|
FOCUS: The Republicans Will Learn Nothing From a Trump Defeat |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>
|
|
Friday, 06 November 2020 12:01 |
|
Rich writes: "Romantic illusions die hard in America."
A smashed ceramic MAGA hat is seen on Black Lives Matter Plaza near the White House, November 3, 2020, in Washington D.C. (photo: Timothy Fadek/NY Magazine)

The Republicans Will Learn Nothing From a Trump Defeat
By Frank Rich, New York Magazine
06 November 20
omantic illusions die hard in America. So many fell on Election Night 2020 that it will be months, maybe years, before we compile a full inventory. We can start by acknowledging a paramount reality that contradicts the idealistic Obama-Biden catechism: There is a Blue America and there is a Red America, but there is no United States of America.
A Biden victory cannot mask the fact that this country is divided, 55-45 in raw numbers but 50-50 for all practical intents and purposes, regardless of the Democratic margin in the presidential popular vote. The fundamental schisms pitting American tribes against each other would remain intact even in the fantastical event that the Electoral College were by some political miracle abolished in the interest of democratizing what we are overly fond of calling the world’s greatest democracy.
Much of our immutable disunity is about race, of course. A lot of it is about the long-running class and cultural wars in which the coastal elites square off against the aggrieved who resent and despise them. Next to these intractable conflicts, the traditional ideological differences between Republicans and Democrats over governance and foreign policy seem secondary. Indeed, our disunity has proved immutable even as party identifications (and ideologies) have shifted on both sides of the chasm over the decades.
For all the durability of this discord, liberals have long had a habit of telling ourselves that peace is at hand. After the election of 1964, in what the historian Rick Perlstein has called “one of the most dramatic failures of collective discernment in the history of American journalism,” the reigning pundits at the Times and The New Yorker, not to mention the esteemed historians Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and James MacGregor Burns, declared the conservative movement and the GOP dead. Hadn’t the Lyndon Johnson juggernaut humiliated Barry Goldwater and the states of the old Confederacy that were his only visible electoral base? The legislative triumphs of the civil-rights movement that LBJ brought to fruition were celebrated as further proof that America had overcome the original sin that had prompted the Civil War. But as surely as the truce of Appomattox would give way to Reconstruction and Jim Crow, so the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was followed by a hail of assassins’ bullets and ensuing waves of racial unrest that would help propel the rise of George Wallace, Richard Nixon, and Ronald Reagan.
So in the increasingly likely event of a Joe Biden victory, please let us not tell each other now that we are on our way to “healing.” Or that what Biden framed as a battle for the soul of America has been won, or even placed on hold. Yes, there was record voter turnout. But even as we congratulate ourselves on our enduring faith in the franchise, we must recognize that one of the two political parties is routinely engaged in sabotaging free elections with voter-suppression efforts aimed at the minority voters it cannot win over at the ballot box. These anti-democratic power grabs became a GOP staple decades before Donald Trump, culminating in the actions of a George W. Bush–anointed chief justice, John Roberts, whose Supreme Court shredded the Voting Rights Act of 1965. As Roberts famously put it in his 2007 opinion for the plurality, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” Since then, discrimination on the basis of race has only expanded in states like Georgia and Florida, where Black voting rights have been cavalierly undermined and trashed.
If Biden survives the GOP’s legal and extra-legal efforts to rob him of votes in the determinative battleground states and is sworn in as president, let’s skip the sanctimony about how “the system worked.” The system is teetering. Trump — in what may be his signal accomplishment — has exposed every weakness in its structure. It turns out that a president can even monkey around with the Postal Service to manipulate election results. He can lie, steal, self-deal, corrupt the legal system, coddle dictators, alienate allies, violate all the internal safeguards intended to prevent executive malfeasance, mismanage a public-health catastrophe that kills his own voters, and get away with it for four long years.
The good news that comes with the potential Biden presidency is that there will be an honest and decent man in the White House, buttressed by a professional and at least nominally bipartisan triage team, who will try to undo the damage. There are a lot of rocks to overturn in every Cabinet department, for they are all stocked with grifters, hacks, and lobbyists who did the bidding of their Dear Leader, his kleptocratic family, their cronies, and their donors. Scientists, as opposed to the quack faux epidemiologist and Russian-propaganda stooge Scott Atlas, will be back in charge of fighting the coronavirus at the federal level. If the Democrats end up with 50 seats in the Senate — a big if — some constructive legislation may be possible, though the Democratic losses in the House would downsize any big ambitions.
Most of all, the nation will have dodged a bullet. What would have happened during an unchecked second Trump term is too horrific to contemplate. But let’s not kid ourselves. If there’s a honeymoon in Washington, it is bound to be short-lived. The center does not hold. Any notions that Trumpism will vanish after Trump’s departure are wishful thinking. His base was angry, is angry, and will be angry. It has been empowered by its victories in down-ballot races all over the country this week; the Democrats’ strenuous effort to flip state legislatures was a debacle. Trump’s unofficial militia will be ginned up by his rhetorical and other efforts to delegitimize the election as a “hoax” right up until Inauguration Day and past it, with potentially violent consequences that mimic the criminality that Trump encouraged and countenanced against Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan.
The Trump faithful will still be listening to him and following him through whatever media he chooses as a platform once he’s out of the Oval Office. While it’s true that many of the Vichy Republicans who enabled him these four years will be happy to see him leave Washington, nothing that happened in this election will make them less fearful of his base, because that base is their party. The likes of Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney, and MSNBC’s crowd-pleasing coterie of Republican Never Trumpers (some of whom promoted Sarah Palin, a Trump in embryo, as John McCain’s running mate) will never inherit the GOP’s grass roots.
What we’ll see instead is the ambitious next generation of right-wing Republicans — Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Nikki Haley, Marco Rubio, Mike Pompeo (Trump enablers all) — pander to their party’s Trumpist base just as they have been doing for four years. They have no shame. Cruz rallied to the cause even after Trump mocked his wife’s looks and smeared his father as a supposed conspirator in the Kennedy assassination. Rubio, often characterized as a centrist in this crowd, could be found exclaiming “We love what they did!” when a caravan of MAGA cars courted violence by trying to run a Biden-campaign bus off a highway in Texas the day before the election. These presidential hopefuls are not going to let any moral compass force them on a detour from their most direct path to their party’s nomination. Sure, they will try to sand down a few rough edges to woo back some of those “suburban housewives” who defected in 2020. But that will enable them to be more insidious in both managing the Trump constituency and furthering its objectives.
Biden and those around him must bear this in mind if they occupy the White House. This is not a time for a replay of Gerald Ford’s magnanimous post-Nixon interregnum. Our long national nightmare is not over. Amnesty is not an option. Anyone who broke the law in the Trump administration must be prosecuted, not pardoned. Public officials who encourage mob violence as Rubio just did must be called out, and the groups they incite directly or with dog whistles must be investigated (as that Texas MAGA caravan is being) by the FBI.
Those of us who work in the so-called mainstream media must also be circumspect. One place to start is with our reliance on polling. In the morning-after judgment of the Republican polling kingpin Frank Luntz, this election was “devastating” for his industry. He told Politico that “the political polling profession is done.” That’s no doubt hyperbole, and, in any case, polls didn’t get everything wrong this year any more than they did in 2016. But they got a lot wrong. Too many in the media, me included, took them too seriously and read too much into them. Nearly every major news organization gave them primacy in their election coverage. Whatever the election’s fallout on the polling industry — surely among the least of our country’s problems right now — the often smug mainstream-media canonization and hyping of flawed political polling has helped feed the right’s assault on empiricism in far more consequential realms, like climate science.
A larger issue is the one that Perlstein identified when he called out the liberal Establishment for its failure to recognize that the radical right was here to stay after Goldwater was crushed by that landslide. In its pre-election editorial “R.I.P., G.O.P.” last month, the Times (and it is hardly alone) faintly echoed the premature obituaries for the 1964 GOP by speaking of the party’s “demise” and arguing that Trump’s “presidency has been an extended exercise in defining deviancy down — and dragging the rest of his party down with him.” But the Republican Party wasn’t hijacked by Trump and dragged down to his level. Trump’s voice gave powerful expression to the views that it had been harboring for half a century.
The GOP won’t be chastened by a Trump defeat. The Republicans are more unified than ever and certainly more unified than the Democrats. The Supreme Court has their back. There is no reason to think that a setback in a single election will cause America’s conservative movement to either dwindle in size or compromise its views no matter what transpires in a Biden presidency. We harbor any illusions to the contrary at our peril.

|
|
Election Day Mayhem Began Two Years Ago |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=55179"><span class="small">Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website</span></a>
|
|
Friday, 06 November 2020 09:29 |
|
Palast writes: "Call it 'The Great Purge' - overwhelmingly wiping away the voting rights of young voters and voters of color. In other words, voters who might be more likely to vote blue."
Greg Palast. (photo: BBC)

Election Day Mayhem Began Two Years Ago
By Greg Palast, Greg Palast's Website
06 November 20
ou didn’t hear this in the cable TV chatter: In the two years leading up to this election, Georgia’s GOP secretary of state quietly wiped away the voter registrations of 198,351 voters — based on false information.
Call it “The Great Purge” — overwhelmingly wiping away the voting rights of young voters and voters of color. In other words, voters who might be more likely to vote blue.
I’m not guessing the number of wrongly purged voters. I directed a team of experts that identified each victim voter for a report issued by the ACLU of Georgia, titled, “Georgia Voter Roll Purge Errors.” (Rather than read this technical report, you can just watch the movie, The Purged: The Vanished Voters of Trump’s America, a 14-minute flick hosted by Leonardo DiCaprio.) Our expert team, working with Black Voters Matter, a 501(c)4 group dedicated to expanding Black voter engagement, discovered the same game had been played with the voter rolls of Michigan, North Carolina and threatened voters in Wisconsin.
It’s no coincidence that these are the states with “surprisingly” lower totals than expected for Joe Biden.
The Purge Game
Here’s how the purge game got started. Two years ago, the Supreme Court’s right-wing five authorized a new method of “cleaning” voter rolls. The Court agreed with GOP voting officials, beginning with Ohio and Georgia, to purge voter rolls of those who “moved.”
The idea sounds fair in theory: If you don’t live in Atlanta, you shouldn’t vote there, and to do so is a felony crime. But in practice, reality does not line up with officials’ claims. At an Atlanta poll, I met Christine Jordan, a 94–year–old who had just been tossed out of the poll. Records said she’d moved, but I went to her home where she showed me photos of her cousin, Martin Luther King, Jr., having dinner with her in that home half a century ago.
In Wisconsin, I met Sequanna Taylor, accused of moving from Milwaukee. Unlikely: Taylor is a Milwaukee County Supervisor! But Jordan, Taylor, and the hundreds of purged voters we filmed and called almost all had one thing in common: They were guilty of voting while Black, or voting while Latinx, Asian American or a student.
Though Michigan has now been called for Biden, we saw the same game there. The rolls were “cleansed” of 313,000 voters, many victims of an older purge scheme called “Interstate Crosscheck.” For Democracy Now!, I confronted the Republican Secretary of State’s spokesman with his secret purge sheet showing that the state had removed thousands of voters with names like Garcia and Brown on grounds they were registered in other states.
The GOP purge operation claimed that Michael Kelly Brown of Georgia is the same voter as Michael Wayne Brown of Michigan. Yet, most of the Michael Browns and José Garcias lost their votes.
Biden has taken Wisconsin. And that’s thanks to new Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, who made this ugly vote suppression tactic an issue — and so far, blocked The Purge in that state.
Michigan? Despite warnings from the Black Voters Matter Fund and others, the new Democratic leadership of the state simply looked at its shoes and whistled. The purged remained purged, putting Michigan into the potential steal zone.
Mail-In Mayhem
President Trump has said he’s going to court because, “We want all voting to stop.”
We think he meant “stop the count.” This is an attempt to prevent counting mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, which were postmarked by Election Day but received during this week.
I’ve been warning about the dangers of going postal for 12 years. No, the problem is not, as Trump bleats, “fraudulent” ballots mailed in from Venezuela. Rather, according to a study by MIT, as many as 22 percent of absentee ballots are never counted. It’s absurdly easy to lose your mail-in ballot to postage due (100,000 tossed in 2016), scotch tape on the envelope, a “naked” ballot (you must cover one envelope with another) or a challenge to your signature, or simply, late because of a post office delay. The Coronavirus sent the number of mail-in ballots through the roof, heavily tilting Democratic, as Trump voters appear to be unconcerned about getting infected.
And now, the nightmare has lawyers. Given that Wisconsin, a smaller state, had 80,000 ballots coming in after Election Day in the midterms, we can expect well more than that arriving after Election Day in Pennsylvania —enough to possibly determine the presidency.
How will it all shake out? I don’t know, I don’t have a crystal ball. But this much is clear: Jim Crow is stalking this election.
Joe Biden, in the first debate said, “He [Trump] cannot stop you [the voters] from being able to determine the outcome of this election.”
Yes, Joe, it won’t be up to Trump to stop the count. According to Article II of the Constitution, that’s up to Pennsylvania’s legislature and the interpretation of Article II by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Good night and good luck.

|
|
|
RSN: Requiem for a Teacher |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=54565"><span class="small">Stephen Eric Bronner, Reader Supported News</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 05 November 2020 13:40 |
|
Bronner writes: "No one should be allowed to scream fire in a crowded theater; respect for all beliefs is required in a multicultural universe, and so is empathy for the subaltern. Freedom of speech has its psychological and social - bordering on the political - limits."
Candles are lit at a makeshift memorial as people gather to pay homage to Samuel Paty, the French teacher who was beheaded on the streets of the Paris suburb of Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, as part of a national tribute, in Nice, France, October 21, 2020. (photo: Eric Gaillard/Reuters)

Requiem for a Teacher
By Stephen Eric Bronner, Reader Supported News
05 November 20
n the 19th of October 2020, a young French high school teacher named Samuel Paty was decapitated. An apparently devout 21-year-old Muslim had become furious that caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad were being shown in class. Demonstrations all over France greeted news of this senseless tragedy. A slain high school teacher instantly turned into a symbol of republican secularism, or what the French call läicité. Police raids were launched against Muslim associations, and there was talk in official circles of deporting hundreds. Mr. Paty’s death has sparked a new wave of Islamophobia and, while Marine La Pen’s neo-fascist National Front is having a field day, President Emmanuel Macron is covering his right flank in preparation for the 2022 election.
Such is the context of a religious “honor killing” that is nothing more than a fanatical act of egoism and revenge. The progressive response is not very difficult to articulate: make clear who is the victim, seek prosecution of the alleged killer and all accomplices, oppose ideological exploitation of the incident, reject arbitrary deportation of Muslims, and affirm the principle of free speech and academic freedom. But it would be a mistake to consider this self-evident. This “post-truth” society of hyper-sensitized “woke” and “cancel” culture too often turns abdication of responsibility into an ethical principle.
From reporting in The New York Times (October 20, 2020) and personal conversations with acquaintances, “explanations” abound that tend to mitigate or even disqualify outright condemnations of what took place. They highlight Mr. Paty’s supposed lack of sensitivity; he should have known that using religious caricatures in class could only cause conflict and hatred. If this teacher’s murderer clearly took matters too far, he still supposedly represents the oppressed, and he was thus justified in feeling insulted. Satirizing someone’s religion is “hurtful.” Whatever Mr. Paty’s intentions, he should have anticipated a controversy that might provide grist for the mill of anti-immigrant reactionaries. In short, he should have been more careful and circumspect.
No one should be allowed to scream fire in a crowded theater; respect for all beliefs is required in a multicultural universe, and so is empathy for the subaltern. Freedom of speech has its psychological and social – bordering on the political – limits.
Little wonder that civil liberties are imperiled. Is pandering to prejudice the criterion for responsible pedagogy? No better objective apology for anti-immigrant sentiments exists than this fanatic’s reaction to a set of cartoons: “devotion” of this sort is nothing but a way of avoiding social responsibility and the dictates of reason. Mr. Paty might have expected criticism and controversy, but not what occurred. Teaching something volatile in a class is not the same as screaming fire in a crowded building: Mr. Paty’s actions occurred in a class where free discourse should be taken for granted. As for empathizing with the marginalized: the murder of this teacher was a decision based on the arrogant and self-righteous assumption that this youth’s feelings somehow expressed the interests of Islam. Not only the act, but this whole line of thinking, is inexcusable. Enough important Muslim leaders in France, such as the imams Hassan Chalgoumi and Hocine Drouiche, whom I am proud to count as friends, make no such excuses and offer no qualifications for such barbaric behavior.
Academic freedom exists to protect the teacher intent on saying something that might provoke controversy; not pandering to parochialism. Mr. Paty apparently did not endorse the blasphemous cartoons but, even if he did, showing them might have rested on little more than the desire to discuss them. Lack of empathy, or the like, should itself have become a topic of debate. There is nothing racist about this pedagogue having his students see the cartoons. In this same vein, the first pages of my book on the notorious Protocols of Zion – A Rumor about the Jews – were devoted to a reprint of this fabricated anti-Semitic pamphlet about a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world. I felt that reading what has been called a ”warrant for genocide” would give students a jolt; it did.
Education should make students uncomfortable. In fact, Theodor Adorno once said that great works should “hurt.” He was right. Critique is predicated on questioning the assumptions underpinning any idea that is taken on faith alone, and unsettling individuals is the most basic purpose of “critical thinking,” no matter what the subject. No intolerant or absolutist interpretation of religion or any body of knowledge that is insulated from criticism can demand respect. Authentic believers have enough confidence in their convictions to extend the rights they exercise to those who worship differently – or do not worship at all. It is those outside the mainstream, the heretics and the free-thinkers, who most rely on the right to free speech. It is for their benefit, not those in power, that this right must be understood as universal.
Immanuel Kant was initially a supporter of the French Revolution; that is, until censorship was imposed and the right to free speech was suppressed. He realized that it underpins all other rights, which is what renders Samuel Paty’s murder doubly senseless. Without free speech, the liberal rule of law and due process cannot function. There can be no freedom of assembly, no right to protest, no meaningful education – and no freedom of religion – without free speech. Through the attack on free speech and academic freedom, indeed, the dogmatists and fanatics are simply taking another step in destroying the very system that enables them to exercise their faith.
R.I.P. SAMUEL PATY
Stephen Eric Bronner is Board of Governors Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University and Co-Director of the International Council for Diplomacy and Dialogue. His most recent book is The Sovereign (Routledge).
Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

|
|
Donald Trump Is Trying to Steal the 2020 Election. America Is Ignoring Him. |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=47231"><span class="small">Alex Ward, Vox</span></a>
|
|
Thursday, 05 November 2020 13:40 |
|
Ward writes: "President Donald Trump is actively trying to stop votes from being counted in the 2020 presidential election and making false claims that Democrats are stealing a win from him. It would all be so damn terrifying if we weren't all, well, used to it."
Protesters hold letters that spell Count Every Vote as they cross an overpass while marching in Portland, Oregon, November 4, 2020. (photo: Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP)

Donald Trump Is Trying to Steal the 2020 Election. America Is Ignoring Him.
By Alex Ward, Vox
05 November 20
Something noteworthy — and oddly hopeful — about the 2020 election: People are ignoring Trump’s antics.
resident Donald Trump is actively trying to stop votes from being counted in the 2020 presidential election and making false claims that Democrats are stealing a win from him.
It would all be so damn terrifying if we weren’t all, well, used to it.
Let’s be clear about what’s happening: As his opponent Joe Biden edges closer to victory, Trump is launching tweet after tweet after tweet in an attempt to delegitimize the election. He’s filed lawsuits to stop the vote count in Pennsylvania and Michigan without evidence of wrongdoing. And he gave an early Wednesday address in which he prematurely claimed victory even though there were millions of votes to be counted in battleground states.
Seeing a leader aim to subvert the electoral process in an attempt to maintain power is the kind of behavior the US government would condemn if it were happening in any other nation. But it’s not. It’s happening here.
While Trump’s behavior is troubling — and make no mistake, it’s deeply troubling — what’s most noteworthy is how almost everyone is ignoring it.
States are continuing to count votes, as they are legally bound to do, despite the president’s wishes. Trump-friendly networks like Fox News are denouncing Trump’s proclamation of an election win as “extremely inflammatory.” Basically, everyone is carrying on with the election even as Trump openly wars against it.
Perhaps it’s not so surprising. Trump has spent the last five years claiming elections have been rigged against him, that the press is the enemy of the people, and that a “deep state” conspires against him. He has had no problem sending militarized law enforcement around the country to dole out punishment to those ideologically opposed to him.
That Trump would say and act in such a way isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. In that sense, one would think the US would be in crisis, inching toward a democratic finish line it may not reach, all because Trump keeps pushing it back or erasing it altogether.
But it’s not. It’s moving forward with an election that, as of Wednesday evening, looks likely to have former Vice President Joe Biden legitimately replace Trump. The only people Trump has successfully rallied to his cause are those in his very immediate orbit, not the broader public and not even most of his allies.
Directly following Trump’s claim that he won on Wednesday morning, Vice President Mike Pence hedged with a simple, “We are on the road to victory,” and said that the campaign was confident Trump would win reelection after all votes were counted. The usual process, then, not Trump’s heavy-handed method.
The oddly hopeful message of the 2020 election so far may therefore be the abject failure of Trump’s authoritarian machinations to keep the country stuck where it is. If anything, it looks like the country is swiftly moving along despite him.

|
|