RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Bernie Sanders Is Ayn Rand's Worst Nightmare: He's Changing How We View Socialism - and Exposing Free Market Parasites Print
Friday, 09 October 2015 13:48

Lynch writes: "Since Senator Bernie Sanders launched his campaign for president this spring, he has gone from being a fringe candidate of the left to a serious challenger of Hillary Clinton, who has long been considered a shoo-in for the Democratic nomination."

Senator Bernie Sanders. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)
Senator Bernie Sanders. (photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)


Bernie Sanders Is Ayn Rand's Worst Nightmare: He's Changing How We View Socialism - and Exposing Free Market Parasites

By Conor Lynch, Salon

09 October 15

 

Conservatives have long wielded "socialism" as a pejorative -- but Sanders owns it and is transforming politics

ince Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., launched his campaign for president this spring, he has gone from being a fringe candidate of the left to a serious challenger of Hillary Clinton, who has long been considered a shoo-in for the Democratic nomination. When Sanders started gaining traction at the beginning of the summer, most shrugged him off as the new Ralph Nader, or even the Ron Paul of the left, an insurgent who would attract a dedicated but slim following.

Today, these comparisons are looking less accurate, and Sanders is no longer a fringe candidate. Last week, the Sanders campaign released its fundraising results for the third quarter of 2015, and not only did it nearly match Clinton’s third quarter results in cash, but broke the fundraising record in small donations. Indeed, the Sanders campaign has reached one million individual donations faster than both of President Obama’s historic campaigns (in 2008, Obama didn’t reach one million until February).

As one would expect, as Sanders has surged, the American right (and center) have gone from ignoring him to attacking him, and the barbs have been predictable indeed. The most common sound something like this: “Socialism has already been tried and it failed,” “There is no free stuff,” “He wants to steal from the job-creators.” Of course, these are familiar attacks that have long wielded against the Democrats, but with a man who does not shun the “socialist” label, they have become even sharper.

First things first: The word “socialism” has become so freely used by the right that it has all but lost the meaning that it once possessed. Since even before the Cold War, the word socialism has been a pejorative in America. When people on the right say, “Socialism has already been tried,” they are by and large thinking of 20th-century communism in the East, i.e., a totalitarian state with a centrally planned economy. If this were the sole definition of socialism, then these anti-socialists would be entirely correct. When considering 20th century communism, it is clear that centrally planned economies without markets do not work in the long run (and black markets become an inevitable feature). At this point in history, markets are necessary for human innovation and wealth creation. But as the economist (and communist, according to Bill O’Reilly) Robert Reich points out his his new book “Saving Capitalism,” the free market vs. government debate is mostly pointless. In order to have a functioning market, there need to be rules, and for rules of the market there needs to be government; the real debate should be whether those rules are working for everyone or just the wealthiest individuals and corporations.

The point is, “socialism” does not necessarily mean centrally planned economies, as most on the right believe. The original definition of socialism was something like this: the collective ownership of the means of production and distribution. In this sense, worker-owned businesses (i.e. worker co-ops) are very “socialistic,” and Sanders has appropriately put forth a plan to increase worker ownership. The word socialism can also mean “Social Democracy” — this is what best describes Bernie Sanders’s philosophy — which involves a market economy with socialistic programs. The most common example of this sort of economic system can be found in the Scandinavian countries, which have hardly “failed.” Indeed, Scandinavian countries have all been previously ranked among the highest in the world when it comes to “ease of doing business,” “global innovation,” and “prosperity.”

The second-most common claim on the right came from the sagging Rand Paul last month, when he said that “Bernie Sanders is offering you free stuff…but guess what, there is no free lunch.” This kind of assumption is not new, and can be traced back to Ronald Reagan and those infamous “welfare queens,” a sad dog-whistle that haunts us to this day. Of course, it’s not about “free stuff,” but fairness. Indeed, when some facts are introduced, this assumption is revealed as a myth that has long been used by the right wing to divide the middle class (particularly along racial lines). Rand Paul seems to be entirely ignorant (willfully, I’m sure) that it is not lazy unemployed people that strain Americas welfare system, but working class people who are not being paid livable wages by corporations. Indeed, this was exactly what was found in a recent study at the University of Berkley California. The Wall Street Journal reports:

“The study found that 56% of federal and state dollars spent between 2009 and 2011 on welfare programs — including Medicaid, food stamps and the Earned Income Tax Credit — flowed to working families and individuals with jobs. In some industries, about half the workforce relies on welfare.”

One of the most notorious of these corporations that doesn’t have to pay its workers living wages and is more or less receiving corporate welfare is McDonald’s. Indeed, if we are keeping with these right wing terms, McDonald’s is one enormous welfare queen. It has previously been estimated that fast-food workers, who are on average 29 years old, receive around $7 billion in public assistance, and McDonald’s even has a resource line (McResource) that assists workers in signing up for assistance programs (so it doesn’t have to pay livable wages). This is also true for other massive corporations like Walmart, which is notoriously low-paying and last year made nearly $16 billion in profit. It is always easier to go after the working class poor than massive corporations who make billions in profit and spend millions on lobbying.

Socialism is not about “free stuff,” but cracking down on these corporations that exploit their workers and then rely on the government to make sure they don’t starve. It is not about being lazy and slacking off, but about demanding a fair share and getting paid decently for one’s labor — it is yet another right wing fallacy that people get paid what they’re worth, and that only lazy people are poor. Socialism is about working people, not slackers. It is about fighting capitalist realities like the fact that the top 25 hedge fund managers in America make more money than all of the 157,800 kindergarten teachers combined. Are investors who produce no value really worth that much more than teachers?

Needless to say, the myths and attacks on Sanders and “socialism” will only grow more intense in the months to come. Republican politicians tend to agree with Ayn Rand when it comes to working people, i.e. that they are parasites (although they’d never say such a thing out loud). The Sanders campaign is changing how American people view “socialism,” and hopefully, he is also exposing the GOP as the anti-working class party that it truly is.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
The Controversial Killing of Fadi Alloun Print
Friday, 09 October 2015 13:36

Frykberg writes: "A video clip shows the Palestinian teen being hit by multiple gunshots fired by an Israeli police officer in Jerusalem's Old City. At the time, he was running and did not appear to pose a threat. The video also appears to show Israeli settlers inciting the police to kill Alloun."

A Palestinian youth runs away from Jewish settlers during clashes outside the West Bank village of Asira al-Qibilya, near Nablus, July 3, 2011. (photo: Abed Omar Qusini/Reuters)
A Palestinian youth runs away from Jewish settlers during clashes outside the West Bank village of Asira al-Qibilya, near Nablus, July 3, 2011. (photo: Abed Omar Qusini/Reuters)


ALSO SEE: Coming Soon: A Third Intifada?

The Controversial Killing of Fadi Alloun

By Mel Frykberg, Al Jazeera

09 October 15

 

The Palestinian teen was shot in cold blood by Israeli police while settlers cheered, his family says.

uring a lull in the clashes that have engulfed much of the occupied West Bank over the past few days, an eerie silence settled over the village of Issawiya - its entrances sealed off by roadblocks manned by Israeli soldiers.

The streets, empty of vehicles and people, were littered with hundreds of stones and rocks. Empty dumpsters, used as barricades by Palestinian youths, lay on their sides as Israeli riot police walked slowly up and down the village's main road, shoving reporters out of the way at gunpoint.

Here, Palestinians have lashed out to dispute Israel's version of events about the circumstances that led to the fatal shooting of Palestinian teenager Fadi Alloun,19, in Jerusalem on Sunday.

"The Israelis are shameless liars. Alloun never stabbed anybody. He was the one who was attacked while on his way to work in Jerusalem at a bakery," a family member of Alloun, who declined to provide his name, told Al Jazeera.

A cousin of the slain Palestinian teenager, who also declined to provide his name, said Alloun was targeted by a mob of about 70 Israeli settlers, one of many who have been rampaging through Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank, attacking Palestinians and their property. "Even if the Israelis prove that he stabbed a settler, what was he to do when beaten and attacked by a huge mob screaming 'Kill the Arabs'?"

The death of Alloun comes on the heels of an unprecedented wave of anti-Arab incitement in Israel, following a pair of stabbings in which two Israelis died, and several others were wounded. In both cases, police fatally shot the Palestinian attackers.

Alloun's father and uncle were arrested in Issawiya shortly after Alloun was killed. The exact circumstances leading to Alloun's death remain unclear and disputed. Israeli officials and police say he had stabbed a settler and was likely armed and dangerous.

A video clip of the incident shows the Palestinian teen being hit by multiple gunshots fired by an Israeli police officer in Jerusalem's Old City. At the time, he was running and did not appear to pose a threat. The video also appears to show Israeli settlers inciting the police to kill Alloun. 

"Israeli soldiers are committing war crimes. This is murder," alleged Tahseen Elayyan from Al-Haq rights organisation in Ramallah. "Based on what we have documented recently, we have noticed that it is very easy for Israeli security forces to claim Palestinians have knives and then to kill them, even when [soldiers'] lives are not in danger." 

Amjad Idris, Alloun's nephew, described the last minutes of Alloun's life to the London-based daily al-Araby al-Jadid, saying he had been chased by a mob of settlers in the Old City before police gunned him down at the Damascus Gate. 

"This was a cold-blooded murder," Idris said. "They could have at least arrested him. They saw he was unarmed and was being hunted down by settlers shouting racist slurs."

According to Idris, Alloun was detained and interrogated by Israeli police several times but did not have any political affiliations.

Al Jazeera's repeated attempts to contact Israeli police for comment on the case were unsuccessful. 

The wave of violence engulfing the occupied West Bank shows no signs of abating. Hundreds of Palestinians have been injured by live ammunition, rubber-coated steel bullets and beatings.

Hundreds more people have been injured by tear gas, and scores have been arrested. Israeli soldiers have also reportedly shot at more than a dozen Palestinian ambulances and assaulted paramedics.

The Palestinian Red Crescent has declared a state of emergency, putting its staff and medics on standby.

"Our ambulance's windshield was shattered - and two of our volunteers wounded - when it was shot by rubber bullets," Kamal Washasa from the Jalazone refugee camp's civil service told Al Jazeera.

In the northern West Bank on Friday, Al Jazeera witnessed Israeli soldiers blocking Palestinian ambulances and fire engines trying to reach blazes and wounded people as settlers rampaged through Burin, Madama and Huwarra, near Nablus.

Palestinian property was also targeted by settlers, with hundreds of cars torched and huge swaths of agricultural land burned by settlers, allegedly under the protection of Israeli troops.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has warned of even more repressive measures to control the violence, but Palestinian activists are unbowed.

"We have nothing left to lose," one young protester from Issawiya told Al Jazeera. "They can kill us, blow up our homes, isolate our village, arrest and beat us - but this is now everyday life."

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: The Astounding Ignorance of the GOP Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=36361"><span class="small">Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page</span></a>   
Friday, 09 October 2015 11:40

Reich writes: "Not a day goes by that a leading Republican presidential hopeful doesn't reveal a level of ignorance and prejudice unprecedented in modern American politics."

Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)
Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)


The Astounding Ignorance of the GOP

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Facebook Page

09 October 15

 

ot a day goes by that a leading Republican presidential hopeful doesn’t reveal a level of ignorance and prejudice unprecedented in modern American politics. Today, Ben Carson, who is now running second to Donald Trump, said that Adolf Hitler’s mass murder of Jews “would have been greatly diminished” had Germans been allowed to carry guns.

What?

Whether it’s Carson on guns or Muslims; Trump on Mexicans, “anchor babies,” or Obama’s citizenship; or almost any of the Republican candidates on abortion, gay marriage, or climate change -- the leading GOP presidential candidates are reaching ever higher into loony land.

House Republicans, meanwhile, are in chaos – unable to elect a Speaker because of the right-wing know-nothings among them who want to shut down the government over the funding of Planned Parenthood and the looming debt limit.

We must face the discomforting fact that one of America's two major parties has lost its mind. How did this come about? Perhaps it's the inevitable culmination of decades of toxic bigotry and ideological paranoia spread by Rush Limbaugh and his imitators, Fox News, and right-wing hate groups -- fueled and funded by the Koch brothers and other oligarchs -- combined with blind rage that a black man became president -- that has finally eaten away enough of the gray matter of an increasingly angry, mostly white, mostly rural, mostly male Republican base to leave us with a zombie GOP.

What do you think?

Not a day goes by that a leading Republican presidential hopeful doesn’t reveal a level of ignorance and prejudice...

Posted by Robert Reich on Thursday, October 8, 2015

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
FOCUS: Please Punch This Man in the Dick Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=11104"><span class="small">Charles Pierce, Esquire</span></a>   
Friday, 09 October 2015 10:37

Pierce writes: "There is no bottom to the barrel that is 'Bobby' Jindal, wandering governor of Louisiana and walking asterisk in the presidential contest. There is no national tragedy that this charlatan cannot make worse."

Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal in 2012. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal in 2012. (photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)


Please Punch This Man in the Dick

By Charles Pierce, Esquire

09 October 15

 

Dammit, Bobby.

here is no bottom to the barrel that is "Bobby" Jindal, wandering governor of Louisiana and walking asterisk in the presidential contest. There is no national tragedy that this charlatan cannot make worse.

Now, let's get really politically incorrect here and talk specifically about this horror in Oregon. This killer's father is now lecturing us on the need for gun control and he says he has no idea how or where his son got the guns. Of course he doesn't know. You know why he doesn't know? Because he is not, and has never been in his son's life. He's a complete failure as a father, he should be embarrassed to even show his face in public. He's the problem here. He brags that he has never held a gun in his life and that he had no idea that his son had any guns. Why didn't he know? Because he failed to raise his son. He should be ashamed of himself, and he owes us all an apology.

This'll be good for at least a three-point bump in the next poll of Iowa Republicans. However, would I be uncivil if I were to suggest that somebody punch this man right in his dick?

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Jeb Bush Just Doesn't Get It Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=33264"><span class="small">Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, TIME</span></a>   
Friday, 09 October 2015 08:52

Abdul-Jabbar writes: "Nothing is more refreshing or endearing to African-Americans than when a rich, privileged, white politician born into a political dynasty who never had nor ever will have to worry about money for the rest of his life, lectures us on what we want and how we think."

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. (photo: Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE/Getty)
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. (photo: Andrew D. Bernstein/NBAE/Getty)


Jeb Bush Just Doesn't Get It

By Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, TIME

09 October 15

 

The candidate doesn’t understand what African-American voters want

atching the presidential candidates over the past couple months has been like watching an old sports movie with a desperate high school football coach whose best players have been carried out on stretchers and who must now dig deep into the bench of inexperienced or incompetent players. Each player he calls jumps up enthusiastically with a “I’m ready, Coach!” But as they take two steps onto the field, they trip, sprawling face-first in the dirt and knocking themselves unconscious.

The number of candidates tripping over their own twisted tongues and taking a dirt header keeps mounting. Carly Fiorina denounced Planned Parenthood over graphic abortion video footage she claimed was from the recent dump by Center for Medical Progress. Many news organizations called her out for misrepresenting the footage, which was from an undisclosed source and not part of the Planned Parenthood videos. Medical experts later said the video could have been a miscarriage. Ben Carson gave a speech at a university claiming that the Big Bang theory violates the second law of thermodynamics. Not true, says pretty much every physicist in the world. Donald Trump verbally abuses Mexicans, women, reporters, and anyone else who questions his scorched-earth march to Washington.

Et tu, Jeb Bush?

One might understand the lunkheaded statements by the first three because they have never held political office and therefore treat voters more like quivering employees who must agree or get fired. Bush, however, should have known better when he face-planted into the turf with this statement meant to lure African-American voters to the GOP: “Our message is one of hope and aspiration. It isn’t one of division and get in line and we’ll take care of you with free stuff. Our message is one that is uplifting — that says you can achieve earned success. We are on your side.”

Nothing is more refreshing or endearing to African-Americans than when a rich, privileged, white politician born into a political dynasty who never had nor ever will have to worry about money for the rest of his life, lectures us on what we want and how we think. Thank you, Bwana Jeb. If only Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X had been so eloquent and insightful, we could have gotten off the “free stuff” cold turkey (unless the free stuff included a turkey).

While he’s at it, perhaps Bush can help Sigmund Freud, who said: “The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is ‘What does a woman want?’” Don’t worry, Sig-man, Jeb has got your back because he definitely knows what they don’t need. “I’m not sure we need half a billion dollars for women’s health issues,” he said a few months ago.

Remember, as governor of Florida, Bush took money from Planned Parenthood and gave it to abstinence-only education programs, which studies have shown to be ineffective. Even members of his own party worry over Bush’s attempts to out-Trump Trump as the GOP’s worst fumblemouth. In August, Politico reported this statement from GOP operative Craig Robinson: “Every time Bush has stuck his foot in his mouth, it’s been a ‘Clean up on Aisle 3’ moment. I think it shows a real lack of message discipline with Bush. We’ve seen more errors out of Jeb Bush this campaign than most of the other candidates.”

Lest we mistakenly think Bush’s characterization of freebie-lovin’ blacks was just a one-time slip, he said pretty much the same thing in his 1996 book, Profiles in Character: “The surest way to get something in today’s society is to elevate one’s status to that of the oppressed. Many of the modern victim movements — the gay rights movement, the feminist movement, the black empowerment movement — have attempted to get people to view themselves as part of a smaller group deserving of something from society. It is a major deviation from the society envisioned by Martin Luther King.” Oh, Marty, he zinged you there, my man. Except for the fact that Bush is talking about something entirely different than what Dr. King meant. Dr. King wanted everyone to have equal opportunity, but knew for that to happen in a society with an infrastructure of institutional racism, civil rights laws and government programs would be necessary to help even the playing field. Not free stuff, but freedom to thrive.

This “free stuff” was just Jeb Bush dusting off the long-disproved myth of the Black Welfare Mother in a desperate effort to appeal to conservatives before his campaign vanishes for good. Based on Bush’s statement, his book should have been titled Profiles in Caricature because there is no evidence, as he was suggesting, that providing welfare, Medicare, food stamps, or low-cost phones has any effect on low-income blacks voting for Democrats.

African-Americans may be more likely to be influenced by how much each party supports racial equality. A recent Pew Research Center poll shows that only 38% of conservative Republicans (and 42% of all Republicans) believe the U.S. needs to continue making changes to give blacks equal rights with whites. This is in sharp contrast to 78% of all Democrats who think we need to make changes to achieve racial equality.

Perhaps Bush also believes in ending the government’s “free stuff” to middle and upper class people in the form of assistance to pay mortgage interest. Following his own logic, Bush’s plan to cut taxes is like giving free money in an effort to buy/rent/lease voters. Everybody likes free stuff (hear me, Tesla Motors), and every politician offers free stuff in one form or another, but most voters—Republicans and Democrats alike—will vote according to their principles.

Bush’s statement is much more significant than just denigrating blacks. By perpetuating the myth of black voters as (1) willing to sell their vote for “free stuff” and (2) being too dumb to understand the larger political context in choosing a candidate to support, Bush has shown us his own “Profile in Lack of Character.” If he doesn’t know the research that prove his description to be false, then he’s tragically uninformed when formulating his political agenda. If he does know the facts, then he’s deliberately misrepresenting them in order to perpetuate racist stereotypes to grub for conservative votes. Either way, it calls into question his leadership ability.

Bush continued his eloquent “stuff” motif a few days ago after the shooting massacre at the Umpqua Community College in Oregon when he said: “Look, stuff happens. There’s always a crisis and the impulse is always to do something, and it’s not necessarily the right thing to do.” Again, Bush demonstrated not only his insensitivity but also his inactivity. Clearly, he was cautioning against gun control, which would alienate his conservative targets, but he offered no alternate suggestions for the 994 mass shootings in 1,004 days in the U.S. How much time does he need before he suggests some plan of action?

Jeb Bush’s lack of compassion or street-level economics reminds me of Mr. Pink (Steve Buscemi) in Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs. He’s one of a group of bank robbers having breakfast at a restaurant before pulling a heist. As they divide the bill, Mr. Pink refuses to tip the waitress because he doesn’t believe in tipping (giving her free stuff). When the rest of the criminals argue, he doesn’t budge. When Mr. Blue says, “You don’t care if they’re counting on your tips to live?” Mr. Pink rubs two fingers together and says, “You know what this is? The world’s smallest violin playing just for the waitresses.”

This finger-rubbing concert mocking the working people is the kind of mute music of political expediency that this country doesn’t deserve.

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 Next > End >>

Page 2306 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN