RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS: The Week the Democrats Found Their Voice Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Saturday, 22 August 2020 11:47

Rich writes: "It wouldn't matter what else the convention accomplished if it didn't accomplish one big thing: a performance by its 77-year-old nominee confirming that he was a plausible chief executive of the United States."

Biden delivering his memorable speech on Thursday. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP/Shutterstock)
Biden delivering his memorable speech on Thursday. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP/Shutterstock)


The Week the Democrats Found Their Voice

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

22 August 20


Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. Today, the Democratic convention and the nomination of Joe Biden.

he Democrats staged their convention this week, officially nominating Joe Biden for president.  Other than demonstrating a shared opposition to Donald Trump, what did it accomplish for the party?

It wouldn’t matter what else the convention accomplished if it didn’t accomplish one big thing: a performance by its 77-year-old nominee confirming that he was a plausible chief executive of the United States. No matter the highs and lows along the way, the four days were, for me, a nail-biter until the final half-hour. At which point Joe Biden walked to the podium and gave what is surely the speech of his very long career.

The speech landed not because it offered soaring “presidential” rhetoric or said anything new but because it seemed written in the direct, sometimes corny, down-to-earth voice of the guy who delivered it. There was policy in it, but never in the form of a party platform’s bullet points. The substance was always knit into either Biden’s personal history or his overall themes of compassion, character, and resilience. It was a nice passive-aggressive touch to refuse to mention the narcissistic Trump by name while lambasting all his failures. And it was smart to focus most on Trump’s calamitous, ongoing mismanagement (or perhaps one should say non-management) of the pandemic, a calamity that stalks every American. Even a Democratic nominee’s obligatory salute to the governmental activism of FDR during an epic national crisis was linked to the specifics of our moment when, with a slight catch in his voice along the way, Biden noted that Roosevelt was “stricken by a disease, stricken by a virus.”

And his delivery? Crisp, energetic, and sober, paternal without being paternalistic. The speech benefited greatly from the lack of crowd-pleasing applause lines — indeed from the lack of a cheering partisan crowd and those network-television cutaway shots to the delegates in over-the-top political apparel whooping it up on an arena’s floor. The mood that prevailed instead was that of the serious business at hand for the country, accentuated further by the dark backdrop of the deep stage, against which, as the text’s oratorical trope would have it, Biden stood front and center as a figure of light and hope.

Trump’s first attack tweet of Biden afterward made no mention of “Sleepy Joe.” The president had to look only as far as Fox News to hear, as Chris Wallace put it, that the speech had been “enormously effective” in blowing “a hole — a big hole” in Trump’s monthslong campaign to brand his opponent as a “mentally shot” shut-in kidnapped by the “radical left.” The Democrats’ strategy to dole out Biden’s public appearances sparingly since his primary victory turned out to be brilliant. By the time the convention arrived, Trump, as well as his political and media allies, had persuaded themselves that “hidin’ Biden” would be exposed and humiliated before a national audience on his big night like Professor Marvel at the end of The Wizard of Oz. Instead Trump and his troops were ambushed like General Custer at Little Big Horn.

Anything else the convention accomplished or failed to accomplish is secondary to that denouement. But that reality shouldn’t diminish Barack Obama’s moving and at times anguished speech — arguably the best of his career too — which fiercely laid out the high stakes that Biden would address the following night. Kamala Harris had the unenviable assignment of following Obama, but made it work by taking an almost joyous tone to her biography and tart political agenda. For me, her speech was crystallized by almost a throwaway line — “Let’s fight with confidence” — because her own confidence is potentially contagious.

My guess is that the only Trump supporters watching the Democrats were hate-watching. Nothing that happened this week, or any week, can sway them. Perhaps some of that small pool of undecided voters will have a Eureka moment after sampling some of the convention, but who knows. Perhaps, too, the Democratic base, especially Black voters, will be more energized to turn out than it was in 2016, but the election is more than two months away and other convention high points, including the rousing speeches of Michelle Obama and Jill Biden, could fade in the tumultuous weeks to come. Though the Democratic Party is far from united, the convention, typified by Bernie Sanders’s magnanimity, did suggest that the temporary truce between the Biden old guard and the rising generation of progressives will hold until November. The proxy debate over whether the Republican apostate John Kasich should have received a speaking spot or not, a pale semblance of the usual Democratic convention-floor ideological brawls, was as quickly forgotten as Kasich himself.

Meanwhile, the onus is on Trump and his party to recover from Biden’s coup and their own depressed poll numbers. As one who was anticipating some outrageous, potentially game-changing stunt from Trump to throw the Democrats off-balance this week, I was heartened to see that he never got his act together. If the best “surprise” he could mount was a bogus “pardon” to Susan B. Anthony, he’s losing his touch.

There was Trump counterprogramming to the convention all right, but he was not the programmer. What filled the vacuum was a Godfather-worthy montage further dramatizing the scale of his mob operation: the bipartisan Senate report finding that his campaign manager Paul Manafort was an asset for Russian intelligence; a judge once again throwing out Trump’s bid to shield his tax returns from a New York criminal investigation; the arrest of Steve Bannon for allegedly pilfering more than $1 million from Trump zealots who decided to chip in for the border wall when Mexico failed to do so; and the apparent assassination attempt conducted by Trump’s honorary 2016 and 2020 campaign chair, Vladimir Putin, against the Russian opposition leader Aleksei Navalny.

Now we have the GOP convention to look forward to! Aside from the unethical confiscation of the White House lawn for a setting, few plans have been made public. Trump has made noises that he disapproves of the virtual presentations that dominated the Democrats’ show, but even if he liked them, it’s hard to picture him having the discipline required to plan and execute them. He can’t read from a teleprompter in any case. A presidency defined by chaos all but guarantees a chaotic improv convention. Today Trump is no doubt ripping up whatever plans the RNC did have.

One thing is certain: Hope will not be on this convention’s agenda. Having lost the crutch of “Sleepy Joe,” Trump and his party are likely to go full white supremacist. One of the few announced bookings — an appearance by the St. Louis couple who confronted peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters with guns — is an apt preview of coming attractions. In an appearance outside Biden’s hometown of Scranton this week, Trump warned ominously that “mayhem” is “coming to your town and every single town in America.” His definition of “mayhem” of course is Black people — Black people marching or kneeling for their rights, Black people moving next door to “suburban housewives,” a Black woman running for vice-president, Black people going to the polls. The next week is going to be grotesque, but at this late date it’s the last election strategy Trump has left before his final gambit of thwarting, stealing, or nullifying the election itself.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: How a Malignant Narcissist Could Successfully Handle the Coronavirus Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=54217"><span class="small">Al Franken, Al Franken's Website</span></a>   
Saturday, 22 August 2020 11:29

Franken writes: "It should be of no surprise that a great majority of the men who have sought and successfully attained the office of president have been narcissists. What most Americans would be surprised to learn is that a number of even our most successful and admired presidents like Teddy Roosevelt, for example, were themselves archetypal malignant narcissists."

Al Franken. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
Al Franken. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)


How a Malignant Narcissist Could Successfully Handle the Coronavirus

By Al Franken, Al Franken's Website

22 August 20

 

t should be of no surprise that a great majority of the men who have sought and successfully attained the office of president have been narcissists. What most Americans would be surprised to learn is that a number of even our most successful and admired presidents like Teddy Roosevelt, for example, were themselves archetypal malignant narcissists. It is said that it was impossible to get through a dinner party without TR somehow working the conversation to the number of Spaniards he slaughtered “leading” the charge up San Juan Hill.

And yet Teddy Roosevelt was an enormously successful and consequential president by anyone’s account, especially his own.

Presidential scholars like Michael Beschloss will tell you that the difference between a successful malignant narcissist like, say, two-term racist Andrew Jackson, and abject failures like one-term racist James Buchanan has always come down to the same single factor – intelligence.

The sad fact is that our country’s horribly inept and tragic response to this pandemic could have been avoided by a malignant narcissist of merely average intelligence. What was needed back in January and February of this year was a president just smart enough to understand that successfully handling our greatest crisis since World War II would have assured his reelection in the fall.

Even the laziest malignant narcissist would have realized that the nation would rally around a leader who openly acknowledged the enormous gravity of the pandemic – as many tens of millions of Americans had well before the president himself finally conceded the obvious. Even just a moderately intelligent malignant narcissist would then have understood that he should turn for guidance to science rather than his son-in-law.

All malignant narcissists are completely lacking in empathy, the one quality that most Americans believe is essential to a successful leader. But those Americans are dead wrong. Some of our most beloved presidents have been smart enough to know that fake empathy can be every bit as effective as the real thing, if not more so. Take, for example, Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, admired for the noble sentiment he so eloquently expressed in his Declaration of Independence – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”

We know now, of course, that Jefferson believed no such thing. Our third president was, in fact, a slaveholder who fathered six children with Sally Hemings, a human being he enslaved and exploited sexually from the time she was a fourteen-year-old child. Jefferson’s intelligence, eloquence, and fake empathy – each strategically deployed to disguise his own monstrous narcissism – have inspired our nation’s highest and, as yet, tragically unfulfilled aspirations.

It is far too late in the game for Donald Trump to feign empathy, though it is entirely possible that he does not know that. If polling numbers stay where they are today, a desperate Trump may very well try faking empathy as an “October Surprise.” In my opinion, that tactic would almost certainly backfire with his most loyal base – angry male xenophobes, themselves narcissists who believe that other people’s misfortunes are always entirely of their own making.

If I were advising Trump, which I most certainly am not, I would make an equally radical suggestion, but one that just might work. Fake humility. Why, you might ask, would fake humility be any more effective than fake empathy? Throughout history, president after president has shown that pretending to humbly admit error is a much easier sell than suddenly feigning empathy for people for whom he has heretofore shown nothing but utter contempt. Indeed, while many Americans share Trump’s complete inability to put themselves in other people’s shoes, almost all do, however, regret serious mistakes in their own lives. And while they themselves would never admit their own transgressions to another living soul, they often admire those who do, whether or not the apologies are sincerely given.

My advice to Trump would be to ask the networks for a half-hour in prime time from the Oval Office. There, laying on thick the aforementioned fake humility, he would confess to the American people that he is well aware of the many tragic, boneheaded mistakes he has regretfully made in his handling of the pandemic and that he has decided to start relying solely on scientifically sound advice from people with postgraduate degrees in medicine and bioscience from fully-accredited universities.

Massive federal funding would soon flow to faster and more accurate testing, ramped-up contact tracing, and a well-executed protocol for isolating those who test positive.Patriotic public service announcements would call on all Americans to wear masks, wash their hands with hot water and soap, and socially distance from others. Within weeks Americans would begin to see a sharp decline in infections, hospitalizations, and senseless fatalities. The cable news channels, always looking to boost ratings, would applaud Trump’s initiatives and excitedly predict that the presidential race would soon tighten to a dead heat.

Trump’s only hope is to stop listening to the sad losers who have been advising him so disastrously. Now is his last chance to prove to Americans that he is the latest in a line of savvy malignant narcissists whom the most respected presidential historians consider to be among our greatest presidents – Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and, yes, George Washington.

The only question now is whether Donald Trump is smart enough to take my advice. I think he is!

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Trump's "Law and Order" Campaign Is a Distraction Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51635"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog</span></a>   
Saturday, 22 August 2020 08:32

Reich writes: "Trump has refused to act to contain the coronavirus, opting to sit on the sidelines as the pandemic ravages the country. But when it comes to waging violence against his own people, he's quickly risen to the occasion."

Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)
Former Clinton labor secretary Robert Reich. (photo: Steve Russell/Toronto Star)


Trump's "Law and Order" Campaign Is a Distraction

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

22 August 20

 

rump has refused to act to contain the coronavirus, opting to sit on the sidelines as the pandemic ravages the country. But when it comes to waging violence against his own people, he’s quickly risen to the occasion.

Here are 6 ways Donald Trump has failed to attack the coronavirus, but instead has attacked Americans.

1. LEADERSHIP? 

Trump has said he has “no responsibility” for the coronavirus pandemic, fobbing it off on governors and mayors whose repeated requests for federal help he’s denied. 

But when it comes to assaulting Americans exercising their right to protest in defense of Black lives, Trump is quick to assert strong “leadership.” He called the NYC Black Lives Matter mural a “symbol of hate” and has sent federal agents to terrorize protestors even as mayors and governors urged him to stay out.

2. STRATEGY? 

Trump has never offered a national strategy for testing, contact tracing, and isolating those who have the virus. He has provided insufficient funding for the schools he’s trying to force open, abysmal standards for reopening the economy, purchasing critical supplies, or helping the unemployed, and no clear message about what people and businesses should do. 

But he has a strategy for attacking Americans. He deployed unidentified federal agents against protesters in Portland, Oregon, where his secret police pulled them into unmarked vans, and detained them without charges. Federal agents have since left the city, causing violence to go down almost immediately, but Trump has threatened to send agents to Kansas City, Albuquerque and Chicago. He also said he’ll send them to New York City, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore and Oakland – not incidentally, all cities with Democratic mayors, large Black populations, and little violent unrest.

3. PERSONNEL? 

Trump can’t find enough federal personnel to do contact tracing for the coronavirus.

But Trump has had no problem finding thousands of agents for his secret police, drawn from the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security.

4. EQUIPMENT? 

Public health authorities don’t have adequate medical equipment to quickly analyze coronavirus tests. 

But Trump’s police have everything they need to injure protesters, including military style armored vehicles, teargas, and tactical assault weapons – “the best equipment,” Trump boasted obnoxiously.

5. LEGAL AUTHORITY? 

There is ample legal authority for Trump to contain the coronavirus.

But he’s likely exceeded the legal authority for him to send federal troops into cities where mayors don’t want them. The framers of the Constitution denied police power to the national government. The local officials in charge of public safety have rejected Trump’s troops. (The mayor of Portland was tear-gassed. The mayor of Kansas City called them “disgraceful.” Albuquerque’s mayor announced: “There’s no place for Trump’s secret police in our city.” Chicago’s mayor said she does “not welcome dictatorship.”)

6. THE TRUTH? 

Trump has tried to suppress the truth about the coronavirus. The White House instructed hospitals to report cases to the Department of Health and Human Services rather than to the CDC. Trump muzzled the federal government’s most prominent and trusted immunologist, Dr. Anthony Fauci, while the White House tried to discredit him. 

But the Trump campaign ran fictitious ads portraying cities as overrun by violent leftwing mobs, and Trump’s shameless Fox News lackeys have consistently depicted protesters as “rioters” and the “armed wing of the Democratic party.”

** 

More than 160,000 Americans have already died from the coronavirus — tens of thousands more than would have died had Trump acted responsibly to contain it. And the economy is in freefall. No matter how hard he tries, we can’t let Trump shift public attention from his failure to attack the virus to his attacks on Americans protesting to create an America where Black lives matter and everyone can thrive.In fewer than 90 days, we must hold him accountable at the ballot box.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
New York's Successful Socialist Slate Shows the Left Should Think Big Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=55795"><span class="small">Rachel Himes and Ansley Pentz, Jacobin</span></a>   
Saturday, 22 August 2020 08:23

Excerpt: "In New York City, the Democratic Socialists of America ran a five-candidate slate for state office - and won across the board. The campaign's overwhelming success points to a model of radical electoral organizing in the wake of Bernie Sanders."

'Julia Salazar's 2018 race was won through a massive mobilization of canvassers.' (photo: Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty Images)
'Julia Salazar's 2018 race was won through a massive mobilization of canvassers.' (photo: Erik McGregor/Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty Images)


New York's Successful Socialist Slate Shows the Left Should Think Big

By Rachel Himes and Ansley Pentz, Jacobin

22 August 20


In New York City, the Democratic Socialists of America ran a five-candidate slate for state office — and won across the board. The campaign’s overwhelming success points to a model of radical electoral organizing in the wake of Bernie Sanders.

our socialist legislators will join New York State senator Julia Salazar in Albany next year. In June, candidates backed by New York City’s Democratic Socialists of America (NYC-DSA), the nation’s largest chapter with over 5,800 dues-paying members, swept races in Brooklyn and Queens, solidifying the organization’s role as one of the most powerful forces in electoral politics in the state. In the midst of a devastating pandemic, a national uprising, and economic recession, 100,000 New York voters cast their ballots for socialist candidates, promising sweeping change.

In this historic moment, socialists have the opportunity — and the imperative — to grow and build the mass movement we need to win the working class’s demands for workers’ rights, universal health care, and a homes guarantee. NYC-DSA illustrates that one way to build such power is by running a socialist slate.

With its strength in numbers, a slate has many advantages. It is a highly visible formation, capable of amplifying its message across several candidates and neighborhoods, and transforming an individual campaign into movement organizing — a particular weakness for establishment Democrats, who struggle to build a volunteer base and connect with everyday people.

This is the story of NYC-DSA, which, fueled by rent law wins in Albany, ran a slate of five state candidates: Jabari Brisport for Senate; Phara Souffrant Forrest, Marcela Mitaynes, and Zohran Mamdani for Assembly, and once again, Julia Salazar for State Senate.

The slate stood for a clear socialist political program: universal health care, a homes guarantee, a Green New Deal for New York, and the decarceration and decriminalization of working people, particularly people of color. This massive redistributive program is now made viable thanks to the success of the slate — powered by the movements — soon to be in the legislature. Going by the name “DSA for the Many,” the slate’s program reflected the politics and priorities of NYC-DSA more broadly, which promotes a shared platform focused on justice for working people.

Running a slate within a mass organization ensured that our goals and demands both predated and outlived the election cycle. It also meant that NYC-DSA could build a caucus before even getting to Albany. A slate lends credibility, flexibility, and durability to socialists’ individual campaigns. The socialist slate became shorthand for both the organization and socialism itself.

Credibility

Even before making the decision to run, the slate’s candidates were deeply embedded in working-class organizing, both within and outside of DSA. Phara Souffrant Forrest, for example, is a union nurse whose entry to socialism was through her work as a tenant organizer. Jabari Brisport is a union public school teacher who came to DSA as an activist in the gay rights and Black Lives Matter movements.

Alone, these candidates are impressive. But with the support of a slate, NYC-DSA, and a coalition of progressive organizations, they stood for a movement — the kind of movement necessary to stand up to New York City’s establishment politicians. Their candidacy, and come January, their office, expands the arena for working-class struggle and grows the socialist movement’s credibility with voters and community members.

Unlike Democratic political clubs or nonprofit organizations, NYC-DSA endorsed in races early, kicking off field operations — the arm of organizing that includes having conversations with people and persuading them to vote — in November for the late-June primary. This gave organizers the time to build a base of support within the districts, and to connect the state races to a national platform: Bernie Sanders was still in the race for president, advocating for the same issues the DSA for the Many slate was fighting for.

As DSA members campaigned nationally for Bernie through an independent expenditure, NYC-DSA connected local issues to the Sanders platform. When knocking on doors in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, for example, volunteers talked about both Mitaynes’s and Sanders’s fight for universal rent control. Not only did linking our slate to Bernie grow in-district support and volunteer energy, but the national scope of the Democratic Primary and the scale of Sanders’s second presidential campaign lent credibility to our local socialist movement.

When Bernie dropped out of the race, our volunteers reminded voters that the fight for universal health care wasn’t over — it was sustained through our state elections, and through DSA’s ongoing organizing. Organizing through the slate maintained organizers’ focus on a broader goal of achieving a socialist future, rather than allowing their disappointment to turn to burnout and distrust of electoral politics. By sustaining the connections we had made between his socialist platform and the state candidates’, we carried on the political revolution ignited by the Bernie campaign.

Flexibility

The COVID-19 pandemic presented the slate with daunting obstacles, but it also opened up new possibilities for organizing. Salazar’s 2018 race was won through a massive mobilization of canvassers, and that’s what the campaigns had prepared for. But in early March, the onset of social distancing guidelines put an end to door-knocking.

But thanks to a committed, talented cadre of electoral organizers, the slate’s campaigns were able to quickly adjust to the crisis, drawing upon the technical and organizational expertise of NYC-DSA electoral leadership.

This structure allowed staff and volunteers to not only quickly adjust to phone banking as the primary method of voter contact, but also to shift the campaign’s messaging in response to the COVID-19 crisis. When volunteers connected with voters over the phone, conversations focused on the failures of elected officials to protect the health, safety, and livelihood of New Yorkers during the pandemic, and what an adequate response would look like. As the candidates amplified this message, volunteers connected voters to socialists who were responding to the pandemic by calling for the cancellation of rent, organizing workers in the restaurant industry, and building mutual aid networks.

As legislators prepared to vote on the state budget, our slate of insurgent candidates backed Salazar, who voted “no” to Governor Andrew Cuomo’s austerity measures, and rallied support for NYC-DSA’s People’s Bailout for New York. These budget demands became an organizing focus for both electoral and issue-based campaigns, making clear the significance of electing socialists to the state legislature, where they have the power to tax the rich and redistribute wealth. As DSA pushed for all workers’ rights to unemployment insurance, and essential workers’ rights to personal protective equipment and hazard pay, the slate brought these demands to voters.

Along with NYC-DSA members, the slate took to the streets during the George Floyd uprising. As speakers, they amplified the demand to defund the police, leading marches to the homes of New York City Council members to demand a “no” vote on any budget that did not cut the NYPD’s $6 billion budget in half. The candidates’ solidarity with protestors points to the possibility that movement candidates can become movement legislators; rather than redirecting protesters toward what Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor has criticized as “more reasonable means,” in-office organizers can use their position to actively support protesters in their fight for justice.

Durability

Throughout the election cycle, the “DSA for the Many” slate made it clear that volunteers and supporters were growing a movement, not just supporting a few candidates. Even when deployed through electoral campaigns, our organizing was not just about winning elections; we are focused on broader goals.

After most election cycles, energy dissipates. Campaigns lose touch with supporters, volunteers are deactivated, and voters resume their daily lives, without the expectation that much will improve. The slate, by contrast, wanted volunteers to gain valuable organizing skills so that they could transition directly from electoral work to issue-based campaigns, like Defund NYPD or Public Power. After the slate’s victories, NYC-DSA membership surged, with new members bringing enthusiasm and militancy to further invigorate projects.

The slate campaigns built a membership and organizational culture, which focused as much on bottom-up organizing as on identifying and developing new leaders, who grow DSA’s capacity to run future electoral campaigns and fight against austerity with the next state budget.

Because each campaign was member-led and embedded in a mass organization, we were able to direct volunteers and resources to where they were most needed. The knowledge and expertise cultivated during these races — including systems for data tracking, volunteer management, and relational organizing — were not only shared among the campaigns, which remained in constant communication throughout the election cycle, but preserved within NYC-DSA.

Establishing the DSA for the Many Multicandidate Committee, a political fundraising tool, also supported our long-term movement goals. Rather than giving money to a single candidate, supporters donated to the slate. Funds raised this cycle will go on to support socialist candidates NYC-DSA endorses in the future.

Winning

DSA’s slate paves the way for independent political power in New York. By running on a shared platform that responded to the changing landscape of people’s lives during the pandemic and protests, these movement candidates differentiated themselves from the establishment. They were a collective of democratic socialists, not true-blue Democrats.

Their victories set a precedent for future elections and also warn establishment (and even progressive) Democrats that New York City is ready for socialism. New Yorkers are not only ready for Julia, Jabari, Phara, Marcela, and Zohran as individuals, but they are ready for the movement these now electeds represent.

The slate’s sweep also suggests possibilities for other cities and counties across the country: while running state races may not yet be feasible or favorable, organizers can create slates that respond to local conditions. East Bay DSA, for example, endorsed slates of candidates for City Council, School Board, and Rent Board. Elections can serve as a way to not only build governmental power, but to train organizers to build movement power.

In New York, voters’ despair over Albany’s twisted politics was met with a movement of reasoned hope. The DSA for the Many candidates couldn’t build a socialist future alone. But with a slate, they don’t have to.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
God Bless America, You Are My Sunshine Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=47905"><span class="small">Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website</span></a>   
Friday, 21 August 2020 12:46

Keillor writes: "I am of a bygone era, I write on yellow tablets with a rollerball pen."

Garrison Keillor. (photo: MPR)
Garrison Keillor. (photo: MPR)


God Bless America, You Are My Sunshine

By Garrison Keillor, Garrison Keillor's Website

21 August 20

 

nto each life some rain must fall,” said my dear Aunt Eleanor, and so when it rained all day on Saturday I thought of her. This is a true memorial, truer than a stone with your name on it. Say memorable things. Grandma said, “You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.” She also said, “We are all islands in the sea of life and seldom do our peripheries touch,” which is also true, especially during a pandemic. My periphery has only touched that of my wife and daughter since February. Whenever handshaking becomes legal again, I hope I remember how many shakes you should do (three? five?). And which friends do you hug and for how long.

In the pandemic I’ve started watching TV again, a habit I lost in 1982 when I got too busy. I can only watch for about half an hour and then I get restless and I only watch baseball, only my Twins, with the fabulous Byron Buxton in CF and a manager named Rocco Baldelli and amid a bunch of talented Latino players we have Max Kepler, a name right out of the 1890s.

Watching baseball makes me feel I’m in America and an old man needs reassurance on that. Back when I lived in Denmark and felt I was walking around with a big red A around my neck, it was thrilling to walk into the Anglican church on Sunday and say the words, “Our Father Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name,” like standing under a hot shower. Same when a sausage was served in a bun, to be eaten in the hand, not with fork and knife. Copenhagen was a strange city, where pedestrians stood waiting for the light to change even though no traffic was coming, but the Lord’s Prayer and a hot dog restored my sense of identity. They had no baseball, they played a game they called football but only used their feet and wore no helmets.

Grandma and Aunt Eleanor would’ve done fine in a pandemic, being farm women, hardy, self-sufficient, devoted to family. Grandma wasn’t a joiner, she had her eight children and sister Della and brother Lew and that was enough. She lived a close compact life, even without a virus to require it. They called it “visiting,” and women were good at it and men not so much, except Uncle Lew. When he was old and failing, he said, “If you don’t have time to come visit me now, don’t bother to come to my funeral,” and he meant it. Sitting and visiting was fundamental to life, and the conversation was all reminiscence, never about politics.

My daughter, home from school, is like them. I hear her in her room, doing FaceTime or Zoom or some app I’ve never heard of, and a flock of girlish voices chattering. It’s what holds her world together. I don’t understand a single thing they’re saying, any more than I understood Danish, but I love the sound. I grew up a loner and never acquired social skills, that’s why I have to write books.

I am of a bygone era, I write on yellow tablets with a rollerball pen. I don’t get contemporary fiction, I want to go back and reread Dickens and Cervantes and Tolstoy. I go for a walk and see a deranged man yammering to himself, a perfectly well-dressed lunatic having an episode, and then I notice the little device clipped to his ear.

I need fixed markers in this attention-deficit world. Mine are my wife’s shoulders and my laptop computer. When people dare to congregate again, I need to go to church and feel absolved of my sins and then go to comedy clubs and watch stand-ups ply their trade. I need to stare at the screen so I don’t miss the fly ball to deep left center and the outfielders stretching out full tilt and the ball rolls into the gap for a double. Such graceful things can happen within this fixed finite field. Bases loaded, one out, our pitcher is struggling, disaster on the horizon, and then there it is — a squiggly grounder to the shortstop who underhands it to the second baseman who pivots and fires to first for the DP, catching the runner by a half-stride, and reflexively we jump to our feet and say, YES!

I want more of those moments, in church, in comedy, in my own kitchen looking at the salad my wife made. YES! I say. Praise the Lord for the zucchini.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 Next > End >>

Page 382 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN