RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
The Forgotten Trauma of a Forgotten War: As the World Looks Away, Death Stalks the Democratic Republic of Congo Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7517"><span class="small">Nick Turse, TomDispatch</span></a>   
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 13:02

Turse writes: "And so it goes in one of the most persistent bloodlettings on this planet, which is likely to continue taking a terrible toll in the years to come as the world turns a blind eye to it all."

The eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo has been ravaged by rebel groups for years. (photo: Mackenzie Knowles/NPR)
The eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo has been ravaged by rebel groups for years. (photo: Mackenzie Knowles/NPR)


The Forgotten Trauma of a Forgotten War: As the World Looks Away, Death Stalks the Democratic Republic of Congo

By Nick Turse, TomDispatch

16 October 19

 


Thanks to the looming impeachment crisis, the already Trumpian news cycle -- the media has dealt with The Donald as no human being in history -- is reaching a bizarre crescendo. And so is a president who seems to spend most of his White House time watching TV and tweeting ever more, ever wilder claims and threats about “spies” and “treason”; a “fake whistleblower report,” “savages” (his political opponents), and "coups"; even a future “civil war” in this country if he’s removed from office. Of course, you know the mantra by now. Who doesn’t? Think of it as the new definition of a news cycle, one that cycles nowhere but around him, 24/7. Think of it as the news cycle of an autocrat wannabe, the self-nominated Nebuchadnezzar of our imperial moment.

And give the president of the United States credit. At this point, it seems as if that impresario of bankrupt casinos and golden-lettered hotels, of reality television and surreal politics has done everything but block out the sun (on this fast-heating planet of ours). You would be hard-pressed, for instance, to notice America’s forever wars these days (as opposed to that “civil war” in a post-Trump America). From Afghanistan to Syria, Yemen to Libya, they do go on (and on and on), but unless Donald Trump briefly turns his attention to one of them, who would know?

And yet coverage of them is extensive compared to the war that TomDispatch Managing Editor Nick Turse so vividly describes today. Talk about never-ending wars that next to no one notices, the set of conflicts in the Democratic Republic of the Congo should take the cake in this century, but who (myself included) knows a thing about them. I was talking to Turse about my own ignorance on the subject as we were preparing his piece for publication and here’s what he had to say on the subject: “When I cover the war in Libya, people at least have some clue about the violence. When I’ve reported on the civil war in South Sudan, people have some inkling of what it must be. But the war in Congo? No one has a clue -- and with good reason. Imagine this: just two Congolese provinces, South Kivu and North Kivu, are now home to an estimated 130 different armed groups. But when do you see Congo’s conflicts on the front page of a newspaper? When does it lead the nightly news? Or get placement on cable news?” Since we all know the answer to that, his piece today crucially fills in a few of those blanks -- and what horrific blanks they turn out to be! Tom

-Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch


he boy was sitting next to his father, as he so often did. He mimicked his dad in every way. He wanted to be just like him, but Muhindo Maronga Godfroid, then a 31-year-old primary school teacher and farmer, had bigger plans for his two-and-a-half-year-old son. He would go to university one day. He would become a “big name” -- not just in their village of Kibirizi, but in North Kivu Province, maybe the entire Democratic Republic of Congo. The boy was exceedingly smart. He was, Godfroid said, “amazing.” He could grow up to be a leader in a country in desperate need of them.

Kahindo Jeonnette was just putting dinner on the table when someone began pounding on the front door. “Open! Open! Open!” a man yelled in Swahili. Jeonnette was startled.

The 24-year-old mother of two looked at her husband. Godfroid shook his head. “I can’t open the door unless you say who you are,” she called out.

“I’m looking for your husband. I’m his friend,” came the response.

“It’s too late now. My husband can’t come out. Come back tomorrow,” she replied.

The man shouted, “Then I’m going to open it!” and pumped several bullets into the door. One tore through Godfroid’s left hand, leaving him with just a thumb and two-and-a-half fingers. For a moment, he was stunned. The pain had yet to hit him and he couldn’t quite piece together what had happened. Then he turned his head and saw his tiny son splayed out on the floor.

The grieving parents can’t even bring themselves to utter their late son’s name. “I’ll never forget seeing my baby lying there,” Jeonnette told me, her eyes red and glassy, as we sat in the kitchen of her two-room, clapboard home in a tumbledown area of Goma, the capital of North Kivu Province. “I close my eyes and that’s all I can see.”

No one knows who exactly killed Jeonnette and Godfroid’s son. No one knows exactly why. His death was just one more murder in an endless tally; a killing somehow tied to a war started decades before he breathed his first breath; a homicide abetted by an accident of birth -- the bad luck of being born in a region roiled by a conflict as interminable as it is ignored.

Lightning Fast Lava, an Exploding Lake, and “the Most Dangerous City in the World”

The attack on Jeonnette and Godfroid’s home, the violence they endured, was no anomaly, but another painful incident in one of the most enduring catastrophes on the planet. A new report, “Congo, Forgotten: The Numbers Behind Africa’s Longest Humanitarian Crisis” by Human Rights Watch and the New York University-based Congo Research Group, finds that between June 1, 2017 and June 26, 2019, there were at least 3,015 violent incidents -- including killings, mass rapes, and kidnappings -- involving 6,555 victims in the provinces of North Kivu and South Kivu.

An average of 8.38 civilians were killed per 100,000 people in those two provinces alone, a number that exceeds even the 2018 death rate of 6.87 civilians in Borno, Nigeria, the state most affected by the terror group Boko Haram. It’s more than double the rate -- 4.13 -- in all of civil-war-torn Yemen, where Houthi rebels and civilians have, for years, been under a relentless assault by a U.S.-backed coalition led by Saudi Arabia.

“The fighting in recent years shows that peace and stability in eastern Congo are elusive,” said Jason Stearns, director of the Congo Research Group. “A comprehensive approach is needed, including an invigorated demobilization program and deep-seated reforms at every level of the state to counter impunity.”

The chances of that happening anytime soon are, however, remote. Violence has stalked the Congo’s far east since at least the nineteenth century, when slave raiders plied their trade here and local mutineers from a Belgian colonial expedition rampaged through the region. And since the end of the last century, North Kivu has been an epicenter of conflict.

For its part, Goma -- home to two million people -- has been called “cursed,” labeled a “magnet of misery,” and identified as “the most dangerous city in the world.” While it might not sit directly over hell, beneath the volcano that looms over it, Mount Nyiragongo, is a burning lake of lava -- an estimated 2.3 billion gallons worth. At the same time, Lake Kivu, the body of water on whose shores Goma sits, could potentially asphyxiate millions in the event of an earthquake, thanks to gases building up beneath its surface. Then again, Lake Kivu itself might just explode -- as it does about once every thousand years.

Goma is, to put it mildly, a tough town and, in recent times, it’s endured some genuine tough luck as well. In 1977, Mount Nyiragongo erupted, sending lava racing through the outskirts of the city at the fastest rate ever recorded, around 62 miles per hour, just shy of the speed of a cheetah running at full tilt. Several outlying villages were obliterated and almost 300 people burned alive.

In 1994, after the overthrow of a Hutu-led regime that had committed a genocide on the Tutsis of neighboring Rwanda, more than a million refugees, mostly Hutus, swamped Goma, prompting aid agencies to set up camps for them. Those camps, in turn, became bases for the ousted genocidaires to launch cross-border raids into Rwanda. In addition, cholera ravaged those refugee camps and Tutsis who had also fled the genocide were soon being attacked in Goma just as they had been in their native Rwanda.

The aftermath of that genocide birthed what came to be known as Africa’s World War, a conflict that raged from the mid-1990s through the early 2000s and saw Goma become a rebel capital controlled by a military elite, while more than five million people in the region died of violence or its fallout: hunger, starvation, and illness. Then, as if things weren’t bad enough, in 2002, Mount Nyiragongo erupted again, sending more than 14 million cubic meters of lava flowing down its southern flank. Two raging rivers of molten rock tore through the center of Goma, destroying 15% of the city, killing at least 170 people, leaving 120,000 homeless, and sending 300,000 others streaming into Rwanda.

Despite a regional peace deal that same year, Goma became the target of a Tutsi group that evolved into the March 23 Movement, or M23, a militia that would then battle the Congolese army for the better part of a decade, leading to yet another influx of displaced people settling into yet more camps and slums on Goma’s peripheries. Worse still, in 2012, the Rwandan-backed M23 rebels briefly seized and sacked the city, while carrying out an assassination campaign in and around it.

Today, Goma is officially at peace, but it’s never really peaceful. “Since the start of 2019, a series of murders, violent robberies, and kidnappings have taken place in peripheral neighborhoods of Goma,” reads a report released this spring by the Rift Valley Institute, which investigates conflict and its costs in the Democratic Republic of Congo. An armed robbery described in the report bears an eerie resemblance to the attack on Jeonnette and Godfroid’s home in Kibirizi. One of the victims explained how bandits carried out that home invasion in a neighborhood on the edge of Goma:

”I was sleeping downstairs with my wife and the baby. They entered the front door by shooting through it. We fled our room to take the stairs to go inside. Downstairs, they forced one of our daughters to show them the rooms upstairs. We locked ourselves in the room. The bandits shot through the door, hurting our baby, right above her eye and in her arm. We fled to the shower. The baby was bleeding very much. They came in and I started to give them everything they wanted from us... It was very traumatizing. My wife, who was pregnant, gave birth too early, but the baby is more or less OK. While locked in the bathroom, I called the chef de quartier and the colonel I know but they started to talk about fuel, [more specifically, the lack of fuel, which prevented them from intervening] so no one came to help.”

In the face of such violence, most Congolese are left with few options but to endure or flee. Last year, 1.8 million people -- more than two percent of Congo’s population of 81 million -- were internally displaced, second only to Ethiopia. All told, there are currently 5.6 million displaced Congolese and it’s estimated that 99% were made homeless due to violence.

Conflict Minerals Trumped by Conflict Alone

From the 1990s through the first years of the present century, an estimated 40 armed groups operated in the eastern Congo. Today, more than 130 such groups are active just in North and South Kivu Provinces.

With at least $24 trillion in gold, diamonds, tin, coltan, copper, cobalt, and other natural resources beneath the ground, it’s often assumed that Congo’s violence is intimately connected with the desire to control its mineral wealth. The Congo Research Group’s Kivu Security Tracker data, however, indicates that there is “no systematic correlation between violence and mining areas.” Instead, that land’s conflicts have become their own revenue stream. A “military bourgeoisie” has used the country’s complex set of conflicts-within-conflicts for career advancement, financing their private wars through kidnapping, the taxation of commodities and the movement of people, poaching, and protection rackets of every sort. Violence has become just another resource in the eastern Congo, a commodity whose value can be measured in both pain and Congolese francs.

Between June 2017 and June 2019, about 11% of the killings and 17% of all clashes in the Kivus occurred in the Fizi and Uvira territories of South Kivu and yet the epicenter of the violence in the region remains Beni territory in North Kivu (also a hotspot in the current and widening Ebola outbreak that even powerful new vaccines are unable to stem). Thirty-one percent of all the civilian killings in the Kivus took place in or around Beni, according to the Human Rights Watch report, “Congo, Forgotten,” with most of the bloodshed attributed to conflict between the Congolese armed forces and the Allied Democratic Forces, or ADF, a decades-old group that only recently rebranded itself as an Islamic State franchise.

Nearby Rutshuru territory experienced 35% of all the kidnappings in the two provinces, according to “Congo, Forgotten.” Recently, Sylvestre Mudacumura, a leader of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, an armed group founded by Hutu genocidaires in 2000, was killed there by the Congolese army. Rutshuru and neighboring Lubero territory are also home to two loose coalitions of opposing militias -- the Nyatura and the Mai-Mai Mazembe -- that draw from and nominally defend different ethnic groups in the region.

And so it goes in one of the most persistent bloodlettings on this planet, which is likely to continue taking a terrible toll in the years to come as the world turns a blind eye to it all.

Slow Burn

Muhindo Maronga Godfroid and Kahindo Jeonnette, both from the Nande ethnic group, hail from Rutshuru. While they don’t know for certain who attacked their home on November 24, 2017, they suspect that Nyatura, a Congolese Hutu militia, was behind it.

When the couple returned from the hospital following the shooting, they found their home completely looted. Fearing for their lives, they fled to Goma, where I met them, with their five-year-old daughter Eliane. All three now live in a two-room shack in a rough part of town where dirt and volcanic rock serve as the floors of most homes.

With his injured hand, Godfroid has been unable to find work. The family survives on the money Jeonnette makes by selling lotoko, a potent local moonshine.

Wearing blue jeans and a red Liverpool soccer jersey, Godfroid continued to talk with me about their son until Jeonnette walked over and waved her hand as if to say, No more. The conversation had left her shaken and she didn’t want to hear about or talk about or think about that horrible night for one second more. Jeonnette said that she needed a drink. Would I like to join her? After an hour of my questions about the violence that had upended her world, about the death of a son whose name she couldn’t bring herself to utter, how could I not?

Jeonnette can’t forget that night, the sight of her son, the moment her life fell apart, but the world has forgotten the humanitarian crisis in Congo -- to the extent that it was ever aware of it in the first place. After several decades of conflict, after a “World War” most people on this planet don’t even know happened (let alone killed millions), after rebel raids and village massacres, after countless attacks and uncounted murders, Congo’s constellation of crises remains largely ignored. It’s a burning reservoir of pain for which -- the yeoman efforts of Human Rights Watch and the Congo Research Group aside -- there is neither an accounting nor accountability.

Retreating to the back room, Jeonnette emerged with a metal cannister of crystal-clear liquor and poured a bit for each of us. As we toasted the memory of her son and I savored the slow burn of the lotoko, Jeonnette took a deep breath and leaned toward me. “This trauma lives in my heart. I can’t escape it,” she said, her eyes brimming with hurt. “This country keeps pulling us back. We just can’t move forward.”



Nick Turse is the managing editor of TomDispatch. He is the author of Next Time They’ll Come to Count the Dead: War and Survival in South Sudan and the award-winning Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam.

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Books, John Feffer’s new dystopian novel (the second in the Splinterlands series) Frostlands, Beverly Gologorsky's novel Every Body Has a Story, and Tom Engelhardt's A Nation Unmade by War, as well as Alfred McCoy's In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power and John Dower's The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War II.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: Bernie Is Back Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35143"><span class="small">Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 12:26

Gottinger writes: "Bernie’s performance at Tuesday night’s Democratic Debate proved that his campaign is still very much alive."

Senator Bernie Sanders will return to the debate stage, two weeks after suffering a heart attack while campaigning. (photo: Tamir Kalifa/The New York Times)
Senator Bernie Sanders will return to the debate stage, two weeks after suffering a heart attack while campaigning. (photo: Tamir Kalifa/The New York Times)


ALSO SEE: Bernie Sanders Was the Big Winner of Last Night's Debate

Bernie Is Back

By Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News

16 October 19

 

hen the Sanders campaign announced he had undergone a procedure on his heart earlier this month, the corporate press went into a frenzy crafting a narrative about the supposedly serious questions the incident raised about the future of his campaign. 

Readers of mainstream publications were led to believe that Sen. Sanders’s campaign may have died on the operating table in Las Vegas. Voters, we were told, would now surely see that Bernie is too old and that there were now too many questions about his health.

Following Bernie’s hospitalization, mainstream reporters even began contacting high profile Bernie supporters to see if they still backed Bernie, but they all stuck with him. 

Unfortunately for the corporate media – and their billionaire owners – the death of Bernie’s campaign was greatly exaggerated. Bernie’s performance at Tuesday night’s Democratic Debate proved that his campaign is still very much alive. Senator Sanders demonstrated the same commanding stage presence as always and communicated his progressive vision for America with a clarity, concision, and confidence that no other candidate can match. 

On Tuesday night, Bernie laid to rest any speculation that he was a tired old candidate who had lost a step. Instead what we saw was the same old Bernie. He railed against corporate greed and shouted about building a political revolution to bring people together to defeat Donald Trump. Watching Bernie, it was hard to believe that just weeks ago he’d undergone heart surgery. 

When asked directly by the CNN moderators about how he could reassure voters about his health, Bernie simply said that they could judge by the “vigorous campaign” he would be running “all over this country.” He then delivered a heartfelt thank you to his colleges and supporters who offered their love, prayers, and well wishes while he was hospitalized. 

Though CNN gave Bernie less speaking time than other candidates, he made great use of his time. He delivered memorable lines calling out America’s for-profit healthcare system and income inequality and he took Vice President Biden to task for his support of the Iraq War and NAFTA. 

On Tuesday night, Bernie proved he wasn’t going anywhere and that he possessed the same fiery demeanor as always. But arguably one of the biggest signs his campaign is still very much alive came not from the debate stage at all, but from the breaking news that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Ilhan Omar, and Rep. Rashida Tlaib were all endorsing him. 

The three representatives are rising stars in the Democratic Party and represent the party’s youthful, progressive grassroots base. The endorsement of Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was especially sought after given that she has become a powerful voice in the Democratic Party. 

By eleven o’clock, it was clear that it had been a pretty good evening for Bernie. 



Paul Gottinger is a staff reporter at RSN whose work focuses on the Middle East and the arms industry. He can be reached on Twitter @paulgottinger or via email.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Let's Be Serious - Trump Doesn't Mind These Incitements to Kill Journalists Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=44184"><span class="small">Mehdi Hasan, The Intercept</span></a>   
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 08:40

Hasan writes: "Does anyone seriously believe that President Donald Trump 'strongly condemns' the meme video of him shooting, stabbing, strangling, and setting on fire a wide array of political and media figures, as well as news organizations, which was aired at a conference at his Doral resort in Miami last week?"

Cesar Sayoc, convicted perpetrator of a series of mail bombs sent to various targets of Donald Trump. (photo: Cesar Altieri/Twitter)
Cesar Sayoc, convicted perpetrator of a series of mail bombs sent to various targets of Donald Trump. (photo: Cesar Altieri/Twitter)


Let's Be Serious - Trump Doesn't Mind These Incitements to Kill Journalists

By Mehdi Hasan, The Intercept

16 October 19

 

oes anyone seriously believe that President Donald Trump “strongly condemns” the meme video of him shooting, stabbing, strangling, and setting on fire a wide array of political and media figures, as well as news organizations, which was aired at a conference at his Doral resort in Miami last week?

If so, I have a degree from Trump University to award them.

On Monday morning, Stephanie Grisham, the president’s press secretary, claimed that Trump had “not yet seen the video,” but would watch it later, and “based upon everything he has heard, he strongly condemns this video.”

Well, what might he have “heard” about the video that she said he hadn’t seen? Here’s the New York Times, which broke the story on Sunday evening:

The video depicts a scene inside the “Church of Fake News,” where parishioners rise as Mr. Trump — dressed in a black pinstripe suit and tie — walks down the aisle. Many parishioners’ faces have been replaced with the logos of news media organizations, including PBS, NPR, Politico, The Washington Post, and NBC.

Mr. Trump stops in the middle of the church, pulls a gun out of his suit jacket pocket and begins a graphic rampage. As the parishioners try to flee, the president fires at them. He shoots Black Lives Matter in the head, and also shoots Vice News. …

The clip ends with Mr. Trump putting a stake into the head of a person with a CNN logo for a face. Mr. Trump then stands on the altar, admiring his rampage, and smiles.

But why should we believe that Trump condemns, or is repulsed by, any of this sickening and graphic violence?

First, he outsourced the initial condemnation of the video to his press secretary, who weirdly tweeted on his behalf. But why didn’t he tweet himself? Are we expected to believe that Trump hasn’t had time to watch it? Or that he is too busy tweeting about national or international issues to tweet about this particular video?

This is a president who spends his every spare moment glued to cable news; a president who tweets dozens of times, on dozens of random topics, every single day; a president who woke up on Monday morning and found time in his packed schedule to tweet in support of former press secretary Sean Spicer’s efforts on “Dancing With the Stars.”

“If he wanted to condemn it, he could,” noted the liberal writer and analyst Judd Legum, in response to Grisham’s statement, adding, “The entire thing is a wink and nod to his supporters.”

In fact, as the Times reported, “The creator of a gruesome video that showed a fake President Trump killing journalists and political opponents … is part of a loose network of right-wing provocateurs with a direct line to the White House.”

Second, Trump has a history of staying shamefully silent when journalists — who he has demonized as “scum,” “fake news,” and “enemies of the people” — are threatened, attacked, or even killed.

In June 2018, five employees of the Capital Gazette newspaper in Maryland were gunned down inside their newsroom. In response to this horrific massacre, as the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan reminded us on Monday, Trump “tweeted ‘thoughts and prayers’ and gave a thumbs-up sign and a dismissive wave to reporters asking for his comments.” When he eventually got around to issuing a proper statement on the killings, observed Sullivan, “it felt late, canned and out of sync with what he obviously believes.”

In August, Cesar Sayoc, a MAGA hat-wearing Trump supporter, was sentenced to 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to mailing pipe bombs to a variety of public figures and organizations, all of whom he had deemed to be enemies of his president. Among them, former CIA director-turned-NBC News analyst John Brennan, actor Robert De Niro, and CNN.

Trump, however, has had nothing whatsoever to say about Sayoc’s sentencing. Not a word.

Earlier this month, Christopher Hasson, a self-professed white nationalist who worried about Trump getting impeached, pleaded guilty to gun and drug charges after planning to “murder innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen in this country.” Hasson had compiled a list of high-profile targets, including cable news anchors such as Joe Scarborough, Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon, and Chris Hayes. He had even searched online for Scarborough’s home address.

Hasson’s guilty plea was met with … wait for it … silence from the president of the United States.

Third, Trump has a history of inciting and glorifying violence. Whether it is telling his supporters to “knock the crap” out of protesters at his rallies, suggesting that the “Second Amendment people” should take action against Hillary Clinton, or warning us that he has the “support of the police, the support of the military, the support of the Bikers for Trump … the tough people,” the president is no stranger to threatening his political and media opponents.

So why should we believe that Trump has a problem with the violent parody movie? Didn’t he himself, in July 2017, tweet a similar meme video in which he was “portrayed wrestling and punching a figure whose head has been replaced by the logo for CNN”? Didn’t he also, in December 2017, retweet “a doctored image with the CNN logo imposed on a blood-like splatter under his shoe”?

Such actions, of course, have consequences. In January 2018, it was reported that a Michigan man had called CNN 22 times, telling the CNN operator, “Fake news. I’m coming to gun you all down.” (Rather than condemn this vile threat against CNN and its journalists, the next day Trump tweeted yet another attack on “fake news CNN.”)

Thankfully, the Michigan man was unsuccessful in his attempt to slaughter journalists. As were Sayoc and Hasson. But how long until a Trump-supporting, media-hating fascist succeeds in murdering an “enemy of the people”? And how much of the blood will be on Trump’s hands?

On Sunday night, ABC News’s Jonathan Karl, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, issued a statement saying that his organization was “horrified” by the meme video. “We have previously told the President his rhetoric could incite violence,” Karl said. “Now we call on him and everybody associated with this conference to denounce this video and affirm that violence has no place in our society.”

This is the same WHCA, however, that threw comedian Michelle Wolf under the bus when she mocked then-White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders for her media-bashing “lies” on behalf of a “racist” president. Everyone from Fox News’s Ed Henry to NBC’s Andrea Mitchell demanded that Sanders be issued an apology by the White House press corps.

Then, when Sanders quit her job this past summer, White House correspondents hosted a farewell drinks party for her — and Karl, the WHCA chief, was among the attendees. “I’m really happy with the turnout,” said Anita Kumar, a White House correspondent for Politico, who co-hosted the party.

Is it any wonder that Trump and his supporters think they can get away with their constant attacks on the U.S. media? With their chilling rhetoric and violent imagery?

Far too many members of the press, even now, refuse to acknowledge or understand the severe threat posed to their own safety by this president and those around him. Instead, they continue to cozy up to those who incite violence against them. They continue to normalize Trump’s hate-filled, authoritarian, and violent rhetoric. When Trump tweeted the ridiculous and shocking video of him body-slamming and punching “CNN,” for example, the New York Times — I kid you not — described the move merely as “an unorthodox way for a sitting president to express himself.”

So this president will continue to demonize us. He will continue to echo Stalin in his attacks on the press. He will continue winking and nodding to his most crazed and violent supporters.

Don’t believe me? This coming Thursday evening, Trump will be holding a campaign rally in Dallas, Texas. The MAGA faithful will be there, cheering him on while booing CNN and the rest.

You think he’ll unconditionally condemn the meme video in front of that particular audience? Express horror or outrage? Stand up for a free press?

If so, you might be running late for class at Trump University.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Physicians to Trump: Immigration Detention Centers Must Close Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51859"><span class="small">Katherine McKenzie, Ranit Mishori and Kate Sugarman, The Hill</span></a>   
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 08:40

Excerpt: "On Saturday, Oct. 19, thousands of doctors and medical students will gather on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Donning our white coats, we will stand together to deliver a simple and firm message: Immigration detention centers must close."

Protesters outside the Clint station on July 4. (photo: Ilana Panich-Linsman/NYT)
Protesters outside the Clint station on July 4. (photo: Ilana Panich-Linsman/NYT)


Physicians to Trump: Immigration Detention Centers Must Close

By Katherine McKenzie, Ranit Mishori and Kate Sugarman, The Hill

16 October 19

 

n Saturday, Oct. 19, thousands of doctors and medical students will gather on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. Donning our white coats, we will stand together to deliver a simple and firm message: Immigration detention centers must close.

As physicians who have worked with detained migrants and asylum seekers, we have seen firsthand the harm that detention can have on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of all migrants, especially children and pregnant women.

We believe that U.S. values and traditions conflict profoundly with the inhumane imprisonment and treatment of those seeking safety in our country. Those who would rather risk everything than remain in countries where violence and gangs reign. Where their lives and their children’s lives are under constant threat. Under U.S. and international law, they are allowed to seek protection and apply for asylum.

Instead, because of new government policies, thousands have been turned away and returned to Mexico, where they remain in danger.  Thousands of others have been sent to immigration detention centers to await decisions on their fate. That includes children and women, even those who are pregnantwho should not be held in detention at all.  

 Asylum seekers should not be forced to stay in detention centers or camps while awaiting adjudication of their claims. News reports and other testimonies have documented substandard and even terrible conditions: no running water, no soap, no beds, inedible food. Medications have been taken away from those who need them; outbreaks have occurred and the government has decided not to provide vaccines. This is unacceptable.

Many advocates have rightfully been fighting to change these conditions.  But we are here to say that it is not enough to ask to improve the conditions in the detention centers. We must demand that they be closed altogether, because they are inherently immoral and should not be there in the first place.

 Individuals who await decisions while in detention risk worsening of chronic medical conditions, development of new illnesses and pregnancy complications, and even death.  Those dying in immigration custody include at least seven children, among them Felipe Gomez Alonzo, Carlos Gregorio Hernandez and Jakelin Call Maquin.

A child’s death is the ultimate atrocity. But children are vulnerable to short and long-term consequences in general. The evidence tells us that there is no acceptable amount of time for a child to be place in detention. All of us — physicians from all specialties and disciplines, including our professional medical organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, The American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Medical Association — agree on this point.  We have outlined the myriad ways that children suffer when detained, especially if they are separated from their parents. A number of children have died in federal custody, some have become ill and it is clear that all are at risk for developing lifelong psychological harm. Many of the children have experienced trauma before coming the U.S., as well as during their journey to this country, and their trauma is compounded by being kept in cages, separated from family and familiar adults, and without the basic conditions needed to their physical and emotional development. 

 Some in the government have commented that the tough conditions, risk of separation, and complicated and unpredictable process should deter people from attempting to cross the border, from seeking asylum in the U.S. But the fact is there is no evidence that detaining asylum seekers will deter them from seeking safety in the U.S. Many are fleeing severe persecution and death threats; that is the reason for risking further danger to come to the U.S. The bleak setting of detention will not dissuade them from fleeing even greater danger in their home countries. 

 Migration opponents have voiced concern that individuals crossing the border in the U.S., seeking legal recourse for human rights violations, will just disappear into our communities and will not return to immigration court to have their claims adjudicated. But immigrants who are not in detention and have legal representation comply with court appearances at high rates, in fact, data shows that nearly 98 percent of families and unaccompanied children comply with their legal obligations. This fact that argues strongly against the rationale for keeping them confined while awaiting adjudication.

So next Saturday we, along with other physicians, health professionals and medical students from around the country, will gather and speak on behalf of all those who care about the welfare of children and the inhumane treatment of those legally seeking refuge in the U.S. We will demand that the administrations’ shameful and devastating policies be changed and that detention camps be closed permanently. Nothing short of that is enough.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Asbestos Kills Nearly 40,000 Americans a Year. Ban It. Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51858"><span class="small">Gina McCarthy and William K. Reilly, The New York Times </span></a>   
Wednesday, 16 October 2019 08:40

Excerpt: "We thought we had relieved America of a death-dealing substance, asbestos, but it keeps finding its way into lungs with the aid of an accomplice. This time asbestos' friend is the Environmental Protection Agency."

A worker in hazmat gear bagging asbestos-laden debris after a wildfire in Santa Rosa, Calif., in 2017. (photo: Jim Wilson/NYT)
A worker in hazmat gear bagging asbestos-laden debris after a wildfire in Santa Rosa, Calif., in 2017. (photo: Jim Wilson/NYT)


Asbestos Kills Nearly 40,000 Americans a Year. Ban It.

By Gina McCarthy and William K. Reilly, The New York Times

16 October 19


The United States should follow other countries and protect its citizens from the deadly chemical, write two former E.P.A. administrators.

ike the varmints in an old western movie, some rattlesnakes just won’t stay dead. We thought we had relieved America of a death-dealing substance, asbestos, but it keeps finding its way into lungs with the aid of an accomplice. This time asbestos’ friend is the Environmental Protection Agency. The same E.P.A. that created the rules to ban it. Well, maybe not the same E.P.A.

Every year, asbestos takes the lives of nearly 40,000 Americans, and thousands more face a lifetime of pain and suffering from disabling lung diseases like asbestosis and mesothelioma, yet its use remains largely unregulated in the United States.

As former E.P.A. administrators who led the agency during pivotal moments in its long struggle to rid our society of asbestos, we can say unequivocally that this struggle will not end anytime soon unless Congress passes the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Act (Arban). This bill is advancing in the House of Representatives and, in coming days, the Energy and Commerce Committee will have an opportunity to send it to the House floor for passage with bipartisan support.

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 Next > End >>

Page 724 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN