RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Hundreds of Thousands of People Didn't Have to Die Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=56759"><span class="small">Nicole Wetsman, The Verge</span></a>   
Saturday, 24 October 2020 12:54

Wetsman writes: "If you take the typical death toll in the United States in a typical year and add the population of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania or the population of St. Louis, Missouri, you'll end up with the number of people who died this year."

A patient hospitalized with COVID-19. (photo: BioSpace)
A patient hospitalized with COVID-19. (photo: BioSpace)


Hundreds of Thousands of People Didn't Have to Die

By Nicole Wetsman, The Verge

24 October 20

 

f you take the typical death toll in the United States in a typical year and add the population of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania or the population of St. Louis, Missouri, you’ll end up with the number of people who died this year. There were nearly 300,000 more deaths than there would have been during a normal year, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Without a pandemic, that many more people would still be alive.

Most of those deaths, about two-thirds, were from COVID-19. But around 100,000 people died as a consequence of the pandemic, even if the virus didn’t directly kill them. They may have died because they avoided a hospital, despite their symptoms of — for example — a stroke, because of a local COVID-19 outbreak. Or maybe they couldn’t get treatment from a medical system overwhelmed by COVID-19. People struggling with substance use disorders died more frequently this year from overdoses, perhaps because they couldn’t access their usual support systems during a time of unusual stress. Deaths from dementia and Alzheimer’s spiked this year, probably because access to normal health care was disrupted. More people considered suicide than normal, although doctors still aren’t sure yet if deaths by suicide have increased.

This sounds abstract, so let’s be concrete. For instance, there is my great aunt, who died last weekend. She didn’t die from COVID-19 but as an indirect result of the pandemic. She caught the virus in a nursing home over the summer and recovered without too many complications. But after the extended time in the hospital, and strain of fighting off a disease, and the isolation forced by the pandemic, she started to decline. At 96, she’d lived a long life. But I wonder: if COVID-19 had been better controlled in the US, and she’d never caught it, would her health problems have accelerated in the same way?

The third surge of COVID-19 in the US could kill thousands over the next few weeks and thousands more through the rest of the year if the virus isn’t brought under control. As deaths from the virus rise again, indirect deaths will start to climb as well. The spiking cases are already starting to overwhelm hospitals in some states, and some are turning away patients. That means there’s less health care available for everyone, not just COVID-19 patients.

We could feel the collateral damage to health for years. Children in the US got standard childhood vaccinations at lower rates this year, which could leave them vulnerable to preventable diseases. Some sexually transmitted disease-screening programs had to go offline, and some people may go undiagnosed. Fewer people were screened for cancer this year, which could risk some illnesses being caught too late.

Fighting the pandemic is about more than just minimizing death from COVID-19. It’s also about minimizing unnecessary death, period.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Water-Only for 22 Days to Defeat Trump Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11243"><span class="small">Ted Glick, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Saturday, 24 October 2020 12:06

Glick writes: "When I began my water-only Fast to Defeat Trump on October 3, I had some idea about how I was going to feel as it progressed. I have done long water-only fasts before, though the last time, on the issue of the climate crisis, was 13 years ago, when I was 58 years old. On this one I’m 71."

Supporters cheer for Joe Biden. (photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)
Supporters cheer for Joe Biden. (photo: Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images)


Water-Only for 22 Days to Defeat Trump

By Ted Glick, Reader Supported News

24 October 20

 

hen I began my water-only Fast to Defeat Trump on October 3, I had some idea about how I was going to feel as it progressed. I have done long water-only fasts before, though the last time, on the issue of the climate crisis, was 13 years ago, when I was 58 years old. On this one I’m 71. And though I’m a regular long-distance bicyclist and exercise guy, that’s getting up there in years, I know.

This one has been harder than the one in 2007. I remember being pretty active during that one as late as the 22nd or 23rd day. Not this time. I have been weak since day two, the primary symptom I’ve had all throughout. This morning I woke up after a good night’s sleep and found it difficult to get going, with the most weakness since I stopped eating.

But the most important thing about my hunger strike is not how I’m feeling but whether or not there is evidence that it is having its desired result. What is that? It’s the motivation of other people who might not vote otherwise to vote for the removal of Trump by voting for Biden, and to get involved in the organized efforts by a number of groups to turn out the majority of the American population that opposes Trump.

I have anecdotal evidence that some individuals are voting or doing phone calling or other voter turnout work that they might not be doing otherwise. But a better metric is the extent of media coverage, and I feel good on that front. I can count about a dozen progressive media sources that have run stories about me or interviewed me.

A main angle of a number of those stories is the fact that in 2002 I was a Green Party candidate for the US Senate and that I was a local leader of a Green Party group in northern New Jersey from 2000 to 2018. Now I’m urging people to vote for Biden, after having been a Bernie Sanders supporter prior to Biden’s primary victory.

Why am I not just voting for Biden and urging others to do the same but also fasting for a planned 32 days to underline why people should do so?

Like many other commentators, I consider this election to be one of – if not the – most consequential elections in decades. There’s the issue of democracy and if we’ll still have it if Trump is elected. There’s the issue of Trump’s open egging-on and support of violent white supremacist groups. There’s his total walking away from giving leadership in the fight against COVID-19. There’s his misogyny and anti-LGBTQ history. There’s his explicit policies of shoveling even more money and power to his fellow oligarchs and the rich. But the ultimate, most important one for me is his overt denial of the climate emergency we are in and his repeated moves to prop up a faltering fossil fuel industry.

For 17 years, the climate issue has been the main issue for me. My last paying job for 10 years before retiring in 2015 was as the National Campaign Coordinator of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. I’ve continued to work close to full-time on this issue since retirement as an unpaid volunteer. I’ve been arrested about 10 times over that 17-year period for the action of nonviolent civil disobedience on the climate issue.

Unlike every other issue, there is a definite time urgency to this one. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a consortium of thousands of scientists, said in a report two years ago that “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society” will take place if the world does not reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030. We are completely and totally behind the 8-ball on this one.

The way I see it, when the future of life on earth is very literally at stake with this election, it’s more than appropriate for actions that may seem extreme if those actions can have an impact. With every fiber of my being, I pray, and believe, that this action is doing that.



Ted Glick is currently on a month-long, water-only Fast to Defeat Trump until November 3rd. He is the author of the recently-published Burglar for Peace: Lessons Learned in the Catholic Left’s Resistance to the Vietnam War. More information can be found at https://tedglick.com, and he can be followed on Twitter at https://twitter.com/jtglick

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
RSN: Why a President Joe Biden Should Invite Bernie Sanders Into His Administration Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=35143"><span class="small">Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Saturday, 24 October 2020 11:08

Gottinger writes: "Some progressives still feeling the sting of Bernie Sanders's primary loss found reason to celebrate this week when Politico reported that he is actively campaigning to be part of a future Joe Biden administration."

Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. (photo: Brynn Anderson/AP)
Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. (photo: Brynn Anderson/AP)


Why a President Joe Biden Should Invite Bernie Sanders Into His Administration

By Paul Gottinger, Reader Supported News

24 October 20

 

ome progressives still feeling the sting of Bernie Sanders’s primary loss found reason to celebrate this week when Politico reported that he is actively campaigning to be part of a future Joe Biden administration.

According to two sources familiar with his thinking, Sanders has expressed particular interest in becoming Biden’s Labor Secretary. As part of his effort, he has been reaching out to progressive allies on the Biden transition team.

The Labor Secretary, an important but often overlooked member of a president’s cabinet, is responsible for overseeing the enforcement of key laws requiring employers to:

  • Pay workers a minimum hourly wage, overtime, and abide by other wage laws.

  • Protect the health and safety of their workers.

  • Honor an employee’s right to family and medical leave.

  • Provide a discrimination-free workplace.

  • Protect workers’ retirements.

  • Protect workers’ right to collectively bargain and form unions.

The Labor Secretary also implements job training programs and investigates wage theft by employers, the largest form of theft in the country by dollar amount.

The responsibilities of a Labor Secretary are a great fit for Sanders, given his long track record of championing workers’ rights.

Senator Sanders himself has not confirmed his ambition to be part of Biden’s administration. When asked, he said, “Right now I am focused on seeing that Biden is elected president.”

Yet he alluded to it this week in his interview with Hill TV’s Krystal Ball.

When Ball asked him if any progressive voices are being included in Biden’s transition team, Bernie responded, “You’ll have to forgive me for not going too much into the details, but yes, there are.”

Biden’s transition team has said they won’t be making any personnel decisions before the election, but Faiz Shakir, former manager of the Sanders campaign, hinted that the Sanders team has some influence in Biden’s team.

“We’ve had a good working relationship with the Biden team and I expect we’ll maintain that all the way through.”

Bill Clinton’s former labor secretary Robert Reich, when asked about the possibility of Bernie becoming Labor Secretary, said, “He’d be terrific.”

Yet some are skeptical that the Biden administration will roll out a welcome mat for progressives like Sanders. Given Biden’s long history of centrist politics and his obsession with bipartisanship, some progressives have feared a Biden administration will lock them out.

Others on the left have suggested Sanders should stay out of a Biden administration because he would have to give up his fierce independence and ability to criticize Biden.

While there are good reasons to argue that the senator would be better off staying in the Senate – one being that the Republican governor of Vermont would appoint his replacement until a special election was held – Joe Biden would be smart to include Sanders in his cabinet for three reasons.

1. His platform is popular.

2. His supporters represent a significant percentage of the Democratic Party.

3. For Biden to have a successful presidency, he’ll need to implement at least part of the Sanders agenda.

Sanders’s platform is popular

Sanders’s two presidential campaigns had a bigger impact on the country than any other failed presidential campaign in recent American history. His campaigns launched Medicare for All, student debt forgiveness, and a Green New Deal into the mainstream.

Even Biden himself acknowledged the role Sanders has played in transforming the Democratic Party when he said:

Senator Sanders and his supporters have changed the dialogue in America. Issues which had been given little attention — or had little hope of ever passing — are now at the center of the political debate. Income inequality, universal health care, climate change, free college, relieving students from the crushing debt of student loans.

I want to commend Bernie for being a powerful voice for a fairer and more just America ... He doesn’t get enough credit for being a voice that forces us all to take a hard look in the mirror and ask if we’ve done enough.

The candidacy of Bernie Sanders inspired an entire new generation of politicians to enter politics by primarying old school, corporate Democrats. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and many others have said he had inspired them to run for office.

Sanders has provided hope for millions of young and working people, students, and retired folks that they had a place in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party base and the American public at large support his policy proposals.

According to recent polling, 87% of Democrats support Medicare for All, 83% of Democrats support tuition-free college, two-thirds of America supports raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and the Green New Deal is even relatively popular in swing districts.

Sanders’s supporters make up a significant percentage of the Democratic Party

Sanders won 27% percent of the primary vote in 2020 and 43% in 2016, and he has remained a well-liked politician. To keep the Democratic base of youth, working people, and students engaged during a Biden presidency, Biden will need to extend an olive branch to the progressive wing. Including Sanders in the administration would be an excellent way to do that.

For Biden to succeed, he’ll need to enact some of the Sanders agenda

If Biden assumes the presidency on January 20, 2021, he’ll take over in the midst of an unprecedented crisis. The Trump administration’s criminally negligent handling of the COVID-19 crisis and the resulting unemployment and housing crisis will require a Biden administration to think big, or the country will be unable to extract itself from the compounding problems. The transformative policy proposals advanced by Sanders would be an excellent roadmap for the Biden administration to follow.

Yet many liberals and progressives have seen signs Biden’s team is moving in the wrong direction. This week, a report came out that Biden’s team was vetting a number of Republicans to be part of his administration. Among those being considered were former governor John Kasich, billionaire Meg Whitman, former senator Jeff Flake, Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker, and Representative Charlie Dent.

Bernie Sanders has inspired a significant portion of the Democratic base with his vision for universal healthcare, a Green New Deal, cuts to military spending, and increasing worker’s wages. Who in the Democratic base has Governor Kasich or Senator Jeff Flake inspired? Kasich waged a bitter war against unions in Ohio, and Flake opposes abortion and voted to end Obamacare three times. There is no base in the Democratic Party for these views, and they don’t belong in a Biden administration.

Extremist, conservative deficit hawks like Flake and Kasich would hamper the Biden administration’s ability to put forth transformative economic policies with their constant handwringing over spending levels, government debt, and paranoid fears of “socialist” government takeover.

Biden would be wise to drop the consideration of Republicans and make an effort to bring in members of the Sanders wing of the Democratic party.

Sanders said this week he’ll be releasing his own independent agenda for the first 100 days of a Biden administration, and he’ll continue to encourage primary challengers to Democrats who fail to support a progressive agenda.

Ultimately, a Biden administration can choose to deal with progressives on the inside or the outside of his administration. He’d be wise to welcome us in. Either way, it will be our job to force him to take our demands seriously.



Paul Gottinger is a staff reporter at RSN whose work focuses on the Middle East and the arms industry. He can be reached on Twitter @paulgottinger or via This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
How Many Americans Will Ayn Rand Kill? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=51503"><span class="small">Paul Krugman, The New York Times</span></a>   
Saturday, 24 October 2020 08:27

Krugman writes; "A long time ago, in an America far, far away - actually just last spring - many conservatives dismissed Covid-19 as a New York problem."

Paul Krugman. (photo: MasterClass)
Paul Krugman. (photo: MasterClass)


How Many Americans Will Ayn Rand Kill?

By Paul Krugman, The New York Times

24 October 20


Liberty doesn’t mean freedom to infect other people.

long time ago, in an America far, far away — actually just last spring — many conservatives dismissed Covid-19 as a New York problem. It’s true that in the first few months of the pandemic, the New York area, the port of entry for many infected visitors from Europe, was hit very hard. But the focus on New York also played into right-wing “American carnage” narratives about the evils of densely populated, diverse cities. Rural white states imagined themselves immune.

But New York eventually controlled its viral surge, in large part via widespread mask-wearing, and at this point the “anarchist jurisdiction” is one of the safest places in the country. Despite a worrying uptick in some neighborhoods, especially in religious communities that have been flouting rules on social distancing, New York City’s positivity rate — the fraction of tests showing presence of the coronavirus — is only a bit over 1 percent.

Even as New York contained its pandemic, however, the coronavirus surged out of control in other parts of the country. There was a deadly summer spike in much of the Sunbelt. And right now the virus is running wild in much of the Midwest; in particular, the most dangerous places in America may be the Dakotas.

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Sometimes, Freedom's Just Another Word for Not Giving a Damn Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Friday, 23 October 2020 12:36

Pierce writes: "In rural Missouri, the anti-maskers relied on the fact that the pandemic had yet to fill the area hospital beds. That is no longer the case."

COVID testing. (photo: Shutterstock)
COVID testing. (photo: Shutterstock)


Sometimes, Freedom's Just Another Word for Not Giving a Damn

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

23 October 20


In rural Missouri, the anti-maskers relied on the fact that the pandemic had yet to fill the area hospital beds. That is no longer the case.

ot long ago, in the VIP room of the shebeen, we talked to Kenneth Starnes, an emergency room physician in what he calls "Winter's Bone" country along the border of Missouri and Arkansas. We talked about the unique problems facing rural healthcare workers in a time of pandemic. At the time, the system in which Starnes works wasn't yet completely overwhelmed. Now, as KSMU reports, the time of reckoning has arrived in a place temperamentally and culturally ill-suited to cope with it.

That independent, Ozarks spirit was on full display at an August forum in West Plains, the county seat of Howell County in south-central Missouri. Many residents were there to passionately argue against a mask ordinance, and the theme that emerged centered on freedom. West Plains resident Joyce Oak said the ordinance would be a dangerous precedent. Here’s some audio from that forum from the city’s Facebook page. “We are on a slippery slope to totalitarian fascism, and it needs to be stopped,” Oak said from the podium. Another resident, Clifton Earles, gave a fiery speech, calling City Council members “self-important” and “scalawags” for even considering the ordinance. “Since when do you even have the authority to mandate anything?" Earles asked. "You derive your authority from the consent of the governed. You work for us, you do not rule us, and we do not consent.”

The anti-maskers relied on the fact that the pandemic had yet to fill the area hospital beds. That is no longer the case.

Cases in Howell County have climbed from 40 to about 1,400, and several families are reporting that the local hospital couldn’t admit their loved ones with COVID-19 because it had reached capacity. So far, at least 20 Howell County residents have died from the disease. And according to the public health department, every nursing home in Howell County except one currently has an outbreak of COVID-19...

The World Health Organization has said a general rule of thumb for determining if the virus is under control is if the percent of positive coronavirus tests is below 5%. Missouri’s health department reported Saturday that the positivity rate over the last seven days is 19.7% statewide. Howell County’s positivity rate sits at 29.6 percent. Six counties reported rates above 50%, and all six of those are considered rural.

This is murderous, and it's hard to believe that the situation isn't the same in rural areas all over the country. For decades now, ambitious politicians, most of whom live on either coast, have blown sunshine up the asses of people in the middle of the country, praising their rugged individualism and using them as helpful marketing archetypes in our national political branding competitions. Small wonder that so many of the people now behave like those archetypes in real life, pandemic and their neighbors be damned.

Meanwhile, West Plains resident Susan DeMuria wishes local authorities would issue new restrictions—because leaving it up to “personal responsibility” isn’t stemming the tide. DeMuria has asthma, and she’s spent almost the entire pandemic isolating and gardening at her home. "I have been in the ICU with asthma, and I know what it's like not to be able to breathe. So, for me this is real. I know what this feels like, and I am petrified," she said, on the verge of tears...

She moved to West Plains about 15 years ago with her husband, who’s a cardiovascular perfusionist at a Columbia hospital. The couple decided not to see each other for a while because of DeMuria’s asthma, which is a health risk for COVID-19 complications. She says she feels hurt that people around her don’t believe in masking or other health precautions. “I just really did not feel that they cared about people like me at the city level, at the county level, at the state level," DeMuria said. "And I’m without my husband, who is working every day and doing things to help people, literally keeping people alive, and I can’t even go to the grocery store.”

Freedom's just another word for not giving a damn.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 Next > End >>

Page 315 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN