RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
FOCUS | How Washington Is Playing Venezuela Like a Fiddle Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7118"><span class="small">Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Friday, 21 February 2014 17:21

Gibson writes: "United States foreign policy can be summed up as hard power vs. soft power...An example of the US's soft power is the current situation in Venezuela."

Nicolás Maduro, shown as he cast his vote, has been named the winner of the presidential election in Venezuela. (photo: Raul Arboleda/AFP/Getty Images)
Nicolás Maduro, shown as he cast his vote, has been named the winner of the presidential election in Venezuela. (photo: Raul Arboleda/AFP/Getty Images)


How Washington Is Playing Venezuela Like a Fiddle

By Carl Gibson, Reader Supported News

21 February 14

 

Una version en Espanol de este articulo aparece debajo de la verison original.
(A Spanish language version of this article appears below the original version.)

nited States foreign policy can be summed up as hard power vs. soft power. An example of hard power is the US backing the unsuccessful 2002 military coup d’état against Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez, when businessman Pedro Carmona Estanga briefly took power. An example of the US’s soft power is the current situation in Venezuela.

A leaked document from November of 2013 shows that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) collaborated with the Colombian government and Venezuelan opposition leaders to destabilize Venezuela and stoke massive protests. The document, obtained by journalist and attorney Eva Golinger, was the product of a June 2013 meeting between US-based FTI Consulting, the Colombian Fundación Centro de Pensamiento Primero Colombia (Centre for Thought Foundation of Colombia First), and Fundación Internacionalismo Democratico (Democratic Internationalism Foundation). The third tactic outlined in the 15-point strategy document openly called for sabotage:

"Maintain and increase the sabotage that affect the population's services, particularly the electricity system, that puts blame on the government for assumed inefficiencies and negligence.”

Coincidentally, during one of Nicolas Maduro's televised speeches outlining his economic plan in early December, the power went out for 60% of Venezuelans for several hours. Maduro blamed the act on sabotage.

The current situation in Venezuela is eerily reminiscent of 1950s Iran. Democratically-elected Iranian leader Mohammed Mossadegh threatened to nationalize the country’s vast oil supply. President Eisenhower sent Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Theodore Roosevelt and the CIA’s near-east and Africa division leader, to Iran to oust him.

After sustained protests and civil unrest engineered by Kermit Roosevelt, Shah Mohamed Reza Pahlavi took power. What followed was 25 years of cruel brutality and fear for the Iranian people, and sustained energy trading with the United States. It was the CIA’s first successful overthrow of a foreign government, and it wouldn’t be the last.

Since Hugo Chavez died in Spring of 2013 and Nicolas Maduro was elected last Fall, Venezuela’s economy has been spiraling downward, as has Maduro’s political legitimacy. Once a top-ten economy, Venezuela’s wealth is based entirely on the oil industry, and the continued success of a finite resource. One large source of the economic malaise has been the mismanagement of oil money – Venezuela energy czar Rafael Ramirez recently admitted that 30 percent of oil revenues were diverted from their original purpose. And while a few corrupt individuals at the top are skimming the nation’s oil money meant for social programs, Venezuelan currency is rapidly declining in value as inflation rates skyrocket.

Mass protests organized largely by students have started erupting all over Venezuela. A brutal government crackdown has resulted in the deaths of dozens of protesters and the injury of hundreds more. While tragic, the deaths harken back to the leaked strategic document:

“Whenever possible, the violence should cause deaths and injuries. Encourage hunger strikes of numerous days, massive mobilisations, problems in the universities and other sectors of society now identified with government institutions.”

Several photos of supposedly Venezuelan protests and police response that went viral on Twitter have recently been found to be taken from other protests, in other countries, years ago.

The charismatic opposition leader, Leopoldo Lopez, has succeeded in uniting the country’s indignant citizens behind him. Lopez is the former mayor of Caracas’ Chacao municipality in 2008, but was banned from running for future elections until 2014 amid allegations of misusing public funds. The Inter-American Court on Human Rights ruled in favor of Lopez and said he could run, but the Venezuelan government vowed that even if he won election, he wouldn’t be allowed to serve. Now in the wake of mass protests, Lopez has even taken to Twitter, taunting the government to arrest him. However, there is more to Lopez than meets the eye.

Emails released by Wikileaks as part of the Global Intelligence Files reveal that Lopez has ties to and has met with corrupt, neoliberal regime leaders like Colombia’s Alvaro Uribe, Brazil’s Fernando Cardoso, and the sketchy Paraguayan Congress. In 2011, Lopez met with Uribe to court his support in his efforts to unseat Chavez. While Uribe was president, he maintained a friendly relationship with George W. Bush, and was later embroiled in scandal when it was found that he used his family farm to train death squads. He also used the DAS – Colombia’s domestic intelligence entity – to spy on his own citizens, and fed that information to death squad leaders.

In 2012, Leopoldo Lopez met with former Brazilian president Fernando Cardoso while touring South America to forge political alliances. Cardoso is best known for privatizing over 100 state entities and implementing mass austerity measures like budget cuts and public sector layoffs to combat growing inflation. The economic effects of Cardoso’s privatization measures are still debated within Brazil, as inflation rates rose by 25 percent within a month right after Cardoso’s austerity programs took effect.

Lopez also met with Paraguay's Congress and vice president, in an attempt to enlist their support for his cause. Paraguay’s Congress effectively staged a coup against democratically-elected Fernando Lugo, calling for impeachment proceedings against the president and giving him just 24 hours to come up with a defense. Lugo says his ouster was a "paramilitary coup" done in retaliation for his efforts to help Paraguay's poor.

The Wikileaks emails also reveal a 2010 document prepared by CANVAS (Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies) that names Leopoldo Lopez as an asset in the organization’s efforts to oust Hugo Chavez. As my colleague Steve Horn and I wrote in November of 2013, CANVAS is an organization specializing in manipulating social unrest in countries where the US government has an interest, shaping the political landscape to favor regime change and the installation of US-friendly, capitalist autocrats.

With the help of $65 million from the US government, CANVAS was behind the Orange Revolution of Ukraine in 2004, which led to the ouster of president Leonid Kuchma. Newly-installed president Viktor Yuschenko, a former central banker, quickly implemented IMF-style austerity measures that angered Ukrainians and cost him the very next election after he unsuccessfully tried to dissolve parliament.

CANVAS’s leader, Srdja Popovic, also has close ties to Michael McFaul, the US ambassador to Russia, attended National Security Council meetings in Washington, and worked as an informant for the private intelligence firm Stratfor, based in Austin, Texas, feeding information from his trusted activist contacts on the ground directly to Stratfor.

When looking at all of Lopez’s connections to US-friendly, capitalist leaders in South America, his economic platform catered toward the private corporations and investors who back him, his possible connections to CANVAS operators, and the fact that the US government allocated $5 million toward funding opposition activities in Venezuela in the 2014 budget, it isn’t hard to connect the dots. While the anger of Venezuelans is genuine, and the Maduro government is openly corrupt, any regime change in oil-rich Venezuela appears to be orchestrated by the oil-hungry United States.

If Lopez succeeds in ousting Maduro, it will be a dream come true for Washington and the wealthy western investor class. And it will be the beginning of the corporate conquest of Venezuela.


Como Washington juega con Venezuela como si fuera un Violin

a política exterior de los Estados Unidos puede ser resumida como poder duro vs. poder suave. Un ejemplo del poder duro es los EEUU apoyando el fracasado golpe de estado del 2002 en contra del presidente Hugo Chávez, cuando el empresario Pedro Carmona Estanga tomo el poder brevemente. Un ejemplo del poder suave de los EEUU es la situacion actual en Venezuela.

Un documento filtrado de Noviembre del 2013 demuestra que la Agencia de Desarrollo Internacional de los Estados Unidos (USAID) colaboró con el gobierno Colombiano y líderes de oposición para desestabilizar Venezuela y causar protestas masivas. El documento, obtenido por la periodista y abogada Eva Golinger, fue el producto de una junta que se llevó en el 2013 entre FTI Consulting, basada en los EEUU, la Fundación Centro de Pensamiento Primero Colombia, y la Fundación Internacionalismo Democrático. La tercera táctica descrita en la estrategia de 15 puntos abiertamente llama para el sabotaje:

“Mantener e incrementar los sabotajes que afecten los servicios a la población, particularmente al sistema eléctrico, que permitan culpar al gobierno de supuestas ineficiencias y negligencias.”

Coincidentemente, durante uno de los discursos televisados de Nicolás Maduro en el que detallaba su plan económico en el principio de Diciembre, la electricidad se apago para más del 60% de Venezuela por varias horas. Maduro nombró el acto como sabotaje.

La situacion actual en Venezuela es inquietamente recordativa a Irán en los 1950s. El democráticamente elegido líder, Mohammed Mossadegh amenazó con nacionalizar las inmensas provisiones petroleras del país. El Presidente Eisenhower mando a Kermit Roosevelt, nieto de Theodore Roosevelt y lider de la división de África y el Cercano Oriente del CIA, a Irán para expulsarlo.

Despues de promulgadas protestas y disturbios civiles ingeniados por Kermit Roosevelt, Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi tomo el poder. Lo que siguió fueron 25 años de cruel brutalidad y temor para la gente Iraní, y promulgado comercio de energía con los Estado Unidos. Para el CIA, era el primer derrumbamiento exitoso de un gobierno extranjero, y no seria el ultimo.

Desde que Hugo Chávez murio en la primavera del 2013 y Nicolás Maduro fue elegido en el otoño, la economía Venezolana a estado en un espiral hacia abajo, así como la legitimidad política de Maduro. Una vez entre las diez mayores economías, las riquezas de Venezuela estan basadas totalmente en la industria petrolera y el continuo éxito de un recurso finito. Una gran fuente del malestar económico de Venezuela a sido la mala administración del dinero petrolero - el czar de energía en Venezuela, Rafael Ramirez, admitió recientemente que el 30% de los ingresos petroleros fueron desviados de su propósito original. Y mientras unos cuantos individuos corruptos en la cima estan robando el dinero petrolero de la nación destinado para programas sociales, la moneda Venezolana cae rápidamente en valor, mientras la inflación se dispara hacia arriba.

Masivas protestas organizadas en gran parte por estudiantes han empezado a eructar sobre todo Venezuela. La brutal respuesta del gobierno ha resultado en la muerte de docenas de protestantes, así como cientos de heridos. Aunque trágicas, las muertes se relacionan con el documento filtrado de estrategia:

“Cuando sea posible, la violencia debe provocar muertos o heridos. Incentivar huelgas de hambre de varios días,movilizaciones masivas, problemas en universidades y otros sectores de la sociedad ya identificados como en instituciones gubernamentales.”

Varias fotos de supuestas protestas Venezolanas y respuesta policial que fueron virales en Twitter, recientemente fueron descubiertas como tomadas de otras protestas, años atrás, en otros paises.

El carismático líder de la oposición, Leopoldo Lopez, a logrado unir a los indignados ciudadanos detras de el. Lopez fue el alcalde de la municipalidad Chacao de Caracas en el 2008, pero se le prohibió participar en elecciones futuras hasta el 2014 por alegaciones de mal uso de fondos públicos. La Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos declaró en favor de Lopez, y dijo que podía correr, pero el gobierno Venezolano prometió que aunque ganara la elección, no se le permitirá servir. Ahora a raíz de las protestas, Lopez a entrado a Twitter, retando al gobierno a que lo arresten. Sin embargo, hay más a Lopez de lo que se parece.

Emails publicados por Wikileaks como parte de Global Intelligence Files, demostraron que Lopez tiene relaciones y se a juntado con corruptos, y neoliberales líderes regimentales como Alvaro Uribe de Colombia, Fernando Cardoso de Brasil, y el corrupto congreso Paraguayo. En el 2011, Lopez se reunió con Uribe para cortejar su apoyo en su esfuerzo para desbancar a Chávez. Mientras Uribe fue presidente,mantuvo una relación amistosa con George W. Bush, y después fue envuelto en escándalos por usar su hacienda familiar para entrenar escuadrones de la muerte. El también uso el Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad - la entidad de inteligencia doméstica de Colombia - para espiar a sus propios ciudadanos y pasarle la información a los líderes de los escuadrones de la muerte.

En el 2012, Leopoldo Lopez se reunió con el antiguo presidente Brasileño Fernando Cardozo mientras recorría Sudamérica para formar alianzas políticas. Cardozo es mejor conocido por privatizar más de 100 entidades estatales e implementar masivas medidas de austeridad como recortes presupuestarios y despidos en el sector público para combatir la creciente inflacion. Los efectos económicos de los métodos de privatización de Cardozo aún son discutidos dentro de Brasil, ya que las tasas de inflación se elevaron por 25% dentro de un mes después de que los programas de austeridad de Cardozo tomaron efecto.

Lopez también se reunió con el congreso y vicepresidente de Paraguay, con el intento de obtener el apoyo de ellos para su causa. El Congreso de Paraguay efectivamente organizóo un golpe de estado parlamentario contra el elegido democraticamente Fernando Lugo, llamando para el proceso de destitución contra el presidente y dandole solo 24 horas para formar su defensa. Lugo dice que su despido fue venganza por sus esfuerzos de quere ayudar a la genter pobre de Paraguay.

Los correos electronicos de Wikileaks también revelan un documento del 2012 preparado por CANVAS (Center for Applied Non Violent Action and Strategies) que nombras a Leopoldo Lopez como un recurso en los esfuerzos de la organización para expulsar a Hugo Chávez. Como mi colega Steve Horn y yo escribimos Noviembre del 2013, CANVAS es una organización que se especializa en manipular disturbios sociales en países donde los Estados Unidos tiene un interés, configurando el paisaje político a favor de un cambio de regimen y la instalación de autócratas capitalistas que favorecen a los Estados Unidos.

Con la ayuda de $65 millones del gobierno estadounidense, CANVAS estuvo detrás de la Revolución Naranja de Ukraine del 2004, que llevó a el expulso del presidente Leonid Kuchma. El recién instalado presidente Viktor Yushchenko, un antiguo banquero central, rápidamente implementó metodos de austeridad al estilo del FMI que enfureció a los Ucranianos y le costó las siguientes elecciones cuando fracasó en su intento de disolver al parlamento.

El líder de CANVAS, tambien tiene relaciones cercanas a Michael McFaul, el embajador de los EEUU en Rusia, atendió a juntas del Consejo de Seguridad Nacional en Washington, trabajaron como informantes para la empresa de información Stratford, pasando información de sus confiados contactos activistas directamente a Stratford.

Cuando viendo las conecciones de Lopez con líderes Sudamericanos favorecientes a los Estados Unidos, su plataforma económica hecha para las corporaciones privadas e inversionistas que lo respaldan, sus conecciones con los operadores de CANVAS, y el hecho de que el gobierno estadounidense aloco $5 millones para financiar actividades de la oposición en Venezuela en el presupuesto del 2014, no es difícil conectar los puntos. Aunque el coraje de los Venezolanos sea auténtico, y el gobierno de Maduro sea abiertamente corrupto, cualquier cambio de régimen en el Venezuela rico de petróleo, parece ser orchestrado por el siempre deseoso de petróleo Estados Unidos.

Si Lopez tiene éxito en expulsar a Maduro, será un sueño hecho realidad para Washington y la clase inversionista occidental. Y será el inicio de la conquista corporativa de Venezuela.



Carl Gibson, 26, is co-founder of US Uncut, a nationwide creative direct-action movement that mobilized tens of thousands of activists against corporate tax avoidance and budget cuts in the months leading up to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Carl and other US Uncut activists are featured in the documentary "We're Not Broke," which premiered at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. He currently lives in Madison, Wisconsin. You can contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , and follow him on twitter at @uncutCG.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Republicans to Discontinue Use of E-Mail Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Friday, 21 February 2014 15:25

Borowitz writes: "Citing the scandals embroiling Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, the Republican Governors Association today ordered its members to discontinue the use of e-mail, 'effective immediately.'"

Scott Walker and Chris Christie. (photo: unknown)
Scott Walker and Chris Christie. (photo: unknown)


Republicans to Discontinue Use of E-Mail

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

21 February 14

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

iting the scandals embroiling Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, the Republican Governors Association today ordered its members to discontinue the use of e-mail, "effective immediately."

According to a memo sent to all Republican governors, "Any plots, schemes, conspiracies, or violations of campaign-finance laws should be conducted using pay phones or easily disposable cell phones such as the ones used on 'The Wire.' " The governors were instructed to read the memo once and then either burn or eat it.

Asked to comment on the new policy, Governor Walker's office responded, "The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Children Murdered, Homes Foreclosed: How the Government Makes "Mistakes" With Impunity Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=26275"><span class="small">Falguni A. Sheth, Salon</span></a>   
Friday, 21 February 2014 15:09

Sheth writes: "Most people are accustomed to bureaucracies making mistakes. And even presidential administrations and U.S. Armed Forces make mistakes."

A boy stands at the site of suspected US drone attacks in the Janikhel tribal area in the Bannu district of Northwest Frontier Province in Pakistan, 11/19/08. (photo: Reuters)
A boy stands at the site of suspected US drone attacks in the Janikhel tribal area in the Bannu district of Northwest Frontier Province in Pakistan, 11/19/08. (photo: Reuters)


Children Murdered, Homes Foreclosed: How the Government Makes "Mistakes" With Impunity

By Falguni A. Sheth, Salon

21 February 14

 

f life-altering mistakes don't warrant accountability, maybe that's because nothing can

Anyone who's been at the mercy of the DMV, the IRS or a health insurance company knows that bureaucracies make mistakes. Most people are accustomed to bureaucracies making mistakes. And even presidential administrations and U.S. Armed Forces make mistakes.

Yet when considering U.S. national security policies, raising the question of mistakes that cost lives is chalked up as a minor issue: "We have to expect collateral damage in wars/drones/bombs/armed conflict."

If we know that organizations make mistakes, then it's not that hard to see that organizations without external oversight and accountability will be empowered to make mistakes with impunity.

Not rectifying mistakes, not allowing oversight, refusing to be accountable to an external judicial body is considered by many an abuse of power. But abuse can only be claimed when a state promises to be accountable. If the state claims that it can't be accountable, can't be reviewed for mistakes, can't rectify mistakes because such practices would be dangerous (the reason isn't really important here), then at most levels, it's hard to name the state's attitude as abuse.

Moreover, as journalist Margaret Kimberley points out, the Obama administration has claimed the right to kill American citizens without charge or trial. That's not an abuse of power. It's a complete usurpation of power. There is no space by which to claim the administration should have acted differently by its own lights.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to call this, not the abuse of, but the monopoly of power?

In 2005, Rahina Ibrahim was "cuffed, detained, and denied a flight" to Hawaii to deliver a conference paper about sustainable housing. She was allowed to return home to Malaysia, but because her name was on a U.S. government no-fly list, Ibrahim's visa was subsequently revoked; she was prevented from returning to the U.S., thus effectively ending her doctoral studies at Stanford. She eventually finished her dissertation in Malaysia, and sued the U.S. government to have her name removed from the no-fly list. But the courts initially ruled that she had no legal standing to sue the U.S. to change its policies because she is a non-citizen, and the U.S.'s efforts to fight terrorism could not be challenged by a foreign national.

Ibrahim persisted, and at least in the most recent round, won. Despite the U.S.'s best efforts to the contrary, Ibrahim is the first to successfully force the U.S. government to remove her name from the list. U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup's ruling points out that the U.S. government had erred: An FBI agent confessed to having filled out the no-fly list form for Rahina Ibrahim in exactly the opposite way as he should have. Alsup had suspected as early as December 2009 that Ibrahim had been the victim of a "monumental" government error.

Murtaza Hussain, in an excellent assessment, points out that Attorney General Eric Holder abused the state-secrets privilege in the Ibrahim case. In an affidavit from April 2013, Holder invoked the state secrets privilege as the reason that the Department of Justice could not turn over the records regarding why her name was put on the no-fly list. Referring to the 2009 State Secrets Policy established under a young Obama administration, Holder promised that he would not claim the state-secrets privilege to hide wrongdoing, incompetence, inefficiency or embarrassment. Nor would he invoke it to "prevent or delay the release of information the release of which would not reasonably be expected to cause significant harm to national security."

Clearly, Holder lied. The reason we know that Holder lied is because of what was revealed in Judge Alsup's decision. In this specific instance, we have clear evidence that the Obama administration abused its power - on the view that the abuse of power is constituted when a government has promised to behave within certain procedural bounds and legal limits, but has stepped beyond them.

As journalists Kevin Gosztola and Marcy Wheeler demonstrate, the Obama administration is completely indifferent to its own state-secrets policy, except as a subterfuge. They have invoked it time and time again, for horrendous ends. As Shahid Buttar, head of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, communicated to Gosztola back in 2012 about the invocation of state secrets privilege:

"the ability of the FBI to 'stand above the law' and not answer to any authority when they outright lie or make deliberate misrepresentations about what kind of operations they are or are not conducting. Also, it makes it possible for the Executive Branch to enjoy extraordinary immunity from punishment when incredible abuses of power are committed and cases on torture, warrantless wiretapping or spying are brought forward in court."

State-secrets privilege is but one of multiple excuses that the Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, has used to expand its own power without any accompanying review or oversight of it. Whether the continued renewal of FISA (which candidate Obama voted in favor of in 2008), the NDAA 2012, NDAA 2013 or a myriad of other laws the Obama administration has endorsed under the unchecked expansions of power claimed by the FBI, CIA (often in collusion with NYPD) and DOJ. Countless foreigners have been rendered from Somalia, Sweden and elsewhere, and interrogated without defense lawyers; numerous men have been placed in solitary confinement in prisons around the country, still unaware of the charges against them, with sketchy trials at best. Some of these men have been rendered stateless with the help of the British Home Office, such that their kidnappings could not be contested. Muslim communities all over the United States - in Southern California, Oregon, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey - have been subject to spying and entrapment.

Let's not forget Terror Tuesdays and the Disposition Matrix, where Obama administration officials gather to determine which alleged terrorist to execute next - without evidence, without oversight, with impunity.

It has also been recently discovered that the FBI - the very agency whose employee made a mistake in placing Rahina Ibrahim on the no-fly list - holds the power to delay the citizenship applications of Muslims, a policy enacted under the Bush administration but still in effect today.

Mistakes, shmistakes.

The targeting of Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki, the 16-year-old U.S.-born son of Anwar Al-Awlaki was a mistake.

Putting post-surgery, wheelchair-bound, Stanford doctoral student Rahina Ibrahim's name on a federal no-fly list in 2005 was a mistake.

Hundreds of thousands of people were subject to housing foreclosures due to mistakes.

The Obama mortgage settlement allows for a threshold error rate for mistaken foreclosures.

Killing scores of civilians by drones is a mistake.

Incarcerating innocent (but not guilty) men without charges or trials is a mistake.

Holder's behavior and that of many of his colleagues in the Obama administration, such as Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, indicates that they have no problems with mistakes, or with lying about government practices, evading demands for evidence, or concealing violations with law. This may make them corrupt - on the view that there should be a higher standard of behavior from government officials, one that conforms to consistency and accountability.

To the extent that the Obama administration has conceded to calls for oversight, it has facilitated pseudo-review boards, as when Obama appointed DNI Clapper to review the National Security Agency's protocols. Even the name of the group, Director of National Intelligence Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies, indicated no interest in external oversight.

On the view that lying, evading and concealing are the (counter)part and parcel of the Obama administration's approach to national security - the other part being that any and all strategies will be utilized without regard to accountability or oversight, because these are necessary actions to protect the public at all costs - then Holder's and Clapper's actions don't reveal an abuse of power, but rather the precise and intended application of power.

In fact, as many have pointed out, the Obama presidency is following in the footsteps of the Bush administration. It might be more accurate to say that the current administration is carving out even bigger footsteps for itself, with its record number of drone murders, solitary-confinement-based incarcerations, domestic and global surveillance, deportations of migrants, and its pointed indifference to looting bankers. By claiming the right to wield power without apology in all areas of national security domestic and foreign, and on behalf of Wall Street, the Obama administration is claiming the status of the Leviathan, as the sovereign authority in Thomas Hobbes' 16th century treatise on politics is named.

The Leviathan claims both to be the actor and author of the collective will: Once people have handed over their consent to the sovereign (demonstrated by abrogating each individual's rights to kill), then the Leviathan claims that power in the name of the people completely. The Leviathan can do no wrong and admits to no wrong. What's more, unless a person can find a stronger protector, they have no choice but to submit to the Leviathan's authority.

The Obama administration refuses to admit that its policies are fraught with mistakes, concede that its mistakes have hurt innocents needlessly, or correct those mistakes in the name of state security. It resists attempts to make it accountable by resorting to incarceration (John Kiriakou), mock trials (Chelsea Manning) or no trials (Barrett Brown), rescinding passports (Edward Snowden), coercing other sovereign states to incarcerate challengers to its power (Yemen/Abdulelah Haider Shaye), and killing citizens and foreigners alike without review or impunity (whether by drones, financial starvation). It claims to be the ultimate sovereign authority - without challenge, dissent or resistance. It makes the same claim as the Leviathan.

At some level, the question that needs to be addressed is not whether the Obama administration is interested in holding itself accountable - but whether we are interested.

If U.S. citizens are interested in the accountability from an administration that considers itself to be not only above the law, but is unilaterally creating law and (by extension) determining others' criminality through its own (often secret) standards, then we have to decide how to wrest back power from an absolutist state. By an absolutist state, I mean an administration that considers dissent, scrutiny and criticism from any lowly individual unforgivable, while insisting that its own mistakes (real and contrived) are necessary to its self-awarded status as the ruler of the world.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | NBC Fiddles As Kiev Burns Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=6853"><span class="small">Frank Rich, New York Magazine</span></a>   
Friday, 21 February 2014 13:57

Rich writes: "The Olympics have a history of turning a blind eye toward politics, with notorious instances like the Nazi-hosted 1936 Berlin Games and the 1968 Mexico City Games staged amid global protests and the bloody Tlateloco Massacre."

Olympic Gold Medal. (photo: AP)
Olympic Gold Medal. (photo: AP)


NBC Fiddles As Kiev Burns

By Frank Rich, New York Magazine

21 February 14

 

he Olympics have a history of turning a blind eye toward politics, with notorious instances like the Nazi-hosted 1936 Berlin Games and the 1968 Mexico City Games staged amid global protests and the bloody Tlateloco Massacre. This week, the streets of Kiev exploded as Ukraine's Putin-backed President Viktor Yanukovych cracked down on his country's anti-government, pro-Western protestors (presumably with the assent of Putin) setting off days of bloodshed. Did the IOC make a grave mistake in handing these games to Russia? And what, if any, should be the response of the IOC, athletes, and the Olympics media to this conflict?

There's no way to know now, but history could well end up judging the Sochi Games as harshly as it does the notorious Berlin Games. Already Garry Kasparov, the chess champion and anti-Putin dissident, is making the analogy. He notes that "Hitler in 1936 was seen as a thoroughly respectable and legitimate politician" and argues that the current IOC chairman, Thomas Bach, a German, should "have learned something from history." If Putin's authoritarian agenda of harsh and violent repression keeps metastasizing in Russia, Ukraine, Syria, and elsewhere - a likely prospect once the Games are over and he is liberated from acting within its spotlight - Sochi may be remembered, as the Berlin Games are, as a giant propaganda gift bestowed on him by dupes and quislings.

The athletes are mere pawns in the chess game between Russia and the West. They should do what their individual consciences dictate. The Ukraine's 43 competing athletes have shown remarkable bravery in that regard, asking to wear black armbands to symbolize the "deep pain" and the "sorrow and sympathy" they feel over the loss of their fellow countrymen. That the IOC has shut down this mild, earnest protest is shameful. At least the committee has not yet tried to silence the figure skater-turned-commentator Johnny Weir, who is now wearing his hair in "a traditional Ukrainian braid" to show solidarity with the Ukraine protestors.

Weir is a bright spot at NBC. But there's a noxious fiddling-while-Kiev-burns surreality to the network's traditional upbeat Olympics packaging when people are being slaughtered in the streets some 600 miles away from Sochi and Putin continues to brutalize dissenters of all kinds in Russia itself. You have to wonder if future generations will judge the treacly, gung-ho Sochi coverage in years hence much as they look back now on Leni Riefenstahl's feel-good propaganda film from the Berlin Games, Olympia - as technically impressive but morally obtuse. On Wednesday, the Sochi-branded edition of the NBC Nightly News didn't even lead with the Kiev standoff but instead chose to go with a news break about a generic Department of Homeland Security warning about potential shoe bombers - a story deemed so inconsequential by the Times and Wall Street Journal the following morning that you had to search the back pages of their print editions to find brief items mentioning it. You have to wonder what corporate interests are at play in NBC's coverage of Russia and Ukraine as it strides to protect its huge investment in the Games and preserve a rare Today ratings victory over ABC's Good Morning America. This question is particularly worth examining now, given the bid of the network's parent company, Comcast, to buy Time Warner Cable. If this deal passes regulatory scrutiny, it will give Comcast still more say over what information Americans receive, not just from NBC but from any source that reaches households by broadband.

As the courts increasingly rule in favor of same-sex marriage rights, conservative state lawmakers are pushing bills to allow businesses, individuals, and, in some cases, government employees to deny services to gay couples on religious grounds. Earlier this week, as BuzzFeed reported, four of these bills - in Kansas, South Dakota, Idaho, and Tennessee - were abruptly scuttled, and one - in Arizona - advanced. Do these religious exemption bills have a chance of arresting the rapid progress of the gay rights movement? Or do this week's events expose them as dead on arrival?

These bills are the last desperate efforts by the religious right to stop the tide of history. It's ludicrous to argue (as one Kansas legislator put it) that people are being "persecuted for their religious beliefs" by, say, being required by law to rent a hotel ballroom to a same-sex wedding. This is just a new version of the last-ditch states' rights arguments invoked to justify turning away black people from lunch counters during the civil rights movement. That even conservative states are now dropping these potential laws in response to public outcry is heartening: A Republican state senator in South Dakota, Mark Kirkeby, was moved to call his state's scuttled bill "mean, nasty, hateful, vindictive." There's never been any moral (or, for that matter, religious) grounds for denying gays their full constitutional rights; now there's no political advantage either. As Andrew Koppelman, a law professor at Northwestern, told the Times in reaction to the string of federal judges in Oklahoma, Utah, and Virginia who recently struck down state laws prohibiting same-sex marriage, "It is becoming increasingly clear to judges that if they rule against same-sex marriage, their grandchildren will regard them as bigots." Though it's happening at a faster speed than they might wish, the justices of the Supreme Court will soon be at this crossroads.

The national Republican party, however, remains an outlier. It doesn't know what the hell to do. Its base still rejects same-sex marriage yet the party establishment (and its fat-cat funders the Koch Brothers included) know full well that demonizing gay marriage is a barrier that keeps young voters from even considering the party's stands on other issues. So the GOP seems to be hoping that if it holds its breath long enough somehow this historic wave will just go away. At Fox News, the party's media surrogate, the less said about anything remotely gay, whether in Russia or at home, the better. Though a serious gay Republican candidate for Congress in San Diego, Carl DeMaio, recently made American political history by becoming the first such candidate in either party to run an ad showing a gay politician holding hands with his partner and waving a rainbow flag at a gay-pride parade, Fox has been conspicuously silent. It's not deploring this development or covering it - the journalistic equivalent, I guess, of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. But events are moving so fast that it's hard to imagine that the GOP can keep hiding in this closet indefinitely.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Obama's Nuke-Powered Drone Strike on America's Fiscal Sanity Print
Thursday, 20 February 2014 16:15

Wasserman writes: "While Fukushima burns and solar soars, our taxpayer money is being pitched at a failed 20th century technology currently distinguished by its non-stop outflow of lethal radiation into the Pacific Ocean."

President Barack Obama during his remarks on the George Zimmerman case. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)
President Barack Obama during his remarks on the George Zimmerman case. (photo: Carolyn Kaster/AP)


Obama's Nuke-Powered Drone Strike on America's Fiscal Sanity

By Harvey Wasserman, Common Dreams

20 February 14

 

o the "all the above" energy strategy now deems we dump another $6.5 billion in bogus loan guarantees down the atomic drain. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz has announced finalization of hotly contested taxpayer handouts for the two Vogtle reactors being built in Georgia. Another $1.8 billion waits to be pulled out of your pocket and poured down the radioactive sink hole.

A nuke-powered drone strike on fiscal sanity.

While Fukushima burns and solar soars, our taxpayer money is being pitched at a failed 20th century technology currently distinguished by its non-stop outflow of lethal radiation into the Pacific Ocean.

The money is to pump up a pair of radioactive white elephants that Wall Street won't touch. Georgia state "regulators" are strong-arming ratepayers into the footing the bill before the reactors ever move a single electron—which they likely never will.

Sibling reactors being built in Finland and France are already billions over budget and years behind schedule. New ones proposed in Great Britain flirt with price guarantees far above currently available renewables.

The Vogtle project makes no fiscal sense … except for the scam artists that will feed off them for years to come.

Substandard concrete, unspecified rebar steel, major labor scandals, non-existent quality control … all the stuff that's defined this industry since the Shippingport reactor started construction outside Pittsburgh some six decades ago is with us yet again.

It would be nice to say this is merely $6.5 billion wasted. But that's the tip of the iceberg. Long Island's Shoreham and New Hampshire's Seabrook came in at 5-10 times their original cost estimates.

Shoreham never made it to commercial operation. Neither did Seabrook Unit Two.

Should Vogtle, for which these loans are designated, beat the odds and actually go on line in the years to come, it will multiply its sunk cost by irradiating the countryside and creating radioactive waste nobody can handle.

Nor can it get private insurance to shield future victims and the taxpaying public from the inevitable disaster. The next commercial reactor to explode (joining the five that already have) will do damage in the trillions.

Its owners will not be liable, and the people making this decision will never go to prison.

But many along the way will pocket major fortunes from substandard construction, corner-cutting "safety" scams, black market parts purchasing, mafia-run hiring operations and the usual greasing of radioactive palms that defines all reactor construction projects.

Take that $6.5 or $8.3 billion and invest it right now in wind, solar, sustainable bio-fuels, geothermal, ocean thermal, wave energy, LED light bulbs, building insulation and Solartopian south-facing windows.

THEN we can dent in our climate crisis.

THAT's where the jobs are.

THERE would be an all-the-above energy strategy that actually makes sense.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2961 2962 2963 2964 2965 2966 2967 2968 2969 2970 Next > End >>

Page 2964 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN