RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Can Elizabeth Warren Stop an Investment Banker From Overseeing Regulation at Treasury? Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33430"><span class="small">Matthew Yglesias, Vox</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 November 2014 13:29

Excerpt: "There are longstanding tensions between the Obama administration and more left-wing Democrats over Obama's approach to the financial services industry. Selecting a veteran investment banker to a key regulatory post inflames those tensions."

Senator Elizabeth Warren is taking aim at an Obama treasury appointee. (photo: Getty Images)
Senator Elizabeth Warren is taking aim at an Obama treasury appointee. (photo: Getty Images)


Can Elizabeth Warren Stop an Investment Banker From Overseeing Regulation at Treasury?

By Matthew Yglesias, Vox

15 November 14

 

  1. President Obama thinks Antonio Weiss, the current head of global investment banking at Lazard should be the next Undersecretary of Treasury for Domestic Finance.

  2. Politico reports that Elizabeth Warren disagrees.

  3. Warren was recently elevated to a leadership post in the Senate Democratic caucus.

  4. The Domestic Finance Undersecretary oversees most of Treasury's functions related to bank supervision and consumer protection.

  5. Somewhat randomly, Weiss is also the publisher of the Paris Review.

The background

There are longstanding tensions between the Obama administration and more left-wing Democrats over Obama's approach to the financial services industry. Selecting a veteran investment banker to a key regulatory post inflames those tensions.

The fact that Weiss was personally involved in Burger King's takeover of Tim Horton's, which many view as a species of tax inversion — a kind of corporate tax avoidance the Obama administration is trying to crack down on — gives him additional political vulnerability.

Warren's opposition is a problem for the White House for two reasons. One is that the recent leadership shift in the Senate Democratic caucus indicates that there's a block of Senate Dems inclined to follow her lead on matters related to banking. The other is that with Obama now in the last two years of his term, Democrats on Capitol Hill see their political destiny as less tied to his and will be more willing to buck him when they feel that he has made the wrong call.

Of course, if Republicans decide that a veteran investment banker is exactly the kind of person they want as Wall Street's watchdog at the Treasury Department then he'll be confirmed easily regardless. But if the GOP sees an opportunity to embarrass Obama by joining a left-right pincers movement against Weiss, he might well go down.

The general theory that people with industry experience make for more bank-friendly regulators is popular, but somewhat lacking in evidence. Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, broadly viewed as Obama's most bank-friendly employee, was a career civil servant with no background on Wall Street. Former CFTC Chair Gary Gensler, generally the Obama appointee who took the toughest line on bank regulation, was a longtime Goldman Sachs guy before joining the government. Weiss' actual views on the key regulatory issues are, at this point, not widely known.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Mitch McConnell's Mission: Degrade and Destroy the Obama Presidency Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=32632"><span class="small">Paul Waldman, The Washington Post</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 November 2014 13:26

Waldman writes: "The real question McConnell faces is this: How can he go about, to borrow a phrase from Barack Obama, degrading and ultimately destroying the Obama presidency? On this, McConnell has very different ideas from his even more conservative colleagues."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. (photo: Getty Images)
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. (photo: Getty Images)


Mitch McConnell's Mission: Degrade and Destroy the Obama Presidency

By Paul Waldman, The Washington Post

15 November 14

 

any have described the question now facing incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as follows: How can he satisfy the Republican crazies on the one hand and show that Republicans can govern on the other? But that isn’t really the question he faces. Aside from an occasional move like passing a continuing resolution to keep the government’s doors open, the Republicans won’t be doing any governing.

Rather, the real question McConnell faces is this: How can he go about, to borrow a phrase from Barack Obama, degrading and ultimately destroying the Obama presidency? On this, McConnell has very different ideas from his even more conservative colleagues.

In the end, this is an argument not about goals but about tactics. That doesn’t mean, however, that it won’t be fought with all the fury that some extremely furious people can muster. There’s already a conflict brewing between McConnell and conservative Republicans over exactly how to go about their futile quest to repeal the Affordable Care Act, even though the new Congress won’t be sworn in for two months. This particular argument is a microcosm of the entire next two years, and it shows just how complicated McConnell’s task is.

Mitch McConnell is now the most important Republican in America, and as such he’s faced with two competing management challenges. The first is to manage the entire Republican party in all its chaotic glory. If keeping everyone within the coalition happy is too much to hope for, at least he can try to keep them from running wild and staging open, bitter rebellions. The second is to manage the GOP’s image in the media.

Though he’s been the leader of Senate Republicans for the better part of a decade, McConnell has never had so much responsibility for his party. And serving both of these goals simultaneously may be harder than even he anticipates. McConnell has long been regarded as one of the shrewdest operators in Washington, but he’s now ascended to a new level as the GOP’s undisputed leader (let’s not kid ourselves that the hapless John Boehner has nearly the same level of influence). One can’t help recall that Newt Gingrich was also regarded as a strategic genius, and two years after he ascended to Speaker of the House, Bill Clinton was re-elected, then two years after that Gingrich was gone.

What Republicans are now arguing about is whether they should try to use the budget procedure known as reconciliation to repeal the ACA. Reconciliation, which is used for budget bills, circumvents filibusters and therefore requires only a 51-vote majority. The problem is that it’s extremely complex and can only be used on some parts of the law. But the conservatives advocating it — both inside Congress from people like Ted Cruz, and outside from groups like Heritage Action — aren’t concerned with such details.

McConnell has offered conflicting signals on whether he will ultimately go that route. And this gets at the core difference between him and conservatives: They want to storm the gates of the Obama presidency, even in a suicide mission, while McConnell would much rather try to weaken the walls little by little until the edifice crumbles.

So imagine two different repeal proposals. One occurs through the regular process. It passes in the House, just as it has fifty times before. When it moves through the Senate, Democrats filibuster it and it dies. McConnell would then say to his party, “Okay, we did that. Everybody had the chance to vote on full repeal. Now let’s go through the law, provision by provision, and see what we might be able to undo for real.”

The second scenario goes like this: the Senate somehow manages to attach a full repeal to a budget bill and pass it through reconciliation. It goes to President Obama, who vetoes it. We then arrive at the same point.

The difference between the two scenarios is that the latter garners much more media attention, since it involves the president directly. Instead of being regarded by the media as a perfunctory vote that everybody knew had to be gotten out of the way before the real work begins, it would become a huge showdown.

And since McConnell is now in charge of the GOP’s image as well as its legislative agenda, the last thing he wants is for them to be seen undertaking this kind of high-profile yet futile gesture, since it would just validate everything Democrats say about them being both radical and unserious about governing. If he’s going to have a veto battle with Obama, he’d much rather it be on something where he knows he’ll have a better chance at getting public opinion on his side. For instance, he might try to eliminate the employer mandate, one of the law’s less popular provisions. That’s a fight he might actually win.

And unlike the Tea Partiers, McConnell knows the difference between winning and losing. He’s just as committed to undermining the Obama presidency as they are. What we don’t yet know is whether he can convince them to let him do it his way.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
An Open Letter to Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=7500"><span class="small">Jim Wallis, Sojourners</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 November 2014 13:22

Excerpt: "The police response to any public reaction has become an urgent moral concern for the entire nation. The impact of one life being taken in Ferguson has already been felt. Now you must do everything in your power to ensure no other lives are lost and no other persons are hurt."

Dr. Cornel West and Rev. Jim Wallace were among the arrested in Ferguson. (photo: Joshua Lott/Getty Images)
Dr. Cornel West and Rev. Jim Wallace were among the arrested in Ferguson. (photo: Joshua Lott/Getty Images)


An Open Letter to Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon

By Jim Wallace, Sojourners

15 November 14

 

An imminent grand jury verdict in St. Louis County will determine whether to indict Ferguson police office Darren Wilson on criminal charges for shooting Michael Brown. News reports have detailed the expectation of violence in the St. Louis area after the decision is handed down and the mobilization being planned by law enforcement in response. This is an open letter to Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon urging him to maintain peace and protect those exercising their right to free speech. I encourage you to read the letter and join me and others across the country in signing it now. Your voice can make a difference. Sojourners will send the letter and signatures to the Gov. Nixon. – Jim Wallis, Sojourners

ear Gov. Nixon,

For the last several months, the nation’s eyes have been on Ferguson, Mo. Few had heard of this small St. Louis suburb until Michael Brown was shot and killed by a member of the city’s police department — whose mission is supposedly to serve and protect. Now this community is an infamous global symbol of the nation’s continued struggle for racial equality and the troubling trend of police militarization.

Jesus proclaimed, “Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God” (Matthew 5:9). The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. reminded us, “True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice.” These are not idealistic thoughts or nice sentiments to be dismissed when tensions and conflict arise. Rather, they are wise words of truth that should guide our thinking in moments of distress. We need to make Jesus’ instruction real and consider Dr. King’s words a practical exhortation for the ensuring peace and public safety in Ferguson once the grand jury has made the decision of whether to indict Darren Wilson.

Whatever happened on that unfortunate day between Michael Brown and Darren Wilson, nobody should have died. And the tensions resulting from Brown’s death were only exacerbated by the police response that focused on exerting power and control through militarized means rather than ensuring public safety and protecting the rights of everyone in the community. Faith leaders stood alongside others, horrified at the sight of an unarmed, dead young black man whose body was allowed to lie in the street for hours. Faith leaders were equally outraged by the use of tear gas, military grade equipment, and other tactics more suitable for a theater of war than the streets of a suburban city.

Sadly we cannot rewrite that chapter in Ferguson’s history, but the pages of the next one remain blank. As governor you have an outsized influence in determining what it will say.

Recently, Rev. Traci Blackmon, a local clergy leader, issued an urgent call for action. She asked people across the country to write you letters of solidarity with the people of Ferguson. Her request followed stories and news reports of law enforcement amassing weapons and riot gear. Meanwhile, Rev. Blackmon reports that young people in Ferguson and other community leaders have been requesting bandages and other first-aid items. This is a striking juxtaposition. Missouri citizens should never feel so threatened by their own government and unsecure about their own safety that they feel the need to stock up on medical supplies.

Your leadership is needed now more than ever. This will be one of the defining episodes of your governorship. Please do everything possible to de-escalate violence, which means limiting the use of military tactics and not deploying the National Guard as a first response. The rights of people to peacefully speak and protest must be steadfastly preserved and respected by everyone, especially government leaders and law enforcement agencies. The easiest and most obvious way to protect public safety is to limit confrontation and not allow people’s rights to be infringed upon.

Regardless of the grand jury’s decision, the police response to any public reaction has become an urgent moral concern for the entire nation. The impact of one life being taken in Ferguson has already been felt. Now you must do everything in your power to ensure no other lives are lost and no other persons are hurt. It is imperative that you prioritize talking to community leaders, allowing public spaces to remain open and safe, and the law to be upheld in ways that protect all life. Your actions can help bring a modicum of justice to a community that has already unjustly suffered so much. Please use your power to be a peacemaker for the sake of all the children of God.

The nation will be watching the decisions you make, and I am hopeful this will be a lesson in leadership from which other public officials across the country can learn. You will be in our prayers over the coming days and weeks.

Sincerely,

Jim Wallis, Sojourners

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
First Snowden, Now Spies on a Plane. Yes, Surveillance Is Everywhere Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=29990"><span class="small">Trevor Timm, Guardian UK</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 November 2014 13:17

Timm writes: "It sounds like a movie plot, but in a remarkable report published on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal exposed that these spy planes are part of an actual mass surveillance program overseen by the Justice Department (DOJ). And it's been kept secret from the public for years."

(illustration: unknown)
(illustration: unknown)


First Snowden, Now Spies on a Plane. Yes, Surveillance Is Everywhere

By Trevor Timm, Guardian UK

15 November 14

 

S government-owned airplanes that can cover most of the continental United States are covertly flying around the country, spying on tens of thousands of innocent people’s cellphones. It sounds like a movie plot, but in a remarkable report published on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal exposed that these spy planes are part of an actual mass surveillance program overseen by the Justice Department (DOJ). And it’s been kept secret from the public for years.

The Journal explained that the US Marshals Service, a sub-agency under DOJ’s control, has a small fleet of Cessna airplanes that are currently armed with high-tech surveillance gear called “dirtboxes” – essentially fake cell towers tricking your phone into connecting to them – that can vacuum the identifying information and location of ten of thousands of phones in a single flight.

The Marshalls allegedly use the mass spying planes to locate suspects, but of course the vast, vast majority of phones they end up spying on belong to completely innocent individuals. Per the Journal’s Devlin Barrett:

The U.S. Marshals Service program, which became fully functional around 2007, operates Cessna aircraft from at least five metropolitan-area airports, with a flying range covering most of the U.S. population, according to people familiar with the program.

On Friday, the Justice Department denied the US Marshals Service are keeping a database on innocent Americans cellphone data from the spying program – but it also refused to confirm or deny if the program even exists.

You might ask: Why are the US Marshals – the fugitive-chasing agents of Tommy Lee Jones lore – get the authority to launch this type of mass surveillance operation at all? That’s unclear, but thanks to some digging by the surveillance crowd on Twitter shortly after the Journal published its story, we know the marshals are far from the only US agency using dirtboxes.

Documents unearthed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s Dave Maass showed that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is using dirtboxes along the southwestern border. Other documents tweeted out by the ACLU’s Chris Soghoian show Immigrations and Customs Enforcement use them too, and we know also the Department of Homeland Security has at least discussed attaching cellphone interception gear to the large Predator surveillance drones that are roaming along our border (and often times far inside).

Then there’s the FBI, which, if it’s not using dirtboxes specifically, is certainly employing a very similar and frightening tactic in and around the Washington DC area. Last year Matthew Aid reported in Foreign Policy:

The FBI also uses a wide range of vehicles and airborne surveillance assets to monitor the movements and activities of foreign diplomats and intelligence operatives in Washington and New York. Some of the vans, aircraft, and helicopters used by the FBI for this purpose are equipped with equipment capable of intercepting cell-phone calls and other electronic forms of communication.

The plane surveillance operation’s on-the-ground forebearer – commonly known as a Stingray, which is like a dirtbox on wheels – has been the topic of growing controversy of late, given that cops are increasingly using Stingrays to collect cellphone information on entire neighborhoods, then teaming up with the feds to cover up the whole thing.

The US government has spent untold millions of dollars spreading Stingrays to local police around the country. Check out the ACLU’s ever-expanding map of which police agencies are operating them and in which state. And now we have planes flying all over the country doing essentially the same thing from the sky? If that’s not illegal, as unnamed government officials claimed it isn’t, it certainly should be.

As the ACLU’s Chris Soghoian told the Journal about dirtboxes: “it’s likely – to the extent judges are authorizing it – [that] they have no idea of the scale of it.” This isn’t unfounded speculation. A judge in Texas recently rejected the government’s request to use a Stingray because they failed to adequately explain to the court what they were doing. Emails released earlier this year through the Freedom of Information Act showed that the US Marshal’s service was literally encouraging local police to deceive judges into believing information obtained through Stingrays were actually coming from a “confidential source”.

The even more shocking part has been Congress’ relative silence on this blatant domestic spying abuse. As Newsweek’s Jeff Stein reported in September, some members of Congress received a demonstration of the capabilities of this technology a few years ago and they know that foreign governments are using dirtbox devices inside the US as well, but beyond Rep Alan Grayson’s sharp letter to the FCC recently, hardly anyone in Congress has even brought it up.

Where’s the Congressional investigation? Our elected representatives have at least feigned concern about the NSA’s massive surveillance programs exposed in the past year and a half, and they may finally get around to doing something about it next week. But now we have planes literally spies on a plane, snooping exclusively on Americans, on a massive scale – and so far, not a peep. That’s not an action movie; that’s a horror show.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | Doctor Without Ebola Quarantined by Vermont Police State Action Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=20877"><span class="small">William Boardman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Saturday, 15 November 2014 11:15

Boardman writes: "Is this what our Constitution expects? Faced with an unusual situation that may require some sort of special handling, the first thing the government does is break the law and trample constitutional rights."

Nurse Kaci Hickox successfully fought her quarantine in Maine. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Nurse Kaci Hickox successfully fought her quarantine in Maine. (photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)


Doctor Without Ebola Quarantined by Vermont Police State Action

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

15 November 14

 

“No person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….”

~ Amendment V, U.S. Constitution

s this what our Constitution expects? Faced with an unusual situation that may require some sort of special handling, the first thing the government does is break the law and trample constitutional rights.

That’s what New Jersey and Maine and several other states did reflexively in response to imaginary Ebola threats in recent weeks. And it also happened more quietly in Vermont. Or as the governor phrased it, “We’re trying to do this the Vermont way.”

When a state decides to exercise its authority without regard to facts or law, the first thing it demands from the citizen-victim is unquestioning compliance. Sometimes, coming from self-important governors like Chris Christie or Paul LePage, that demand is loud, bullying, and incoherent. And when faced with principled opposition, such lawless governors are left with egg on their faces in court.

In Vermont, equally lawless state coercion has been quieter, subtler, and deadly bureaucratic, complete with threatening paperwork that omits cogent reference to the state’s obligations, and to every citizen’s rights. Vermont governor Peter Shumlin embraced Vermont’s way of lawless state coercion when he said, less than truthfully, at an emergency news conference October 28: “… if, with this situation – or any other individual – the health department deemed it necessary to establish involuntary monitoring, we have an ability to do so by an order of the commissioner.”

That is an example of classic Orwellian Newspeak right out of “1984,” as it neatly avoids telling the truth without actually lying. Acting Health Commissioner Tracy Dolan made the same false claim. Shumlin and Dolan gave the absolutely false impression that the health commissioner can issue a lawful health order on her own authority. She cannot. If she tried to do that, she would be breaking the law, and they both presumably know that – or they certainly should, as a requirement of their jobs. More importantly, the governor should be actively protecting due process of law, not acting passively in panic, hiding behind a bureaucratic charade when faced with figuring out what to do with a Vermont doctor who went to Guinea and Sierra Leone, for a personal investigation of the Ebola outbreak there, and then came back to the U.S. healthy. Three weeks later, he’s still healthy.

Screened by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), he was found to be symptom-free. No one claims he came into contact with anyone with Ebola, and he claims he did not. Never mind, reality didn’t matter to authorities in high panic mode in Vermont. For reasons they have yet to explain, they adopted a coercive, illegal approach to this Ebola-free doctor, an approach that would also leave him free of his civil rights.

Peter James Italia earned his MD in the Dominican Republic in 1987

The curious, but unlucky doctor is Peter James Italia, who was unemployed and living in Rutland, Vermont, in the summer of 2014, as the Ebola outbreak in West Africa was growing in intensity. (As of mid-November, according to the WHO (World Health Organization), the death toll had passed 5,000 and there were more than 14,000 people known to be infected; conditions were apparently improving in some parts of Liberia, but not elsewhere.) Dr. Italia claims no special expertise in Ebola treatment, but said he was “quite familiar with infection control procedures, disease transmission and isolation protocols as I have considerable experience and training as a doctor in dealing with and treating patients who have been placed in isolation due other serious infectious diseases.”

Asked why he decided to go to Guinea, he wrote [unedited]:

The simple answer is that I saw too many red flags popping up everywhere, esp where the CDC and the WHO and the US gov were involved. I felt that they were being too naive in their dealing with the Ebola virus and too slow in their response to the epidemic itself.

I found their rhetoric to be not only meritless but totaling misleading. And it was these kinds of actions that were going to place the Amer public, as well as the rest of the world, increasingly in harms way due to the Ebola virus. And I felt very strongly that things would only continue to get worse. I therefore decided to go to West Africa to do some investigative reporting on the Ebola epidemic firsthand.

Dr. Italia does not claim to be a professional reporter and he was not apparently linked to any news organization when he was in Guinea and Sierra Leone. While there, he filed two brief reports, written in diary-style, “with major TV networks in the US, England and France, incl NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, BBC and France24, but no one acknowledged me” (as he wrote on Facebook October 15). He had arrived in Conakry on September 27, after filling out customs forms in Algeria and Guinea on which he stated that the purpose of his trip was to investigate Ebola. He had a 30-day roundtrip ticket on Royal Air Maroc and paid for the trip from his savings account. His earliest Facebook post from Africa on October 1 reads in its entirety:

Greetings from West Africa! I have arrived in Conakry, the capital of Guinea to join in the fight against the spread of the Ebola virus and to help those who have been stricken. On Monday I spoke with the director of the hospital here in the capital. I have been waiting for the past 2 days to see the national coordinator for Ebola to get permission from the government. Because I do not have a medical license, those international organizations helping here in West Africa such as Doctors Without Borders and Samaritans Purse would not help me. This has made things quite difficult for me.

Furthermore, not traveling with a group is rather dangerous since this is a third-world country. It simply is not safe for one to travel alone here, especially a foreigner. Yet here I am out of necessity because of the terrible way I have been treated in the US because I did not graduate from a US medical school to the point that I can't find work. Nobody gives a damn about me or all my accumulated knowledge and skills from many years of hard work. Nor the fact that I am a good doctor. What in the hell is wrong with people? Why have I been treated this way? And still despite everything I am also here because of a deep desire to help people. Maybe it is here that I will be able to put my medical/surgical knowledge and skills to work again.

Finally, if I don't hear soon from the Ebola coordinator, I plan to leave the relative safety of the capital and make my way to where Guinea borders on Sierra Leone ­– the so-called frontier.

Vermont officials freaked out over the doctor’s visit to Ebola country

Meanwhile, back in Vermont during early October, deputy state’s attorney Christina Rainville in Bennington County (next door to Rutland County) was apparently looking for Dr. Italia to appear as a witness in an ongoing case. In 2013, Italia was a witness for the prosecution in the trial of Peter Campbell-Copp, who was found guilty of setting up a ponzi scheme that duped would-be authors into paying him a total of more than $100,000 for publishing books that were never actually published. Campbell-Copp was sentenced to six months in prison. Italia, who was one of the defrauded authors, has since published at least two books.

According to one self-serving account, Rainville found Italia’s Facebook page and “discovered Italia was in Africa.” She then “became concerned for his safety.” So of course she first called the U.S. Marshall’s office, where a deputy more sensibly told her to report on Dr. Italia to the Vermont Health Department. Rainville’s activity reportedly led to some unspecified “federal-level investigation” of a man who was already presenting himself to the CDC in Guinea and otherwise living in plain sight. Dr. Italia was staying at the Riviera Royal in Conakry, a high-security hotel compound, surrounded by a wall and comprising 74 air-conditioned rooms, a restaurant, swimming pool, spa, casino, and other amenities. (Rainville was not available for comment. The health department did not respond to inquiry.)

A more credible account from Dr. Italia indicates that Christina Rainville was indeed interested in his testifying in ongoing proceedings against Peter Campbell-Copp, but she did not get in touch with him directly. As Dr. Italia wrote: “I never got anything from Christina, but I got an email from The Victims Advocate, Tammy Loveland, who knows me from the first case. They were looking for potential witnesses. I was the one who told Tammy that I was not able to testify because I was in West Africa.”

In any event, Vermont’s response was beginning to creep out of control. Rutland mayor Christopher Louras first emailed Dr. Italia on October 15. That day Dr. Italia had posted his first media report on Facebook, in which he wrote in part:

I recently visited the border of Guinea with Sierra Leone in the south along the main route connecting Conakry with Freetown.

Life goes on as usual in the rural towns of Guinea in the south that lie near the border of Sierra Leone as people go about their daily business. Children can be seen running about and playing. Adults wait by the roadside to sell their goods to passersby while others just sit idly by and watch. I tell the people I speak with that I am an American doctor. I ask about the Ebola virus and if there are any sick people in town. I am told that many of the small rural hospitals are nearly empty.

There is a basic fear and distrust of the government here in Guinea and of outside (western) medicine in general. Like many other third-world countries, the population as a whole tends not go to the hospitals; they will however visit the local medicine man. The Ebola epidemic has only seemed to heighten these feelings. “Where is the medicine?” I am often asked by some of the townspeople with regard to the Ebola outbreak. “The medical supplies, the help?” I have no good answer for them.

Panic and ignorance, more contagious than Ebola

Mayor Louras said he had only become aware of Dr. Italia in July, “during a landlord-tenant dispute, then again on Oct. 15, 2014, when advised by Bennington [state’s attorney] office that he was in West Africa actively seeking to treat Ebola patients.” The Rutland mayor said his intent had been to confirm that the doctor was in Africa and to find out when he was coming back. (Governor Shumlin, at his October 28 news conference, suggested that the FBI had also been involved.) The mayor’s first email to Dr. Italia said, in part:

We are following the Ebola crisis both in the U.S. and abroad and are formulating appropriate local response strategies.?Is there any information you have gleaned from your trip to date that you can share with us that would be of use to our planning?... Are you having any success finding a clinic that will work in partnership with you?

Dr. Italia replied the next day, noting that he had not hooked up with an organization yet and that he would have suggestions for Rutland soon, adding, without more specific detail: “I can tell you that the response to date re the Ebola epidemic has been just as inadequate and unsure here as to what you see going on in the US. Believe me when I tell you that this disease is much more contagious than the CDC has portrayed it.”

Mayor Louras wrote back the same day, describing local Ebola anxiety:

I am disappointed (though frankly hardly surprised) to learn that that the contagion is much more aggressive than CDC is communicating. Concerns throughout the local emergency management community as well as the local medical community are high. The level of engagement, and thoroughness of answers and advice from the CDC is somewhat alarming.

For example, from a municipal standpoint we have questions about the viability of Ebola outside its human host (think wastewater/sewer infrastructure), there is no information available re: if precautions are or are not necessary when a category A agent is may be present if a sewer main were to rupture 300 meters from the hospital….

In Guinea, Dr. Italia went into the field along the Sierra Leone border

On October 19, Dr. Italia posted his second, much longer but no more specific media report on Facebook – an excerpt:

I just got back from another trip to the border of Guinea with Sierra Leone…. This time, however, I crossed over the border illegally into Sierra Leone to see what I could find out about the Ebola problem there…. I came across a motorcyclist who said he could take me across the border on his motorcycle. Sounded like a plan if I wanted to get across the border even if it was illegal since I was all out of ideas. So we crossed into Sierra Leone on his motorcycle.

At the first village we came to in Sierra Leone, the villagers were immediately upset by our being there. I explained to the elders that I was an American doctor there to help with the Ebola problem and that I was on my way to Freetown. They demanded that we pay them money for them to let us pass. We refused to give them any money. We were finally allowed to pass.

The same thing happened when we got to the next village. Again, I told the people there that I was an American doctor and asked if anyone in the village was sick. Again, we were asked to pay money. Ironically, they also accused us of potentially bringing Ebola into their village from Guinea, when it was clearly the people in their own country, Sierra Leone, that they should have been more worried about. They also accused us of being there for other nefarious reasons, not having anything to do with Ebola. Again, we refused to pay any money.

Instead of letting us pass, they called the police. So, we were taken by the police to the local police station, where we were detained for several hours, questioned and then released separately. I was taken back to the border crossing by a customs official and told to return to Conakry.

Having made no more progress than this in more than three weeks in Guinea, Dr. Italia vented his frustration in another email exchange with Mayor Louras the same day:

My medical credentials have been verified by both the Fed of State Med Boards (to which Vermont belongs) and the ECFMG. I have trained and taught in US hospitals. Yet, because I graduated from a medical school in the Dominican Republic, I have been treated as an undesirable and prevented from being able to pursue my med/surg career at every turn. I am far from being stupid. In fact, I have written 2 books. In the first book, I describe an entirely new calculus method, and in the second, I describe how I aided seriously ill and dying patients at major US medical centers….

I need for the record to be set straight now so I can go back to my med/surg career and not be treated as an undesirable for the rest of my life. I am willing to assist you and the city of Rutland re Ebola. However, I was really hoping to hear from the major news media by now and maybe somebody who was willing to help me for a change.

Authorities on two continents make their presence felt

Two days later, the doctor posted on Facebook that “the hotel manager has told me the police are looking for me. I haven't heard from the major TV networks.” The next day he posted, with both prescience and despair:

Hmm, no police...yet! My return flight to JFK is tomorrow night. Maybe I can get out of here without incident. But then my real problems only begin.

Rejected and ignored for too long now by society – as my firsthand reports on the Ebola epidemic here in West Africa having been completely ignored by the news media and everyone else only goes to show once more – I will be homeless and forced to live on the streets. I think DEATH would be a better alternative than to keep living like this.

Responding to this post the next day, Mayor Louras expressed exaggerated sympathy and asked a question related to his primary agenda. The full email:

Clearly you are extremely distressed. You have my sympathies and you are not alone in your anguish. The CDC has proved itself to be entirely incompetent and ineffectual in battling this latest public health crisis. Your reports do in fact appear to be ignored. Are you continuing your mission to combat Ebola? Or are you still planning to return to Rutland?

At the airport for his flight home October 23, Dr. Italia was not allowed to board his Royal Air Maroc plane. At the ticket counter he was told that he was on a “no fly list,” with no further explanation. The next day his Facebook post included:

So, I was forced to return to my hotel that I had just checked out of only hours earlier. All this, despite the fact that I have not been sick nor have I been around or in contact with Ebola patients during my investigation into the scope/severity and the handling/management of the Ebola problem in West Africa. I have contacted the American embassy to apprise them of my situation…. [emphasis added]

Still in Guinea on October 26, Dr. Italia posted a desperate message on Facebook that said in part:

American Doctor Wants Work
Note: Please like this post and share it.
Help!!! If there is a hospital anywhere that wants to hire me, please let me know ASAP. I've
been a very vocal critic for some time now of the CDC’s and WHO’s handling of the Ebola epidemic….

I tried to do something GOOD for everyone’s sake. You’d think that people would at least notice, that maybe someone would care. Apparently not. I’ve received not one ounce of recognition for all my efforts, not even a simple thank you from anyone – not that any of that matters now. But apparently someone did notice (and perhaps retaliated?) because I ended up getting stranded here in Guinea with no flight out and without any explanation as to why. Now I see why I can’t get work in the US….

Vermont sets ambush for the doctor who doesn’t have Ebola

As it turned out, he wasn’t stranded. The American embassy in Conakry managed to get him a seat on a Brussels Airline flight. No one explained to Dr. Italia why he had been on a “no fly list” or whether it was some other glitch. He sent an email titled “Maybe Flying Out Tonight” to friends, including the Rutland mayor, saying: “As it stands right now, I hope to be leaving tonight at 6:45pm. I change planes in Brussels and arrive at JFK tomorrow afternoon at 2:05pm. If I don't have a problem at JFK, then I can take Amtrak to Rutland on Tuesday, I guess….”

Responding with what seems like guilty foreknowledge, Mayor Louras deadpanned in total response: “Thank you for reaching out. I hope your travels go smoothly at this juncture. Please keep me in mind if you have further updates.” [emphasis added]

Once on the plane, Dr. Italia’s travels were indeed smooth, made smoother still by the kind handling of the CDC and, later, the gentle predations of Vermont law enforcement and health authorities. Smooth, as it turned out, was not really a good thing. At JFK, two security officers met Dr. Italia at the plane. As he reports: “They quickly escorted me to the health and safety office at JFK, where I was briefly detained for temperature screening and questioning.” He described it as “completely routine,” with minimal personnel present: two CDC screeners and two security officers, but “I wasn’t told anything by anyone.”

What had apparently been going on behind the scenes for some time was hinted at in The New York Times of October 26, the same day Dr. Italia left Guinea. A long story exploring panic and pandemic, quarantine and the Constitution, ended with these less-than-entirely-accurate paragraphs apparently about Dr. Italia, though he’s not identified:

And the virus has presented at least one unusual challenge for law enforcement agencies, senior American officials said on Sunday. They described how agencies had urgently investigated a man who wrote a bizarre post on social media that he was going to try and contract Ebola in Africa and then return to the United States.

According to senior American officials, the man traveled to the West African country of Guinea in the past month in the hopes of working alongside humanitarian assistance organizations treating patients. The organizations quickly determined that the man had no medical expertise and was acting strangely, and they turned him away

Even though his Facebook post indicated that he was mentally unstable, mentioning a time machine at one point, a multi-agency investigation was launched that involved the F.B.I., Customs and Border Protection, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In Guinea, C.D.C. officials interviewed the man and took his temperature several times, and determined that he showed no signs of the virus. The C.D.C. had no legal ability to hold the man and he is not in the custody of American or Guinean authorities there, American officials said Sunday.

By Sunday night, officials said they do not believe they can stop him from returning to the United States, but said federal authorities would be closely monitoring him when he arrived, likely in the next several days.

It’s not that we were trying to prevent him from returning, we were just ensuring that he didn’t pose a health risk to other travelers,” said a senior American official. “When we determined that he didn’t pose a risk we had no issue with him flying home.”

Times’s hatchet job based on anonymous (and unreliable) sources

The “bizarre post on social media” about contracting Ebola and returning to the U.S. does not appear to exist, at least in relation to Dr. Italia, nor did the Times provide anything close to a persuasive source for its existence. Basing the casual slur of “mentally unstable” on the mention of time machines is no more justified than attributing mental instability to those who deny climate change or evolution, or those who believe in resurrection or life after death.

But what’s critically important in the flawed Times report is the ultimate respect for law demonstrated by the CDC and other U.S. officials involved. Letting an Ebola-infected person fly with other passengers, even if within his legal rights by some anomaly, clearly poses an ethical dilemma in which the better choice seems clearly to protect others at the temporary expense of the infected person’s possible rights. And having concluded in this case, within a reasonably brief time, officials said, “When we determined that he didn’t pose a risk we had no issue with him flying home.”

That response, civilized, measured, responsible, and effective, turns out not to be “the Vermont way.” Unnamed Vermont authorities, but quite likely including the governor and the acting health commissioner, chose to act outside of any legal authority and pressure others to do the same. State spokesperson Nancy Erickson wrote: “I won’t speak to the decision-making process that led to how the Health Department chose to meet him.” Hence, when the CDC had finished clearing the healthy doctor at the airport, there were a Vermont sheriff and a Vermont public health nurse on hand, ready to do something, it’s hard to imagine what, since they were both outside their jurisdictions and they had no warrant, health order, or other simulacrum of legal process. But they got lucky.

Dr. Peter Italia is, by all accounts, a very good natured person, and so, when these unexpected caretakers invited him to come with them back to Vermont, he did so, apparently with little hesitation or apprehension. Little has been revealed about that several hour drive from JFK to Rutland in an unmarked sheriff’s patrol car, but it ended with Dr. Italia being housed in a public accommodation, a Rodeway Inn in Rutland, under armed guard.

“The subject of quarantine was never mentioned at the airport nor during the whole trip back to Rutland. The word quarantine was first mentioned once I was inside the motel room and the public health nurse pulled out some papers and told me they were quarantine papers for me to sign. At no time did anyone offer me the opportunity to speak to an attorney or advise of my rights,” Dr. Italia wrote.

In Vermont, “voluntary” quarantine is enforced under duress

So Dr. Italia was persuaded to subject himself to a “voluntary” quarantine, which he agreed to while in the sheriff’s custody and without the benefit of counsel. And everyone involved knew – or should have known full well – that he was not sick with Ebola, he was not sick with anything, and he posed no risk to anyone.

Presumably Dr. Italia was induced to sign a profoundly deceitful Vermont Health Department form titled “Agreement to Voluntarily Comply with Quarantine.” The first dishonesty of the document is the conceit that compliance is voluntary in any true sense. The form includes a deliberately dishonest intimidation paragraph at the end, where it states with Orwellian accuracy that “the Vermont Commissioner of Health can issue an emergency health order for quarantine, pursuant to the authority vested in the office of the Vermont Commissioner of Health” by statutes then cited. And in Dr. Italia’s case, the first thing the form requires is affirmation of a falsehood: “You have been exposed to Ebola ...”

Then the form adds: “If you fail to comply with that emergency health order you can be subject to civil or criminal penalties that may include fines and/or imprisonment pursuant to” other cited statutes. That should be enough to intimidate most people, regardless of how improper an order is.

Metaphorically if not legally, this constitutes a fraud on the public. Vermont doesn’t show you the statutes themselves, the state just threatens people with the statutes. And the state has the worst motive for concealing the statutes, because the statutes require the state to follow due process of law and to make some effort to prove its case.

The controlling statute, which Vermont governor and acting health commissioner effectively lied about, is section 126 of Title 18 (Health) of Vermont Statutes [18 V.S.A. 126] that applies to any health order that is not accepted “voluntarily,” as would have been the case if the healthy doctor back from Guinea had simply said, “No.”

Vermont had no likelihood of obtaining a legal health order

Then the state would have been required, as the statute says, first to “prepare a notice of intent to seek a health order, setting forth the health officer’s reasons to believe a health order should be issued.” The state of Vermont gave Dr. Italia no notice, of anything. It is all but impossible to imagine any health officer being able to justify a health order in this instance without committing perjury.

But the statement of intent is only the beginning of the state’s burden. Next the state is required by law to provide both supporting evidence and “a statement of procedural rights available” and to serve both “on the person against whom the health order is sought.” In the case of Dr. Italia, there is no supporting evidence. And a statement of procedural rights is like a terrifying prospect to the state.

And even that’s not the state’s entire burden. The person against whom the health order is directed has the right to a hearing, albeit “held before the issuing authority.” Even that creates a catch-22 of the Health Dept. sitting in judgment on itself: “... at such hearing, the person against whom the order is sought shall be given an opportunity to rebut the allegations and demonstrate that no health order should issue.”

A related statute [18 V.S.A. 127] allows a health officer to issue an emergency health order, effective immediately, “when necessary to prevent, remove, or destroy an imminent and substantial public health hazard, or to mitigate an imminent and substantial significant public health risk.” In this instance, no such risk existed, at least not in the minds of people who were thinking clearly.

And even under this statute: “The health officer may issue an emergency health order only after preparation of a written statement of reasons stating the need for an emergency health order together with the supporting evidence and a statement of procedural rights available under this section.” And after that there’s still an opportunity for a hearing within 5 business days.

Dr. Italia was unconstitutionally deprived of his liberty

After his night at the Rodeway Inn, Dr. Italia was moved to a remote house, where he was isolated with two law enforcement officers on guard outside. Public health nurses visit him twice a day to check for symptoms that have yet to appear. The nurses wear no special protective gear and have had no special training for this quarantine. As the doctor wrote: “I feel quite well…. I remain symptom free as I have been all along – and just as I had expected I would…. I'm in a safe, secluded, undisclosed location. I have been asked not to disclose my location, so I cannot discuss it. Everyone is making sure that I am comfortable, fed and well taken care of.”

Rutland mayor Louras declined to answer further questions relating to Dr. Italia’s care, condition, or future, among others. On Facebook, the mayor fully embraced Vermont’s lawless sham this way: “The City applauds the efforts made by the State to keep public health and safety in the forefront, while guarding against unnecessary panic.”

A search of Governor Shumlin’s website for “quarantine,” or “Dr. Italia,” or even “Ebola” turns up NO results.

Most Vermont media dropped this story once the “mystery” of the anonymous quarantined man was revealed. Other than Senator Patrick Leahy’s mild concern (which didn’t last) about the use and misuse of quarantines, the issue of state abuse of power has been largely ignored (with the exception of Vermont Free Press, which wonders if Ebola is a “false flag” operation).

A few days before he was due to be released, Dr. Italia wrote:

I don't think anybody should be comfortable with being forced into "voluntary" quarantine. I think it's wrong to treat anyone in the manner that I have been treated. Moreover, there was absolutely no valid scientific reason at all to force me into quarantine in the first place – I was never around or in contact with Ebola patients.

This is the sort of abuse of power that would not be tolerated in a free country.


William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 Next > End >>

Page 2653 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN