|
FOCUS: Meet Paul Ryan |
|
|
Tuesday, 14 August 2012 11:59 |
|
Excerpt: "Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney's new running mate, has a history of anti-climate science statements and votes..."
Paul Ryan introduces his controversial budget recommendations on Capitol Hill, 04/05/11. (photo: AP)

Meet Paul Ryan
By Al Gore, Reader Supported News
14 August 12
aul Ryan, Mitt Romney's new running mate, has a history of anti-climate science statements and votes, according to Brad Johnson:
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Mitt Romney's vice-presidential pick, is a virulent denier of climate science, with a voting record to match.
A favorite of the Koch brothers, Ryan has accused scientists of engaging in conspiracy to "intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change." He has implied that snow invalidates global warming.
Ryan has voted to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from limiting greenhouse pollution, to eliminate White House climate advisers, to block the U.S. Department of Agriculture from preparing for climate disasters like the drought devastating his home state, and to eliminate the Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA-E).
He has also said there is "growing disagreement among scientists about climate change and its causes."
In addition to his opposition to meaningful action to reduce global warming pollution, Paul Ryan's budget called for "drastic cuts in federal spending on energy research and development and for the outright elimination of subsidies and tax breaks for wind, solar power and other alternative energy technologies."
Solving the climate crisis requires political leadership that recognizes the serious reality of global warming and fights for policies that move us toward a clean energy economy, not backward.

|
|
In Paul Ryan, The Right at Last Has Their Man |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11385"><span class="small">Bill Moyers, Reader Supported News</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 14 August 2012 09:32 |
|
Excerpt: "In this campaign, Romney is now the 'the man who isn't there' - the dispensable one. But in Paul Ryan, the Golden Boy from Janesville who schooled himself in the ideology of right-wing think tanks inside the Beltway, they finally have one of their own - a true believer for the new Gilded Age."
Portrait, Bill Moyers. (photo: Robin Holland)

In Paul Ryan, The Right at Last Has Their Man
By Bill Moyers, Reader Supported News
14 August 12
ver since Barry Goldwater lost his bid for the presidency in 1964, the conservative movement has been looking for a choice, not an echo (Goldwater's mantra). Reagan came close, but compromised too often on taxes and back-slapped with Democratic Speaker Tip O'Neill too often to give them total satisfaction. George W. was almost the putty-in-their-hands they'd craved, but the vast corruption he tolerated left a record they couldn't boast of, and his wild deficit spending (including two wars they allowed him to put on the credit card and the budget-busting Medicare prescription bill) frustrated their aim of reducing the government until it could be drowned in the bathtub.
Mitt Romney hasn't won their hearts either. He has shed so many of his previous positions in order to appease the Tea Party that he sounds as if he is reciting by rote Conscience of a Conservative - Goldwater's declaration of principles - and just might forget it all the morning after his inauguration.
This was never Romney's party, and without Karl Rove's shadowy money behind him, he would not have survived the primaries. So shape-shifting a figure was unlikely ever to inspire the front line troops in an election the Right sees as a showdown with the Anti-Christ at Armageddon. In this campaign, Romney is now the "the man who isn't there" - the dispensable one.
But in Paul Ryan, the Golden Boy from Janesville who schooled himself in the ideology of right-wing think tanks inside the Beltway, they finally have one of their own - a true believer for the new Gilded Age.
The country, too, now has a choice, not an echo. And that should add up to a definitive election in November.
Watch Moyers & Company weekly on public television, and explore more at BillMoyers.com.

|
|
|
GOP Rep. Joe Walsh: Muslims Are 'Trying to Kill Americans Every Week' |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=16814"><span class="small">Rebecca Leber, ThinkProgress</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 14 August 2012 09:23 |
|
Excerpt: "By branding Islam as a violent religion, Walsh incites a familiar fear-mongering tactic that lawmakers like Michele Bachmann have been widely condemned for."
Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh incites fear-mongering tactics against American-Muslim communities. (photo: AP)

GOP Rep. Joe Walsh: Muslims Are 'Trying to Kill Americans Every Week'
By Rebecca Leber, ThinkProgress
14 August 12
n Friday night, there were two pellet-gun shots on a mosque in the Chicago suburb Morton Grove. No one was injured, and 51-year-old David Conrad has been charged for shooting on the outer wall of the building as people prayed inside.
This was just days after Tea Party Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) delivered a town hall speech on the "real threat" of radical Muslims in the U.S. "trying to kill Americans every week." Walsh made these comments just 15 miles from Morton Grove mosque:
"One thing I'm sure of is that there are people in this country - there is a radical strain of Islam in this country - it's not just over there - trying to kill Americans every week. It is a real threat, and it is a threat that is much more at home now than it was after 9/11," Walsh said.
Walsh went on to claim that radical Islam had found its way into the Chicago suburbs, including some that he represents.
"It's here. It's in Elk Grove. It's in Addison. It's in Elgin. It's here," he said.
In the same speech, Walsh said he is "looking for some godly men and women in the Senate, in the Congress, who will stand in the face of the danger of Islam in America without political correctness," according to Salon.
By branding Islam as a violent religion, Walsh incites a familiar fear-mongering tactic that lawmakers like Michele Bachmann have been widely condemned for. Yet acts of violence against American-Muslim communities are nothing new; for example, the FBI is currently investigating a suspicious fire that recently destroyed a Missouri mosque.

|
|
The Ryan Role |
|
|
Monday, 13 August 2012 14:17 |
|
Krugman writes: "Look, Ryan hasn't 'crunched the numbers'; he has just scribbled some stuff down, without checking at all to see if it makes sense."
Portrait, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, 06/15/09. (photo: Fred R. Conrad/NYT)

The Ryan Role
By Paul Krugman, The New York Times
13 August 12
ark Kleiman points us to a lamentable but revealing column by William Saletan, which illustrates perfectly how the essentially ludicrous Paul Ryan has gotten so far - namely, by playing to the gullibility of self-proclaimed centrists, who want to show their "balance" by finding a conservative to praise.
Saletan writes:
Ryan is a real fiscal conservative. He isn't just another Tea-Party ideologue spouting dogma about less government and the magic of free enterprise. He has actually crunched the numbers and laid out long-term budget proposals.
OK, what? Where is that coming from? Did Saletan miss the whole discussion when the Ryan plan came out? Did he miss the point where even Jacob Weisberg apologized for his initial praise, admitting that
I reacted too quickly and didn't sort out just how laughable Ryan's long-term spending projections were. His plan projects an absurd future, according to the Congressional Budget Office, in which all discretionary spending, now around 12 percent of GDP, shrinks to 3 percent of GDP by 2050. Defense spending alone was 4.7 percent of GDP in 2009. With numbers like that, Ryan is more an anarchist-libertarian than honest conservative.
Look, Ryan hasn't "crunched the numbers"; he has just scribbled some stuff down, without checking at all to see if it makes sense. He asserts that he can cut taxes without net loss of revenue by closing unspecified loopholes; he asserts that he can cut discretionary spending to levels not seen since Calvin Coolidge, without saying how; he asserts that he can convert Medicare to a voucher system, with much lower spending than now projected, without even a hint of how this is supposed to work. This is just a fantasy, not a serious policy proposal.
So why does Saletan believe otherwise? Has he crunched the numbers himself? Of course not. What he's doing - and what the whole Beltway media crowd has done - is to slot Ryan into a role someone is supposed to be playing in their political play, that of the thoughtful, serious conservative wonk. In reality, Ryan is nothing like that; he's a hard-core conservative, with a voting record as far right as Michelle Bachman's, who has shown no competence at all on the numbers thing.
What Ryan is good at is exploiting the willful gullibility of the Beltway media, using a soft-focus style to play into their desire to have a conservative wonk they can say nice things about. And apparently the trick still works.

|
|