|
Giving Thanks the Indigenous Way |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52355"><span class="small">Ruth Hopkins, Al Jazeera</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 28 November 2019 15:00 |
|
Hopkins writes: "Thanksgiving may be the ritualized glorification of genocide and conquest, but does it have to be?"
Protesters in North Dakota block route 6 in Mandan on Thanksgiving Day in 2016. (photo: Reuters)

Giving Thanks the Indigenous Way
By Ruth Hopkins, Al Jazeera
28 November 19
Thanksgiving may be the ritualised glorification of genocide and conquest, but does it have to be?
n the United States, the fourth Thursday of every November is observed as Thanksgiving. You may have heard the fabled yarn of its humble beginnings: the one where pilgrims who had fled religious persecution in England celebrated a bountiful harvest with a feast featuring local Native Americans as guests.
Interestingly, that incarnation of Thanksgiving did not appear until the mid-1800s. Sarah Josepha Hale, the author of the poem that became "Mary Had a Little Lamb", lobbied hard to make Thanksgiving - already a popular annual tradition in New England - a national holiday, and she used such an origin story to do it. She found that story in a book by clergyman Alexander Young called Chronicles of the Pilgrim Fathers (1841). The book contained the text of a letter by a pilgrim recounting a comparable harvest celebration that happened in 1621.
Hale was successful in her effort and, in 1863, President Abraham Lincoln declared Thanksgiving an official holiday, using it as an opportunity to commemorate Union victory at Gettysburg during the Civil War. He was also taking a cue from President George Washington, who had likewise proclaimed a "Day of Public Thanksgiving and Prayer" after winning the American Revolution.
But the Thanksgiving tradition did not have the benign roots Hale and Young had portrayed. Its actual basis appears to have been the appropriation of native harvest feasts that had been taking place in North America for millennia, in order to celebrate indigenous genocide and territorial conquest.
In 1637, Massachusetts Governor William Bradford declared an official "Day of Thanksgiving" to celebrate the massacre of 700 Pequot men, women and children. In his book "Of Plymouth Plantation", Bradford described the slaughter in gory detail: "It was a fearful sight to see them frying in the fyer and the streams of blood quenching the same, and horrible was the stincke and sente," Governor Bradford wrote. "But the victory seemed a sweete sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God, who had wrought so wonderfully for them, thus to inclose their enemise in their hands and give them so speedy a victory over so proud and insulting an enimie."
As you can see, when we pull away the white-washed veneer of the holiday, it is little more than the ritualised glorification of the extermination of an entire race of people.
But does it have to be?
There are many native communities who use the nationally designated holiday of Thanksgiving to dine with extended family - but they are not doing it to celebrate "Thanks-Taking", as it has been coined by those who know its true history. We are partaking in harvest feasts that indigenous nations have observed in the Americas since at least 10,000 BC.
Even now, feast days are still held throughout the year by southwest tribes. They include traditional dances, cultural activities, ceremony and banquets.
The Ottawas, who live in the northern regions of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan, host ghost suppers in November, where they cook a large meal and invite everyone in the community to attend. These dinners are meant to honour loved ones who have passed on. People travel from one supper to the next until they have eaten at each one.
It is also a tradition of my people, the Oceti Sakowin (Dakota/Lakota of the Great Sioux Nation), to fix a plate filled with food that is set aside for spirits when we share a meal.
My people follow ancestral teachings and we have seven core values that we hold high: wowaunsila (compassion), wowauonihan (respect), wowacintanka (patience and tolerance), wowahwala (humility), woohitike (bravery), woksape (wisdom), and wacante oganake (generosity).
Generosity and gratitude are so revered that the most powerful among us are not those who hoard wealth. Rather, they are those who give the most to others, especially to those who need it most. Materialism is frowned upon, and to be called stingy or greedy is considered a grave insult. We aim to give freely to our brethren without counting the cost.
Generosity and gratitude are espoused in our daily lives and important occasions are marked with a "giveaway", where families give all manner of items to community members to honour kin for various reasons. Useful household goods, home decor, starquilts, blankets, art, horses, clothing, furniture and anything else you can think of may be given away at these occasions and there is often a feast of thanks associated with it.
Giving thanks is a common theme in our ceremonies and prayer songs too, and honouring Mother Earth and the abundance she provides us with is a key part of our culture.
This is what Thanksgiving could be, but in order for that to happen, we must recognise the truth of the holiday's revolting colonial origins. It may sound cliche, but when we fail to learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it.
For the past few years, Thanksgiving has been hard for me. In 2016, mere days before the holiday, the Oceti Sakowin and our allies were attacked by militarised police at Standing Rock for protecting ancestral burial sites and the fresh water source of millions of people, both native and non-native, from a pipeline that would be forced through our land at the point of a gun.
They used water cannon on unarmed civilians when the air temperature was below freezing. People were tear gassed and shot with rubber bullets. Hundreds were injured, including one young woman who suffered permanent damage to her arm and another who nearly lost an eye.
On that fateful night that some call Bloody Sunday, when my heart was broken and we became one with our ancestors, I recognised that the atrocities our grandmothers and grandfathers had faced - the brutality, blind hatred and aggression, the massacres and acts of genocide which inspired Adolph Hitler himself - had not ended and could happen all over again.
America, Custer may have died for your sins, but there will be no absolution without truth. Only then can we hope to charter a new path, as one. The true spirit of Thanksgiving cannot be honoured when it is forged in white supremacy and dipped in indigenous blood.
Acknowledging our shared history can help put an end to vicious destructive cycles meant to fill spiritual emptiness, and replace it with grateful hearts that will bring families and communities together, united in purpose, giving thanks for nature's bounty. Then, not only will our bodies be nourished, but our souls will be too.

|
|
That Time Donald Trump Left Halfway Through a Performance of 'The Wall' |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52354"><span class="small">Kory Grow, Rolling Stone</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 28 November 2019 15:00 |
|
Grow writes: "In 2010, the future president attended a Roger Waters performance of Pink Floyd's masterpiece but didn't stick around long enough to see the wall fall. Could he have learned something if he'd stayed?"
Donald Trump left halfway through a Roger Waters performance of Pink Floyd's 'The Wall' in 2010. What could he have learned if he'd stayed? (photo: Dana Nalbandian/WireImage)

That Time Donald Trump Left Halfway Through a Performance of 'The Wall'
By Kory Grow, Rolling Stone
28 November 19
In 2010, the future president attended a Roger Waters performance of Pink Floyd’s masterpiece but didn’t stick around long enough to see the wall fall. Could he have learned something if he’d stayed?
ong before Donald Trump was our omnipresent, problematic president, he was New York City’s omnipresent, problematic gadfly. He flexed his supposed billions to attend any number of events around town, from WWE WrestleManias at Madison Square Garden to baby-boomer rock concerts. In 2008, he went to so many Neil Young shows that my colleague Andy Greene interviewed him about his Young fandom. “[Neil has] performed for me at my casinos over the years and he just brings it down,” Trump said. “I’ve met him on occasions and he’s a terrific guy. … Whatever the hell ‘it’ is, he’s got it.”
So it was no real surprise when I spotted Trump at one of Roger Waters’ concerts at Madison Square Garden, where Waters performed all of Pink Floyd’s monumental 1979 album, The Wall. It was early November 2010, a few days after the midterm elections, and Trump was still known best as the host of The Apprentice and a rich loudmouth. When he came in, he had people escort him to his seat with pomp to spotlight his VIP status and then just settled in. I was sort of shocked to see him there — and I was excited that I had a better seat than him — so I took a photo. Strangely, I think he saw me.
He sat there and watched the first half of the show, as Waters played a fictionalized rock star who gets seduced by fascism and starts blasting the pillars of education (“Another Brick in the Wall Part 2”), taking advantage of groupies (“Young Lust”), and dropping bombs on foreign countries (“Goodbye Blue Sky”). As he sang, a physical wall was constructed around him until the final brick was put in place just before the intermission.
It was a jaw-dropping piece of rock theater — I loved the show so much I saw it three times. But Donald Trump apparently didn’t agree. As the second act started, I looked again and his seat was empty; he never returned to it. He had seen the wall go up, but he missed the second act, where Waters’ character faces a trial and finds redemption, tearing down the wall and renewing his faith in humanity. The second act, of course, is why The Wall, which turns 40 on November 30th, is a classic work of art — you need the empathy to give the rock opera balance.
Within a few months, Trump started his birther campaign against President Obama, and a few years later, he launched his presidential bid, sowing division with fascistic ideologies and, yes, promises of a wall on the Mexican border.
Now, of course, I’m not saying that seeing the wall get built but not topple inspired Trump’s dogma or worldview, and I’m not saying that seeing Roger Waters play a character that became a demagogue cheered on by an arena influenced his future path — I don’t want to try to parse his psyche. But I did find the whole thing ironic when he ran for president.
A couple of years back, I had the pleasure of interviewing Roger Waters, a man who has called Trump “pig-ignorant” and a “nincompoop,” and I told him my story of seeing the president of the United States of America completely miss the point of The Wall. Waters just laughed. “That’s interesting in its symbolism,” he told me. “I’m glad you told me that. I had no idea he was there.”
It’s doubtful that Waters would ever welcome Trump to one of his concerts: Waters’ most recent tour emasculated Trump during “Pigs (Three Different Kinds),” among other indignities, and he told me he’s planning a 2020 tour especially to rail against Trump during election year. But if the president does show up again, let’s hope he hangs around long enough to see the wall come down. He just might learn something.

|
|
|
FOCUS: Y'all Little 'President' Be Lying His Ass Off |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=43108"><span class="small">Monique Judge, The Root</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 28 November 2019 13:30 |
|
Judge writes: "Have you ever known a person who just lies for no reason? Like, they stay making stuff up all the time just for the sake of talking and conversation?"
Donald Trump. (photo: Jabin Botsford/WP/Getty Images)

Y'all Little 'President' Be Lying His Ass Off
By Monique Judge, The Root
28 November 19
ave you ever known a person who just lies for no reason? Like, they stay making stuff up all the time just for the sake of talking and conversation? Their stories have little basis in reality; they just want to get one off, and to do that, they make up whatever details they need to in order for the story to sound good.
That person, ladies and gentlemen, is the alleged “president” of the United States, Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has not met a lie he didn’t get along with. He has not met a half truth he was unwilling to let fall from his lips. His penchant for exaggeration and complete and total hyperbole is well-documented.
They have a word in Spanish for people like Donald Trump; that word is mentiroso. It means liar. Donald Trump is a liar.
In his latest attempt at gassing himself up via lies and stories he’s made up in his own head, Business Insider reports that Trump told a crowd of people at a rally in Sunrise, Fla., Tuesday night that there is a contingent of “liberals” who want to change the name of the Thanksgiving holiday.
As is the norm with his big gigantic lies, he offered no evidence of his claim and no details as to what these so-called “liberals” wanted to replace the name Thanksgiving with. He simply asserted it as fact and then used that as a talking point to gas himself up, as usual.
“You know, some people want to change the name Thanksgiving,” he said. “They don’t want to use the term ‘Thanksgiving.’”
He told the crowd “we’re not changing it” and added “We’re going to have do a little work on Thanksgiving.”
“People have different ideas why it shouldn’t be called Thanksgiving,” he continued. “But everybody in this room, I know, loves the name Thanksgiving, and we’re not changing it.”
What in the straw man argument hell is this? I’m willing to bet no one has said they didn’t like the name Thanksgiving or wanted to change it, but here your man go using it to inflate his own ego.
Trump went on to take credit for people saying “Merry Christmas” as opposed to the more generic “Happy Holidays.” As BI notes, when Trump campaigned in 2016, he hitched his wagon to the horse that called wishing people “Happy Holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas” a “war on Christmas,” and he promised to change that when he got in office—because that’s exactly what the president of our nation should be thinking about and working on while in office. He later claimed credit for “fixing” the issue.
“And that was true also with Christmas, but now everybody’s using Christmas again,” Trump crowed at the Florida crowd Tuesday. “Remember I said that?”
Another straw man argument. Public Policy Polling released a survey in 2016 that revealed 80 percent of Americans don’t give a fuck whether you say “Happy Holidays” or not. And as BI notes, Ivanka Trump herself as well as several Trump-owned businesses have used the phrase “Happy Holidays” since he has been president.
In summation, your “president” is an old ass goofy liar who has a mouth that is shaped like an anus.
No wonder he is so full of shit.

|
|
FOCUS: Michael Bloomberg, Presidential Candidate, Just Killed the Bloomberg News Agency |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51548"><span class="small">Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 28 November 2019 11:30 |
|
Taibbi writes: "Bloomberg News suffered a major disruption over the weekend. The episode predicts the future of the news business, and the death of the news business."
Michael Bloomberg. (photo: Getty Images)

Michael Bloomberg, Presidential Candidate, Just Killed the Bloomberg News Agency
By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stones
28 November 19
If you can only report in one direction, you’re not reporting in any direction
loomberg News suffered a major disruption over the weekend. The episode predicts the future of the news business, and the death of the news business.
After billionaire and former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg formally entered the race for the Democratic presidential nomination Sunday, Bloomberg agency Editor-in-Chief John Micklethwait circulated a memo to editorial and research staff. In it, Micklethwait told staff it would not “investigate” either his owner and boss, or any of his boss’s Democratic opponents:
We will continue our tradition of not investigating Mike (and his family and foundation) and we will extend the same policy to his rivals in the Democratic primaries. We cannot treat Mike’s democratic competitors differently from him.
If Mike Bloomberg had any respect for the news business he would encourage his editorial staff to kick him in the balls at every opportunity. Either that, or he would sell his media business. Or not run for president.
Characteristically, he picked the one path that is most contemptible and destructive, retaining ownership of one of the world’s biggest news outlets just to defang it for the duration of his (incidentally moronic) presidential run. It’s an awesomely selfish act that shows his contempt for the whole idea of journalism.
With this decision, Mike Bloomberg just put the roughly 2,700 journalists who work for him in a terrible ethical bind. If huge portions of the political landscape are closed off to those reporters by fiat, by definition none of their reporting in any other direction can really be legitimate.
It’s appropriate to focus investigative coverage on President Donald Trump. But if this is the only avenue you’re allowed, it’s not news, and reporters aren’t really supposed to put up with such conditions. It amounts to forcing a political directive on the editorial staff.
Bloomberg readers and viewers will have no idea what stories were passed over. They won’t know what facts or narratives are being left out of coverage. It’s a joke.
Bloomberg with this move is the first major news outlet to openly transform into an unidirectional political organ, formalizing a trend I wrote about in a book called Hate Inc. The news landscape has already been divided into a binary coverage paradigm. For-profit media companies have stopped telling their audiences bad news about their political “sides.”
This began in the Nineties with Fox, which realized it could make boatloads of ad dollars selling slanted coverage to the mostly white, politically conservative “55 to dead” demographic that Fox chief Roger Ailes was targeting.
While the station didn’t mind milking fake narratives for profit (Trump’s infamous birther story being a prime example), the biggest deception in Fox was in its non-investigation of Republicans and conservatives.
Fox didn’t have to lie: It just downplayed adverse coverage of politicians its audiences had been trained to support. During its huge ratings surge during the Iraq War, for instance, Fox avoided even belated skeptical coverage of the failed WMD hunt, and covered episodes like Abu Ghraib as if they were liberal plots. The biggest lies were in omitted narratives.
In the summer of 2016, we started seeing an acceleration of the same behaviors in traditionally “mainstream” outlets like MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post. Trump was inspiring what many outlets described as a rethink of traditional objective journalism. I worried about where this would lead in August of that year:
The model going forward will likely involve Republican media covering Democratic corruption and Democratic media covering Republican corruption. This setup just doesn’t work.
Once relieved of the burden of at least looking unbiased, editors and reporters inevitably become vulnerable to misinformation, then end up doubling down on wrong narratives. In both the WMD affair and the Russiagate/“Walls are closing in” narrative, news companies were easily led off cliffs because they were working backward from narrative instead of fact.
Worse, when you stop covering your “side,” editors and reporters start pre-selecting stories that come from the “right” perspective. This leads to over-coziness with certain political sources, which in turn leads to a blurring of missions and even language: Reporters start to sound like politicians.
Pop quiz: Which of the following groups of headlines are from a commercial television station, and which were written by the Democratic National Committee?
Group A
Watch Jim Jordan Get Smacked Down
Timeline: The Pressure Campaign Against Yovanovich
Debunked: Trump’s Most Laughable Corruption Claim
The Last Time Trump Spoke at the Economic Club, He Lied a Lot
Group B
Gotcha: Rudy Giuliani’s “Disorganized Crime”
Trump Boasts About Economy With Many Sectors Reportedly Faltering
Trump Elevates Policy Over National Security
GOP Continues Pushing Ukraine Conspiracy Theory
Group A is the DNC. Group B is MSNBC.
You can repeat the same exercise with the other “side.” Which of the following headlines were written by Republican operatives, and which by a for-profit news company?
Group A
The Results Are In, Schiff Flopped
The African American Community Is Thriving Under Trump
Seeing Red: Democrats Panic as Trump Reshapes Federal Bench
Americans Are Decidedly Out on Impeachment, But That Won’t Stop Democrats
Group B
Here’s Why Biden’s Supporters Think He’s Floundering in Iowa
Poll: Independents Flip on Impeachment, Now Vastly Opposed After First Two Weeks of Public Hearings
Democratic Anxiety Rises Over Impending Thanksgiving Anti-Impeachment Ads
Elizabeth Warren Denied Sending Her Kids to Private School Despite Sending Son to Elite Private School
Group A is the Republican National Committee. Group B is the Daily Caller.
The Bloomberg dictum created to accommodate a grandiose billionaire jumping in the political ring is less of an organic development than the coverage problems at places like Fox or MSNBC. Still, it comes from the same misguided belief that there’s such a thing as credible one-sided reporting, or credible reporting that pre-excuses owners or sponsors from coverage.
For Mike Bloomberg to own a media network for as long as he has without understanding or caring about this is astonishing. He’s been a presidential candidate for just a few days now, and he’s already done tremendous damage by telling voters he thinks it’s OK to buy the free press. And this is the guy who’s going to rescue democracy?
There are many other reasons to distrust Bloomberg’s run, beginning with his appalling record on police issues and his blasé dismissal of critiques of Wall Street corruption, but his aristocratic take on the role of the media — that it may be permitted to look at some things and not others — is already disgusting. God save us from more billionaires with messiah complexes.

|
|