RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Rogers reports: "A controversial legislative rider added by Monsanto to the Agriculture Department budget last spring will no longer be effective after Sept. 30 under a draft stopgap government funding bill being drafted by Senate Democrats."

(illustration: Occupy Monsanto)
(illustration: Occupy Monsanto)

Senate to Kill Monsanto Protection Act

By David Rogers, Politico

25 September 13


controversial legislative rider added by Monsanto to the Agriculture Department budget last spring will no longer be effective after Sept. 30 under a draft stopgap government funding bill being drafted by Senate Democrats.

The provision touched off a storm last spring as critics accused Monsanto of "court-stripping" to protect its sales of the genetically modified seeds for which the St. Louis-based giant is a pioneer in commercializing.

The continuing resolution approved by the House last week would extend the rider without comment for the first months of the new fiscal year. But the Senate substitute, to be unveiled Wednesday, will explicitly go back and make clear that that Monsanto-backed provision will end this month.

"That provision will be gone," said Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), confirming the change to POLITICO. The Center for Food Safety, a Washington-based non-profit, welcomed the decision as "a major victory for the food movement" and "sea change in a political climate that all too often allows corporate earmarks to slide through must-pass legislation."

"Short-term appropriations bills are not an excuse for Congress to grandfather in bad policy," said Colin O'Neil, director of government affairs for the Center.

The whole dispute has been overshadowed by the larger fight over Republican efforts to use the same CR to cut off funding needed by President Barack Obama to implement his health care reforms. But for many environmental and food safety groups, the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act" -as the rider was called-became a major cause last spring, generating a huge amount of Internet traffic and calls on Obama to veto the agriculture budget.

Caught in the middle was Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) who had inherited legislative agreements made under her predecessor, the late Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii). Mikulski promised then that she would do everything she could to terminate the provision with the new fiscal year. But the CR posed its own challenges since typically the leadership simply extends current spending and related provisions for the life of the resolution.

This is essentially what would happen under the House CR running through Dec. 15. Mikulski wants a shorter end date, Nov. 15. And given the Monsanto controversy, she and Pryor, chairman of the agriculture appropriations subcommittee, chose to act and take it out after Sept. 30.

Their decision was helped along by the fact that even early proponents in the House Appropriations Committee appear to have backed away. Indeed the fiscal 2014 agriculture appropriations bill reported by the House panel but never voted upon on the floor, did not extend the rider.

Monsanto and its allies have argued that what the company sought was no more than what some federal courts have done themselves in the past: Allow farmers to continue to use GMO seed –under environmental guidelines-while the court review continues.

Monsanto successfully expanded support among farm groups also interested in some such stewardship program. But the language itself was unusually strong in that it directed Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack in no uncertain terms about how he should respond in future court cases impacting GMO seeds.

The secretary "shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law… immediately grant" temporary permits to continue using the seed at the request of a farmer or producer wanting such a stewardship program, the provision reads. And while Vilsack has been a big champion of the biotech industry, he was uncomfortable with what he saw as an effort to "pre-empt judicial review."

"We have all known this rider's days were numbered," O'Neil told POLITICO. "But given the recent GMO contamination episodes of wheat and alfalfa in Oregon and Washington it is clear that our nation's safeguards, in particular those of the federal courts, should not be under attack from policy riders like this." your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+6 # reiverpacific 2013-09-26 10:19
Pity that we could get a "Kill Monsanto Act" to go with this.
+7 # DPM 2013-09-26 10:23
Winning a battle doesn't mean the war is won. We must press on!
+5 # Billsy 2013-09-26 13:59
Given Monsanto's abuse of judicial process and its bullying of farmers whose crops have been contaminated by neighbors' GMO seeds, I see no reason to pay any heed to their lawyers or concerns. Enough! By rights they should have their corporate charter revoked and be subjected to an endless flood of civil suits. I have long suspected that their attempts to dominate world food supplies came out of some secret meeting held at the Bohemian grove or some other such exclusive enclave well out of public eye. There can be no other reason for their bold draconian attempts to force their failed GMO product on global markets.
+2 # walnut13 2013-09-26 17:32
Hooray for good news!
+1 # RnR 2013-09-26 23:37
March Against Monsanto, October 12, 2013...bought a new camera :)
+1 # reiverpacific 2013-09-27 10:07
Quoting RnR:
March Against Monsanto, October 12, 2013...bought a new camera :)

Good idea to have a camera or better still a tiny movie camera, on marches and protests these days, to catch the militarist police abuse as it happens (but keep it as hidden as possible -they are not above snatching cameras any more).
I have quite a photo-library of the "Darth Vader" squad in Portland and beyond taken during the Dimwits era and the current 'death by drone' scenario, which I only got away with by playing the "naive furrin' visitor" role -quite a handy tactical use of my Scottish accent at times, as they never have asked for my I.D. yet. Heh-heh (evil chuckle).

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.