Excerpt: "In its statement, which comes as the NSA gears up for a make-or-break legislative battle...the agency pointed to 'privacy protections' which it says it keeps on all Americans' phone records."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. (photo: Sanders.gov)
NSA Statement Does Not Deny 'Spying' on Members of Congress
05 January 14
• Agency responds to questions from Senator Bernie Sanders
• Statement cites 'same privacy protections as all US persons'
he National Security Agency on Saturday released a statement in answer to questions from a senator about whether it “has spied, or is … currently spying, on members of Congress or other American elected officials”, in which it did not deny collecting communications from legislators of the US Congress to whom it says it is accountable.
In a letter dated 3 January, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont defined “spying” as “gathering metadata on calls made from official or personal phones, content from websites visited or emails sent, or collecting any other data from a third party not made available to the general public in the regular course of business”.
The agency has been at the centre of political controversy since a former contractor, Edward Snowden, released thousands of documents on its activities to media outlets including the Guardian.
In its statement, which comes as the NSA gears up for a make-or-break legislative battle over the scope of its surveillance powers, the agency pointed to “privacy protections” which it says it keeps on all Americans' phone records.
The statement read: “NSA’s authorities to collect signals intelligence data include procedures that protect the privacy of US persons. Such protections are built into and cut across the entire process. Members of Congress have the same privacy protections as all US persons. NSA is fully committed to transparency with Congress. Our interaction with Congress has been extensive both before and since the media disclosures began last June.
“We are reviewing Senator Sanders’s letter now, and we will continue to work to ensure that all members of Congress, including Senator Sanders, have information about NSA’s mission, authorities, and programs to fully inform the discharge of their duties.”
Soon after Sanders' letter was published, the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, announced that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (Fisa) Court, the body which exists to provide government oversight of NSA surveillance activities, had renewed the domestic phone records collection order for another 90 days.
On Saturday, the New York Times published a letter from Robert Litt, in which the general counsel for the Office of National Intelligence denied allegations that Clapper lied to Congress in March, when questioned about NSA domestic surveillance.
Last month, two federal judges issued contradictory verdicts on whether such NSA surveillance was constitutional. Judge Richard Leon said it was not constitutional; Judge William Pauley said that it was.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
 16 March 2019
|
 18 March 2019
|
 16 March 2019
|
 16 March 2019
|
 17 March 2019
|
 16 March 2019
|
 15 March 2019
|
 15 March 2019
|
 17 March 2019
|
Comments
A note of caution regarding our comment sections:
For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.
We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.
It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.
We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.
It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.
Adapt and overcome.
Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News
- the masters with the will to power,
- the desire to spy on everyones thoughts
- and unlimited capability to come up with weasel words when reporting what they really do.
I wonder what NSA agents would think about everyone else spying on them...
Message to NSA, FBI, CIA, Homeland Security and whatever other agency of the U.S. Government monitors my mail, phone, internet postings, invades my privacy, puts me on a list of subversives, and tries to interfere with my rights to free speech, peaceful protest, free association and other rights so many have fought to achieve for so long—you are a cartel of criminal organizations that violates the rights of millions in the U.S. and abroad. So far your secret renditions, torture of prisoners, drone attacks, Special Operations assassinations, war crimes, and crimes against humanity have been committed with impunity. I hope that all of you responsible will in time get your due.
Message to those on government lists. You can request NSA for your Freedom of Information Act file by going to www.nsa.gov and from the FBI by emailing foiperrequest@ic.fbi.gov When you are denied on grounds of “national security” appeal, then turn your requests over the ACLU and National Lawyers Guild so that they can do class action litigations
"Members of Congress have the same privacy protections as all US persons."
"And therein lies the rub."
While this was a perfect messenger and venue to ask the question and (hopefully) ignite discussion and concern, it may not be 'slam dunk' good for privacy advocacy. Given today's Congress, and who they mostly serve (hint: the 'rulers'), it might not be so easy.
I'm thinking Congress's looney-tunes and tuned-out members may interpret this as a call to legislate a 'carve out' which would exempt Congress from being "spied on", like ordinary (95th-Class) citizens now are. Result: Nobody ends up accountable to law if they happen to "serve" the people in government. Not the same law as us, anyway. Will their concern be about their own safety, or the betterment of American domestic society?
And there's the definition of 'spying', surely to be used in all the spin and reaction and trolling and polling. Definition? Applied towards whom and what? Constitutional rights, anyone?
Tis a new year. Stay tuned....
But we are losing sight of just how isolated and controlled congress is. Following the Anthrax letters that were sent to members of contgress in 2001, all letter mail now sent to a member of congress is routed to a military base near washinton where the mail is opened, checked and then scanned. The pdf scans are sent to the member of congress electronically and the phyhsical letters aer stored at the military base. so the Pentagon has both hard and electronic copies of all letters sent to congress.
Letters that go to members of congress via email or via their websites are probably intercepted and stored in just the same way all other people's email is.
It really is pretty silly to ask a hard core criminal like Alexander if he is breaking the law. He's not going to confess. He's a sociopath. He does not ever understand what he's doing. He just is driven to do it more.
I expect Congress simply to enact a law shutting it down as a criminal organization. They need to hold hearings and when people like Alexander lie they need to hold him in contempt and put him in custody or jail. This will probably be a pretty long battle with the president who will defend the NSA at all costs. But it should be a battle that congress undertakes.
But it won't. Congress won't do anything that benefits the american people.
Privacy is hugely important for people. Snowden said this -- kids now are not growing up with a sense of privacy. What they are and the decisions the make are all open to the judgment and observation of others. Knowing that you are always being watched is like having the police inside your head.
The NSA, itself funded at the pleasure of the US Senate, has essentially not answered Sen Sanders' question. It is carrying on the grand tradition exemplified by Watergate in its seamy GOP-ish paranoia from the 1970's.
And US readers have to get their information from European sources??
RSS feed for comments to this post