RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Four Lost Decades: Why American Politics Is All Messed Up Print
Sunday, 22 September 2013 07:58

Cassidy writes: "Why is Washington so screwed up? Some people blame the Tea Party, others blame the lobbyists; my culprit is the economy."

The U.S. Capitol building. (photo: M. Scott Mahaskey/Politico)
The U.S. Capitol building. (photo: M. Scott Mahaskey/Politico)


Four Lost Decades: Why American Politics Is All Messed Up

By John Cassidy, The New Yorker

22 September 13

 

Political update: the annual showdown over the federal budget and associated topics is about to begin. Over the weekend, President Obama warned that he wouldn't negotiate with Congressional Republicans about raising the debt ceiling, which is due to be breached sometime next month. But there's widespread speculation that the G.O.P. will play hardball and shut down the federal government.

If your eyes are already glazing over, don't feel guilty. I get paid to track this stuff, and I, too, find it a struggle to keep up. If, as Marx said, history repeats itself, first as tragedy and then as farce, how do you describe a four-peat? In 2010, Congress failed to pass a budget. In 2011, we had a debt-ceiling crisis that resulted in the sequester and Standard & Poor's downgrading treasuries. Last year, it was the fiscal-cliff crisis. And this year, we have a debt-ceiling crisis and a budget crisis- without a new spending resolution, the federal government will run out of money at the end of the month- with the added complication that some Republicans want to defund Obamacare. In short, it's business as usual on the Potomac.

Why is Washington so screwed up? Some people blame the Tea Party, others blame the lobbyists; my culprit is the economy. Countries with healthy economic systems tend to have polities that function pretty well. (The United States of the postwar era is a good example.) Countries with dysfunctional economies tend to have dysfunctional political systems, in which radical groups look for someone to blame and rival interest groups fight over the spoils. And that, sadly, is where we are now.

Read More: Four Lost Decades: Why American Politics Is All Messed Up


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Greedy Old Party Strikes Again Print
Saturday, 21 September 2013 13:02

Galindez writes: "Not only are these cuts cruel and inhumane to the people in need who will lose access to food they need to survive, they will also hurt the economy. That’s 40 billion less in spending at retail food markets over the next 10 years."

(photo:
(photo: Move for Hunger.org)


The Greedy Old Party Strikes Again

By Scott Galindez, Reader Supported News

21 September 13

 

he Republican Party has once again shown that GOP really stands for Greedy Old Party.

House Republicans voted to cut the food stamp program by $40 billion over the next 10 years. These cuts will hurt millions of people, namely seniors and the poorest among us. But it will most heavily affect low-income families with children where the parents work for a living but don’t make enough to adequately feed their families. Working families with kids are 72 percent of all food stamp beneficiaries.

According to the Census Bureau, food stamps kept four million people out of poverty last year. The Congressional Budget Office reports that the House proposal would cut assistance to nearly four million low-income people in 2014 and an average of three million more each year for the next decade.

Not only are these cuts cruel and inhumane to the people in need who will lose access to food they need to survive, they will also hurt the economy. That’s 40 billion less in spending at retail food markets over the next 10 years. Food producers will also be harmed. Food stamps, or SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), is a targeted program that in the end always results in the purchase of food.

Sure, there is fraud in the system, recipients do sell their cards, but in the end the cards are used to by food at local markets, which stimulates the economy.

It's easy to say that recipients are lazy and taking a handout. The truth is that most of the recipients that people think are just lazy have other factors that contribute to their need for assistance. Mentally disabled people are not walking around with signs saying I’m disabled. They are trying to appear normal.

Forty percent of single adult households (with children) have jobs. Single adult households with pre-school children experience difficulty getting and holding a job due to child care. Sixty-four percent of the married head of households with children (receiving food stamps) have jobs.

Picking on the weak and scapegoating the poor is the Republican way.

Which brings us to Obamacare. The latest GOP maneuver is to say, "Defund it or the government shuts down."

I'll bet many of you believe the Greedy Old Party thinks Obamacare will be a train wreck. I can understand why you would feel that way. They opposed it before it was even proposed. The truth is Obama could have proposed a free market plan that would be a boon to the insurance industry and the GOP would have opposed it. Wait, that’s exactly what he did – it's Romneycare on the national level.

The reality is that the Greedy Old Party is afraid Obamacare will work, not fail. Failure of Obama’s signature legislation would hurt the Democratic Party for decades. Success of Obamacare will mean Democrats living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for years to come. That’s why they are trying to kill it before Americans realize they will be able to afford a doctor’s visit. Before millions of Americans with pre-existing conditions hear the word "covered" from an insurance company instead of "denied."

Okay, I hear some of you saying, "What about the mandate?" I agree that single payer is the way to go. Ask yourselves who pays for single payer. We all would, in our taxes – isn’t that a mandate?

If Congress were ready to pass single payer, I would be 100% behind repealing Obamacare. But Obamacare will help millions of people who need health care, and repealing it would result in unnecessary suffering for uninsured people.

Obamacare will help the economy, make people healthier, and harm the Greedy Old Party – a win win win for America.


Scott Galindez attended Syracuse University, where he first became politically active. The writings of El Salvador's slain archbishop Oscar Romero and the on-campus South Africa divestment movement converted him from a Reagan supporter to an activist for Peace and Justice. Over the years he has been influenced by the likes of Philip Berrigan, William Thomas, Mitch Snyder, Don White, Lisa Fithian, and Paul Wellstone. Scott met Marc Ash while organizing counterinaugural events after George W. Bush's first stolen election. Scott will be spending a year covering the presidential election from Iowa.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=13281"><span class="small">Igor Volsky, ThinkProgress</span></a>   
Saturday, 21 September 2013 12:55

Volsky writes: "Republicans that came to power after the 2010 midterm elections demanded something entirely different: they threatened to push the nation into default and shut down the government unless Congress approves deep structural budget cuts during a period of economic recession."

House Republicans Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy, and John Boehner are steering the country toward a government shutdown. (photo: AP)
House Republicans Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy, and John Boehner are steering the country toward a government shutdown. (photo: AP)


The GOP’s Three-Year Campaign to Shut Down the Government

By Igor Volsky, Think Progress

21 September 13

 

s the nation races toward another budgetary crisis next month, Republican leaders are using the prospect of a government shutdown and the need to raise the nation's debt ceiling as leverage points to undermine the Affordable Care Act - just days before uninsured Americans are expected to sign up for health care coverage - and extract additional cuts to government programs.

Past Congresses have used the debt ceiling as a "vehicle for other legislative matters" or nongermane amendments, but as the timeline below demonstrates, the Republicans that came to power after the 2010 midterm elections demanded something entirely different: they threatened to push the nation into default and shut down the government unless Congress approves deep structural budget cuts during a period of economic recession.

In November of 2010, GOP leaders informally polled the incoming freshman and were surprised to discover that "all but four of them said they would vote against raising the ceiling, under any circumstances." This response was the result of what the Washington Post described as a "natural outgrowth of a years-long effort" by GOP recruiters to build a new majority with uncompromising anti-tax, anti-spending candidates and it effectively hamstrung Republican leaders from accepting any kind of budgetary compromise from the Obama administration. As a result, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) walked away from so-called grand bargains with the White House at least twice and have since adopted the same kind of uncompromising rhetoric that's known to animate political campaigns, not actual governance.

Though Congress has already enacted approximately $2.4 trillion in deficit reduction since the start of fiscal year 2011 - 72 percent of the savings have come through spending cuts - the deficit has fallen to the lowest level since 2008, and inflation-adjusted discretionary spending is now below the final two fiscal years of the Bush administration, Republicans keep holding the debt ceiling and continuing resolution hostage, to achieve more cuts. Here is how we got here:

2010

FEB 4: Congress votes to increase the nation's borrowing limit - a vote it had taken 40 times in the past three decades. Republicans increased the debt ceiling 19 times during the presidency of George W. Bush, raising the nation's limit by nearly $4 trillion.

Martha Roby, who will go on to represent Alabama in Congress, issues a statement condemning the vote. "This 'need' to raise the debt ceiling is caused by one thing: out-of-control spending in Washington," she says. Reid Ribble, a soon-to-be Congressman from Wisconsin, agrees, "This Congress has done nothing but spend future generations of this country into a black hole."

SEP 10: Speaking at the Faith & Freedom Conference, Rep. Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA) tells the crowd, "The government shut down...That's what I wanted to hear! A good clap for that!" "We want you with us," says Westmoreland. "We gotta have you there. Because they're going to come and say, 'Daddy can't go to the VA, the national parks are closed' ... we need to make sure you're going to be with us."

SEP 30: With the fiscal year ending and the 2011 budget not yet adopted, Congress passes an extension -- known as a continuing resolution -- to keep the government running under existing spending levels until Dec. 3.

NOV: Republicans vow to cut $100 billion from the 2011 budget during the mid-term elections and win back control of the House. Initially, Boehner seems hesitant to use the debt ceiling as leverage to achieve the cuts. "I've made it pretty clear to them that as we get into next year, it's pretty clear that Congress is going to have to deal with" the debt limit, Boehner told reporters on Nov. 19. "We're going to have to deal with it as adults. Whether we like it or not, the federal government has obligations, and we have obligations on our part."

DEC: Alarmed by growing talk from Republicans about taking the debt ceiling hostage to achieve spending cuts, the White House tries to increase the borrowing limit as part of a tax package that passed Congress, but the effort fails. "I'll take John Boehner at his word - that nobody, Democrat or Republican, is willing to see the full faith and credit of the United States government collapse," Obama says at an end-of-the year press conference. "Once John Boehner is sworn in as speaker, then he's going to have responsibilities to govern. You can't just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower."

DEC 2-21: Unable to pass a spending bill, Congress enacts four different continuing resolutions to keep the government running until March 4. These appropriations cut the Congressional Budget Office's projection of discretionary spending from 2013 through 2022 by more than $400 billion.

2011

JAN: At a closed-door retreat at a Marriott in Baltimore's Inner Harbor, just days after taking power, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) promises to use the debt ceiling as leverage to achieve spending cuts.

"I'm asking you to look at a potential increase in the debt limit as a leverage moment when the White House and President Obama will have to deal with us," he says. "Either we stick together and demonstrate that we're a team that will fight for and stand by our principles, or we will lose that leverage."

FEB: Paul Ryan announces that Republicans will seek a budget for FY 2011 with $35 billion in budget cuts, far less than the $100 billion in cuts that House Republicans had promised. Later that month, the House passes $61 billion in cuts for the remainder of FY 2011, "the amount that would remain to be slashed had a $100 billion cut been applied to the full-year budget."

MARCH 2: Congress passes a short-term resolution extending operations to March 18. Spending is cut by $4 billion.

MARCH 16-17: Congress approves yet another continuing resolution extending federal operations through April 8. Spending is cut by $6 billion.

APRIL 4: House Republicans "gave the speaker an ovation" when he informed them that he was advising the House Administration Committee to begin preparing for a possible shutdown. That process included alerting lawmakers and senior staff about which employees would not report to work if no agreement is reached.

APRIL 14: Shortly before 11 pm, Boehner announced that he has agreed to support a seventh short-term extension, funding the government through Sep. 30. Spending is cut by $38 billion, but budget analysts reported that the plan would reduce actual spending in the current year by only $350 million.

JUNE-AUG: House leaders try to convince their caucus of the dangers of defaulting on the debt ceiling. "Leaders like me would try to tell them: Look, no, really, we think it could be bad," Ryan says. "They'd look at it with suspicion ...If there was any semi-credible source saying default wouldn't be so bad, they clung to that."

AUG: At the last minute, Congress passes the Budget Control Act, increasing the debt ceiling immediately by $400 billion, then by another $500 billion after September. The measure cuts $2.4 trillion over 10 years and establishes a Super Committee to recommend a deficit-reduction package by Thanksgiving 2011. If the committee fails, automatic cuts worth $1.2 trillion are automatically triggered. After deep cuts are enacted by the end of the year, the debt ceiling will increase by another $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion, covering the Treasury's borrowing needs until 2013. Ryan boasts that Republicans won two-thirds of the cuts to discretionary spending that they wanted.

AUG 5: Standard & Poor's issues the first downgrade of the nation's credit rating, saying the "political brinkmanship of recent months" had shown evidence of "America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable." This costs the country a million jobs and $19 billion.

2012

SEP: Congress passes a continuing resolution through March of 2013. The government is funded at an annual rate of $1.047 trillion, consistent with the cap set by the Budget Control Act.

2013

JAN 2: Congress passes the American Taxpayers' Relief Act. The measure makes permanent most of the Bush tax cuts. The Act also reduces deficits over the next 10 years by about $750 billion: $630 billion comes from revenue increases, approximately $30 billion comes from programmatic spending cuts, and the rest from interest savings resulting from lower deficits.

The measure also postpones automatic cuts for two months, until March 1, 2013. An increase in the debt ceiling is not included.

JAN: Congress agreed to suspend the debt ceiling without additional program cuts -- but only through May 2013.

MARCH 1: The sequester begins to take effect at the end of the two-month delay under ATRA. Democrats have called for a balanced package of revenue increases and spending cuts to replace the sequester, while Republican congressional leadership has stated that deficit reduction must come solely from cuts.

MARCH 21: Congress approved an appropriations bill to fund government operations through the remainder of fiscal year 2013, which largely maintains low current funding levels -- further reduced by $85 billion in cuts from the sequester.

JULY: Sens. Mike Lee (UT), Ted Cruz (TX), and Rand Paul (TX) circulate a letter warning they will not approve any spending measure to keep the government operating "if it devotes a penny" to Obamacare. The letter is signed by Sens. John Cornyn (TX), John Thune (SD), and Marco Rubio (FL).

AUG 22: Eighty members of the House Republican conference sign on to a letter sent to Republican leaders "demanding that any spending bill that reaches the House floor be free of funds to implement or enforce the president's healthcare reform law."

AUG 26: The Treasury Department announces that the nation will hit the debt ceiling by mid-October.

SEP 30, 2013: Fiscal year 2013 ends. Congress and the President must agree on appropriations for fiscal year 2014 by September 30 so the government can function when the new year begins on October 1, 2013.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Scalia Forms Search Committee for New Pope Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Friday, 20 September 2013 14:30

Borowitz writes: "Justice Scalia said he had 'no other alternative' but to pick a new Pope himself after reading what he called a 'disturbing' interview with Pope Francis today."

Pope Francis puts flowers on the altar inside St. Mary Major Basilica, 03/14/13. (photo: L'Osservatore Romano/AP)
Pope Francis puts flowers on the altar inside St. Mary Major Basilica, 03/14/13. (photo: L'Osservatore Romano/AP)


Scalia Forms Search Committee for New Pope

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

20 September 13

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

aying he was "sorry it had to come to this," Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said today that he was forming an "independent search committee" to select a new Pope.

The visibly upset jurist appeared at a press conference with the sole other member of the newly formed search committee, Justice Clarence Thomas.

Justice Scalia said he had "no other alternative" but to pick a new Pope himself after reading what he called a "disturbing" interview with Pope Francis today: "The Pope said he doesn't want to speak out against abortion and gay marriage. Well, sorry, my friend, but that's the entire job description. You should have thought of that before you let them blow that white smoke in Rome."

Justice Scalia acknowledged that only the College of Cardinals has the legal authority to choose a Pope, but added, "Quite frankly, those jokers got us into this mess. Right, Clarence?"

Justice Thomas had no comment.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Crisis at Fukushima's Unit 4 Demands a Global Take-Over Print
Friday, 20 September 2013 14:23

Wasserman writes: "There is no excuse for not acting. All the resources our species can muster must be focused on the fuel pool at Fukushima Unit 4."

An aerial view of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, 03/24/11. (photo: Reuters)
An aerial view of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, 03/24/11. (photo: Reuters)


The Crisis at Fukushima's Unit 4 Demands a Global Take-Over

By Harvey Wasserman, The Free Press

20 September 13

 

e are now within two months of what may be humankind's most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

There is no excuse for not acting. All the resources our species can muster must be focussed on the fuel pool at Fukushima Unit 4.

Fukushima's owner, Tokyo Electric (Tepco), says that within as few as 60 days it may begin trying to remove more than 1300 spent fuel rods from a badly damaged pool perched 100 feet in the air. The pool rests on a badly damaged building that is tilting, sinking and could easily come down in the next earthquake, if not on its own.

Some 400 tons of fuel in that pool could spew out more than 15,000 times as much radiation as was released at Hiroshima.

The one thing certain about this crisis is that Tepco does not have the scientific, engineering or financial resources to handle it. Nor does the Japanese government. The situation demands a coordinated worldwide effort of the best scientists and engineers our species can muster.

Why is this so serious?

We already know that thousands of tons of heavily contaminated water are pouring through the Fukushima site, carrying a devil's brew of long-lived poisonous isotopes into the Pacific. Tuna irradiated with fallout traceable to Fukushima have already been caught off the coast of California. We can expect far worse.

Tepco continues to pour more water onto the proximate site of three melted reactor cores it must somehow keep cool.Steam plumes indicate fission may still be going on somewhere underground. But nobody knows exactly where those cores actually are.

Much of that irradiated water now sits in roughly a thousand huge but fragile tanks that have been quickly assembled and strewn around the site. Many are already leaking. All could shatter in the next earthquake, releasing thousands of tons of permanent poisons into the Pacific.

The water flowing through the site is also undermining the remnant structures at Fukushima, including the one supporting the fuel pool at Unit Four.

More than 6,000 fuel assemblies now sit in a common pool just 50 meters from Unit Four. Some contain plutonium. The pool has no containment over it. It's vulnerable to loss of coolant, the collapse of a nearby building, another earthquake, another tsunami and more.

Overall, more than 11,000 fuel assemblies are scattered around the Fukushima site. According to long-time expert and former Department of Energy official Robert Alvarez, there is more than 85 times as much lethal cesium on site as was released at Chernobyl.

Radioactive hot spots continue to be found around Japan. There are indications of heightened rates of thyroid damage among local children.

The immediate bottom line is that those fuel rods must somehow come safely out of the Unit Four fuel pool as soon as possible.

Just prior to the 3/11/11 earthquake and tsunami that shattered the Fukushima site, the core of Unit Four was removed for routine maintenance and refueling. Like some two dozen reactors in the US and too many more around the world, the General Electric-designed pool into which that core now sits is 100 feet in the air.

Spent fuel must somehow be kept under water. It's clad in zirconium alloy which will spontaneously ignite when exposed to air. Long used in flash bulbs for cameras, zirconium burns with an extremely bright hot flame.

Each uncovered rod emits enough radiation to kill someone standing nearby in a matter of minutes. A conflagration could force all personnel to flee the site and render electronic machinery unworkable.

According to Arnie Gundersen, a nuclear engineer with forty years in an industry for which he once manufactured fuel rods, the ones in the Unit 4 core are bent, damaged and embrittled to the point of crumbling. Cameras have shown troubling quantities of debris in the fuel pool, which itself is damaged.

The engineering and scientific barriers to emptying the Unit Four fuel pool are unique and daunting, says Gundersen. But it must be done to 100% perfection.

Should the attempt fail, the rods could be exposed to air and catch fire, releasing horrific quantities of radiation into the atmosphere. The pool could come crashing to the ground, dumping the rods together into a pile that could fission and possibly explode. The resulting radioactive cloud would threaten the health and safety of all us.

Chernobyl's first 1986 fallout reached California within ten days. Fukushima's in 2011 arrived in less than a week. A new fuel fire at Unit 4 would pour out a continuous stream of lethal radioactive poisons for centuries.

Former Ambassador Mitsuhei Murata says full-scale releases from Fukushima "would destroy the world environment and our civilization. This is not rocket science, nor does it connect to the pugilistic debate over nuclear power plants. This is an issue of human survival."

Neither Tokyo Electric nor the government of Japan can go this alone. There is no excuse for deploying anything less than a coordinated team of the planet's best scientists and engineers.

We have two months or less to act.

For now, we are petitioning the United Nations and President Obama to mobilize the global scientific and engineering community to take charge at Fukushima and the job of moving these fuel rods to safety.

If you have a better idea, please follow it. But do something and do it now.

The clock is ticking. The hand of global nuclear disaster is painfully close to midnight.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 3051 3052 3053 3054 3055 3056 3057 3058 3059 3060 Next > End >>

Page 3053 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN