300 Koch-Led Businessmen Tie Noose Around Democracy's Neck

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet

05 July 14

The beauty of our country's present system of government? Anyone is perfectly free to buy a member of Congress.

he Koch boys, Charles and David, live in their own little world. It's a special world, enshrouded in a rarefied atmosphere created by the fumes emanating from their family's enormous stockpiles of wealth.

Thus, the two brothers have always felt very special, and they also expect those of us in the down-to-Earth world to treat them special, even heroic. The boys were born rich and right-wing, and they parlayed Daddy Fred Koch's millions into a huge industrial conglomerate that has made each of them uberbillionaires. This has further bloated their sense of self-importance, while also giving them the financial muscle to try transforming our democratic world of egalitarian ideals into their fantasy world of laissez-fairy, social Darwinism, ruled by supermen like...well, like them, of course.

So, twice a year, the Kochs convene a secret summit of superrich supermen to plot strategy and pledge millions of dollars to their political transformation of America. In June, about 300 of the billionaire brotherhood gathered with Charlie and Dave at the St. Regis Monarch Bay Resort on the Southern California coast. As investigative reporter Lauren Windsor wrote in The Nation, the Koch confab, which bore the heroic title of "American Courage," took over the entire luxury resort, including its golf course and restaurants, for three days, at the cost of nearly a million bucks—not counting charges for guest rooms.

David Koch provided a keynote talk, modestly titled "Saving America," and attendees were treated to a feedfest of right-wing boilerplate from a gaggle of GOP congress critters summoned to the summit. The billionaires were especially delighted to hear Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell assure them that he would defend to his last sour breath their right to buy our elections.

Then, reports Windsor, the 300 Koch-headed supermen pledged to do just that, promising to put up $500 million this year to turn the U.S. senate over to Republican control.

You see, the beauty of our country's present system of government is that anyone is perfectly free to buy a member of Congress. And isn't that what democracy is all about?

The industrialist Koch brothers, of course, prefer to buy everything in bulk, and they've spent millions of dollars to purchase controlling shares of a whole flock of Republican Congress critters. In fact, they have spent so much on their self-serving attempts to buy so many elections (from Congress all the way down to small-town school board races) that they've made themselves the poster boys of Big Money corruption. By huge margins, the public is demanding that Congress terminate the plutocratic infestation of our democratic system by Kochites.

How have the brothers responded? By buying another senator—this time a former-member-turned-lobbyist. Don Nickles, an Oklahoma Republican, became a powerhouse Washington lobbyist shortly after he left the Senate in 2005. His lobby shop pulls in some $8 million a year to run favor-seeking chores for the likes of AT&T, Exxon Mobil, FED EX, General Motors, and Wal-Mart. Now, Nickles is pulling the Koch's plow, using his Capitol Hill influence and contacts to try to defeat reforms that would shut off the funnels of secret, unlimited amounts of corporate cash that the Koch network puts into elections.

What we have here is a perfect example of Big Money looping full circle to strangle The People's right to be self-governing. The Koch boys and their gang of supermen write huge checks to candidates and front groups to elect lawmakers who serve their interests. Some of those lawmakers, like Nickles, later slide into lucrative lobbying slots, getting paid a bundle by Koch & Company to fend off democratic, anti-corruption reforms. Thus, the Kochs and their ilk can keep making bulk purchases of lawmakers...and the circle is drawn ever tighter around democracy's neck.

We Are a Clueless Nation: America's Congenital Blind Spot on Iraq

By Robert Hennelly, Salon

05 July 14

As our military contemplates Iraq again, we're beset by unchallenged magical thinking -- and a dangerous narcissism

e celebrate our national identity on the occasion of Independence Day. In our patriotic narrative we always see ourselves as heroic and selfless, advancing universal freedom and prosperity. Yet in 2014 we are a clueless nation, afflicted with attention deficit disorder, caught in a mindless repeat pattern.

We are now in the second month of an Iraqi crisis redux and the news wave is way too dominated by the same white male faces that got it so wrong last time.

As the U.S. military heads into Iraq again, the news media lacks sufficient Iraqi and Muslim voices offering us any authentic situational awareness of the facts on the ground or on what has transpired since we left. What images we do get are video loops of “marauding radical jihadis” who have commandeered American combat vehicles. Our fee-for-service armchair warriors say the rolling tide of soulless jihadis are a grave threat to U.S. interests and must be stopped.

In a matter of weeks they have upended what the U.S. thought it had accomplished over several years with the death of 4,500 American soldiers, the wounding of tens of thousands more, and the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars. The huge toll paid by Iraqi civilians along the way was too often dismissed as collateral damage, and now we just don’t understand why they don’t love us “after all we have done for them.”

The latest wave of jihadis are like the gruesome aliens depicted in this summer’s “Edge of Tomorrow,” starring Tom Cruise as Marine Corps Major William Cage. These evildoers evidently just manifested out of the sand with no warning. With a straight face, news anchors say nobody saw it coming.

Really? Since the last U.S. convoy rolled out of Iraq in December of 2011 the country has been in nothing but violent convulsion with thousands of Iraqi civilians of all ages being killed by terror bombings. In a matter of weeks after the U.S. patted itself on the back for another job well done, Iraqi security forces were targeted for attack on a regular basis. In the beginning of 2012 even the “secure” Green Zone came under mortar attack.

Even before the U.S. pulled up stakes, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s 2011 violent crackdowns on nonviolent Iraqi Arab Spring youth protestors was sowing the seeds for the more militant reaction that now threatens the entire region. Rather than constructively respond to the youthful protesters’ valid grievances about his dysfunctional government’s self-dealing and poor public services, Maliki resorted to force. History goes on in foreign places even if we are not paying attention.

By July 23, 2012, the counter-surge was able to launch dozens of simultaneous attacks on Iraqi security forces and Shi’ite civilians that left 116 people dead and 300 wounded. Back then what was billed as The Islamic State of Iraq took credit.

“Nobody saw it coming” because once American skin was out of the game, after the U.S. military withdrew, the U.S. media dropped running coverage. GI Joe and Jane were off the set. Our news media had other things it needed to feature rather than the misery of a foreign people. Our infotainment complex had to fill their news hole by keeping us up to date on the latest smartphone app, zero in on the arrest of the “tanning mom” and keep us current on the omnipresent Kardashians.

With an American electorate kept so ill-informed and already often unable to find Iraq on a map, President Obama did not have to fear contradiction when he declared back in December 2011 in a weekend address that with the exit of U.S. troops from Iraq “our war there will be over.” And in his subsequent State of the Union addresses he has continued the phony narrative that with the U.S. military exit from Iraq and Afghanistan “our longest war” would “be over.”

Over? Because he said it was and because Americans were no longer in the casualty mix? Did any reporters ever get to ask the president just what he meant by over? Did we get a sense of what the contours of Pax Obama would look and feel like? Historically the end of war has meant peace.

It is this kind of unchallenged magical thinking, infused with a dangerous narcissism, that sets us up for things like the Sept. 11, 2012 Benghazi attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. We use our full military might to overthrow existing social orders and insist on being surprised that there are violent consequences. Can we agree to include physics in the syllabus for statecraft?

Nobody saw the original 9/11 coming either. Just like Cruise’s Major Bill Cage in “Edge of Tomorrow,” we are caught in a bloody “Groundhog Day” haunted by the deja vu that we have been here before, but just can’t close the temporal loop to change the bloody outcome. We are always well-intentioned victims just trying to do our best to make the world safe for democracy. We say we are just sending 300 soldiers — and then it’s 750.

Our drone attacks, which occasionally kill innocent civilians, are just our way of reducing the risk to our soldiers while taking the fight to the evildoers.

We do our best to keep them surgical — but even in surgery, innocents die.

If only the locals could see the big picture.