RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Inside Monsanto's Demented Spin Campaign Print
Thursday, 26 March 2015 13:15

Lappe writes: "Its recent PR missives against anti-GMO activists, Monsanto, which is today the world's largest manufacturer of genetically modified seeds, is using the same fear tactics. Only this time, it's stirring up fear of a world without biotech crops."

Monsanto protest. (photo: Win McNamme/Getty)
Monsanto protest. (photo: Win McNamme/Getty)


Inside Monsanto's Demented Spin Campaign

By Anna Lappe, Earth Island Journal

26 March 15

 

Fifty years after "Silent Spring" hit bookstores, Big Ag is still trying to win the public's hearts and minds

n the fall of 1962, a group of chemical companies including Monsanto – at the time the largest producer of the cancer-causing chemical compound, PCB – launched a full-throttle public relations campaign against Silent Spring and its author, biologist Rachel Carson.

In Silent Spring, Carson dared to take on the world’s biggest chemical companies, explaining that their products were not only harmful to birds and bees, but to humans, too. In the wake of its publication, the chemical industry PR machine kicked into gear. “Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent attempting to discredit not only the book but the ‘hysterical’ woman who wrote it,” says Kaiulani Lee, the playwright and actor who wrote and performs the definitive play about Carson, A Sense of Wonder.

In addition to paying spokespeople to tarnish Carson’s reputation, Monsanto also sent a parody to newspapers around the country. In “The Desolate Year,” Monsanto painted a frightening picture of a world without chemicals. It was a bleak place. “Genus by genus, species by species, sub-species by innumerable sub-species, the insects emerged,” the article warned. “Creeping and flying and crawling. … They were chewers, and piercer-suckers, spongers, siphoners and chewer-lappers, and all their vast progeny were chewers – rasping, sawing biting maggots and worms and caterpillars.” It goes on and on like this for five pages. (As we now know, that diatribe was fear-mongering, not fact-marshalling. Organic and low-chemical farmers across the United States are proving that you can eliminate, or greatly reduce, toxic chemical use on the farm without having to worry about being overrun by pests, weeds, or diseases.)

I can’t help but notice that in its recent PR missives against anti-GMO activists, Monsanto, which is today the world’s largest manufacturer of genetically modified seeds, is using the same fear tactics. Only this time, it’s stirring up fear of a world without biotech crops.

In a recent debate on NPR, Monsanto’s Chief Technology Officer, Robert Fraley, sounded remarkably like “The Desolate Year.” “What I’d like to do is [describe] what it would be like to live in a world without GMO crops,” Fraley said in his closing statement. “Without GMOs, farmers would need to dramatically increase their use of herbicides and insecticides. [T]he pressure … will drain more wetlands, will cut down more forests. We [will] have to take tractors and run up and down the fields … and release more greenhouse gas emissions. Banning GMO crops is equivalent to putting 26 million new cars on the road. … I hope, for the sake of all the people … that you vote to … support GM food.”

Despite Fraley’s dire warnings, feeding the future doesn’t depend on GMOs. In fact, the spread of GMOs is actively undermining our ability to feed future generations by locking farmers into dependence on expensive seeds and inputs, by undermining soil health, by reducing biodiversity, and more.

Keep in mind that the main GM traits that have been commercialized convey just two qualities, or a combination of them: pest- and weed-resistance. Industry promises for big nutrition or yield improvements have not borne fruit. Studies show that non-GM corn and soybean yields in Europe, for example, are similar to the yields achieved with GMOs here in the US.

What’s more, we know that the ecologists who warned that GMOs would spur weed and pest resistance were right. As Jonathan Foley, the head of the California Academy of Scientists, has said: “You can’t put out a weed-resistant crop and expect the weeds to sit still. They will evolve.” They will, and they have. Today, we have Roundup-resistant weeds, some with stalks so thick that they can damage farm equipment. And we have Bt-resistant bugs so defiant they’ve got corn growers in our Midwest worried. “Every ecologist predicted that,” Foley says.

As with the chemicals Carson raised the alarm about, when it comes to genetic engineering, the risks are too great, the rewards too minimal, the alternatives too ample to do anything but to stand up to this latest wave of industry fear-mongering.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS | What's Religion Got to Do With It? German Co-Pilot as Terrorist Print
Thursday, 26 March 2015 11:46

Cole writes: "Once it became clear that Andreas Lubitz, 28, deliberately crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, a reporter immediately asked 'what was his religion?' (Parent company Lufthansa said they didn't know). Authorities said there was no evidence it was 'terrorism.'"

Rescue workers on scene Germanwings Flight 9525 crash. (photo: Claude Paris/AP)
Rescue workers on scene Germanwings Flight 9525 crash. (photo: Claude Paris/AP)


What's Religion Got to Do With It? German Co-Pilot as Terrorist

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

26 March 15

 

nce it became clear that Andreas Lubitz, 28, deliberately crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, a reporter immediately asked “what was his religion?” (Parent company Lufthansa said they didn’t know). Authorities said there was no evidence it was “terrorism.”

Lubitz is from Rhineland-Palatinate, known for its wine-growing and pharmaceuticals. It is roughly 2/5s Roman Catholic and a third Lutheran. A fourth of its people don’t really care about religion one way or another.

Why in the world would his religion be relevant? If he did crash the plane on purpose then presumably he was depressed and wanted not only to commit suicide but also to be a mass murderer. You could understand how a depressed person with low self-esteem might think it ego-boosting to determine the fate of so many others.

It isn’t political terrorism, likely, but certainly it was a terroristic act of killing.

But we know why they asked. It was out of bigotry against Muslims, probing whether another one had gone postal. The subtext is that white Christians don’t go off the deep end, even though obviously they do, in large numbers. It isn’t a logical question about Andreas Lubitz from Rhineland-Palatinate. Zeynep Tufekci tweeted,

Maybe I need to add some more principles to my Top Ten differences between White Terrorists and Others, like “terrorism is only ruled out when the whiteness of the perp can be firmly established.”

BBC News: “Germanwings plane crash: Co-pilot ‘wanted to destroy plane’ BBC News”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Fukushima in Year Five of Endless Radioactive Contamination Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=20877"><span class="small">William Boardman, Reader Supported News</span></a>   
Thursday, 26 March 2015 08:37

Boardman writes: "The world's worst nuclear power disaster continues to release radiation into the sea and air around Fukushima, Japan, where the site remains only partially-controlled and is still years if not decades from any sort of safe shutdown."

Workers at Fukushima nuclear plant. (photo: Getty/AFP)
Workers at Fukushima nuclear plant. (photo: Getty/AFP)


Fukushima in Year Five of Endless Radioactive Contamination

By William Boardman, Reader Supported News

26 March 15

 

Fukushima’s fourth birthday brings little encouraging news

he world’s worst nuclear power disaster continues to release radiation into the sea and air around Fukushima, Japan, where the site remains only partially controlled and is still years, if not decades, from any sort of safe shutdown. The March 11, 2011, multiple-meltdown has already cost billions of dollars to mitigate, with no end to spending in the foreseeable future. And the unwillingness of the Japanese and other governments around the world to deal honestly with the growing catastrophe is creating an expanding, global sacrifice zone. 

The Fukushima site owner, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has spent about $3 billion to date, with little progress to show for it. The company’s ineffective site cleanup program has wasted more that $500 million on useless equipment and failed techniques, according toJapanese government auditors

The Japanese government had allocated more than $15 billion for radioactive waste cleanup outside the plant site, in Fukushima Prefecture and elsewhere. This program has made little progress while creating new mounds of radioactive waste that needs to be stored somewhere, but there’s nowhere to store it yet.

The government’s current plan is to create a vast radioactive waste dump near the Fukushima nuclear site. The plan was adopted despite fierce objection from Fukushima residents, some 2,300 of whom will lose their land to the 16 square mile waste dump that is supposed to be only temporary (30 years). The Japanese government has promised the prefecture $2.5 billion per year in subsidies in exchange for local cooperation. The cost of building, maintaining, and dismantling the waste dump will cost unknown billions more. 

The government plans to build a more permanent waste dump, also in Fukushima Prefecture, over the next 30 years. Japan, like the US, has so far failed to create a permanent nuclear waste storage site anywhere.

Nuclear “security” secrecy protects government from accountability  

In December 2014, Japan put into effect a strict new state secrets law that critics, including the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, fear will make Japan more like Russia, China, or North Korea. The Japanese government adopted the law in order, it said, to give the US and others confidence in sharing intelligence with Japan. The law makes a wide range of government activities secret, including much that relates to nuclear power and, by extension, activities at Fukushima.  

Despite TEPCO’s demonstrable failures from plant design to cleanup, the Japanese government has doggedly kept outside nuclear experts uninvolved in Fukushima’s disaster aftermath, preferring to leave the faltering but lucrative cleanup in the hands of TEPCO and its Japanese nuclear industry allies. Adding fiscal insult to radiation injury, the Japanese government also compensates TEPCO for its partly self-induced losses with some $1.2 billion in tax dollars a year. 

The Japanese government has embarked on a controversial and expensive project to build or rebuild some 440 sea wallsalong 240 miles of the northern Japanese coastline. At an estimated cost of $6.8 billion, the completed sea walls will not protect the inland from predicted massive tsunamis. Already the government has allocated this sea wall funding to other, less critical parts of the country, including some $5 million to Okinawa. 

Radioactive water flows constantly into the Pacific Ocean

With virtually no effective means of controlling the flow of groundwater into the plant or controlling the flow ofradioactive water out of the plant and into the Pacific Ocean, TEPCO remains the world’s leader in radioactive pollution. Unmeasured and unchecked, the radioactive runoff from Fukushima will continue to accumulate in the Pacific with unknown consequences farther into the future than anyone can predict. The estimated water flow into and out of Fukushima’s damaged reactors is 300 tons, or 80,700 gallons every day (roughly 3,300 gallons an hour, or almost 30 million gallons a year) just from uncontrolled groundwater.

TEPCO has been reassuring the public that radiation levels have been dropping in the water released into the Pacific. On February 22, however, TEPCO sensors identified a new leakfrom the Fukushima complex. Water from this leak tested at 50 to 70 times higher than the usual contaminated water going into the Pacific.  Within a day, the level dropped quickly to only 10 to 20 times above normal. In the course of several days in mid-March, Tritium levels in groundwaterjumped by as much as 17 times over previous readings. TEPCO did not offer an explanation for the increases, nor did the corporation analyze the water for Cesium or Strontium. 

Even the present consequences of this radioactive water flow are disputed, as most Pacific nations do little or nothing to assess the impact accurately, scientifically, or comprehensively. In Peru this year, a massive die-off of more than 500 sea lions was attributed by some to Fukushima radiation, while Peruvian officials looked to fish nets or ocean plastic as causes. Along the US west coast, scattered die-offs of starfish are a topic of debate as to whether they are caused by Fukushima radiation. So far, the only certainty is uncertainty, although the evidence includes a reality of dead sea creatures covering 98 per cent of California’s nearby ocean floor, a phenomenon that was at only one per cent of the ocean floor before Fukushima.

Plumes of radioactivity from Fukushima have reached the Pacific coast of Canada and the United States, with little government curiosity as to their impact – even though such plumes will keep coming as long as Fukushima keeps leaking, and the continuously-renewed radionuclides in the water will remain toxic for years, decades, in some cases centuries.

Government ignorance rooted in denial continues to be massive

Radioactivity in the air is largely ignored, although there are credible assertions that Fukushima continues to emit airborne radiation at least intermittently. Over the past four years, much of the airborne radiation from Fukushima has settled on the ground around the region and become ground contamination that remains in places dangerous for humans, as well as agriculture (hence the ban on Fukushima produce). Now scientists are hoping that salt-loving bacteria might be effective in cleaning the ground of radioactive elements such as Cesium and Plutonium, but this is still in the experimental stage.

At the Fukushima site, TEPCO has performed an examination by a muon detection system that confirms what was already well known about the reactor in Unit 1: that the fuel had mostly melted and fallen to the bottom of the reactor containment vessel. The fuel in Units 2 and 3 also melted in a similar manner. A separate muon scan by Nagoya Universityalso appears to confirm that the Unit 2 core has also melted down completely.

This muon exercise is another example of evasion trying to pass as forthrightness. TEPCO’s scan confirms conclusions long since arrived at by informed observers, but ignores a far more dangerous – and critical – question: where is the core now? As Japan Times posed the problem:

However, the scan — based on tomography imaging that made use of elementary particles called muons — did not look at the bottom part of the reactor, where the molten fuel would have pooled. So some experts suggested that it was not possible to tell whether the fuel had indeed been contained.

The three cores in Units 1, 2, and 3 remain radioactively hot, lethal to humans, and unapproachable by anything but special robots. For the cores to become safe in any practical sense, they need to be isolated from human contact for a period longer than humans have yet existed on Earth, an engineering, security, and cultural problem for which there is no known answer, or cost. If one or more of the cores has, indeed, melted through the reactor containment (the so-called China syndrome), there is no known remedy for, or means to control that event. 

Hundreds or more reactor fuel rods remain unsecured at Fukushima

Fukushima Unit 4’s reactor was in the midst of re-fueling and was empty at the time of the accident. The new and spent fuel had been stored some fifty feet above ground, in a fuel pool that was damaged by the earthquake. That fuel pool was structurally unsound and in danger of collapse, risking yet another meltdown, this time outside any containment. On March 24, TEPCO announced that it had completed removal of all 764 fuel rods from the elevated fuel pool and stored them in a safer, ground-level fuel pool.

The spent fuel pools in the other three reactors remain unsecured. When Unit 3 exploded in 2011, the explosion knocked a crane into the fuel pool and TEPCO had been removing the crane in sections. In late February, an oil leak from the crane still in the fuel pool led to the temporary shutdown of the fuel pool cooling system.

The reactor explosions of 2011 reportedly sent radioactive debris, including parts of fuel rods, as far as 60 miles in all directions. 

Radioactively contaminated food products from the Fukushima region continue to reach public markets in Japan and elsewhere. In Taiwan, health authorities have seized more than 283 banned food products that were deliberately mislabeled by corporate distributors to conceal their origins in the Fukushima region. Counterfeiting food labels is a crime in Japan punishable by fines up to $900,000 and/or two years in jail. Japanese regulators did not intercept the Fukushima food from being exported to Taiwan, even though Japan prides itself on strict monitoring of food product radioactivity. That pride is based on only periodic test samples (every three months for beef, for example). TheJapanese Health Ministry recently announced plans to eliminate another 20 food products from testing, and to increase the testing period to one year. The Ministry willcontinue to test beef, milk, and 43 other products.   

When Taiwanese officials caught up with the corporate fraud, they seized more than half a ton of illicit produce. By then an unknown amount had already been sold to consumers. Taiwanese health officials have promised a crackdown on importers and promised to force corporations to make refunds to consumers with receipts for illegal goods. 

Hong Kong recently reported detecting Cesium 137 in powdered green tea from Japan, but the radiation was well below the legally allowed maximum. The importer withdrew the tea from the market. In 2011, Hong Kong also reported “unsatisfactory” levels of radioactive contaminants in three samples of vegetables. Occasionally since then, other samples of Japanese food have shown low levels of radioactivity. 

In early March, a United Nations conference on disaster relief met in northern Japan, where Fukushima food products were discussed. Not all Fukushima products are contaminated, but the mere name of their source region is associated with contamination in much of the public mind. Without providing supporting data, Voice of America reported:

At the Fukushima Agricultural Technology Center, workers put fish, chicken, and vegetables in radiation detectors made in the United States. All food from the area is tested for radiation. Officials say Japanese safety standards are ten times stricter for levels of radioactive cesium than American or European standards.

Japanese residents affected by Fukushima are getting little help

Fukushima prefecture’s population was about two million in 2012. About 1,800 residents are dead or missing as a result of the Fukushima Daiichi meltdowns. In 2015, at least 120,000 residents are still alive in Japan, but internal refugees fromtheir contaminated homes. According to Green Cross International, more than 30 million Japanese residents are continuously exposed to radiation from Fukushima. A Kyoto University professor points out that there is a heavily contaminated area outside the Fukushima evacuation zone where people continue to live. Professor Hiroaki Koide of the Research Reactor Institute said on the Nuclear Hotseat program:

Because of the radiation dispersed due to the accident a large area of Japan … has been contaminated.… It looks like the national government is simply going to abandon these people. Moreover, surrounding the 386 square mile evacuation zone where these people live, there is a 5,400 square mile [14,000 square kilometer] area that is heavily contaminated.

If Japan were a country under the rule of law, this would be a restricted access area where people should not be allowed to live due to radiation. The several million people who live there have been cast aside and told if you want to leave, go ahead and do it on your own. The government feigns ignorance. These millions of people, including children and infants, go about their daily lives in this area being exposed to radiation as if there’s no problem at all.… I think this is very bizarre. [emphasis added] Additionally there has been no resolution at the accident site … from my vantage point, the accident is not under control at all. [emphasis added]

Additionally there has been no resolution at the accident site … from my vantage point, the accident is not under control at all.

Neither the Japanese government nor TEPCO has yet carried out comprehensive health assessments of the estimated 20,000 emergency workers who worked at the Fukushima site while it was most radioactive in 2011. TEPCO and its sub-contractors reportedly overexposed many workers to radiation at the site. In March 2015, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, a Japan-US institute based in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, initiated a project aimed atassessing the health of all 20,000 Fukushima workers. Among the first sample of 2,000 workers targeted, only 704 responded and agreed to health assessments.

Neither TEPCO, its subcontractors, nor the Japanese government is actively participating in the health assessment effort. During the cleanup period, the government more than doubled the “safe” limit of radiation exposure above the previous – and current – “safe” levels. News reports at the time said that TEPCO and its subcontractors exposed their cleanup workers to much more than the doubled “safe” limit. TEPCO mostly prevented news coverage on-site, except for official tours. 

With the Fukushima disaster continuing, perhaps slowly but largely out of control, the Japanese government has announced plans to reopen the nuclear plant on the island of Kyushu as well as 42 other plants that have remained shut down since 2011. And TEPCO says it plans to decontaminate some 54 million gallons of radioactive water stored on the Fukushima site and discharge it into the Pacific. 



William M. Boardman has over 40 years experience in theatre, radio, TV, print journalism, and non-fiction, including 20 years in the Vermont judiciary. He has received honors from Writers Guild of America, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Vermont Life magazine, and an Emmy Award nomination from the Academy of Television Arts and Sciences.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Danny Schechter Was Our News Dissector Print
Thursday, 26 March 2015 08:30

Excerpt: "It is impossible to fully explain media criticism - and media understanding - as it exists today without recognizing the remarkable contribution of Danny Schechter."

Danny Schechter. (photo: Mohamed Nanabhay/flickr)
Danny Schechter. (photo: Mohamed Nanabhay/flickr)


Danny Schechter Was Our News Dissector

By John Nichols and Moyers & Company

26 March 15

 

From Moyers & Company: Our friend and colleague Danny Schechter – a fiercely independent and progressive producer, journalist and media critic — died last week of pancreatic cancer. Danny was not afraid to speak his mind. In the words of the public media newspaper Current:

Schechter had a prickly relationship with PBS for years. He complained publicly that PBS turned down several of his programs for national distribution, including South Africa Now, created in 1988 in an effort to circumvent Pretoria’s ban on news coverage of anti-apartheid unrest; Rights & Wrongs: Human Rights Television with host Charlayne Hunter Gault; and Counting on Democracy: The Untold Story Of 175,000 Missing Votes in the 2000 Presidential Election, about the electoral irregularities in Florida. Several stations aired the shows despite PBS’s decision.

Below, a remembrance and tribute from John Nichols of The Nation magazine.

t is impossible to fully explain media criticism — and media understanding — as it exists today without recognizing the remarkable contribution of Danny Schechter.

Danny Schechter. (photo: Mohamed Nanabhay/ flickr CC 2.0/ Edited from original)

Danny Schechter. (photo: Mohamed Nanabhay/ flickr CC 2.0/ Edited from original)

Two years before Ben Bagdikian took apart the fantasy that American media was liberal, with The Elite Conspiracy and Other Crimes by the Press (Harper & Row), more than a decade before Bagdikian exposed the corporate infrastructure of news-gathering with The Media Monopoly (Beacon Press), more than 15 years before Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) began its ongoing exploration of the abuses and excesses of that corporate media, and almost 20 years before Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky put it all together with Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of Mass Media (Pantheon), there was this news director on the coolest radio station in Boston, WBCN-FM, who started his daily show with the announcement, “This is Danny Schechter, your news dissector.”

Dissecting the news was Schechter’s thing. He reported to listeners what was happening, then he explained why it was happening, and then he revealed why other media outlets did not tell the whole story. It was bold and daring, and the word of what Danny Schechter was doing on one progressive-rock station in Boston spread far and wide. “As ‘News Dissector’ on Boston radio,” recalled Chomsky, “Danny Schechter literally educated a generation.”

What distinguished Schechter, who died too young at age 72, was his merging of a stark and serious old-school I.F. Stone-style understanding of media power and manipulation with a wild and joyous Yippie-infused determination to rip it up and start again.

Schechter was of his times. He marched for civil rights and against wars. He made common cause with hippies and Yippies. He danced and sang and inhaled. He was, he recalled, “a participatory journalist, a down-with-the-movement reporter, a manic media maven.”

But Schechter also came to recognize “how naive we were, how arrogant, how out-maneuvered” the movements of the 1960s and early 1970s were. And he made it his purpose over the ensuing decades to tell the whole story of the real stories of protest and power, and of how media and political and economic elites manipulate democracy.

Schechter did not always do so as an outsider. After his gig at WBCN, he went national, as a producer for the ABC newsmagazine 20/20, where he won two Emmy Awards. He helped to get CNN started, served as an executive producer for Globalvision and as executive editor for MediaChannel.org. He developed and served as executive producer for the remarkable South Africa Now news magazine, which played a critical role in revealing the true story of apartheid and of the global anti-apartheid movement. He used television and film and books and the Internet — where he was a pioneering blogger on media issues — to reveal and challenge the failure of major media to expose human rights abuses abroad and corporate abuses at home.

Schechter always recognized that he had antecedents as a critic of corporate and stenographic media — George Seldes and I.F. Stone, among them — and he was always there to counsel, to cheer on, to poke and prod those who carried the critique forward.

He could do so because he had stood at the pivot point where the mediasphere was getting more consolidated and less courageous, and he had recognized this as an affront to cherished premises of a free press and democracy itself. He finished his career as he began, fierce and fun, unrelenting in his critique yet optimistic about what might be made of media.

One of Schechter’s great fights was to maintain local public-access television programming and new-media interventions by citizen journalists. That wasn’t a fight that many Emmy Award winners took on. But the guy who used to dissect the news on a rock station out of Boston understood why it mattered.

“A growing segment of the public wants to be involved with new media. The boom in on-line computer networks and even radio talk shows demonstrates the demand and the need — which the media giants are unlikely to satisfy,” he wrote for Newsday in 1993. “Let’s hope that the Congressional watchdogs who are questioning the anti-trust implications of these new monopolies-in-the-making will speak out to preserve public access. In commercial television, everything is slick, but little matters. Its edges may be rough, but public access should matter to us — not only for what it is, but for what it can become.”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Traitor Senators Used Israeli Spies Against Their Own Country Print
Wednesday, 25 March 2015 13:52

Excerpt: "Israel intelligence was funneled to Republican Congresspeople in order to ruin support for Iran/U.S. nuclear negotiations, a recent report has found."

Senator Tom Cotton. (photo: AP)
Senator Tom Cotton. (photo: AP)


Traitor Senators Used Israeli Spies Against Their Own Country

By Cenk Uygur and John Iadaola, Informed Comment

25 March 15

 

enk Uygur (http://www.twitter.com/cenkuygur) and John Iadaola (https://twitter.com/jiadarola) host of The Young Turks discuss a recent report on Israeli spying activities used to aide traitor senators against Iran/U.S. nuclear talks.

Israel intelligence was funneled to Republican Congresspeople in order to ruin support for Iran/U.S. nuclear negotiations, a recent report has found. The cables being used to send and receive information to and from the U.S. had been breached by the Israeli spies easily allowing them to steal then send back to members of Congress and is being seen as a direct sabotage attempt.

When asked about the breach in security Israeli officials denied everything, claiming they found the intelligence from other places.”

The Young Turks: “Traitor Senators Used Israeli Spies Against Their Own Country”

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 2518 2519 2520 Next > End >>

Page 2518 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN