RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Not Giving Up on Happiness: Care of the Self and Well-Being in a Plague Year Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51519"><span class="small">Juan Cole, Informed Comment</span></a>   
Thursday, 19 March 2020 12:53

Cole writes: "The specter of plague haunts our world, and it brings with it not only the ghouls of disease and death but vast economic and social uncertainty of a sort only the most elderly among us remembers (the Great Depression and World War II)."

Prof. Juan Cole. (photo: University of Michigan)
Prof. Juan Cole. (photo: University of Michigan)


Not Giving Up on Happiness: Care of the Self and Well-Being in a Plague Year

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

19 March 20

 

he specter of plague haunts our world, and it brings with it not only the ghouls of disease and death but vast economic and social uncertainty of a sort only the most elderly among us remembers (the Great Depression and World War II). My father is 90 and when I called him a child of the depression once, he pointed out to me that as someone born in 1929, he really didn’t come to political consciousness until the Depression had ended. He was too young to fight in the war, though he joined the army three years after it ended. So you’d really have to be 95 or older to have fully experienced those world-shaking events.

As I write, the United States is (somewhat belatedly) trying out social distancing as a way of attempting to forestall the worst consequences of the novel coronavirus, attempting to avoid the catastrophe that has befallen Italy, e.g. Friends of mine have spoken of anxiety attacks, general unease, fear of the unknown. And with good reason, since Italy is sending us scenes like this:

It is not going to be easy to get through the coming year (or God forbid, year and a half). We will do it. In this essay, I won’t address the governmental and social steps that will be necessary, though see David Faris’s piece in today’s issue of Informed Comment.

I’m instead going to talk about care of the self and how to maintain well-being during this calamity. For the past few years I’ve been devouring the literature on Positive Psychology, and it led me to teach a course this semester on the History of Happiness and the care of the self. In that course, we look at the Greeks, modern Buddhism, and Sufism, as well as Positive Psychology itself. This movement was founded by Professor Martin Seligman at the University of Pennsylvania. There are now several peer-reviewed journals devoted to this research, and to my mind, researchers have discovered unexpected contributors to subjective well-being which, however, would mostly have come as no surprise to the wisdom traditions such as Buddhism and Sufism.

So here is what I have learned about well-being or happiness (Seligman prefers the term “well-being” but the publishers rather like books on happiness, so they’ve titled his that way).

1. Gratitude. Being grateful and expressing gratitude has been found to be highly correlated with feelings of well-being and happiness, and practices of gratitude can increase those feelings significantly. Say someone did something nice for you, and you thanked the person perfunctorily. If you now go back and sit the person down and explain what an important impact on your life their thoughtfulness had, it increases your feelings of well-being and those of the person thanked. Remembering something for which you are grateful increases happiness and reduces stress and depression. Some people keep a regular gratitude journal, which may increase feelings of well-being. Kiralee Schache et al. argued in a 2018 article in The British Journal of Health Psychology that there are actually physical benefits of gratitude. We need all the positive health effects we can get.

So for those who are social distancing and feeling a little lonely and a lot anxious, one action this literature suggests we might take is to call up people who’ve done nice things for us and just tell them how grateful we are and what it meant to us. All of us have reasons to be grateful even in the midst of our current predicament. We after all have been given a lot of positive things even if we now face a dire challenge. It is important not to lose sight of everything we have to be grateful for even as some things are taken from us.

2. Hope. Hope researcher Charles Snyder wrote,

“A rainbow is a prism that sends shards of multicolored light in various directions. It lifts our spirits and makes us think of what is possible. Hope is the same – a personal rainbow of the mind.”

Being hopeful or optimistic sometimes gets a bad rap as not sufficiently hard-nosed. As Alan Carr notes, Voltaire famously made fun of Leibniz’s assertion that we live in the best of all possible worlds (arguably, science and cosmology suggest that Leibniz was right– even slight changes in the history of the earth, or in the paramaters of the laws governing the universe, would have made human life impossible). Voltaire invented in his Candide the buffoonish character of Professor Pangloss, who tried to be optimistic about the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. But psychologists are finding that pessimism is bad for you in all sorts of ways.

Optimists are more likely to solve problems because they believe that if they just keep slugging away, they can solve the problem. Pessimists give up. Optimists tend to have a positive self-image and to think well of others, which helps them make friends. Hope is not unrealistic, it is a recognition that what obstacles exist can be overcome. Elaine Houston notes that Hope is positively correlated with feelings of well-being, with success in athletics and academics, Certainly as a society, and for most individuals, this challenge is one we have every hope of successfully defeating. Carr explains that we can train ourselves to be more optimistic through the three D’s. We can distract ourselves from being overly preoccupied with the negative by focusing on something positive. We can create some distance from pessimistic thoughts by reminding ourselves that they are only part of the picture, and there are hopeful signs as well. And we can dispute with our most pessimistic thoughts, pointing to the positive.

Hope fends off chronic anxiety of the sort many of us are starting to feel now. Chronic anxiety and constant triggering of fight or flight responses produce the hormone glucocorticoid, which over time depletes norepinephrine, one of three neurotransmitters associated with feelings of happiness and well-being (along with serotonin and dopamine). In other words, being depressed and hopeless produces hormones that create a downward spiral– after a while we simply cannot have that feeling of alertness and freshness that norepinephrine should give us, because anxiety hormones have depleted it. (See Rick Hanson, et al., The Buddha’s Brain.).

3. Creativity

Cathy Malchiodi writes,

“A recent study in the Journal of Positive Psychology (Tamlin, Conner, DeYoung & Paul, 2016) indicates that engaging in a creative activity just once a day can lead to a more positive state of mind. Researchers at the University of Otago constructed a study to understand if creativity impacts one’s emotional well-being, based on the growing belief that there is a connection between creativity and emotional functioning. To test this hypothesis, they evaluated the responses of 658 young adults; each day the participants documented how much time they spent on creative endeavors as well as the positive and negative emotional changes they perceived.

After 13 days, the researchers reviewed the participants’ responses and discovered an “upward spiral for well-being and creativity” in those individuals who engaged in daily creative pastimes.

Some people in the current crisis will be working overtime, and God bless the health care providers and food producers and others on the front lines.

Others may have less to do than normal and find themselves at loose ends. Along with gratitude and hope, the literature high recommends creative endeavors.

Watching television has been shown to make you depressed. Drinking alcohol is also a downer. Listening to music, on the other hand, lifts mood and affect. My guess is that it is because when we listen to music we become its co-creators, whereas television-watching is passive (and a lot of television connives at producing fight or flight and anxiety responses).

But best of all is to make something of your own. Everyone has favorite creative hobbies, whether knitting or writing poetry or cooking or carpentry and home improvement or painting. Now is the time to get back out that canvass or to go back to work on that short story.

I have made some suggestions for how to write short quatrains after the Persian form here. In fact, I have a translation of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam coming out on April 29.

Keep well, everyone. Gratitude, hope and creativity are some of the ways we can get through this. God bless.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: What the Coronavirus Emergency Has to Do With Biden vs. Sanders Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=48990"><span class="small">Norman Solomon, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Thursday, 19 March 2020 12:03

Solomon writes: "On the surface, the coronavirus emergency has nothing in particular to do with Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. What's obvious is that Donald Trump's unhinged bluster and inaction let the pandemic get a lethal jump on the United States, people are dying while huge numbers of lives are in jeopardy, and quick drastic steps are imperative."

Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders bumped elbows before Sunday night's Democratic presidential debate. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)
Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders bumped elbows before Sunday night's Democratic presidential debate. (photo: Evan Vucci/AP)


What the Coronavirus Emergency Has to Do With Biden vs. Sanders

By Norman Solomon, Reader Supported News

19 March 20

 

n the surface, the coronavirus emergency has nothing in particular to do with Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. What’s obvious is that Donald Trump’s unhinged bluster and inaction let the pandemic get a lethal jump on the United States, people are dying while huge numbers of lives are in jeopardy, and quick drastic steps are imperative. Yet at the same time, the differences between what Biden and Sanders are advocating have enormous implications for what could be done to curb the deadly virus in this country.

The absence of a public health system is consistent with a timeworn pattern of massive holes in the public sector. Biden merely wants to patch up some of the holes, while Sanders wants to build strong structures on truly democratic foundations.

“It is time to ask how we got to where we are, not only our lack of preparation for the virus, but how we end up with an economy where so many people are hurting at a time of massive income and wealth inequality,” Sanders said at the close of his recent debate with Biden. “It is time to ask the question of where the power is in America. Who owns the media? Who owns the economy? Who owns the legislative process? Why do we give tax breaks to billionaires and not raise the minimum wage?”

While so-called “moderate” Democrats like Biden don’t want to answer — or even hear — such questions, Sanders insists on continuing to ask them. Such perseverance has never been more needed than at this pivotal moment, with so many lives in the balance. “Where the power is in America” has everything to do with why the U.S. government’s response to the unfolding coronavirus catastrophe has continued to be so anemic, foreshadowing so many more deaths and so much more grief.

It’s urgent to implement all-out measures to contain the coronavirus spread (seriously aiming for containment rather than merely “flattening the curve”). Meanwhile, policies are needed to make sure that insurance-industry profiteers and other sectors of corporate America don’t get away with rapaciously benefiting from catastrophe in ways that would cause untold misery for vast numbers of people.

A pair of campaign documents released this week — the Biden “Plan to Combat Coronavirus (Covid-19) and Prepare for Future Global Health Threats” and the Sanders “Emergency Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic” — convey big differences in approach to the current unprecedented crisis.

Biden proposes to tweak the health care system and aid only some who suffer economic distress. In sharp contrast, Sanders is proposing far-reaching measures that include free health care for all (“Medicare will ensure that everyone in America, regardless of existing coverage, can receive the health care they need during this crisis”) and major financial assistance to all (“emergency $2,000 cash payments to every person in America every month for the duration of the crisis”).

Calling for programs that would spend at least $2 trillion in response to the coronavirus emergency, Sanders laid out commensurate programs — to “mobilize on a scale not seen since the New Deal and World War II to prevent deaths, job losses, and economic ruin.”

Joe Biden vs. Bernie Sanders is not only an electoral contest between presidential candidates. It’s also a contrast of patchwork fixes vs. profound structural changes. Refusal to upset the apple carts of corporate power vs. willingness to fight that power. Tepid adjustments vs. truly transformational agendas.

Sanders was correct when he said last week that “poll after poll, including exit polls, show that a strong majority of the American people support our progressive agenda.” Days ago, the Bernie 2020 campaign sent out a mass email declaring that “our campaign has won the battle of ideas.”

Whether the ideas that Sanders is championing can appreciably shape the government’s response to the coronavirus will have a lot to do with how successful the United States can be in limiting its terrible effects.



Norman Solomon is co-founder and national coordinator of RootsAction.org. He was a Bernie Sanders delegate from California to the 2016 Democratic National Convention. Solomon is the author of a dozen books, including “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.”

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: History Will Reckon Seriously With Bernie Sanders. So Should We All. Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Thursday, 19 March 2020 11:46

Pierce writes: "I never will apologize to anyone for having voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary here in the Commonwealth (God save it!). His positions on most issues were closest to my own."

Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty)
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty)


History Will Reckon Seriously With Bernie Sanders. So Should We All.

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

19 March 20


The Vermont senator's two campaigns cleared the biggest space for progressive ideas that our politics has seen since the Great Society.

never will apologize to anyone for having voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary here in the Commonwealth (God save it!). His positions on most issues were closest to my own. Now that his last campaign for president likely has cratered, there are a lot of Democrats who seem content to spike the football, which is further proof that everyone should’ve been forced to go through the Eternal Sunshine procedure to forget the 2016 primaries ever happened. Joe Biden is going to be the Democratic nominee, barring something unforeseen and awful. However, he is not going to be the Joe Biden of 1988 or even the Joe Biden of 2008. Bernie Sanders—and Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris, and Julian Castro, and Andrew Yang, and, hell, Jay Inslee—have seen to that. Biden’s natural political instincts are to go along with the predominant political dynamic and, for the first time since 1972, that’s a fair fight.

The two presidential campaigns Bernie Sanders has run have cleared the biggest space for progressive ideas that our politics has seen since the Great Society. His 2016 campaign opened 2020 up to progressive ideas and candidates. Now, in extremis, we are seeing the results of that clearing. Good god, the two parties are fighting in Congress over how much Free Money! each of us is going to get. That Bernie Sanders was able to run as strongly as he did in two campaigns is part of the reason for that, and it’s just pigheaded to deny that. 

Certainly, there is a lot about his basic constituency that is impolite and unpleasant. (Anyone who’s out there arguing that Biden deliberately risked people’s lives by insisting that primaries still be held on Tuesday should be marooned on Mercury for the duration. It’s both vicious and stupid.) But the fact is that it has been a long time since unapologetic liberalism got a serious unequivocal hearing in one of our two major political parties. Bernie Sanders, in his own characteristically grumpy and stubborn way, has forced that issue, and now he’s done so at a time of serendipitous crisis as well. History is going to reckon seriously with him. So should we all.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
GOP Senator Says We Shouldn't Shutdown the Economy Just Because Coronavirus May Kill 3.4 Percent of Our Population Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=10204"><span class="small">Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Thursday, 19 March 2020 08:19

Chait writes: "Johnson seems to fashion himself a cool-headed sophisticate who is using statistics to rationally assess risk. What he doesn't seem to grasp is that when you're talking about the majority of the population of the United States, even a 1 percent chance of premature death is not a small number. It's a huge number."

An election official with the Chicago Board of Elections sanitizes a voting machine. (photo: Charles Rex Arbogast/Shutterstock)
An election official with the Chicago Board of Elections sanitizes a voting machine. (photo: Charles Rex Arbogast/Shutterstock)


GOP Senator Says We Shouldn't Shutdown the Economy Just Because Coronavirus May Kill 3.4 Percent of Our Population

By Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine

19 March 20

 

ight now, all people are hearing about are the deaths,” Republican Senator Ron Johnson told the New York Times last week. “I’m sure the deaths are horrific, but the flip side of this is the vast majority of people who get coronavirus do survive.” The problem with this line of reasoning is that “the vast majority” is not a useful standard when measuring a pandemic that is projected to infect at least half the population.

In a follow-up interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Johnson attempted to clarify his thinking, and managed to express it in an even more callous and stupid way:

“I’m not denying what a nasty disease COVID-19 can be, and how it’s obviously devastating to somewhere between 1 and 3.4 percent of the population,” he said.

“But that means 97 to 99 percent will get through this and develop immunities and will be able to move beyond this. But we don’t shut down our economy because tens of thousands of people die on the highways. It’s a risk we accept so we can move about. We don’t shut down our economies because tens of thousands of people die from the common flu …

“… getting coronavirus is not a death sentence except for maybe no more than 3.4 percent of our population (and) I think probably far less.”

Johnson is comparing the virus to auto fatalities. Around 37,000 people die every year in car crashes, which is certainly a lot. But losing 1 to 3.4 percent of people who get the coronavirus would mean millions of deaths. So no, we don’t shut down the economy to prevent 37,000 deaths, but we might shut down the economy to prevent 100 times that many deaths.

Johnson seems to fashion himself a cool-headed sophisticate who is using statistics to rationally assess risk. What he doesn’t seem to grasp is that when you’re talking about the majority of the population of the United States, even a 1 percent chance of premature death is not a small number. It’s a huge number.

Joseph Stalin allegedly said, “A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” It’s not reassuring to hear this philosophy espoused by high-ranking national officials.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Seven Ways to Be a Good Citizen in the Time of Coronavirus Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51527"><span class="small">Tim Dickinson, Rolling Stone</span></a>   
Thursday, 19 March 2020 08:19

Dickinson writes: "With the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic - and orders to practice 'social distancing' to break the chain of transmission and save the lives of the most vulnerable - many Americans are taking an unexpected spring break, cooped up in their own homes and apartments."

Sen. Ron Johnson. (photo: Mark Wilson/Getty)
Sen. Ron Johnson. (photo: Mark Wilson/Getty)


Seven Ways to Be a Good Citizen in the Time of Coronavirus

By Tim Dickinson, Rolling Stone

19 March 20


We’re all in this pandemic together. Here are a few tips to make sure America comes through this stronger on the other side.

ith the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic — and orders to practice “social distancing” to break the chain of transmission and save the lives of the most vulnerable — many Americans are taking an unexpected spring break, cooped up in their own homes and apartments.

The crisis is acute. Seattle has been on lockdown for weeks, and the San Francisco Bay Area received a shelter-in-place order Monday. New York is warning of a deficit of thousands of ICU beds as hospitals brace for a wave of critically ill patients. As the United States scrambles to avoid the fate of Italy, where doctors don’t have enough ventilators to provide support to sick people gasping for air, daily life has been upended.

Across the country, bars and restaurants are closing, joining shuttered concert venues, sports arenas, and amusement parks. And whether you’re newly laid off, working from home, or trying to balance being a parent and your child’s substitute teacher, let’s face it, you’ve got some extra, anxiety-prone hours on your hands. Instead of filling that void with Disney+ and day drinking (the new “Netflix and Chill”?), here are some civic-minded actions you can take to escape the tedium of this morbid moment and focus on the promise of the future — for all of us.

1) Respond to the Census

The 2020 census is now underway. The once-every-10-years count may seem dull, but it is one of the most vital tools in our democracy. The final count determines how trillions of federal dollars are allocated around the different communities in the country, as well as the number of congressional seats allotted to each state. The census is a count of all persons in the country — so don’t let your immigration status be a barrier. If you’re here, you count. The good news is that you can fill out the form for your household online at my2020census.gov right now; just plug in your address and get started. The bad news for those seeking an escape is that it only takes a few minutes to complete the questionnaire.

2) Register to Vote 

Are you registered to vote? (You can check on your status using this Am I Registered to Vote? checker.) If you’re not registered you can enfranchise yourself at Vote.gov — a federal site that will connect you online to own state’s voter-registration process. Laws vary by state, but if you’re able to, consider signing up for an absentee ballot which will allow you to vote by mail. The coronavirus quarantine is showing how easily Election Day can be disrupted, so voting by mail offers a failsafe. And even without a pandemic virus loose in America, voting in person can contribute to long lines that dissuade others from voting. Registering absentee may help enfranchise someone else by speeding up in-person voting for others. Once you’re registered, touch base with your friends and family, in particular those who live in swing states, and help get them signed up too. You might also tweet your support for this new bill that would ensure every American the right to a vote-by-mail ballot and expand early voting across the country.

3) Contact Your Member of Congress

We should all be practicing social distancing to “flatten the curve” to keep coronavirus cases from overwhelming the hospitals — risking their ability to not only help those affected by COVID-19 but to also attend to the general public and the baseline cases of broken bones, heart attacks, and other critical illnesses. The paradox of this crisis is that we are all acting together to slow down the spread of the disease, prolonging the time that we will be living with its impacts. It speaks well of our national character that we’re willing to sacrifice to protect our most vulnerable. But in this time of shared sacrifice, the government has a roll to play to cushion the economic blow.

You can leave your big-government/small-government priors at the door: This isn’t a financial crisis brought about by reckless speculation. This isn’t a natural part of the business cycle. There’s no moral hazard in the government stepping in to keep businesses solvent and industries from being flattened while we all work to lessen the lethality of this pandemic. And when interest rates are essentially zero, the money borrowed today to bridge us though this terrible moment won’t crimp future growth. (And if you don’t trust me on this, listen to George W. Bush’s former top economic adviser, who writes: “There are times to worry about the growing government debt. This is not one of them.”)

The speed and efficacy of the federal response will be determined by the actions taken by congress in the coming days. The cruise-ship and casino industries and their lobbyists are already lobbying the feds for bailouts. You should let your representative know how this crisis is affecting your family — and demand that the government help you keep your rent or mortgage paid and food on your table until you’re back to work and your kids are back at school.

What’s needed right now is not only a one-time check, according to a U.C. Berkeley economist who helped shape Elizabeth Warren’s agenda — its something like this:

4) Check in on Your Neighbor

For many, the order to practice social distancing is a source of boredom and frustration. For others, it’s a question of life or death. No one is immune from the coronavirus, but if you’re young and healthy, the odds are good you’ll get over COVID-19 if you come down with it. For an older or immune-suppressed friend, colleague, or neighbor, the consequences are potentially dire. If you’re fortunate enough to fall in the first category, you can make a difference in the lives of those who are in the latter. Do you know a vulnerable person down the hall or down the street? Ask (via text or through a closed door) if you can bring them a bag of groceries, run a trip to the pharmacy, walk their pet, or pick up their takeout.

5) Tip Well and Consider Paying for Regular Services You’re Skipping

This is an economically precarious moment for everyone. If you’re still employed, count yourself fortunate. But working from home may be changing your needs. Do you usually hire a dog walker? Does someone come to clean your house? Even if you’re canceling these services for the time that you’re homebound, consider continuing to pay these service-providers at least a percentage of what you’d normally spend. The knock-on effects of the economy are hard for everyone, and many in the gig- and hustle-based economy don’t have a safety net. Similarly, even if you’re picking up takeout instead of dining out, consider tipping the full 20 percent. These people are literally risking their well-being to keep you fed.

6) Follow the Orders and Advice of Local Officials

The tactics for fighting cornonavirus are evolving by the day — and even by the hour. Keep informed of your community’s recommended restrictions and observe them. If your local or state leaders are in denial, listen to a governor you respect. Govs. Mike DeWine (R-Ohio) and Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) have been among the most aggressive in responding to this crisis, as they both lead states with a mix of urban and rural areas. Pay attention to the hard truths they’re telling.

We’re a country of stubborn individuals, and an otherwise-healthy disrespect for authority is baked into our cultural DNA. But this is not a time to be a maverick. This is a time to put others first. Social distancing won’t be perfect, but it can be very effective. The hard work of keeping in isolation will be undermined, however, if people treat this shutdown as spring break — as happened in Italy, where people spread the virus by taking to beaches and ski resorts and public squares — exacerbating the crisis, causing the hospital system to be overrun and the country to be put on lockdown.

7) Be a Good Patient

Unless you’re in a vulnerable population, don’t freak out if you do get sick. You will have a burning desire to know if you’ve got the coronavirus, but you may have to sit with that.

As Oregon’s chief medical officer for Health Security, Preparedness and Response Program told Rolling Stone: “If people are sick, but they’re not that sick — they’re basically feeling OK even though they’re ill — those people do not necessarily have to go to see a health care provider.” Why? As a Columbia University virologist explained to Rolling Stone: “Ultimately there’s nothing that we can really do for people until they become severely ill — and then it’s to provide supportive care for them. There’s a lot of people in this country who are in higher-risk groups. Make sure that you’re thinking of those people before you demand a test or a hospital bed, or just more attention because you’re scared.”

If you’re sick and concerned about your well-being, please do contact your doctor or advice nurse. They can often advise you remotely about when to seek in-person care, and arrange for precautions if you need to be seen. But an influx of the “worried well” at the emergency room is a hazard to everyone. Save the scarce resources of testing kits and doctor time for those who need supportive care to stay alive. Take it from a top health official in New York:

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 Next > End >>

Page 551 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN