RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: Yes Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15102"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Sunday, 21 June 2020 11:50

Sanders writes: "If you think you are living in unusual and unprecedented times, you're right. This is a moment in American history that kids will be studying in school for a very long time."

Bernie Sanders addresses supporters during a campaign rally at the University Michigan in Ann Arbor on 8 March 2020. (photo: Jeff Kowalsky/Getty Images)
Bernie Sanders addresses supporters during a campaign rally at the University Michigan in Ann Arbor on 8 March 2020. (photo: Jeff Kowalsky/Getty Images)


Yes

By Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News

21 June 20

 

f you think you are living in unusual and unprecedented times, you're right. This is a moment in American history that kids will be studying in school for a very long time.

We are living through a pandemic that has claimed the lives of 120,000 Americans. And, now, after cities and states have "reopened," the number of new cases is skyrocketing.

We are living through an economic meltdown where over 30 million workers have lost their jobs, and people across the country are struggling with hunger, evictions and unpayable debts.

We are living through a massive outpouring of rage against police brutality and murder and the systemic racism which has plagued this country since it's inception.

And, in the midst of all of that, we have a narcissistic and demagogic president who defies science in terms of the pandemic, ignores the pain of the unemployed and hungry and, instead of leading the effort to combat racism, is actively trying to encourage violence and divide us up.

That's the bad news.

Here's the good news:

We are actively and successfully fighting back.

As a result of mass demonstrations across the country, local, state and federal governments are beginning to move toward holding police officers accountable and rethinking the very nature of policing.

And, at the ballot box, there are a number of strong progressive candidates who are taking on the political establishment, running great campaigns and have an excellent chance of winning their Democratic primary and general elections.

Among the candidates whom we are supporting with elections coming up very soon are:

Charles Booker for U.S. Senate in Kentucky, Jamaal Bowman (NY-16), Mondaire Jones (NY-17), Samelys López (NY-15), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Arati Kreibich (NJ-05), Amy Padden in Judicial District 18, Colorado, Alonzo Payne in Judicial District 12, Colorado, Matt Toporowski in Albany County, New York, Mike Gianaris for New York State Senate, Julia Salazar for New York State Senate, Jessica Ramos for New York State Senate, Jabari Brisport for New York State Senate, Yuh-Line Niou for New York State Assembly, and Ron Kim for New York State Assembly.

Last but not least, in the midst of these tumultuous times, it is imperative that we maintain our bold vision for the America we want to see in the years to come, a vision that more and more Americans are embracing.

Yes. We can transform a rigged and corrupt political system and create a vibrant democracy based on one person, one vote.

Yes. We can create an economic system based on the principles of justice, not greed.

Yes. We can create a guaranteed federal jobs program and decent income for all American workers as we rebuild our crumbling infrastructure.

Yes. We can make public colleges and universities tuition free, cancel all student debt, and have high quality and universal childcare.

Yes. We can make health care a human right and not a jobs benefit, and pass a Medicare for All single-payer program.

Yes. We can create millions of good jobs by implementing a Green New Deal as we lead the world in combating climate change.

Yes. We can move toward a country which eliminates racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia and all forms of bigotry.

Yes. We can fight against all forms of gender discrimination and protect a woman's right to control her own body.

Yes. We can pass common sense gun safety legislation and end the epidemic of gun violence in our country.

And, yes! Listening to the American people, and responding to their needs, we can do much, much more.

In this difficult moment in American history, this is not the time for despair or retreat. Now is the time for courage. Let us go forward together.

In solidarity,

Bernie


Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
We Can't Risk Anything With This Election Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35918"><span class="small">Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Sunday, 21 June 2020 08:55

Moore writes: "Trump has lost none of his base and they are more rabid than ever. Sleeping on the sidewalk for five nights just to get in to see Trump? THAT is commitment. Do not take Trump for granted. Don't think he can't win."

Michael Moore. (photo: Getty Images)
Michael Moore. (photo: Getty Images)


We Can't Risk Anything With This Election

By Michael Moore, Michael Moore's Facebook Page

21 June 20

 

Michael Moore below sounds the alarm that Trump’s supporters remain uniquely dedicated, passionate and committed. This piece is reminiscent of his ominous 2016 prediction that Trump could in fact win at that stage too.

However the New York Times is reporting that Trump’s rally in Tulsa actually was a disappointment in terms of turnout. Did Coronavirus fears factor in, or is reality finally catching up with the Trump reality show. It’s hard to say but he was apparently furious. — MA/RSN "

hey started lining up on Tues in Tulsa for Trump’s rally today. 100,000 are expected! Trump has lost none of his base and they are more rabid than ever. Sleeping on the sidewalk for five nights just to get in to see Trump? THAT is commitment. Do not take Trump for granted. Don’t think he can’t win. Don’t get all cocky telling everyone there’s no way he’s winning the White House because, frankly, you sound a lot like yourself four years ago when you told everyone there’s no way this country is going to put a clown in the Oval Office. If you are once again not taking my warnings seriously, then I have a question I want you to answer, and I ask you to answer me honestly:

“How many people would line up for five days just to hear Joe Biden talk?”

12?

5?

None?

The candidate who inspires the most people in the swing states to excitedly get to the polls — and ensure that each of them bring 10-20 of their friends & family w/ them on Election Day — all of them highly-motivated, fired-up, & “on a mission from God” — THAT’S who wins the White House. Don’t think we don’t have a problem here. Don’t get all smug laughing at these Bubbas in Tulsa today & snickering over how many of them are going to come down with Covid-19. They live, eat and breathe Trump — and none of us do that with Joe Biden. We’re counting on Hatred of Trump - not love of Biden - to win the day. Is that how you really think — hate beats love? Like, the more we ply our neighbor’s hatred of Trump, that’s the ticket to win? Because deep down we know there’s no massive, intense love of Joe Biden, no one is all dreamy and jazzy when they think about Joe Biden’s jobs plan, Joe Biden’s health care plan, child care plan, criminal justice plan, income inequality plan — “Mike! Stop! We get it.” Trump’s ppl will pack the polling sites. Our people will, well...well...they’ll be there!

That’s not enough. We’d better figure this out. Biden better get out of the basement. We need to know he’s ok. We need to know what Plan B is. Don’t be afraid to search your own mind about what you’re afraid to ask or say. We can’t risk ANYTHING with this election. Biden has to rock everyone’s world to win. I’m just the messenger. I’ll do my part.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
How Public Opinion Changes for the Better Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35861"><span class="small">Bill McKibben, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Saturday, 20 June 2020 13:50

McKibben writes: "You could feel the Zeitgeist shifting these past days, as culturally powerful parts of our society decided that the future lies with the protesters demanding accountability for America's past and safety from its present authorities."

Bill McKibben. (photo: Wolfgang Schmidt)
Bill McKibben. (photo: Wolfgang Schmidt)


How Public Opinion Changes for the Better

By Bill McKibben, The New Yorker

20 June 20

 

ou could feel the Zeitgeist shifting these past days, as culturally powerful parts of our society decided that the future lies with the protesters demanding accountability for America’s past and safety from its present authorities. Top brass at the Pentagon apologized for taking part in Trump’s Bible-hoisting photo op. The N.F.L. commissioner, Roger Goodell, took to the Internet to say, “We, the National Football League, condemn racism and the systematic oppression of black people.” And Nascar—long the perfect marriage of corporate branding and unrepentant good-ol’-boyism—banned the Confederate flag at its races and events. Not only that, but Richard Petty—the winningest driver in stock-racing history and now a team owner, who said, in 2017, that he’d fire any driver who protested the National Anthem—let the African-American driver Bubba Wallace repaint his car with Black Lives Matter emblems, for last week’s race in Martinsville, Virginia. Those actions stem, of course, from the success of organizers in making the Black Lives Matter message resound—polling shows that, in the course of a few weeks, support for the movement spiked by almost twenty percentage points.

Public opinion doesn’t usually move in staccato bursts like that. If you look, say, at polling data about support for interracial marriages, it rises from four per cent around the year I was born, in 1960, to about ninety per cent now—it’s such a slow and steady curve that you’d almost guess it reflected the death of old people more than of old opinions. Culture usually shifts gradually—painfully gradually for those of us who want change. But, occasionally, attitudes swing quite suddenly, as if pressure had been silently building up behind a dam until it burst. That silently building pressure usually takes the form of good organizing (in this case, superb work by the current generation of civil-rights activists), and the breach itself usually comes from events. The video of George Floyd’s death was so stark that it summed up, in an iconic way no witness could avoid understanding, so much of the country’s racial history.

Often, great organizing—say, by labor unions seeking a new contract—is for immediate and tangible actions, and the side with more muscle and unity generally prevails. The goal of other types of organizing is precisely to shift the Zeitgeist, the prevailing sense of what’s normal and natural and obvious. When that happens, more fundamental change (reëxamining the role of police in our society, for instance) can suddenly be on the table. There’s no guarantee that the right things will happen, and the pressure must be unrelenting, but what was impossible weeks ago now seems, at the least, plausible. In the climate crisis, each fight against a pipeline or a frack well, against an oil company or a bank that backs it, is important in its own right. But each also serves as a way to build the pressure that will, eventually, move us psychologically from a world that sees the fossil-fuelled economy stretching out into the future to one that understands we need to change.

There are signs that we’re reaching that paradigm shift, both because of powerful organizing (eight million people in the streets last fall for global climate strikes) and because environmental events, such as the wildfires in California and Australia, demonstrate our scary reality more plainly all the time. Around the world, more and more cities and countries are rolling out economic-recovery plans that emphasize climate action, as if that was the most obvious idea. (It is.) Even in this country, you can see it in the polling: a string of recent surveys shows that the issue of global warming is Trump’s single greatest vulnerability. And you can sense it in significant corners of the culture, too—corners that pay a lot of attention to marketing and branding and predicting the future. Lyft’s announcement on Wednesday that all of the cars used in its network will be electric by 2030 will not solve the climate crisis. (Indeed, if it draws people away from the subway, it could make it worse; what we really need are electric buses and electric bikes.) But it’s a sign—like Wallace’s car circling the Nascar track—that, after years and years of organizing, a new logic is beginning to drive events.

Passing the Mic

The actress Jane Fonda has devoted much of the past year to climate organizing, convening a weekly series of civil-disobedience actions that she calls Fire Drill Fridays. They stretched through the winter in Washington, D.C., and when she went back to California, to film the next season of “Grace and Frankie,” the activism relocated with her. She describes the events in her forthcoming book, “What Can I Do?: My Path from Climate Despair to Action.”

You’ve been an activist most of your life. Does the energy around climate justice and racial justice remind you of the nineteen-sixties, or is it different?

It feels different now. The protests are far more diverse. There are all-white communities in Southern California, for instance, where many hundreds of white people have been marching carrying Black Live Matter signs. No one expected that. Many factors are at play—the work that’s been done by Black Lives Matter, SURJ (Showing Up for Racial Justice), and White People 4 Black Lives are some examples. The election of Trump forced many whites to recognize the degree to which white supremacy was still very much alive in this country. This was no surprise to black people, but so many whites felt that Obama’s Presidency signalled the beginning of the end of that malignancy. The murder of George Floyd was so visible, so intentional, that it woke a lot of people  . . . the last straw after Breonna Taylor was shot in her bed, and Ahmaud Arbery was shot while jogging. Many white people were brutalized by the police in the ensuing protests, getting a taste of what blacks have endured for too long. I think the young climate strikers who took to the streets by the millions around the world last fall really had an impact on people’s awareness of the gravity of the climate crisis, but also they made protesting and civil disobedience O.K., and showed it was effective. I think this helped make it O.K. for people to fill the streets against police brutality now. Frankly, climate and racial injustice don’t seem like two separate causes anymore.

What are the clearest memories in your mind from this year of Fire Drill Fridays?

There were many, but I remember November 1st, the fourth Fire Drill Friday. As we gathered to prepare for that rally, it hit me so clearly: this is working! People are travelling from all over the country to join this growing community, because that’s what it was becoming, and put their bodies on the line. A large percentage of them had never engaged in civil disobedience before, and, from what I saw and what they told me, it was transformative for them. Annie Leonard, the executive director of Greenpeace U.S.A., and I were aiming to rouse people who were new to civil disobedience, and that’s what was happening, and this must become the new normal.

Another clear memory is December 20th. We were marching to the Hart Senate Building, to do a sit-in. I looked around, and there was the Reverend William Barber II, Ai-jen Poo, Gloria Steinem, Dolores Huerta, and Heather McTeer Toney, all of us marching together, all those leaders of major movements coming together for climate. That felt new.

Some activists say that they can’t be bothered voting this year, because Joe Biden is “just another old-school Dem.” You’ve gone through many elections—does 2020 feel crucial to you?

Never has so much been at stake. Scientists have told us unconditionally that we have ten years to cut fossil-fuel emissions in half before we hit the tipping point, when the collapse of the planet’s ecosystems will be beyond our control. If Joe Biden doesn’t win, it will be almost impossible to accomplish this.

But, even if Biden wins, we will need to fill the streets, make calls, recruit friends and colleagues to make him do the right thing. And, to insure he wins, we need to work like hell and get everyone to vote.

Climate School

An important—and well-documented—new study from Berkeley’s Goldman School of Public Policy quantifies what the plummeting cost of solar and wind power could mean for America. If we adopted policies for a rapid buildout of renewable energy, it could supply ninety per cent of our electricity carbon free by 2035, and that electricity would cost customers less than it costs them today. “Previous studies concluded either we need to wait until 2050 to decarbonize, or the bills will go up if you decarbonize,” Amol Phadke, a co-author of the study, told reporters. “I think we really need to revisit these conclusions, because of the dramatic decline in costs.”

An equally important new study from Carbon Tracker Initiative spells out what moves like that would mean for the fossil-fuel industry: the value of coal, gas, and oil reserves will drop by nearly two-thirds. Which means, of course, that the industry will also see its political power to block change reduced. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Another straw in the wind: In a report for the European N.G.O. Finance Watch, Thierry Philipponnat, a French financial regulator who serves as a European Union expert on sustainable investment, recommends making banks set aside more capital when they’re making loans to the fossil-fuel industry, to take into account the risk that all that gas and coal and oil will end up stranded underground. According to his proposal, as the Financial Times explains, “the risk weighting for bank exposures to new fossil-fuel reserves would be increased from 100 per cent to 1,250 per cent.” This would essentially make it impossible for banks to lend to projects expanding the fossil-fuel system. These are the kinds of numbers that change the shape of the future.

Now that unemployment is running so high, especially among young people and African-American and Latinx adults, here’s a fairly detailed proposal for a Civilian Climate Corps, which is centered on community colleges and is designed to reduce not just temperatures but inequality.

If you’re interested in climate and weather, one of the great teachers is Jeff Masters, the co-founder of the Weather Underground Web site. The blog he started there, Category 6, has long been the most vital part of it, particularly during hurricane season. But for hard-to-imagine reasons, the owners of the enterprise are deep-sixing it. Happily, Masters and his colleague Bob Henson seem to be nimbly shifting the operation over to Yale Climate Connections.

Scoreboard

It’s been incredibly hot in Siberia all spring—hot enough that rapidly thawing permafrost destabilized an oil-storage tank, resulting in one of the largest spills in the region’s recent history.

Climate change is made scarier when it interacts with other forces: David Helvarg offers a grim preview of what may be an above-average hurricane season, with all potential evacuations and shelter-in-place orders having to take place amid coronavirus fears. If you think there’s anything abstract about all that, read Gaurab Basu and Samir Chaudhuri’s account of Cyclone Amphan crashing in from the Bay of Bengal last month. The overlapping effects on people’s lungs of wildfire smoke and COVID-19 could also make for an uncomfortable summer out West.

Three major insurance companies said that, going forward, they will no longer underwrite the giant Adani coal mine planned for Australia.

Warming Up

Not music this week, but poetry in “Writers on Earth”: a collection of stories and verse from young writers around the globe, confronting the fact that the planet they’re inheriting is in grave danger. Here is an excerpt of a poem by Vani Dadoo, aged sixteen, from India:

In my city
If you stand on the beach and see the sun drowning in the sea
and behind you there is a row of commercial buildings
you’d agree
that the dying, red sunlight seems to be gilding
the glass windows and the metal girders.
e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
How the Supreme Court Is Quietly Enabling Trump Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=54765"><span class="small">Stephen I. Vladeck, The New York Times</span></a>   
Saturday, 20 June 2020 13:49

Vladeck writes: "In the coming weeks, the Supreme Court is expected to clear its docket of current term cases, with potential major decisions on DACA, abortion, President Trump's financial records and public funding for religious schools."

Activists in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. (photo: Getty Images)
Activists in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. (photo: Getty Images)


How the Supreme Court Is Quietly Enabling Trump

By Stephen I. Vladeck, The New York Times

20 June 20


Using emergency relief at the court, the administration has imposed controversial policies without a final determination of their legality.

n the coming weeks, the Supreme Court is expected to clear its docket of current term cases, with potential major decisions on DACA, abortion, President Trump’s financial records and public funding for religious schools. Like Monday’s ruling on L.G.B.T. discrimination, it’s a safe bet that they will generate outsize attention — and that the decisions will be deeply controversial in some quarters.

But for all of the attention that we pay to these “merits” cases on the court’s docket, the Trump administration, with a majority of the justices’ acquiescence, has quietly racked up a series of less visible — but no less important — victories by repeatedly seeking (and often obtaining) stays of lower-court losses.

Such stay orders are generally unsigned and provide no substantive analysis. But they nevertheless have the effect of allowing challenged government programs to go into full effect even though lower courts have struck them down — and often when no court has ever held them to be lawful in the first place.

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The Folly of Trump's Bolton Lawsuit Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Saturday, 20 June 2020 11:13

Rich writes: "While the White House staff is down to C- and D-list toadies in year four, surely at least some of them knew that this lawsuit was a terrible idea for Trump, just on selfish political grounds."

John Bolton and Donald Trump. (photo: Oliver Contreras/WP/Getty Images)
John Bolton and Donald Trump. (photo: Oliver Contreras/WP/Getty Images)


The Folly of Trump's Bolton Lawsuit

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

20 June 20

 


Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, John Bolton’s memoir, Neil Gorsuch’s surprise decision, and #Rampgate at West Point.

he Trump administration has sued John Bolton in an attempt to stop his upcoming memoir, despite its publisher having already printed and distributed copies. If the book is, effectively, already out, what is the point of the lawsuit?

This is something of a mystery. While the White House staff is down to C- and D-list toadies in year four, surely at least some of them knew that this lawsuit was a terrible idea for Trump, just on selfish political grounds. Bolton’s book was past the point of being recalled when Bill Barr’s Justice Department made its doomed move, Bolton had already taped an ABC interview about the juicy parts, and the Wall Street Journal was publishing an excerpt. Whether as a matter of First Amendment law or just plain common sense, there was no way Trump could suppress this book. So what was the point? The only visible result has been to give Bolton an even larger megaphone.

The wise move for Trump, of course, would have been to simply ignore the book altogether. But clearly he didn’t listen to any such counsel, even if one of his bunker mates had the guts to offer it to him. As a consequence, Bolton has a huge audience for a key revelation that destroys one of the central planks of Trump’s reelection campaign — that China foisted the coronavirus on America and that Joe Biden is somehow China’s corrupt accomplice in evil, #BeijingBiden. It’s hard to keep making that case — which was preposterous to start with — when Bolton has revealed in graphic detail that Trump was kissing President Xi Jinping’s ass, “pleading” with him for a trade deal in a quid pro quo intended to boost Trump’s reelection prospects.

One other possible result of Trump’s legal action may also be salutary — the potential for his suit to claw back Bolton’s royalties even while failing to kill the book itself. An author who chose the title The Room Where It Happened was clearly counting on a Hamilton-scale payday. But a man who has betrayed his country on Bolton’s scale — from hawking the fictional Bush administration intelligence to justify the disastrous invasion of Iraq to staying silent about presidential criminality during impeachment — deserves nothing but contempt.

In any event, most of the reported contents of his book either confirm or fill in additional details of what we already know. We certainly don’t need Bolton to tell us that Mike Pompeo thinks Trump is “so full of shit,” which is not only self-evidently true but also a naked instance of psychological projection by Pompeo, who is doing his best to go down in history as America’s worst secretary of State. So familiar is much of Bolton’s brief against Trump that it’s amazing Trump still thinks he can cover it up — whether with lawsuits, lies, Twitter trolling, or counterprogramming.

Which leads me to wonder if the pointless but rowdy legal action against Bolton may have another purpose entirely: to distract from and drown out an arguably more pressing reality that Trump wants to cover up — the surge of COVID-19 cases in (mostly) red states. On a parallel track to the Bolton fracas, both Trump and Mike Pence have been engaged in a campaign to falsify and downplay news of the pandemic, as if they were locked in a primary race to be the mayor from Jaws. Though in this case the jurisdiction is not Martha’s Vineyard but Tulsa, where 19,000 Trumpists have already started lining up to pack into a hall for Saturday night’s rally.

So what if these MAGA-ites have to agree to a waiver relieving the Trump campaign of liability should they get ill? So what if Tulsa’s own chief health official has said there’s a “huge risk factor” in attending? So what if masks aren’t required? No worries. This week Trump has said the coronavirus will go away without a vaccine (even as he falsely promises a vaccine imminently). Pence has said projections of a “second wave” of the coronavirus are “overblown” by the media. (The sidelined Anthony Fauci says we’re still in the first wave.) Both men, as well as their political and media allies, are dismissing the rise in cases as simply the result of the rise in testing (false) and attributing the new outbreaks mainly to nursing homes, prisons, and meat-packing plants (tell that to the infected barflies of Florida). When Tulsa reported its highest number of new COVID cases to date yesterday, the White House press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, took it as her cue to say the rally offered “a safe opportunity to congregate” and Trump went on Hannity to declare that the virus is “fading away.”

Though the White House doesn’t seem to know or care, there is one crucial distinction between lying about the revelations in John Bolton’s book and lying about a pandemic. With the pandemic, all Americans are in the room where it happens and will see for themselves if it does. Either those 19,000 rally attendees in Tulsa will remain healthy in the weeks to come — or they will get sick and in some cases die. Period.

In the wake of this week’s Supreme Court decision expanding federal workplace protections to gay and transgender people, some conservatives and Evangelicals have come to criticize its lead author, Neil Gorsuch, and argue that his turn away from conservative orthodoxy will keep Trump voters home in 2020. Are they right?

If Evangelical voters and their leaders had the humanity and Christian values they claim, you’d think that today’s surprise Roberts Court decision, protecting some 700,000 young immigrants from Trump and Stephen Miller’s cruel scheme to deport them en masse, would balance out their rage at the long-overdue decision upholding LGBTQ rights. But you would be wrong. Now, as always, these voters threaten to quit the GOP whenever they find Republicans’ actions insufficiently homophobic or misogynistic for their tastes, and always try to cloak their protest as a battle for “religious freedom.” (“Religious freedom” was the same dodge adopted by an earlier generation of right-wing religious and political demagogues who argued against desegregation.)

But the threats are empty. As recently as 2015, Franklin Graham was thundering about leaving the GOP in protest over the funding of Planned Parenthood and “wasteful spending.” Today, he’s among the most vocal of Trump backers in the land, even endorsing the sacrilegious Bible photo op in front of St. John’s Church.

According to Henry Olsen of the Washington Post, it wouldn’t take many defections to put Trump in jeopardy. “Even a small reduction in the Republican margin among the devout will destroy any hope Trump will be reelected,” he writes. In Olsen’s number crunching of 2016 and 2018 voting patterns, Trump’s margin among Evangelical voters would need to fall only ten points in November for him to lose Florida and North Carolina and possibly Georgia and Texas.

But I wouldn’t waste any prayers on that. I’d guess that if Trump does lose, it won’t be because these voters bolt. All you need to know about this constituency is that Roy Moore, an accused serial pedophile, received more than 80 percent of the Christian conservative vote in the 2017 Alabama Senate race — almost identical to Trump’s share of the white Evangelical vote, the Access Hollywood tape notwithstanding, in 2016.

President Trump seemed to have trouble bringing a glass to his mouth and walking down a ramp during a visit to West Point last weekend, drawing attention to his health. What do you think is going on?

You don’t have to be a doctor, or know the specific diagnosis, to recognize Trump’s continued physical and mental decline. About the only people who don’t seem to know are his own handlers, who did nothing to protect him from the spectacle of his doddering down the ramp on-camera at West Point.

Once again, much as with his hyping of the Bolton book, Trump went out of his way to advertise his own scandal — this time, by sending forth another one of those ludicrous tweets claiming that what you can see with your own eyes on video isn’t what actually happened. And once again, he dismantled a pillar of his own reelection campaign. You can’t go around calling your opponent “Sleepy Joe” and smearing his mental and physical capabilities when you lack the ability to pick up a glass of water with one hand.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 Next > End >>

Page 447 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN