reid — close friends and former San Francisco 49ers teammates who, in collusion grievances, alleged owners conspired to keep them unemployed because of their political activism — announced Friday are cloaked in a confidentially agreement, Kaepernick’s victory is as clear as his talent as a quarterback.

The NFL finally admitted as much, ending its lame arguments about why Kaepernick remains unsigned after last playing for San Francisco in 2016. That was the year Kaepernick sat and then kneeled to draw attention to police brutality and systemic oppression. Reid was the first player to kneel alongside him.

At the Super Bowl in Atlanta last week, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell continued to push the company line, essentially saying no teams believe that Kaepernick is capable of helping them win. It’s one thing to offer that tripe to the media. It’s quite another, however, to convince an arbitrator that none of the league’s 32 teams could use a passer who has made 58 career starts, helped a team reach a Super Bowl, is only 31 years old and has the fourth-best touchdown-to-interception ratio of all time.

Kaepernick’s grievance was expected to go to a full hearing sometime this year, and the NFL was facing the possibility of massive financial liability if it lost. Without a winning hand, the NFL decided to fold, said Stanford Law School professor William B. Gould IV.

An expert in labor law, Gould has closely monitored the developments surrounding the Kaepernick and Reid grievances. He wasn’t surprised by the league’s exit strategy.

“The NFL had to have some measure of concern about substantial liability,” said Gould, who served as chairman of the National Labor Relations Board from 1994-98. “The damages [awarded to Kaepernick] could have been considerable. For Kaepernick [to settle], it seems to me this has to be [financial] compensation. And I would think substantial compensation. Kaepernick certainly comes out of this a winner.”

The NFL is the most powerful sports league on the planet. It has virtually inexhaustible financial resources. It has top-notch lawyers. And it is fiercely protective of its image — the whole thing about not tarnishing the shield and all.

For the NFL to have settled with Kaepernick and Reid, who alleged that the owners attempted to ruin their careers because they chose to shine a light on racial injustice, well, that’s a horrible look for Goodell and the billionaires whom he serves. And the fact that the league found this option more palatable than continuing its fight reveals the level of its long-running palpable concern about the Kaepernick-Reid situation.

It wouldn’t be surprising if the league, on failing to have Kaepernick’s collusion grievance dismissed last August, began re-evaluating its position.

Gould believes that with so many smart people in the NFL’s New York headquarters, someone probably suggested it was time to find a back door.

“The league has taken so many hits, both in the area of race and in health and safety for the players, that they have to be gun-shy about future exposure,” he said. “Not simply in terms of compensation, because they can take a hit in terms of compensation. But in terms of public exposure and bad publicity, which they don’t want and can hurt them in the future.”

The fact is, except for fans who disagree with Kaepernick’s politics and the broadcasters and writers who carried the league’s water on the nonsensical Kaepernick-isn’t-good-enough-to-be-on-an-NFL-roster argument, it was clear that something was going on that had nothing do to with football.

The Washington Redskins helped prove that.

After starter Alex Smith suffered a potentially career-ending injury in November, the Redskins signed failed 32-year-old passer Mark Sanchez. After Sanchez did what Sanchez does, the Redskins dipped back into the free-agent quarterback market and signed Josh Johnson, who’s also 32 and who had not thrown a pass in a regular-season NFL game since 2011.

What’s more, since Kaepernick has been on the outside looking in, the list of ridiculously ineffective quarterbacks who have been signed is as long as it is laughable. It’s as if the league posted a sign in flashing red neon at every stadium that read, “Don’t believe what your eyes are seeing. All of these guys are actually better than Kaepernick.”

I mean, the Jedi mind trick doesn’t work on everyone.

The woeful performances of many players at Kaepernick’s position, the most important position in sports, undercut the league’s argument every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

Even after Reid returned to work in late September last season and signed a multiyear contract extension this week, there wasn’t even a whisper in the game about doors potentially opening for Kaepernick. Because a full hearing on Kaepernick’s grievance was drawing closer, the league was under increasing pressure to come to the realization it finally did.

As I wrote a while ago, Kaepernick will never again play in the NFL. But labor lawyer Thomas A. Lenz said the NFL is most likely paying a whole lot for what it has done to Kaepernick. Perhaps even more than $10 million in the settlement.

“Over the Super Bowl period, with so much attention on Kaepernick, it [the pressure] seemed to mount,” said Lenz, a lecturer at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. “And in terms of the settlement, it’s pure speculation at this point, but you could be looking at a couple of seasons of pay, whatever perks there might have come from a typical season under contract and endorsement opportunities he may have missed out on because he was not playing. There’s a whole range of things. I don’t think a settlement of [many millions of dollars] would be wild speculation at all.”

Of course, while Kaepernick’s fans will celebrate his victory, there’s also an inconvenient truth that must be addressed. Reid has publicly bashed Malcolm Jenkins and Anquan Boldin, the co-founders of the Players Coalition, for accepting money from the NFL to fund social justice work. Now, Reid and Kaepernick are likely taking the NFL’s cash as well.

On its face, that’s difficult to reconcile.

But the thing is, no matter where one stands on the NFL-Players Coalition partnership, Kaepernick and Reid should be applauded for fighting after they became convinced that their careers were illegally derailed. Especially Kaepernick. After absorbing a lot of hits throughout his toughest battle, he showed he’s a winner.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Why Is the Media Showering Howard Schultz With Free Airtime? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9643"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Saturday, 16 February 2019 11:43

Reich writes: "America is the only place in the world where any citizen over the age of 35 can run for president. No experience in government necessary. No support from a political party necessary. You don’t even have to have any ideas or policy proposals."

Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)


Why Is the Media Showering Howard Schultz With Free Airtime?

By Robert Reich, Guardian UK

16 February 19


Becoming a Serious Presidential Candidate used to require political support, now, for the right price, the media can do the anointing

merica is the only place in the world where any citizen over the age of 35 can run for president. No experience in government necessary. No support from a political party necessary. You don’t even have to have any ideas or policy proposals.

Take Howard Schultz, the former CEO of Starbucks whose most notable achievement to date has been the Mocha Frappucinno.

On Tuesday, CNN made Schultz a Serious Presidential Candidate by giving him an hour-long “town hall” in which he fielded questions from an audience.

Why did CNN do this? Because Schultz is worth over $3.6bn.

In today’s America, someone with this much money can buy so much advertising and self-promotion that he automatically becomes a SPC just by virtue of wanting the job and having the capacity to self-finance a campaign.

Ironically, CNN and other major media are giving Schultz free media now because he can afford an almost infinite amount of paid media later.

Years ago, political parties played the major roles in selecting presidential candidates. Candidates came up through the ranks. They had to convince party leaders across the nation they had what it took to be president. Conventions were the last step in the winnowing process.

Then, over the last several decades, the media took over the job of winnowing the pack. Winners were determined largely by campaign coverage, including presidential primary debates.

Donald Trump became a SPC in 2015 not only because of his billions but also his notoriety as the star of a popular reality TV show and, before that, decades in the tabloids where he learned the art of getting media attention.

Now, it seems, all you need to get the media to anoint you is the money to buy an infinite amount of media.

Part of the reason is the dramatic acceleration in presidential campaign spending.

In the 2000 election, neither George W. Bush nor Al Gore spent more than $200m, in today’s dollars. In 2008, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, the total spent by and for Barack Obama was $730m. In 2016, total spending by Trump and Clinton came to around $1.16bn.

At the same time, there’s more money at the top to spend on politics. Michael Bloomberg, another SPC, with his own media empire, makes Schultz look like a piker by comparison. Bloomberg is worth over $40bn, of which he’s already pledged at least 1% – $400m – to defeating Trump.

It’s not clear if Bloomberg will run. If he does, he’ll run as a Democrat. But Schultz is planning to run as an independent, so he won’t even have to go through the gauntlet of primary battles.

Which means Schultz could deliver the 2020 election to Trump by siphoning off votes from the Democratic candidate.

Schultz cannot win, so why is he running? Not because he has any burning issue he wants to raise, or policy he wants to push. His interviews to date have been curiously anodyne.

Back in 2014, before anyone thought of Trump as a plausible candidate, Schultz berated the incivility he saw in American politics and called for business leaders like himself to “take the lead and do what we can to move the country forward”.

Is that it? He wants more civility?

It didn’t seem to occur to Schultz that America’s growing incivility might be related to the frustrations of people earning coffee grinds while those at the top run off with the Super Venti Flat White.

That same year, Starbucks paid its baristas an average of $9 an hour (it now pays $11, which, adjusted for inflation, isn’t much more). Schultz took home $149.8m.

Under Schultz, Starbucks touted its so-called “social responsibility,” but it was for show.

Take, for example, the bracelets it sold for $5, whose proceeds were donated to banks and loan funds to support investment in poor communities. At the very same time, Starbucks kept some $1.9bn offshore to avoid paying US taxes – representing hundreds of millions in lost tax revenues that might otherwise have helped poor communities.

Social responsibility my macchiato. Starbucks spends millions each year lobbying the federal government, often seeking spending cuts along with the kind of tax breaks that continue to minimize Starbucks’s tax bill.

For Schultz, like Trump, it’s all about money and media.

Schultz is running because he thinks it will be a hoot – the capstone to his coffee career, the apex of his espresso.

But like many other billionaires of America’s New Gilded Age, Schultz doesn’t seem to give a damn about what his political escapades do to America.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 Next > End >>

Page 973 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN