RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Why Republicans Are Disciplined and Democrats Aren't Print
Thursday, 25 July 2013 08:13

Reich writes: "Republican discipline and Democratic lack of discipline isn't a new phenomenon. As Will Rogers once said, 'I'm not a member of any organized political party. I'm a Democrat.' The difference has to do with the kind of personalities the two parties attract."

Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)
Portrait, Robert Reich, 08/16/09. (photo: Perian Flaherty)



Why Republicans Are Disciplined and Democrats Aren't

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

25 July 13

 

or the past five years of the Obama administration Republicans have marched in lockstep to oppose just about everything Obama and the Democrats have proposed. Yet the Democrats rarely march together. Recently, for example, 22 Democrats in the House joined every Republican in voting to delay the individual mandate in Obamacare.

When Republican leaders tell rank-and-file Republicans to call Obamacare's cost controls "death panels," or to say the rich are "job creators," or the poor are "takers rather than makers," they all repeat the same words. (Frank Luntz, their message consultant, once said: "There's a simple rule. You say it again, and you say it again and you say it again, and you say it again, and you say it again, and then again and again and again and again, and about the time that you're absolutely sick of saying it is about the time that your target audience has heard it for the first time.")

Democrats never stick to the same message. They rarely even say the same thing the same way twice. In fact, their messages often conflict.

To be sure, the Tea Partiers in Congress have challenged the GOP leadership. But that challenge is really about who should have the authority to impose discipline over the Party. The firebrands are bucking the old establishment with their own new establishment. Democrats, by contrast, buck their leaders all the time. And they do it as individuals, lone wolves and free agents.

Republican discipline and Democratic lack of discipline isn't a new phenomenon. As Will Rogers once said, "I’m not a member of any organized political party. I’m a Democrat."

The difference has to do with the kind of personalities the two parties attract. People who respect authority, follow orders, want clear answers, obey commands, and prefer precise organization and control, tend to gravitate toward Republicans.

On the other hand, people who don't much like authority, recoil from orders, don't believe in clear answers, often disobey commands, and prefer things a bit undefined, tend to gravitate to the Democrats.

In short, the Republican Party is the party of the authoritarian personality; the Democratic Party is the party of the anti-authoritarian personality.

In "Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics" (Cambridge University Press, 2009), Jonathan Weiler, professor of international studies at UNC Chapel Hill and his co-author, Marc Hetherington, use statistical models to determine whether someone is a Republican or Democrat. It turns out that the best predictor of party affiliation is someone’s score on an authoritarian personality scale that measures many of the traits I mentioned above.

This means Republicans will almost always be more disciplined about voting and messaging than the Democrats. Which gives the GOP an advantage in times like this, when the two parties are at war with each other - and when so many Americans, angry and confused, are looking for simple answers.



Robert B. Reich, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Plutocratic, Narcissistic, Ayn-Randian Fantasyland Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15060"><span class="small">Jim Hightower, Jim Hightower's Blog</span></a>   
Wednesday, 24 July 2013 13:49

Hightower writes: "One thing I've come to value in the last couple of years is the altruism and keen economic insights of the fourth richest man in America: Charles Koch."

Texas' progressive political curmudgeon, Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)
Texas' progressive political curmudgeon, Jim Hightower. (photo: JimHightower.com)


The Plutocratic, Narcissistic, Ayn-Randian Fantasyland

By Jim Hightower, JimHightower.com

24 July 13

 

ne thing I've come to value in the last couple of years is the altruism and keen economic insights of the fourth richest man in America: Charles Koch.

Even though Koch was raised rich and has now amassed a personal fortune of about $34 billion, he recently gave us a deeper sense of his true worth, measured not in dollars, but in values: "We want to do a better job of raising up the disadvantaged and the poorest in this country," he declared. Excellent thought - FDR couldn't have put it better! Noting that a big problem for the poor is that the Powers That Be "keep throwing obstacles in their way," Koch cut to the chase, saying, "We've got to clear those out."

Yes, Charlie, I'm with you! Clear out such barriers as the offshoring of middle class jobs, union busting, poorly funded schools, and the lack of affordable healthcare, housing, and child care.

Good God, no! barked Koch. It turns out he intends to "help" poor people by eliminating - ready? - "the minimum wage." Why? Because, explains this clueless son-of-the-rich, having a wage floor "reduces the mobility of labor."

In case you don't dwell in the plutocratic, narcissistic, Ayn-Randian fantasyland where the Kochs hang out, "labor mobility" is right-wing psychobabble for social Darwinism. Remove all remnants of America's economic safety net, they coldly theorize (while wallowing in their nests of luxury), and the poor will be "freed" to become billionaires. As Charles puts it, with no protections, the disadvantaged would have to scramble just to live, thus freeing them to "start a business... drive a taxicab... become a hairdresser."

What a visionary he is! Where you see massive, debilitating poverty, but he sees a Brave New World with millions of billionaire hairdressers! And the Kochs wonder why they're considered kooks.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Global Surveillance: Will the Germans Say Nein? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=5494"><span class="small">Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Wednesday, 24 July 2013 11:13

Weissman writes: "When the victorious Americans taught the post-war Germans to be 'democratic,' I do not think this is what they had in mind."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel. (photo: unknown)
German Chancellor Angela Merkel. (photo: unknown)



Global Surveillance: Will the Germans Say Nein?

By Steve Weissman, Reader Supported News

24 July 13

 

erman Chancellor Angela Merkel must harbor terrible thoughts about Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who exposed the global spying of America's National Security Agency (NSA). Facing what seemed an easy re-election on September 22, Frau Merkel now suffers an endless barrage of embarrassing questions and home-grown details about Germany's messy relationship with the American spy-masters.

When the victorious Americans taught the post-war Germans to be "democratic," I do not think this is what they had in mind. The increasingly authoritarian Obamanistas will hardly enjoy being shamed by a model of working democracy in the land of Hitler's grandchildren. Nor will self-righteous liberals like Nancy Pelosi who cheer their chosen one for doing what they opposed George W. Bush for even thinking.

The irony is delicious. At the end of April, some three weeks before Snowden flew to Hong Kong with the down and dirty, twelve high-ranking German officials from the Bundesnachrichtendienst, or BND, the country's foreign intelligence service, visited NSA headquarters in Maryland to be trained in how best to collect public and private data.

According to the dogged journalists at Der Spiegel, who interviewed Snowden on encrypted emails and studied his documents, BND chief Gerhard Schindler repeatedly expressed an "eagerness" to cooperate more closely with the NSA, to which the Germans looked for "guidance and advice." The Germans even met with senior members of the NSA's highly secretive Special Source Operations, which forms data mining alliances with U.S. companies, especially in Information Technology.

Der Spiegel also revealed that the Americans helped train Germany's domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, or BfV, which monitors movements Berlin considers extremist. Both the foreign and domestic intelligence services appear to be using the NSA's XKeyscore spying software, which captures both content and metadata for up to several days at a time.

The relationship cuts two ways. Germany plays a central role in the NSA's global data surveillance, but is also a major target. "Each month," the magazine reported in its first dispatch, "the US intelligence service saves data from around half a billion communications connections from Germany." Snowden's documents also reveal that the NSA spies on the institutions of the European Union.

Along with the spying, Snowden's documents raise the specter of American political interference. Der Spiegel cites an approving assessment from NSA agents in January: "The BND has been working to influence the German government to relax interpretation of the privacy laws to provide greater opportunities of intelligence sharing."

Mrs. Merkel at first tried to play down the issue and then denied all knowledge. But, as the details keep emerging, she finds herself in a box. "The German government either feigned ignorance, kept quiet about its complicity or … the intelligence agencies have gotten out of control," charged her Social Democratic challenger Peer Steinbrück.

A former finance minister generally seen as a moderate, Steinbrück accuses Merkel of giving in to BND and American pressure to interpret Germany's surveillance law "to make it easier to provide protected data to foreign services."

"The issue here goes to the core of our democracy and constitutional state," said Steinbrück. The chancellor herself must "demand a binding pledge from the U.S. government to cease spying on citizens, companies and possibly official locations in millions of instances."

The unlimited surveillance and data retention has absolutely infuriated Hansjörg Geiger, the former head of both the BND and BfV. "It is wrong, it is Orwellian," he said. Dr. Geiger wants a new code to regulate intelligence services within the EU and NATO. He would forbid political and economic espionage against other member states, and stop member states from doing any intelligence work on another's territory without permission and without observing local laws.

Geiger's comments are especially poignant, given the long-standing relation with U.S. intelligence going back to Reinhard Gehlen, Hitler's spy chief on the Soviet front whom the Americans made Germany's top spy. I can hardly wait for WikiLeaks to get hold of what American spooks and diplomats are saying about Geiger's new view.

In the meantime, Merkel's latest defense suggests one of the potential limits on Germany's democratic process. "I find it rather amazing that the impression is being created that we are cooperating with evil," said her spokesman, Georg Streiter. "I mean they are our friends."

"We have closely cooperated with our friends for decades. And if there are now different views, different interpretations of the law and different laws on personal data in America and Germany, then that doesn't mean they are suddenly evil."

As a matter of habit, I try never to use the word "evil," with all its religious and even Satanic overtones. But evil or not, American spy agencies in Germany have developed their imperial over-reach over those long decades of friendship, and have hardly changed their spots "suddenly." Many German leaders have helped them have their way, and will not be eager to rehash their past connivances.

Most observers still expect Merkel to get through the scandal and win re-election, but the beauty of democracy is that it sometimes gets out of hand. If it does, and if Germany says nein to global surveillance, it could more than embarrass those in Washington who have their own views on how to run the world.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Weiner Continues Sexting During Apology Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Wednesday, 24 July 2013 10:26

Borowitz writes: "Mr. Weiner was halfway through his apology when reporters noticed him remove a phone from his pocket and aim its camera lens unmistakably in the direction of his pants."

Anthony Weiner is in the running to be New York's Mayor.  (photo: Getty Images)
Anthony Weiner is in the running to be New York's Mayor.  (photo: Getty Images)



Weiner Continues Sexting During Apology

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

24 July 13

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

ew York City mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner stirred controversy today by continuing to send dirty texts throughout a press conference devoted to apologizing for his behavior.

Mr. Weiner was halfway through his apology when reporters noticed him remove a phone from his pocket and aim its camera lens unmistakably in the direction of his pants.

After seeing the candidate snap a photo of the pants region and then send a text, reporters bombarded Mr. Weiner with questions, asking him if he had in fact just sexted.

"Yes, I did, but I swear this was the last time," he said. "This behavior is now behind me."

Mr. Weiner then concluded his press conference by removing his shirt and snapping a quick shot of his naked torso.

According to the latest New York City poll, Mr. Weiner still has a commanding lead among voters who describe themselves as pervs.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Joshua Chellew: Right Wing Propaganda Tool Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=20877"><span class="small">William Boardman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Tuesday, 23 July 2013 14:37

Boardman writes: "Google Joshua Heath Chellew. He was a white man killed last month in Georgia by four black teenagers. What do you think the chances are that: Obama will think at least one thug could have been his son if he had one?"

Joshua Chellew was killed by 4 young black teens in Georgia. (photo: 11 Alive)
Joshua Chellew was killed by 4 young black teens in Georgia. (photo: 11 Alive)


Joshua Chellew: Right Wing Propaganda Tool

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

23 July 13

Consumer warning: when you see the right wing trope about Joshua Heath Chellew, you are experiencing dishonest discourse intent on misinforming and misleading you, in this case for the sake of racism.

This Example of Right Wing Intellectual Dishonesty Starts With a Death

he story began, according to news reports and arrest warrants, after 1 a.m. on Sunday, June 30, when Joshua Chellew, 36, an unmarried, redheaded white man stopped at a Chevron station in Mableton, Georgia, where he lives. According to the 19-year-old woman who was waiting in Chellew's car, he went into the gas station to get something. When he came out he met up with four young black men, ages 18 and 19, the witness said:

He was coming outside of the store talking to himself like he always does and one of them asked him what he was talking about.… I don't know them and have never seen them before.… They were hanging out by the gas station, getting gas.

Whatever was said, the four young black men attacked Chellew, hitting him with their fists but not weapons, driving him into the five-lane road, where he fell, apparently unconscious, into a traffic lane. The four men left him there and, moments later, a car hit him and drove on.

The young woman who was waiting for Chellew said the entire incident took less than two minutes. She said, "He was unconscious after he got hit by the car and he was taking his last breath when I got to him…. He was a good person, one of them funny, outgoing kind of people."

Attackers Arrested and Jailed Within Three Days

After police arrived, Chellew was taken to Grady Memorial Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. That Sunday afternoon the first police press release described the event as "a pedestrian struck by a vehicle" and killed. The release mentioned the missing driver, but not the four men.

By 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, July 2, police had three of four suspects in custody. The fourth turned himself in soon thereafter. The hit-and-run driver also turned himself in and was not charged. The four suspects, also all from Mableton, are being held without bail on charges that include Violation of the Georgia Street Gang Act, Aggravated Assault, and Felony Murder.

The Marietta Daily Journal reported the Sunday morning attack and the arrests the next day, Wednesday, July 3. The case remained "active and ongoing" as of July 22, according to the Cobb County Police Dept.

Also on July 3, the local NBC-TV station talked to Chellew's aunt, Cindy Standard, who described him as a sweet man who worked in landscaping and liked to write music and never hurt anyone. She said, "He was a beautiful person who had a lot of life to live and he didn't deserve that. Nobody deserves that."

Police said little about the teenage suspects other than that they were likely members of the Re-up gang and had been arrested before for gang activities.

Why Do Some Compare This to the Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin Case?

On July 16, Reader Supported News ran my piece "United States of Zimmerman," which was a critique of aspects of the trial of George Zimmerman for killing Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida. That same day, a reader calling himself JackB posted this comment on my piece, reproduced here in full to make clear how politicial and ideological this right wing cliché is:

You have to understand there are only white racists. Even people like Sharpton & Jackson who are best described as being professional racists since that is how they make their living - they are not racists. They are liberals & it is an immutable law of nature that liberals are never racists. At least that is how they describe themselves.

Google Joshua Heath Chellew. He was a white man killed last month in Georgia by four black teenagers. What do you think the chances are that:
  • Obama will think at least one thug could have been his son if he had one?

  • That Holder will start an investigation into the crime or call it a hate crime?

  • That there will be a media circus over the crime (or even coverage)?

  • That Jackson & Sharpton will be marching for justice.

  • That there will be groups of white liberal demonstrators marching for "justice"?

  • That RSN will have an article supporting those demanding "justice"?

  • That the "Thumbs Down" folk on the board will go all righteous & sanctimonious demanding "justice". The [sic] can recycle all these posts - just change the names?

  • I think the chances are a number between zero & none.

How Many Black Men Does It Take for a White Racist to See a "Mob?"

While ignoring the sarcasm, spite, and inaccuracies of JackB's first paragraph, it has in common with the rest of the post a parrot-like quality that started turning up on right wing websites with no purpose more apparent than inciting hatred for dark-skinned people. As early as July 8, Examiner.Com was pitching the event as a "black-on-white hate crime attack" while making several other errors in the text, where four attackers became "a mob."

That sort of dishonest exaggeration is needed to justify the claim that people like JackB make: that the media are somehow at fault for not giving more coverage to what is, so far, a crime story in which the most unusual feature is a hit-and-run driver who's not charged with anything. Like JackB's opening, The Daily Caller of July 12 mockingly titles a piece "Warning: This Post is Racist" and begins: "Who's Joshua Chellew? The fact that you don't know his name is the whole point. But that's not your fault."

The fault, say Daily Caller, JackB, and their ilk, belongs to the national media. But right wing parrots don't even attempt to offer context, much less understanding. There were 42 gun deaths in America on June 30, according to Slate, which names none of them. Death in America is too common to make national news. Who knows the names of any of those 42 who died by gunshot on the same day Joshua Chellew was beaten, run over, and died?

Will Black People Never Stop Lynching Whites?

The only reason the right has talking points about Chellew now is because he provides a handy opportunity to make racist political points. These people don't tell us about the man himself, the human being - that's left to the local paper. For the right, Chellew is a useful white cipher for beating black people. Top Conservative News says of the Chellew case, "If the races had been reversed, this would be the biggest news story in the United States.…"

Think about that for a moment. Top Conservative News is suggesting that four white men killing a black man is unusual enough to be big news. Really.

The anonymous blog UrbanBaby makes several errors of fact about the event, but assures us with remarkable certainty that "Joshua Chellew was killed because he was a white man. Its [sic] that simple."

That is simple indeed, but to get there the right needs to distort the event, even in its current, skeletal form. The distortion takes the form of oversimplification, as above, as well as omission to fit the agenda:

  • Omitted is any explanation for what started the beating - not that the beating is excusable, but there's no evidence it had more to do with race than drugs, gambling, debt, or any other speculation.

  • Omitted is the precise cause of death - charged with felony murder, the four suspects may not have killed Chellew.

  • Omitted is that still unidentified hit-and-run driver, who may or may not have provided the immediate cause of death.

Turning Racism Inside-Out Doesn't Make It Any Less Racism

The right reduces Chellew's death to a simplistic racist killing without knowing the race of the gas station attendant or the girl in the car, neither of whom managed to help Chellew in time. They don't know the race of the driver who hit Chellew, or of any of the police and medical responders. And they don't know what relationship Chellew had with any of these people, if any. All the right wants is a real white victim. It's happy to invent the rest.

Facts don't matter. What matters is promoting the fear of ethnic crime against white people. As GOPUSA asks about the Zimmerman case, "Would this have even been a national story if the perp was black and the victim was white? Of course not." GOPUSA then uses the Chellew case and two others, featuring an illegal alien and a South American Indian, to illustrate how preyed upon whites are.

Rush Limbaugh told the Chellew story on July 15, reading from the Marietta Daily Journal. He pointed out that: "They published a picture of Joshua Chellew, and he's a redheaded white guy. And then they published pictures of the four people that beat him up, killed him, and they are black. And so these stories … They just don't get reported. Black-on-white crime like this, or black-on-black crime, doesn't get reported. Like in Chicago."

Rush has the racist meme down pat, even if he rushes to judgment about who "killed him [Chellew]."

Yes, 30,000 Parrot-Heads Can Be Wrong

Google Joshua Heath Chellew, as JackB suggested, and you will find this politically pointed version of the Chellew case repeated over and over by fellow travelers on the right. They don't care that it's incomplete, and at least partly wrong. It looks like a black-on-white racial crime, so they call it one - even though the local police disagree.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution of July 12 reported: "The deadly assault of a Mableton man has become a national story, at least online, with several web sites and blogs claiming Joshua Chellew was killed because he was white" - even though Cobb County Police Sgt. Dana Pierce says the crime was not racially motivated but probably gang-related.

The Atlanta paper, a major regional if not national media outlet, added: "But not everyone is convinced. A Google search on Chellew's name produces about 31,200 results, most of which focus on race and an alleged cover-up by local media outlets."

As for the Zimmerman case, there's little comparison:

  • In the Chellew homicide, suspects were arrested promptly; Zimmerman, who admitted to the killing, was not arrested for more than 40 days.

  • In this homicide, there is already a national publicity effort by a dedicated corps of partisans; in the Zimmerman case, coverage developed more slowly, and then only because there were no charges against the admitted killer.

  • In this homicide, the authorities appear to be doing their job; in the Zimmerman case, authorities including the police, coroner, state attorney, and jury failed in a variety of aspects of their jobs.

  • In this homicide, the case is fresh and still under investigation, which makes comparison to a case that's had a jury verdict meaningless at best, dishonest and manipulative at worst.

JackB and friends carry on about "justice," without ever saying what they mean. What "justice" is missing here? Justice is a function of the legal system (in theory) and so far the legal system in Georgia appears to be on a path of justice (except, perhaps, for the hit-and-run driver). Calls for "justice" in this case would be about what? Probably not the driver.

These calls for "justice," framed as mockingly as they are, have no substantive meaning. They are fundamentally dishonest in denying centuries of actual injustice perpetrated by white people against the whole range of people of color. The way JackB uses "justice" is just a coded style of race-baiting.

This is probably not what JackB had in mind for an RSN article supporting those demanding justice. But that's what it is.



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 3071 3072 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 3080 Next > End >>

Page 3078 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN