RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Politics
Why We Must Try Print
Tuesday, 09 February 2016 09:05

Reich writes: "Instead of 'Yes we can,' many Democrats have adopted a new slogan this election year: 'We shouldn't even try.'"

Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)
Robert Reich. (photo: Richard Morgenstein)


Why We Must Try

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog

09 February 16

 

nstead of “Yes we can,” many Democrats have adopted a new slogan this election year: “We shouldn’t even try.”

We shouldn’t try for single-payer system, they say. We’ll be lucky if we prevent Republicans from repealing Obamacare.

We shouldn’t try for a $15 an hour minimum wage. The best we can do is $12 an hour.

We shouldn’t try to restore the Glass-Steagall Act that used to separate investment and commercial banking, or bust up the biggest banks. We’ll be lucky to stop Republicans from repealing Dodd-Frank.

We shouldn’t try for free public higher education. As it is, Republicans are out to cut all federal education spending.

We shouldn’t try to tax carbon or speculative trades on Wall Street, or raise taxes on the wealthy. We’ll be fortunate to just maintain the taxes already in place.

Most of all, we shouldn’t even try to get big money out of politics. We’ll be lucky to round up enough wealthy people to back Democratic candidates.

“We-shouldn’t-even-try” Democrats think it’s foolish to aim for fundamental change – pie-in-the-sky, impractical, silly, naďve, quixotic. Not in the cards. No way we can.

I understand their defeatism. After eight years of Republican intransigence and six years of congressional gridlock, many Democrats are desperate just to hold on to what we have.

And ever since the Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision opened the political floodgates to big corporations, Wall Street, and right-wing billionaires, many Democrats have concluded that bold ideas are unachievable.

In addition, some establishment Democrats – Washington lobbyists, editorial writers, inside-the-beltway operatives, party leaders, and big contributors – have grown comfortable with the way things are. They’d rather not rock the boat they’re safely in.

I get it, but here’s the problem. There’s no way to reform the system without rocking the boat. There’s no way to get to where America should be without aiming high.

Progressive change has never happened without bold ideas championed by bold idealists.

Some thought it was quixotic to try for civil rights and voting rights. Some viewed it as naďve to think we could end the Vietnam War. Some said it was unrealistic to push for the Environmental Protection Act.

But time and again we’ve learned that important public goals can be achieved – if the public is mobilized behind them. And time and again such mobilization has depended on the energies and enthusiasm of young people combined with the determination and tenacity of the rest.

If we don’t aim high we have no chance of hitting the target, and no hope of mobilizing that enthusiasm and determination.

The situation we’re in now demands such mobilization. Wealth and income are more concentrated at the top than in over a century. And that wealth has translated into political power.

The result is an economy rigged in favor of those at the top – which further compounds wealth and power at the top, in a vicious cycle that will only get worse unless reversed.

Americans pay more for pharmaceuticals than the citizens of any other advanced nation, for example. We also pay more for Internet service. And far more for health care.

We pay high prices for airline tickets even though fuel costs have tumbled. And high prices for food even though crop prices have declined.

That’s because giant companies have accumulated vast market power. Yet the nation’s antitrust laws are barely enforced.

Meanwhile, the biggest Wall Street banks have more of the nation’s banking assets than they did in 2008, when they were judged too big to fail.

Hedge-fund partners get tax loopholes, oil companies get tax subsidies, and big agriculture gets paid off.

Bankruptcy laws protect the fortunes of billionaires like Donald Trump but not the homes of underwater homeowners or the savings of graduates burdened with student loans.

A low minimum wage enhances the profits of big-box retailers like Walmart, but requires the rest of us provide its employees and their families with food stamps and Medicaid in order to avoid poverty – an indirect subsidy of Walmart.

Trade treaties protect the assets and intellectual property of big corporations but not the jobs and wages of ordinary workers.

At the same time, countervailing power is disappearing. Labor union membership has plummeted from a third of all private-sector workers in the 1950s to fewer than 7 percent today. Small banks have been absorbed into global financial behemoths. Small retailers don’t stand a chance against Walmart and Amazon.

And the pay of top corporate executives continues to skyrocket, even as most peoples’ real wages drop and their job security vanishes.

This system is not sustainable.

We must get big money out of our democracy, end crony capitalism, and make our economy and democracy work for the many, not just the few.

But change on this scale requires political mobilization.

It won’t be easy. It has never been easy. As before, it will require the energies and commitments of large numbers of Americans.

Which is why you shouldn’t listen to the “we-must-not-try” brigade. They’ve lost faith in the rest of us.

We must try. We have no choice.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Congress Must Kill the Trans Pacific Partnership Print
Tuesday, 09 February 2016 09:01

Goodman writes: "Free trade defines an agreement that has as a first (and sometimes only) priority, the best interests of corporations; namely, their profits."

A man takes part in a Tokyo protest against Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks ahead of President Obama's visit to Japan. (photo: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg)
A man takes part in a Tokyo protest against Trans-Pacific Partnership trade talks ahead of President Obama's visit to Japan. (photo: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg)


Congress Must Kill the Trans Pacific Partnership

By Jim Goodman, CounterPunch

09 February 16

 

rade is good, but “free trade” doesn’t work for farmers or workers or most everyone else. Free trade does, however, work spectacularly well for corporations who have over 600 advisers to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations — we have no access to the negotiations, corporations have plenty.

From a practical point of view it would make more sense if we made our own shoes and computers. We should grow less grain for European (and American) livestock and more food for ourselves. We could actually pay workers here a fair wage and US workers could afford to buy US goods and perhaps own a home and send their kids to college.

In farm country we are told these trade deals will allow us to export more goods and in so doing, increase our profits. I have farmed for a good many years and I have, over the course of that time, known many farmers, most of them who farm on a much larger scale than I do. I have yet to meet a farmer who directly exports abroad, or even one who has the volume of product or operational infrastructure to do so.

Farmers products ultimately end up in the hands of some corporate entity, a Multi-national Corporation which handles the exporting/importing and generally takes most of the profit.

Free trade defines an agreement that has as a first (and sometimes only) priority, the best interests of corporations; namely, their profits. At what expense those profits are taken is apparently of little concern to the trade negotiators and in particular the corporate representatives that are active participants in the otherwise secretive TPP negotiations, or the other trade deals Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TISA).

Fair trade, on the other hand, would put the interests of people and the environment ahead of corporate profit. Fair trade would protect jobs rather than off-shoring them as has historically happened after passage of all free trade agreements.

Free trade has no consideration for cultural preferences because it has no consideration for people. Japanese farmers and consumers prefer to grow and eat their traditional varieties of rice, not imported rice — that should be their right, not so under the TPP.

Food safety standards under free trade would, by design, fall to the lowest common denominator. Lower safety standards on food imports, like lower labor safety standards, reduce operating costs and thus increase corporate profit.

Pharmaceutical companies would be granted extended monopoly patents, thus increasing health care costs and access to generic medications.

Banking interests insist on and will get, Financial Service Agreements that would severely limit the ability of governments to restrict the trade of risky financial products or in general their ability to regulate “too big to fail” banks.

Perhaps most distressing to the U.S. economy, free trade agreements have always forced workers into a downward wage spiral. Jobs tend to flow to wherever wages are the lowest. The TPP would set the stage for member countries like Vietnam with its $2.75 daily wage to become an even lower cost labor alternative than China.

I have watched and opposed these “free trade agreements” for decades — they keep getting worse. In summary they have:

  1. Moved living wage jobs to economies where they have become slave labor jobs.

  2. Busted unions and fired union organizers

  3. Devalued the place of women in agriculture

  4. Moved food production to wherever food can be produced at the lowest cost

  5. Increased food imports to the extent that food safety inspections are nearly non-existent

  6. Aggressively promoted GMO’s (genetically modified organisms) and the corporations that produce them

  7. Pushed US agriculture into a system of commodity cropping and CAFO’s (confined animal feeding operations)

  8. Pushed indigenous farmers worldwide off the land and into urban slums

  9. Made farm workers and livestock expendable commodities

Each trade agreement gets worse, each trade agreement takes away our control, each trade agreement shifts wealth upward and leaves the world more impoverished.

The actual trade aspects of TPP are little more than a sales pitch to garner support for passage. TPP is really about fundamentally restructuring our democracy and our society—if passed, the results will not be pretty.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Jeb Hopes to Woo Voters With Ad Featuring Worst President in US History Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=9160"><span class="small">Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker</span></a>   
Monday, 08 February 2016 14:35

Borowitz writes: "With the crucial New Hampshire primary just hours away, the Bush campaign believes it can finish strong by reminding voters of Jeb's connection to a man who left the nation in smoldering ruins."

George W. Bush and Jeb Bush. (photo: Stephen Jaffe/AFP/Getty Images)
George W. Bush and Jeb Bush. (photo: Stephen Jaffe/AFP/Getty Images)


Jeb Hopes to Woo Voters With Ad Featuring Worst President in US History

By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker

08 February 16

 

The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, "The Borowitz Report."

he former Florida Governor Jeb Bush is hoping to jump-start his lagging Presidential campaign with a new television ad featuring the worst President in U.S. history, campaign aides confirm.

With the crucial New Hampshire primary just hours away, the Bush campaign believes it can finish strong by reminding voters of Jeb’s connection to a man who left the nation in smoldering ruins.

In the ad, which Bush aides are calling “a fantastic closing argument,” Jeb’s ability to keep the United States safe and create peace around the world is praised by the President, whose decisions helped destabilize the Middle East and give rise to ISIS.

Across the state, the ad featuring the worst President in U.S. history is making a powerful impression on voters. “It brought back a lot of memories,” Carol Foyler, who lost her house in 2007, said.

With the ad scheduled to air around the clock until primary day, aides to Bush are hoping that the commercial, persuasive as it is, is not too little, too late. “We’re kicking ourselves that we didn’t air this sooner,” one Bush aide said. “An endorsement from [the person who presided over the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression] confers instant credibility.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
Bill Romanowski Calling Cam Newton 'Boy' Was Racist Print
Monday, 08 February 2016 14:31

King writes: "Racist white men, for hundreds of years, have found power in calling grown black men 'boy.' Age has nothing to do with it."

A disappointed Cam Newton after his Carolina Panthers lost to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50 on Sunday. (photo: Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)
A disappointed Cam Newton after his Carolina Panthers lost to the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl 50 on Sunday. (photo: Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)


Bill Romanowski Calling Cam Newton 'Boy' Was Racist

By Shaun King, New York Daily News

08 February 16

 

ormer NFL standout Bill Romanowski is a racist.

Last night, after Cam Newton, who broke records for being sacked in the Super Bowl, saw his dreams of winning the game dashed. After it was over, as expected, he was utterly dejected.

This is normal, but black men are not often given the space to be emotional or expressive without being subjected to white anger.

Romanowski, a former Denver Bronco with a bad reputation, could not wait to chime in. In a now deleted tweet, he said “You’ll never last in the NFL with that attitude. The world doesn’t revolve around you, boy! #CamNewton”

Apparently, even though it’s 2016, I have to explain where the racism is in that tweet.

Newton is not a boy. He’s not a rookie. He’s the MVP of the NFL. He’s a father. He’s the face of his franchise. He’s a businessman and a role model.

Racist white men, for hundreds of years, have found power in calling grown black men “boy.”

Age has nothing to do with it.

Throughout history, black men who were decades older than white men have been called “boy” by them. It’s meant to belittle and dehumanize. It has deep roots stemming from slavery, all the way through Jim Crow, and, as we now see, into modern America.

Let’s not mince words here. Romanowski wasn’t saying Newton was acting like a boy. He made a statement to Newton, put a comma after that statement, and followed the comma with the word, “boy.” He was calling Cam a boy.

Show me one instance where another league MVP has been called “boy” by anyone other than a stone cold racist. Show me one instance where any athlete in the Super Bowl has been called such a slur.

We should have seen this coming. Last week, Romanowski openly threatened Newton, saying he would choke him and hold on to it for a long time, until he couldn’t breathe. One of the commentators then using the exact words of Eric Garner, who was choked to death by the NYPD, said the words “I can’t breathe.”


Who says this stuff? I don’t care how crass this man is known for being — this is disgusting.

To be clear, this was no coming out party for Romanowski. He was a racist before he wrote a bigoted tweet about Newton, but he has now proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt that being an African American quarterback still requires athletes to wade through a sea of ridiculousness that has nothing to do with athleticism.

Romanowski once spit in the face of another black player. That’s about as deeply insulting as it gets. Later, another athlete told Sports Illustrated that Romanowski referred to other black players privately by the “n-word.”

After a denial of the allegation by Romanowski, Sports Illustrated stood by their story and their source.It doesn’t matter though — he keeps getting asked his opinion. At a time when Donald Trump is a popular candidate for president, how can we be surprised?

To be clear, I wasn’t even a Cam Newton fan a few weeks ago.

His Carolina Panthers are division rivals to my hometown Atlanta Falcons and he has pretty much made our lives miserable these past few years.

But to see this man subjected daily to thousands of racist messages and critiques, online and off, has caused me — and thousands of others — to root for him more than ever.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
We're Heading Toward a National Water Crisis Print
Written by <a href="index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=32795"><span class="small">Mark Ruffalo, EcoWatch</span></a>   
Monday, 08 February 2016 14:18

Ruffalo writes: "Flint's man-made water disaster is an outrageous tragedy and a human health crisis. And unfortunately, it's not an isolated case. It's one instance in a pattern of government failures to take water testing seriously and respond to evidence of water pollution."

Mark Ruffalo at the Sundance Film Festival, in Park City, Utah. (photo: Victoria Will/Invision/AP)
Mark Ruffalo at the Sundance Film Festival, in Park City, Utah. (photo: Victoria Will/Invision/AP)


We're Heading Toward a National Water Crisis

By Mark Ruffalo, EcoWatch

08 February 16

 

or the past two years, the 100,000 residents of Flint, Michigan, drank, cooked and bathed with lead-contaminated water. Rates of lead poisoning—which can impair brain development and cause other serious health ailments—among the area’s children have skyrocketed, from 5 percent before the water turned bad to 16 percent today.

Residents have long reported brown, bad-tasting and foul-smelling water and unexplained sicknesses. Almost a year ago, water tests showed dangerous levels of lead. Yet state, local and federal officials did nothing. Worse, they assured residents that the water was safe. In recently released emails, state officials demonstrated indifference and even contempt toward the complaints that came mostly from poor, black residents. Furthermore, according to some witnesses and media reports, state officials diluted water samples or took incomplete “slow drip water samples” to game results and claim that the water was safe.

Flint’s man-made water disaster is an outrageous tragedy and a human health crisis. And unfortunately, it’s not an isolated case. It’s one instance in a pattern of government failures to take water testing seriously and respond to evidence of water pollution.

In 2009, federal data revealed that water being delivered to tens of millions of Americans contained illegal concentrations of dangerous chemicals. That contamination has led to widespread ill-effects such as rashes and elevated risk of various diseases and hundreds of thousands of Clean Water Act violations. At congressional hearings that year, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials pointed to failed political leadership under the Bush administration. President Obama promised to turn a new leaf.

Sadly, there have since been numerous high-profile cases of contamination, such as in Toledo, Ohio, in 2014, where agricultural runoff and crumbling infrastructure led to an algal bloom in Lake Erie that made the city’s drinking water unsafe. Also in 2014, in West Virginia, a chemical spill contaminated the Elk River, the tap water supply for hundreds of thousands of people. This past August, 3 million gallons of contaminated water were released into the Animas River in Colorado, resulting in lead levels 3,500 times normal and arsenic levels 300 times normal, affecting many communities and farms.

Then there are the horrific, under-reported cases of water contaminated by drilling and fracking for natural gas and oil, another ongoing man-made disaster where politics has trumped providing safe drinking water.

In spite of concrete evidence of water contamination, Obama’s politics—support for natural gas and fracking, particularly around his 2012 reelection—have dictated the EPA’s actions. Case in point: Three EPA investigations into drinking water contamination since 2010, in Dimock, Pennsylvania; Pavillion, Wyoming and Parker County, Texas.

In Parker County, the EPA issued an emergency order—much like one they just issued in Flint—compelling fracking company Range Resources to provide drinking water to affected families. Then, in 2012, the EPA cut a deal with the fracking company to shut down the investigation and withdraw the emergency order in exchange for participating in the EPA’s national fracking study. Affected residents were left with nothing but polluted water.

The other cases are equally disturbing. Despite evidence of dangerous water contamination, the EPA dropped investigations and issued rosy news releases that everything was okay. Residents report being told by regional EPA officials, off the record, not to drink their water.

This past year, the EPA released a draft of its national fracking drinking water study with a headline that they did not find evidence of widespread, systemic contamination. Scientists and advocates cried foul, as the substance of the report contradicts that claim and in fact shows many instances and mechanisms of contamination. Now the EPA’s independent science advisory body has forcefully echoed that criticism and called for detailed accounting and inclusion of the three investigations.

These cases, along with Flint and many others, demonstrate an epidemic of credibility and trust that is putting people at greater and greater risk.

It’s time to acknowledge the national water pollution crisis we face, which will only get worse with climate change wrought by fossil fuels extraction and consumption responsible for fouling so much of our precious water in the first place. Obama should direct his EPA to do its job to help people across the country with water contaminated by drilling and fracking.

Flint must be a clarion call for a new era of routine water testing, full transparency and a commitment to ensuring that all citizens have safe drinking water. Renewed federal investment in our crumbling, lead-ridden drinking water systems is also necessary to help ensure that the tragedy taking place in Flint isn’t replicated elsewhere. Residents there and all Americans deserve nothing less.


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 
<< Start < Prev 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 Next > End >>

Page 2152 of 3432

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN