|
I Object |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=15102"><span class="small">Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News</span></a>
|
|
Wednesday, 30 December 2020 13:03 |
|
Sanders writes: "In the richest country in the history of the world, we cannot allow the working class to get left behind."
Sen. Bernie Sanders speaking in Madison, WI. (photo: The Isthmus)

I Object
By Bernie Sanders, Reader Supported News
30 December 20
ast night, the House of Representatives, with a two-thirds majority of 275 to 134, voted in a bi-partisan way to increase the direct payments going to working families from $600 per adult to $2,000 per adult.
The House did the right thing. I congratulate them. Now it is time for the Senate to step up to the plate and do what the American people overwhelmingly want us to do.
Earlier today, I spoke on the Senate floor urging Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to bring this bill to a vote. Now I am asking you to join me:
Please add your name to tell Mitch McConnell to let the Senate vote on increasing direct payments to $2,000 for working people across the country. This is important.
As a result of the pandemic, tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs and their incomes. In the middle of the winter, families now face the threat of eviction and the possibility of being thrown out in the streets.
Hunger in America is at the highest level that it has been for decades with moms and dads struggling to feed their kids, and working families lining up mile after mile to get emergency food packages.
We are even seeing an increase in grocery store shoplifting as desperate Americans try to keep their families from going hungry — all of this taking place in the wealthiest country in the history of the world.
In the last number of years, as people know, Congress has provided massive tax breaks for the wealthiest people in this country. That is one of the reasons why we currently have higher income and wealth inequality than any time since the 1920s.
Inequality has grown worse during this pandemic, with many in the billionaire class seeing their wealth increase by hundreds of billions of dollars while Americans struggle to put food on the table.
Congress has also given enormous tax breaks to large corporations so the biggest companies in this country pay zero dollars in federal income taxes.
We have also passed the largest military budget in the history of our country at $740 billion, more than the military budgets of the next ten nations combined.
Meanwhile, half a million Americans are homeless, and half of working families are struggling to survive paycheck to paycheck.
In the middle of a horrific pandemic, over 90 million Americans are uninsured or underinsured and not sure whether they can afford to go to a doctor.
We are coming to the close of one of the most terrible and painful years in American history. That is a tragic fact. More than 330,000 people have died from COVID-19 and record-breaking new cases have left hospitals overwhelmed with new admissions.
The House has done the right thing by an overwhelming vote. Democrats and Republicans in the House voted to increase that $600 direct payment to a $2,000 payment, and 78% of Americans believe that is the right decision.
If Mitch McConnell refuses to bring this legislation to a vote in the Senate, I will delay the Senate vote on the National Defense Authorization Act and keep the Senate in session through the New Year. Working families need help now.
In this historic moment, that is where we are right now. Do we turn our backs on struggling working families, or do we respond to their pain?
Please sign my petition — tell Mitch McConnell to bring $2,000 payments to a vote in the Senate.
In the richest country in the history of the world, we cannot allow the working class to get left behind. Thank you for adding your name to join me in calling on Mitch McConnell to let the Senate vote on this important legislation.
In solidarity,
Bernie Sanders

|
|
FOCUS: Mike Pence Can't Steal the Election for Trump on January 6. Here's Why. |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=52606"><span class="small">Greg Walters, VICE</span></a>
|
|
Wednesday, 30 December 2020 11:36 |
|
Walters writes: "Life is getting downright awkward for Vice President Mike Pence."
Vice President Mike Pence. (photo: Getty Images)

Mike Pence Can't Steal the Election for Trump on January 6. Here's Why.
By Greg Walters, VICE
30 December 20
“The idea that Pence is going to overturn the election in January is pure fantasy-land nonsense.”
ife is getting downright awkward for Vice President Mike Pence.
Trump and his allies are ramping up pressure on Pence to play a shady role in Trump’s doomed, last-ditch attempt to steal the 2020 election at a key moment on January 6.
That’s the day Pence faces the unhappy task of presiding over the official tally of the Electoral College in Congress—an event that’s set to seal Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s victory and make Trump wild with rage.
Pence doesn’t have a prayer of actually flipping the result of the election, no matter how much Trumpworld wants him to, legal experts say. His job will be to oversee the joint session of the House and Senate that will officially count the Electoral College votes for president and vice president. In fact, his role is tightly circumscribed by law. But Trump’s allies are undeterred, and want Pence to find a way to only count the votes that Trump likes anyway.
That means Pence, who’s eyeing his own 2024 presidential run, will face the tricky political goal of somehow balancing his devotion to Trump against the law and the Constitution. And he appears destined to disappoint his boss.
“The idea that Pence is going to overturn the election in January is pure fantasy-land nonsense,” said Justin Levitt, an election law expert at Loyola Marymount University.
Rumble Day
Trump’s supporters are attempting to turn January 6 into some kind of Armageddon over his unfounded allegations of voter fraud. That marks a big departure from the way the event normally passes as a major snoozefest.
Technically speaking, there shouldn’t be much to consider: Electoral College delegates have already cast 306 votes for Biden and 232 for Trump.
But a raft of Trump-friendly, self-styled “alternative electors”—from the swing states where the president wrongly claims that victory was stolen from him—have reportedly also been gathering themselves together into an imaginary pro-Trump bloc, even though there’s no legal basis for them to do that.
White House senior advisor Steven Miller laid out this plot on Fox News on December 14. “As we speak, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote and we are going to send those results up to Congress,” Miller said.
On January 6, the House and Senate will meet in a joint session to officially receive and count the votes, in what would normally be a sleepy affair.
The rules for counting the ballots leave a clear mechanism for resolving disputes—and one that doesn’t appear to allow Trump’s allies much room for silly stuff.
An objection to the vote-count must be submitted in writing and signed by both a member of the House and a member of the Senate.
In the House, members like arch-Trumpian Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama are gearing up to launch just such a challenge. In the Senate, the guy to watch is newly-minted GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville, who Trump has been publicly exhorting on Twitter to throw down for him.
If that happens, the two chambers then retreat to their respective sides of the Capitol building for two hours of debate, and then they each vote on the objection.
The House, which is controlled by Democrats, is sure to shoot down any wild-eyed, pro-Trump objection.
But the Republican-controlled Senate all-but-certainly will too. The Senate simply doesn’t have a majority of hardcore Trump supporters willing to throw out the results of a national election, and moderate GOP senators like Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine have signaled they’re simply not up for it. So have stalwart conservative senators like John Thune of South Dakota and John Cornyn of Texas.
Even the wily GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who has publicly acknowledged Biden’s victory, recently warned Republican senators to resist calls to disrupt the count because it would ultimately force the chamber to vote against Trump.
Here’s how Pence comes in
Some Trump supporters are now hoping Pence will use his constitutional role overseeing this process to somehow swing the outcome in Trump’s favor.
Trump reportedly became furious with Pence after watching a Lincoln Project ad that accused Pence of “backing away” from Trump’s “trainwreck” to save his own reputation. The ad closes by saying Pence will put the nail in Trump’s political coffin on January 6.
Trump later retweeted a call for Pence to “act” by refusing to certify the Electoral College results last Wednesday evening.
Pressure is building on Pence from outside the White House, too, in unusual ways, even by the Trump era’s standards.
The Rasmussen polling agency, which has faced accusations of pro-GOP bias, posted a bizarre and controversial series of tweets that suggested Pence could simply not count the Electoral College ballots he didn’t like.
To support that theory, which appears to suggest that the sitting vice president could single-handedly decide the winner of any presidential election, the polling agency cited a quote (supposedly) from the notoriously bloody Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.
The agency later dismissed objections to its Stalin citation with an “LOL” and accused its critics of being the “usual partisan hacks.”
Pence is also facing a lawsuit over his January 6 role. House Republican Louie Gohmert of Texas filed the suit in his home state on Sunday. He’s demanding a federal judge allow Pence to exercise supreme judgement in the vote-counting procedure.
Legal experts have poured scorn on the idea that Pence can exercise this kind of unfettered power to single-handedly decide the next president.
“If the Twelfth Amendment somehow gave the vice president the power to unilaterally throw out electoral votes for the other guy in favor of their own party (and even themselves), one might think that one of them would’ve noticed by now,” tweeted Steven Vladeck, an expert on national security law at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law.
Gohmert’s goofy lawsuit prompted a public rebuke from none other than Alyssa Farrah, who worked for Pence for two years before moving over to become the White House communications director and then resigning on December 4.
“Uh, Guys.. why don’t we focus our efforts on winning back the House in ’22,” Farrah wrote.
Pence Can’t Do It
Unfortunately for Trump, Gohmert, and the Rasmussen polling agency, the vice president’s role in this process is actually feeble, according to Levitt and other election law experts.
“His job is to open the envelopes with the electoral votes,” Levitt said. “He reads the certificates and asks for objections if there are any. But if there are any objections, the law clearly says that the chambers of Congress deal with the objections, not the VP. He’s the ceremonial letter-opener, not a decider.”
That appears to leave Pence with no room to maneuver, no matter how much Trump fans want him to, Levitt said.
“He’s basically got the same role that the presenter has at the Oscars,” Levitt said. “The actor at the mic doesn’t actually decide who wins Best Picture.”
Pence could conceivably find a way to weasel out of the role altogether, though.
The Constitution says that the president of the Senate is supposed to do the job—which is technically Pence. But if Pence isn’t around, the business could be performed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, which would be Sen. Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa.
Given all this mishegoss, it’s little wonder Pence is reportedly planning a trip out of the country—as early as the evening of January 6.

|
|
|
Americans' Acceptance of Trump's Behavior Will Be His Vilest Legacy |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9643"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Guardian UK</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 29 December 2020 13:35 |
|
Reich writes: "Most of the 74,222,957 Americans who voted to re-elect Donald Trump - 46.8%of the votes cast in the 2020 presidential election - don't hold Trump accountable for what he's done to America."
Robert Reich. (photo: Getty)

Americans' Acceptance of Trump's Behavior Will Be His Vilest Legacy
By Robert Reich, Guardian UK
29 December 20
Trump has brought impunity to the highest office in the land, wielding a wrecking ball to American democracy
ost of the 74,222,957 Americans who voted to re-elect Donald Trump – 46.8%of the votes cast in the 2020 presidential election – don’t hold Trump accountable for what he’s done to America.
Their acceptance of Trump’s behavior will be his vilest legacy.
Nearly forty years ago, political scientist James Q Wilson and criminologist George Kelling observed that a broken window left unattended in a community signals that no one cares if windows are broken there. The broken window is thereby an invitation to throw more stones and break more windows.
The message: do whatever you want here because others have done it and got away with it.
The broken window theory has led to picayune and arbitrary law enforcement in poor communities. But America’s most privileged and powerful have been breaking big windows with impunity.
In 2008, Wall Street nearly destroyed the economy. The Street got bailed out while millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings, and homes. Yet no major Wall Street executive ever went to jail.
In more recent years, top executives of Purdue Pharmaceuticals, along with the members of the Sackler family that own it, knew the dangers of OxyContin but did nothing. Executives at Wells Fargo Bank pushed bank employees to defraud customers. Executives at Boeing hid the results of tests showing its 737 Max Jetliner was unsafe. Police chiefs across America looked the other way as police under their command repeatedly killed innocent Black Americans.
Here, too, they’ve got away with it. These windows remain broken.
Trump has brought impunity to the highest office in the land, wielding a wrecking ball to the most precious windowpane of all – American democracy.
The message? A president can obstruct special counsels’ investigations of his wrongdoing, push foreign officials to dig up dirt on political rivals, fire inspectors general who find corruption, order the entire executive branch to refuse congressional subpoenas, flood the Internet with fake information about his opponents, refuse to release his tax returns, accuse the press of being “fake media” and “enemies of the people”, and make money off his presidency.
And he can get away with it. Almost half of the electorate will even vote for his re-election.
A president can also lie about the results of an election without a shred of evidence – and yet, according to polls, be believed by the vast majority of those who voted for him.
Trump’s recent pardons have broken double-pane windows.
Not only has he shattered the norm for presidential pardons – usually granted because of a petitioner’s good conduct after conviction and service of sentence – but he’s pardoned people who themselves shattered windows. By pardoning them, he has rendered them unaccountable for their acts.
They include aides convicted of lying to the FBI and threatening potential witnesses in order to protect him; his son-in-law’s father, who pleaded guilty to tax evasion, witness tampering, illegal campaign contributions, and lying to the Federal Election Commission; Blackwater security guards convicted of murdering Iraqi civilians, including women and children; border patrol agents convicted of assaulting or shooting unarmed suspects; and Republican lawmakers and their aides found guilty of fraud, obstruction of justice and campaign finance violations.
It’s not simply the size of the broken window that undermines standards, according to Wilson and Kelling. It’s the willingness of society to look the other way. If no one is held accountable, norms collapse.
Trump may face a barrage of lawsuits when he leaves office, possibly including criminal charges. But it’s unlikely he’ll go to jail. Presidential immunity or a self-pardon will protect him. Prosecutorial discretion would almost certainly argue against indictment, in any event. No former president has ever been convicted of a crime. The mere possibility of a criminal trial for Trump would ignite a partisan brawl across the nation.
Congress may try to limit the power of future presidents – strengthening congressional oversight, fortifying the independence of inspectors general, demanding more financial disclosure, increasing penalties on presidential aides who break laws, restricting the pardon process, and so on.
But Congress – a co-equal branch of government under the constitution – cannot rein in rogue presidents. And the courts don’t want to weigh in on political questions.
The appalling reality is that Trump may get away with it. And in getting away with it he will have changed and degraded the norms governing American presidents. The giant windows he’s broken are invitations to a future president to break even more.
Nothing will correct this unless or until an overwhelming majority of Americans recognize and condemn what has occurred.

|
|
What Could Biden's 'Climate Cabinet' Realistically Accomplish? |
|
|
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=46576"><span class="small">Zoya Teirstein, Grist</span></a>
|
|
Tuesday, 29 December 2020 13:29 |
|
Teirstein writes: "Last week, President-elect Joe Biden announced his 'climate nominees,' the people who will lead executive offices and departments related to energy, environment, public lands, and climate change."
Joe Biden. (photo: Joshua Roberts/Getty Images)

What Could Biden's 'Climate Cabinet' Realistically Accomplish?
By Zoya Teirstein, Grist
29 December 20
ast week, President-elect Joe Biden announced his “climate nominees,” the people who will lead executive offices and departments related to energy, environment, public lands, and climate change.
If confirmed by the Senate, Representative Deb Haaland of New Mexico will lead the Department of the Interior; former governor of Michigan Jennifer Granholm will lead the Department of Energy; Michael Regan, secretary of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, will lead the Environmental Protection Agency; and Brenda Mallory, director of regulatory policy at the Southern Environmental Law Center, will head up the Council on Environmental Quality. Gina McCarthy, former head of the EPA under President Obama, will lead the newly formed White House Office of Domestic Climate Policy with Ali Zaidi, a longtime climate adviser to Biden, as her deputy. (Neither of those appointments need senate confirmation.) In November, Biden appointed former secretary of state John Kerry as his special presidential envoy for climate.
“We need to seize the opportunity to build back and build back better than we were before,” Biden said at an event on Saturday in Wilmington, Delaware, introducing his climate team. “That’s what this administration is going to do with the help of these fine people.”
But that’s a tall order. Biden’s Cabinet will inherit agencies in disarray — the Trump administration rolled back environmental protections, suppressed climate science, and pushed career public servants out in droves. Biden wants to hit the ground running on January 20 with a $2 trillion climate plan that seeks to revitalize the economy, significantly ratchet down emissions, and correct environmental injustices across the nation. His “Climate Cabinet” will be tasked with making much of that happen, especially if Republicans retain control of the Senate and Biden is forced to lean on the powers of the executive branch.
“The policy-making processes that are Cabinet-led are critical to what the president’s ultimately going to try to achieve,” John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and advisor to Obama, told Grist. “There’s going to have to be real creativity, real attention to using all the authorities that these agencies have, that the White House has, to get the country on the path that President-elect Biden has promised.”
There’s reason to believe that Biden’s Cabinet will be able to get to work on Biden’s climate agenda, even if Republicans try to hamstring climate progress in the 117th Congress. Carol Browner, EPA administrator under Clinton and director of the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy under Obama, says agencies can start regulating greenhouse gas emissions immediately and without Congress’ cooperation. “Whether it’s the work that Transportation and EPA can do on cars and trucks, whether it’s the work the Department of Energy can do on energy efficiency, they all have existing legal authority,” Browner told Grist. “There’s a lot they can do without ever talking to Congress.”
During her time in the Obama administration, Browner worked with the Department of Transportation and the EPA to create the framework to regulate cars and trucks on greenhouse gas emissions. She worked with the Department of Energy to regulate industrial appliances to make them energy efficient. “Those things are significant,” she said. “If done properly and aggressively, they will give you measurable and sustainable reductions.”
Podesta gave a different example of a Cabinet secretary who made a big impact on the environment: Bruce Babbitt. Babbitt, who served as Clinton’s secretary of the interior, moved the needle on conservation in the Clinton administration by encouraging Clinton to use the Antiquities Act to significantly expand the national monument system across the U.S. By the end of his time in office, Clinton had added nearly 6 million acres of protected land to the national monument system. “That doesn’t happen by chance,” Podesta said. “Babbitt was a particular champion.” Haaland, a major proponent of conservation and, if confirmed, the first-ever Native American cabinet secretary, could lobby Biden in a similar way to expand protections to not only land, but tribes and their respective cultural and natural heritages, too.
And while it’s true that Biden’s Cabinet has a mountain of work ahead of it, to borrow a phrase the president-elect wore thin on the campaign trail, his nominees can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time. “They have their work cut out, but it’s not an impossible battle by any means,” Browner said. “You can have a group of people working on fixing all of the bad stuff Trump left behind and you can have another group moving forward… There’s no reason you can’t call the car companies in on day one and say, ‘Let’s talk about how many electric vehicles you’re gonna make by what year.’”
There’s another reason why Biden’s administration will be well suited to pushing through climate policy: Biden hasn’t just appointed climate hawks to head the departments that traditionally deal with the environment, like Interior and EPA; he’s also appointed people with solid climate records to head other departments across the federal government. He tapped Janet Yellen, former chair of the Federal Reserve under Obama, to head his Treasury Department. Yellen has a record of talking about the risk climate change poses to global financial stability. He intends to put former South Bend, Indiana, mayor and rival presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg in charge of his Department of Transportation. During the Democratic primaries, Buttigieg released a $1 trillion plan centered around updating and equalizing the country’s infrastructure. Biden will nominate Xavier Becerra, the California attorney general who has sued the Trump administration over its environmental rollbacks more than 50 times, to lead his Department of Health and Human Services.
“You want people across the government to embrace the program that Biden has laid out,” Podesta said. “It’s really a whole-of-government thing.”

|
|