RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Excerpt: "A Taliban spokesman said the violence marked the start of their annual spring offensive which heralds the fighting season, adding that 'a lot of suicide bombers' were involved. ... The Taliban said the main targets were the German and British embassies, and the headquarters of Afghanistan's NATO-led force, all in Kabul."

Smoke rises from the site of an attack near the Afghan parliament in Kabul. (photo: Reuters)
Smoke rises from the site of an attack near the Afghan parliament in Kabul. (photo: Reuters)

Taliban Attack US Bases and Government Sites Across Afghanistan

By Al Jazeera and Agencies

16 April 12


The Guardian UK reports this morning that heavy fighting in Kabul has ended after 18 hours of gunfire, according to government officials and police. - CW/RSN


Western embassies and parliament attacked in biggest attack on Kabul since 2001, as security forces continue fightback.

uicide bombers have struck across Afghanistan in co-ordinated attacks, with explosions and gunfire rocking the diplomatic area of Kabul as Taliban fighters took over buildings and tried to enter parliament.

A joint operation by Afghan and international forces to displace the attackers from the buildings they had occupied continued into Monday morning, with Kabul residents reporting that the sound of machine guns and heavy weapons could be heard through the night.

On Monday morning, Al Jazeera's Bernard Smith reported from Kabul that police had been seen to be removing bodies from the site of an assault on Taliban attackers who had been holed up in a construction site next to the Kabul Starr hotel.

Fighting was ongoing near the parliament, where one gunman remained inside a building opposite the parliament and was shooting at security forces, Hashmatullah Stanikzai, a police spokesman, said.

'Spring Offensive'

Outside the capital on Sunday, attackers also targeted government buildings in Logar province, the airport in Jalalabad, and a police facility in the town of Gardez in Paktya province.

A Taliban spokesman said the violence marked the start of their annual spring offensive which heralds the fighting season, adding that "a lot of suicide bombers" were involved.

The attacks are among the most serious on the capital since US-backed Afghan forces removed the group from power in 2001.

A spokesman for International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said there were as yet no reports of casualties in the attacks in Kabul, and the US embassy said in a statement all its staff were accounted for and safe.

The Taliban said the main targets were the German and British embassies, and the headquarters of Afghanistan's NATO-led force, all in Kabul.

Several Afghan members of parliament joined security forces repelling attackers from a roof near the parliament.

Afghan police also arrested 15 would-be suicide bombers in northern Afghanistan who were trying to launch attacks in Kunduz province. There were reports of the arrest of suicide bombers in other areas.

Al Jazeera’s Smith said the damage and death toll from Sunday's violence was still being determined.

"This is the biggest attack there has been in Kabul since the Taliban were overthrown in 2001. We have been told that 19 suicide bombers have blown themselves up or been killed and another 17 have been arrested," Smith said.

The co-ordinated attacks are bound to intensify concern in the run-up to the planned withdrawal of foreign combat troops by the end of 2014.

The assault appeared to repeat the tactics of an attack in Kabul last September when fighters entered construction sites in several places to use them as positions for rocket and gun attacks.

Zabiullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, said it had been easy to bring fighters into the capital, and that they had had inside help to move heavy weapons into place.

Afghan security forces, who are responsible for the safety of the capital, were scrambling to reinforce areas around the so-called "Green Zone" diplomatic section of the city centre.

Attackers fired a rocket-propelled grenade that landed just outside the front gate of a house used by British diplomats in the city centre and smoke billowed from the area after the blast, a witness told the Reuters news agency.

Two rockets hit a British embassy guard tower near the Reuters office in the city, with embassy sources saying staff were in a lock-down.

'Suicide Bombers'

Fighting raged late into the night at some NATO facilities, ISAF said via Twitter.

A US defence official who declined to be identified said the attackers had mostly used small arms and rocket-propelled grenades, and "perhaps even suicide bombers".

Three rockets hit a supermarket that is popular with foreigners near the German embassy, witnesses said.

Smoke rose from the vicinity of the embassy while women scurried for cover as gunfire crackled.

As the shooting went on, US army convoys could be seen coming to the area accompanied by Afghan police in flak jackets.

Staff at the embassies were not available for comment.

'Defend Them'

Attackers also fired rockets at the parliament building in the west of Kabul, and at the Russian embassy,a spokesman for the parliament said.

Most MPs had left the building before it came under attack, said a politician. However, one of several who fought back from a roof, Naeem Hameedzai, told Reuters: "I'm the representative of my people and I have to defend them."

Afghan media said Taliban fighters had stormed the Kabul Star hotel complex near the presidential palace and the Iranian embassy.

The windows of the hotel were blown out and smoke billowed from the building.

In the eastern province of Paktia, NATO helicopter gunships attacked Taliban fighters holed up in a building next to a construction site while in the eastern city of Jalalabad.

A Reuters witness said that Taliban attacked a foreign force base near a school in the city.

One Taliban fighter was killed, another blew himself up and a third was captured. A blast also went off near the airport in Jalalabad, a witness said. your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+8 # cadan 2012-04-16 09:54
We are of course the invaders, and Afghanistan is of course the graveyard of empires.

We will eventually be expelled, but by dallying around, we are making sure that (as somebody wrote) "When the Taliban finally does kick out the invaders, many Afghans will feel that the good guys finally won."

(A dark thought here is that they might be right.)
-7 # dick 2012-04-16 10:48
Criticizing U.S. involvement is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. What is more difficult is determining how to keep the Taliban from gaining control of Afghanistan & Pakistan. Control of Afghanistan means The Mother of All Nightmares for Afghan women & girls, and a secure base for launching CBW attacks against US. Control of Pakistan means Bin Laden's heirs with nukes. Would casual critics of current policy please be responsible enough to address these concerns. It's YOUR life.
+8 # cadan 2012-04-16 11:21
Well, Dick, in fact the Soviets had installed a government in Afghanistan that was non-Taliban.

Now that may be good or that may be bad, but that's the situation that existed before we wrecked it. (And i think under the Soviets the condition for Afghan women was better.)

I think that we cannot fix the situation in Afghanistan, and by trying we only make it far worse.

Oppressive laws are nothing compared with bombing weddings---or shooting humans for sport.

So i think that for us, we'll just have to let somebody else clean up our mess, if they can. That's what we did in Viet Nam, and the result is much better than our continued presence would have been.
+6 # Activista 2012-04-16 12:07
10 years + of slaughtering Afghans in Operation Enduring Freedom -
who is the Freedom Fighter (defending their country - Afghanistan)
and who is the terrorist (occupying their country - Afghanistan)?
Pentagon Generals are more .... than Soviet Generals in 1988 - 34 years ago.
+3 # Bodiotoo 2012-04-16 15:02
Bin Laden is dead...bring home the troops.
+3 # Shanti 2012-04-17 08:29
"Women scurried for cover" Really? Sort of sexist, I think. How about "Shoppers rushed for cover" or "Civilians rushed for cover." Women are not mice or rats, after all. Not really sort of sexist, but really sexist.
+1 # Activista 2012-04-17 10:04
"main targets were the German and British embassies, and the headquarters of Afghanistan's NATO-led force, all in Kabul?"
i.e. military targets -
compare this to Reagan 1980's "Freedom Fighters" al-Qaeda. Trained by CIA to load a car with explosive and attack PUBLIC market in Kabul full of civilians -

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.