RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: Robert Mueller, We Need to Hear More Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50881"><span class="small">Robert De Niro, The New York Times</span></a>   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 10:46

De Niro writes: "You said that your investigation's work 'speaks for itself.' It doesn't."

Robert De Niro as Robert Mueller on 'Saturday Night Live.' (photo: Will Heath/NBC)
Robert De Niro as Robert Mueller on 'Saturday Night Live.' (photo: Will Heath/NBC)


Robert Mueller, We Need to Hear More

By Robert De Niro, The New York Times

30 May 19


You said that your investigation’s work “speaks for itself.” It doesn’t.

ear Mr. Mueller,

It probably hasn’t escaped your attention (in my mind, nothing escapes your attention) that I play a version of you on “Saturday Night Live.” As “Robert Mueller,” my character is intimidating because he is so honest and upright. I do it for comic effect — that’s the intention anyway — but there’s also a lot of truth to it. To put it another way — it’s good-natured fun, but not entirely good-natured.

There’s a level of satire, directed at the current administration. To be fair, not everyone appreciates the humor. The president has tweeted that there’s “nothing funny about tired ‘Saturday Night Live’” and that it’s “very unfair and should be looked into,” even “tested in courts,” and “this is the real collusion!” Though what or with whom the show would be colluding is unclear. But then I don’t have to tell you about problems with the term “collusion.” You barely mention the word in your report, and then only to explain why you’re not using it. That could be a punch line on “Saturday Night Live.”

As I prepared for my role on the show, I got to know you a lot better. I read about your lifetime devotion to public service and your respect for the rule of law. I watched how you presided over the special counsel’s office apparently without leaks. And you never wavered, even in the face of regular vicious attacks from the president and his surrogates.

READ MORE

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
No 'Treason.' No Coup. Just Lies - and Dumb Lies at That. Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=50299"><span class="small">James Comey, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 08:33

Comey writes: "We must call out the president's lies that the FBI was corrupt and committed treason, that we spied on the Trump campaign and tried to defeat Donald Trump. We must constantly return to the stubborn facts."

Former FBI director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., June 8, 2017. (photo: Saul Loeb/Getty)
Former FBI director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., June 8, 2017. (photo: Saul Loeb/Getty)


No 'Treason.' No Coup. Just Lies - and Dumb Lies at That.

By James Comey, The Washington Post

30 May 19


James Comey is a former director of the FBI and a former deputy attorney general.

t is tempting for normal people to ignore our president when he starts ranting about treason and corruption at the FBI. I understand the temptation. I’m the object of many of his rants, and even I try to ignore him.

But we shouldn’t, because millions of good people believe what a president of the United States says. In normal times, that’s healthy. But not now, when the president is a liar who doesn’t care what damage he does to vital institutions. We must call out his lies that the FBI was corrupt and committed treason, that we spied on the Trump campaign and tried to defeat Donald Trump. We must constantly return to the stubborn facts.

Russia engaged in a massive effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Near as I can tell, there is only one U.S. leader who still denies that fact. The FBI saw the attack starting in mid-June 2016, with the first dumping of stolen emails. In late July, when we were hard at work trying to understand the scope of the effort, we learned that one of Trump’s foreign policy advisers knew about the Russian effort seven weeks before we did.

In April 2016, that adviser talked to a Russian agent in London, learned that the Russians had obtained “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of emails and that the Russians could assist the Trump campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Clinton. Of course, nobody from the Trump campaign told us this (or about later Russian approaches); we had to learn it, months after the fact, from an allied ambassador.

But when we finally learned of it in late July, what should the FBI have done? Let it go? Go tell the Trump campaign? Tell the press? No. Investigate, to see what the facts were. We didn’t know what was true. Maybe there was nothing to it, or maybe Americans were actively conspiring with the Russians. To find out, the FBI would live up to its name and investigate.

As director, I was determined that the work would be done carefully, professionally and discreetly. We were just starting. If there was nothing to it, we didn’t want to smear Americans. If there was something to it, we didn’t want to let corrupt Americans know we were onto them. So, we kept it secret. That’s how the FBI approaches all counterintelligence cases.

And there’s the first problem with Trump’s whole “treason” narrative. If we were “deep state” Clinton loyalists bent on stopping him, why would we keep it secret? Why wouldn’t the much-maligned FBI supervisor Peter Strzok — the alleged kingpin of the “treasonous” plot to stop Trump — tell anyone? He was one of the very few people who knew what we were investigating.

We investigated. We didn’t gather information about the campaign’s strategy. We didn’t “spy” on anyone’s campaign. We investigated to see whether it was true that Americans associated with the campaign had taken the Russians up on any offer of help. By late October, the investigators thought they had probable cause to get a federal court order to conduct electronic surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser named Carter Page. Page was no longer with the campaign, but there was reason to believe he was acting as an agent of the Russian government. We asked a federal judge for permission to surveil him and then we did it, all without revealing our work, despite the fact that it was late October and a leak would have been very harmful to candidate Trump. Worst deep-state conspiracy ever.

But wait, the conspiracy idea gets dumber. On Oct. 28, after agonizing deliberation over two terrible options, I concluded I had no choice but to inform Congress that we had reopened the Clinton email investigation. I?judged that hiding that fact — after having told Congress repeatedly and under oath that the case was finished — would be worse than telling Congress the truth. It was a decision William Barr praised and Hillary Clinton blamed for her loss 11 days later. Strzok, alleged architect of the treasonous plot to stop Trump, drafted the letter I sent Congress.

And there’s still more to the dumbness of the conspiracy allegation. At the center of the alleged FBI “corruption” we hear so much about was the conclusion that Deputy Director Andrew McCabe lied to internal investigators about a disclosure to the press in late October 2016. McCabe was fired over it. And what was that disclosure? Some stop-Trump election-eve screed? No. McCabe authorized a disclosure that revealed the FBI was actively investigating the Clinton Foundation, a disclosure that was harmful to Clinton.

There is a reason the non-fringe media doesn’t spend much time on this “treason” and “corruption” business. The conspiracy theory makes no sense. The FBI wasn’t out to get Donald Trump. It also wasn’t out to get Hillary Clinton. It was out to do its best to investigate serious matters while walking through a vicious political minefield.

But go ahead, investigate the investigators, if you must. When those investigations are over, you will find the work was done appropriately and focused only on discerning the truth of very serious allegations. There was no corruption. There was no treason. There was no attempted coup. Those are lies, and dumb lies at that. There were just good people trying to figure out what was true, under unprecedented circumstances.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
I'm Undocumented and I Work for Bernie Sanders. Here's How We're Fighting to Prevent More Migrant Kids From Dying. Print
Written by   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 08:33

Sisa writes: "Seven other DACA recipients and I spent six days in a D.C. jail for taking part in sit-ins inside Congressional offices as part of a fight for a Clean Dream Act."

DACA recipient Belen Sisa poses for a portrait in the Memorial Union on ASU's Tempe campus. (photo: The State Press)
DACA recipient Belen Sisa poses for a portrait in the Memorial Union on ASU's Tempe campus. (photo: The State Press)


I'm Undocumented and I Work for Bernie Sanders. Here's How We're Fighting to Prevent More Migrant Kids From Dying.

By Belén Sisa, Refinery29

30 May 19

 

n December 2017, I sat alone in a dark cell on a metal bunk bed without a mattress or heat, over 2,000 miles away from my hometown of Gilbert, AZ.

Seven other DACA recipients and I spent six days in a D.C. jail for taking part in sit-ins inside Congressional offices as part of a fight for a Clean Dream Act. Standing up and demanding that undocumented youth like us be given the chance to live in this country without fear of deportation, we put everything on the line in hopes of pushing politicians to have the courage we had and pass a Dream Act.

My parents brought me to the U.S. from Argentina when I was 6 years old so I could live a better life than they experienced. They made the right choice, and Arizona is truly the only place I’ve known as home. But as I see photos of children sitting in cages, and I read the reports of minors dying in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) custody, I can’t help but wonder: What if Trump were the president when my parents came to the U.S.?

I was fortunate enough not to be detained when my family immigrated here. Although life was far from easy growing up during the era of SB 1070, infamously known as the “show me your papers law,” which formalized the damaging and hostile practice of racial profiling, I was still able to attend public school and eventually go to Arizona State University, where I found my voice through activism and local campaigns.

Carlos Gregorio Hernández Vásquez, 16, the latest victim of this administration’s policies, died in a detention center from the flu after being held longer than the 72-hour limit — not in a hospital where he should have been. Imagine being a child who does not speak English and have no one protecting you from having to experience these inhumane conditions. These places are made to break you. This violation of human rights should not be happening in the United States.

What were these children going through during their last few moments of life? What were their dreams? Why did they die from completely preventable causes? These are all the questions we should be asking.

These asylum-seeking children died because of the cruel immigration policies being put in place by the Trump administration and due to CBP’s lack of following protocol. Hernández Vásquez; Jakelin Caal Maquin, 7; Felipe Alonzo-Gomez, 8; Juan de León Gutiérrez, 16; Wilmer Josué Ramírez Vásquez, 2; and another unidentified girl whose death was covered up, 10, all deserved better than to have died caged in a detention center. It was our duty to keep them safe.

This is happening in the “land of the free.” We cannot normalize the detainment and death of children and their family members. The outrage must be clear in the same way it was a year ago when we were confronted with audio recordings of immigrant children crying for their mothers. The Trump administration must be held accountable — by us, the American people. We constantly hear Republicans say they are pro-life, yet they ignore the lives of migrant children. If this isn’t hypocritical, I don’t know what is.

While taxpayer dollars are being wastefully thrown at walls and increased funding for ICE and CBP, children are dying and the root causes of this human rights crisis are not being addressed. As Americans, we should be helping countries in Central America rebuild to address the reason people are fleeing to the U.S. As a nation of immigrants, we should fix our broken immigration system to welcome immigrants in a humane and civil process.

The time is now to stand up for justice and humanity — we must end the barbaric practice of family separation and detention of children in cages. We must dismantle the cruel and inhumane deportation programs and detention centers and establish standards for independent oversight of relevant agencies within the Department of Homeland Security.

This is why we need leaders like Bernie Sanders, who will fight for all people, not just those who cast ballots. Bernie supports these policy proposals and believes they should be the standard of basic human rights that we, as a country, guarantee to all people. We cannot continue to allow politicians and corporations — who have the power to end migrant child deaths, but instead are profiting from immigrant detention — off the hook, and we must demand justice.

Belén Sisa is the Latino Press Secretary for Bernie Sanders' 2020 presidential campaign. The views expressed here are her own. She is an undocumented immigrant and DACA recipient who cofounded Undocumented Students for Education Equity (USEE) at Arizona State University.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
ICE Is Expanding DNA Testing to Find 'Fraudulent Families' Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49860"><span class="small">Samantha Grasso, Splinter</span></a>   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 08:33

Grasso writes: "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is expanding its pilot program testing the DNA of immigrant families to prove their relationship and detect so-called 'fraudulent families.'"

ICE officers. (photo: Getty)
ICE officers. (photo: Getty)


ICE Is Expanding DNA Testing to Find 'Fraudulent Families'

By Samantha Grasso, Splinter

30 May 19

 

.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is expanding its pilot program testing the DNA of immigrant families to prove their relationship and detect so-called “fraudulent families,” according to documents posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website on Tuesday afternoon.

The program, initially launched as a two-to-three-days-long pilot at two border locations earlier this month, is called Operation Double Helix 2.0. Through the pilot, Customs and Border Protection referred families to ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations division for voluntary Rapid DNA testing. Cheek swabs were then taken from the family members in question and used to establish a child-parent relationship within 90 minutes. (A DHS official didn’t tell Wired what happens if the family refuses the DNA test; we’ve also reached out to DHS and ICE about this and will update if we hear back.)

In FBO documents, HSI states it is “seeking assistance with the implementation” of the program. The documents also say HSI has identified seven locations along the southern border to expand the program, though the specific locations weren’t disclosed. According to the ICE documents, the expansion will run for five months, with an opportunity for a five-month extension, and that no more than 50,000 tests are expected to be administered during the program expansion.

DNA evidence won’t be stored, the documents claim, and Rapid DNA machines will destroy DNA samples after test results are printed. Reveal immigration reporter Patrick Michels first noted the existence of the FBO documents on Twitter.

At the time of the initial announcement of the program, ICE also announced that it was moving resources and personnel to the southern border to investigate the smuggling of children for the use of “fake families.” However, this increased concern isn’t supported by any of the available evidence on how many people have fraudulently posed as families. From Wired from earlier this month, emphasis mine:

Since April 18, CBP has referred 101 families for suspected fraud to ICE special investigators, a DHS official told reporters Wednesday. Of those, 29 were determined to be fraudulent, resulting in 45 people being referred for prosecution and 33 being accepted by prosecutors. CBP doesn’t have figures yet for April, but in the month prior, 53,077 family units were apprehended at the southern border, placing best estimates for the rate of fraud somewhere below half a percent.

Likewise, even figures from a larger stretch of time don’t indicate that “fraudulent families” make up any significant portion of families entering the U.S. From the Los Angeles Times last month, emphasis mine:

Brian Hastings, the Border Patrol’s chief of law enforcement operations, told reporters Tuesday that, from April 2018 to March 25 of this year, his agents had identified more than 3,100 individuals in family units making fraudulent claims, including those who represented themselves as minors but were in fact older than 18.

That’s roughly 1% of all family units apprehended at the border in that period.

It appears that ICE, regardless of the facts, is eager to expand its program to catch other “fake” families, which, again, make up somewhere between zero and one percent of all family units processed at the border. Alas, that is completely in character for an abusive organization lead by an anti-immigration administration that couldn’t care less about the truth.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
US Energy Department Rebrands Fossil Fuels as 'Molecules of Freedom' Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=49311"><span class="small">Luke O'Neil, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Thursday, 30 May 2019 08:33

O'Neil writes: "America is the land of freedom, as any politician will be happy to tell you. What you don't hear quite so often is that the stuff under the land is also apparently made of freedom as well."

Press release from department said increasing export capacity is 'critical to spreading freedom gas throughout the world.' (photo: Eric Gay/AP)
Press release from department said increasing export capacity is 'critical to spreading freedom gas throughout the world.' (photo: Eric Gay/AP)


US Energy Department Rebrands Fossil Fuels as 'Molecules of Freedom'

By Luke O'Neil, Guardian UK

30 May 19


Press release from department said increasing export capacity is ‘critical to spreading freedom gas throughout the world’

merica is the land of freedom, as any politician will be happy to tell you. What you don’t hear quite so often is that the stuff under the land is also apparently made of freedom as well. That is, at least according to a news release this week from the Department of Energy (DoE).

Mark W Menezes, the US undersecretary of energy, bestowed a peculiar honorific on our continent’s natural resources, dubbing it “freedom gas” in a release touting the DoE’s approval of increased exports of natural gas produced by a Freeport LNG terminal off the coast of Texas.

“Increasing export capacity from the Freeport LNG project is critical to spreading freedom gas throughout the world by giving America’s allies a diverse and affordable source of clean energy,” he said.

The concept of “freedom gas” may seem amorphous, but it’s actually being measured down to the smallest unit.

“With the US in another year of record-setting natural gas production, I am pleased that the Department of Energy is doing what it can to promote an efficient regulatory system that allows for molecules of US freedom to be exported to the world,” said Steven Winberg.

It’s unclear if members of the Trump administration attempting to assign patriotic intentions to natural gas are aware of the silliness of the concept, but Rick Perry seems to believe in it.

“Seventy-five years after liberating Europe from Nazi Germany occupation, the United States is again delivering a form of freedom to the European continent,” the energy secretary said earlier this month, according to EURACTV.

“And rather than in the form of young American soldiers, it’s in the form of liquefied natural gas.”

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 Next > End >>

Page 875 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN