RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Intro: "The City of New York, the New York Police Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and several large corporations including JPMorgan Chase have repeatedly violated the constitutional rights of Occupy Wall Street protesters, according to a wide-ranging federal lawsuit filed on Monday morning."

Occupy Wall Street victims of pepper-spray, September 24, 2011. (photo:
Occupy Wall Street victims of pepper-spray, September 24, 2011. (photo:

NYC City Councilors Sue NYPD Over Occupy Wall Street Abuses

By Common Dreams staff, Common Dreams

01 May 12


Occupy Wall Street: Take the Bull by the Horns


he City of New York, the New York Police Department, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and several large corporations including JPMorgan Chase have repeatedly violated the constitutional rights of Occupy Wall Street protesters, according to a wide-ranging federal lawsuit filed on Monday morning.

Occupy Wall Street victims of pepper-spray cop Anthony Bologna, September 24, 2011. The NYPD made false arrests and violated free- speech rights of protestors and journalists last year, according to a complaint filed today in a Manhattan federal court.

Four New York City Councilors - Letitia James, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Ydanis Rodriguez and Jumaane Williams - filed the civil rights lawsuit alleging that city police used excessive force and violated free speech rights as part of its crackdown on protesters. Also joining the suit as plaintiffs are a local Democratic Party official, freelance journalists, and Occupy activists.

"This unlawful conduct has been undertaken with the intention of obstructing, chilling, deterring and retaliating against (the) plaintiffs for engaging in constitutionally protected protest activity," the lawsuit alleges.

The City Council members are calling for an independent monitor to review all of the more than 2,000 OWS-related arrests and further explore the city's decision to temporarily close Zuccotti Park and other public spaces during the protests. The suit also seeks unspecified damages.

The new lawsuit is a 146-page "compendium of complaints, amplified by the council members' participation."

The Associated Press reports:

NEW YORK - Four lawmakers sued the city Monday over its handling of the Occupy Wall Street protests, saying police conduct is so problematic that the force needs an outside monitor.

The city and police violated demonstrators' free speech rights, used excessive force, arrested protesters on dubious charges and interfered with journalists' and council members' efforts to observe what was going on, the four City Council members and others say in the federal civil rights suit.

"This unlawful conduct has been undertaken with the intention of obstructing, chilling, deterring and retaliating against (the) plaintiffs for engaging in constitutionally protected protest activity," says the suit, which was filed a day before Occupy and labor activists planned a large May Day march. [...]

"We need accountability, we need relief and we're not going to just sit idly by" - NYC City Councilor Jumaane WilliamsWhile Occupy activists have gone to court before over particular episodes in the movement's contentious history with the city, the new lawsuit is a nearly 150-page compendium of complaints, amplified by the council members' participation. A local Democratic Party official, freelance journalists and Occupy activists also are plaintiffs.

Their criticisms range from a police official's much-discussed use of pepper spray on penned-in protesters in September to the temporary removal of demonstrators from Manhattan's Union Square in March.

The council members' involvement in the Occupy suit helps dramatize its argument that police oversight is so ineffective it warrants a court-appointed monitor. The officials want an independent eye to review all of the more than 2,000 Occupy-related arrests and to explore the sometime closures of Zuccotti Park and some other public spaces.

The four lawmakers - Letitia James, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Ydanis Rodriguez and Jumaane Williams - said they felt they needed to pursue avenues beyond City Hall to address their growing concern.

"We need accountability, we need relief and we're not going to just sit idly by," Williams said.

He and Mark-Viverito were among dozens of people who calmly sat down in a roadway near the Brooklyn Bridge during a Nov. 17 demonstration. Their disorderly conduct cases are on track to be dismissed if they avoid rearrest.

Rodriguez, meanwhile, was accused of resisting arrest while trying to get to the protesters' encampment in lower Manhattan's Zuccotti Park as police uprooted them Nov. 15. He emerged with visible scrapes to his head and said police assaulted him. Prosecutors recently dropped the charges against the councilman, saying they couldn't secure the testimony of a key officer in the incident.

"I feel that the NYPD misused its powers," he said.

Some state legislators also have proposed an independent inspector for the New York Police Department, citing the Occupy protests and other issues.

The lawsuit, crafted by attorneys Leo Glickman, Yetta Kurland and Wylie Stecklow, also seeks unspecified damages and court orders about access to public spaces and other issues in the case.

Electeds, Press File Federal OWS Suit Vs NYPD, JP Morgan Chase


CONTACT: Yetta Kurland 917 701 9590

Leo Glickman 917 582 1405

Wylie Stecklow 917 576 6727

Elected Officials and Members of the Press File Civil Rights Suit Against NYPD and JP Morgan Chase For Arrests Related to OWS.

Federal lawsuit alleges civil rights violated by NYPD and private entities including JP Morgan Chase and Brookfield Properties asks for federal independent monitor.

Lawyers on behalf of 5 elected officials and over half a dozen members of the press filed a major lawsuit today in federal court alleging the City of New York, the MTA, the New York Police Department, Brookfield Properties, JP Morgan Chase and others are in violation of numerous civil rights, including First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly. The suit seeks redress for police misconduct in arrests made during the "Occupy Wall Street" protests and asks that a federal independent monitor be appointed to oversee the NYPD in order to safeguard the public.

The 143 page complaint submitted by a group of civil rights attorneys including Leo Glickman, Yetta G. Kurland and Wylie Stecklow, was filed today in United States District Court in the Southern District and includes a 24 minute video which highlights the use of excessive force and selective enforcement which many have claimed has become an issue over the past 6 months during the "Occupy" protests.

The suit also addresses the City's relationship with JP Morgan Chase who donated $4.6 million to the NYPD during this time, as well as the fact that members of the press and elected officials have been arrested while observing and/or reporting on these protests.

One of the plaintiffs, New York City Councilmember Ydanis Rodriguez, who was bloodied and arrested on November 15, 2011 for attempting to observe the eviction of Zuccotti park stated "While my charges were dismissed, the bigger issue still remains, namely that the NYPD misused their power and did not respect my First Amendment or the NYC Charter which gave me the right to act as an observer."

New York City Councilmember Letitia James, another plaintiff in the suit, stated "this is about accountability but it is also about ensuring that we have a proper balance of powers in this City. People should not be afraid to suffer harm from the police when they express their First Amendment right to assemble."

New York City Councilmember Melissa Mark Viverito has also joined the suit. She stated "Some of us in the City Council are looking to address these issues legislatively, in the meantime we will avail ourselves of the United States judicial branch to ask for its help to ensure our police properly protect the public they are entrusted to serve."

Jumaane Williams, another New York City Councilmember made the point that this effects everyone not just OWS protestors. "We hope this suit will help all New Yorkers, as well as the NYPD. We believe officers should not be put in a situation where they are asked to act in a way which results in this type of misconduct or puts them at odds with the public."

Paul Newell, a plaintiff and Democratic District Leader for Lower Manhattan added that the police misconduct "had a chilling effect of the freedoms of speech, movement and assembly as well as quality of life in Lower Manhattan."

John Knefel, a journalist and radio show host, who was arrested while covering a protest in the publicly-accessible Winter Garden in lower Manhattan because he didn't have NYPD issue press credentials, is one of the plaintiffs as well. "It is of course concerning that the public is arrested for exercising their First Amendment rights, but it is likewise concerning that members of the press are arrested when they try to cover this."

Justin Sullivan, another plaintiff and citizen press journalist who assembled the video exhibit for the suit stated "I was arrested while covering someone else being arrested for complaining about someone else being arrested for doing a ‘mic check'. This is not how our police should act."

Attorneys and the plaintiffs will be holding a press conference at 9:45am on the steps of City Hall on Monday April 30, 2012. Copies of the complaint are available below and at your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+19 # Capn Canard 2012-05-01 09:56
I hope this works, but who here has any faith in our law? I seriously want to know, is there anyone who can trust our authorities to uphold the law and defend the innocent?
+1 # John Locke 2012-05-02 08:25
They have a Civiol Rights complaint and experienced Civil Rights attorneys handling it...they also have individuals that have standing to bring the matter before th court...I expect a good outcome...
+1 # DPM 2012-05-02 09:56
Even if they lose the suit, the attention it focuses on these events are a good thing. Let's think...positive.
+11 # SFgiuseppe 2012-05-01 09:59
Where/How do we donate to this cause?
+7 # jwb110 2012-05-01 12:43
Anybody who has ever lived in NYC, native or otherwise, is aware of how corrupt the NYPD is and how easy they are bought and sold.
I hoe that these people stick to their guns and provide oversight to an other wise Military Police. The next step is to keep the FIB, CIA, FEMA and all those others whose sole purpose is to undo the Constitution and The Bill fo Rights.
+4 # mrbadexample 2012-05-01 13:07
There are numerous court orders that have already been handed down regarding the NYPD’s conduct—the Handschu case (unauthorized surveillance) and a consent order regarding Critical Mass come to mind. If the city decides to flagrantly violate these prohibitions, the problem isn’t with the NYPD—it’s with the Mayor’s office and the Police Commissioner. And winning a judgment on this new suit won’t change a thing.
+6 # Elusive Pimpernel 2012-05-01 17:25
Your characterizatio n of the Mayor's office and the Police Commissioner's office dictating the laws and undermining laws on the books is absolutely correct.

The public must not assume that because they are public servants that all is fair and above board. Both your cited offices relish in power and are well aware that their power can be furthered by a supportive city and state legal team which all work together.

If you want to see another city hall and mayor with unbridled power, check out Chicago's new mayor Rahm Emanuel, and read about some of his extreme new measures of public surveillance as well as further limiting Chicago citizens of their rights. The Patriot Act was and is a very helpful tool by which these city managers and police can enforce laws that they can make up as they go along.

Its all about power and control!
+12 # okie_mule 2012-05-01 13:33
Unjust laws and unjust application of laws can only be only be remedied by massive, peaceful demonstrations. Public pressure that wanes becomes a stimulant to repressive behavior.
+7 # Elusive Pimpernel 2012-05-01 14:33
Its ironic, I lived in NY from Oct.1969 to July 1971 and it was during the time that the famous or infamous Cerpico police corruption was going on. All of mid town Manhattan was a tourist trap with all sorts of trashy shops. It was a den of sex for sale, blatant street walking, drug sales on sidewalks, and other elicit activity which was all but ignored by the well greased palms of the NYPD's best.

Never did I see them remove or mace these hookers and drug pushers or raid the sex stores for illegal porn. It was an accepted way of life because these people paid protection.

The folks at occupy Wall Street didn't pay protection or have an IN with the corrupt NYPD, and as a result, suffered the consequences of police misconduct and enforcement of their removal from a PEACEFUL demonstrations.

Its sad that vice gets a pass, and people with a moral cause are gagged, assaulted, maced, forced to vacate, and arrested. I'm sure these police were angry because there is no bribery payoff from causes such as OWS.

Once again the police gets away with it! With NY politics the way it is, I highly doubt that anything serious will happen as a result of this suit, but still, the suit must go on if for no other reason than to publicize NY's brutal and militaristic approach to controlling a peaceful protest.
0 # 1984 2012-05-03 20:56

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.