Colarossi writes: "Senator Bernie Sanders and other lawmakers on Sunday sent a letter to President Joe Biden asking for an expansion of Medicare benefits to be included in the upcoming American Families Plan, a roughly $1.8 trillion spending and tax plan aimed at rebuilding the U.S. economy."
Bernie Sanders. (photo: Antonella Crescimbeni)
Bernie Sanders Leads 17 Senators in Letter to Biden Asking for Medicare Expansion
26 April 21
enator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and other lawmakers on Sunday sent a letter to President Joe Biden asking for an expansion of Medicare benefits to be included in the upcoming American Families Plan, a roughly $1.8 trillion spending and tax plan aimed at rebuilding the U.S. economy.
Sanders, along with Senators Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), led 13 other lawmakers in drafting a letter to Biden urging for extended health benefits.
The lawmakers are seeking that Biden reduce the Medicare eligibility age; expand Medicare benefits to include hearing, dental and vision care; implement a cap on out-of-pocket expenses under traditional Medicare; and negotiate lower drug prices for the program.
"Medicare has been one of the most successful and popular federal programs in our nation's history since it was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965. Now, 55 years later, the time is long overdue for us to expand and improve this program so that millions of older Americans can receive the health care they need, including eyeglasses, hearing aids and dental care," the letter stated.
The letter comes just days before the American Families Plan is expected to be released ahead of Biden's joint address to Congress on Wednesday. The new plan is set to include billions of dollars in funding related to education, child care and climate change.
However, just how much the new plan will include overhauls and funding for healthcare remains up in the air. As of Friday, White House officials were planning to include a last-minute $200 billion allocation to extend health insurance subsidies through the Affordable Care Act, The Washington Post reported.
According to that report, the White House is also planning to scrap an earlier measure that would reduce consumer and government spending on prescription drugs � falling in direct opposition to the 17 lawmakers' new letter.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters Friday that expanding access to health care and making it more affordable remains a top priority for the Biden administration. Psaki added that while the initial drafts of the spending plan will be released on Wednesday, the plan is still a work in progress and could include several additional measures.
"Even as he's making these decisions, that the American Families Plan and his speech on Wednesday, will not represent the totality of every priority item for him and every item on his agenda that he wants to move forward as president," Psaki said.
Biden's new plan will be partially funded by several tax increases on high-income Americans and investors, and will represent the second phase of his $4 trillion "Build Back Better" economic agenda. Combined with the $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal the White House previously released, the plan will represent the biggest overhaul to the American economy in decades, the Post reported.
On Sunday, the 17 Democratic lawmakers said the new plan could represent a "historic" moment to improve Medicare for millions of Americans.
"We have an historic opportunity to make the most significant expansion of Medicare since it was signed into law. We look forward to working with you to make this a reality and, in the process, substantially improve the lives of millions of older Americans and persons with disabilities," the letter added.
|
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Hey! Aren't these funds supposed to be used for education, health care, infrastructure, and bailing out bankrupt cities? Didn't you love seeing FBI Director Mueller on TV yesterday saying that if these programs had been up and running we could have avoided 911.
Case in point for those with short memories or born in this century -- the Presidential Dailey Brief for August 6, 2001.
Yet no hope of universal healthcare, enhanced public education, or renewed infrastructure, as the US slides farther and farther down the quality of life index and looming medievalism.
Our only hope is to alert our friends, neighbors, colleagues and anyone whose attention we can get and tell the story of how tyranny came to the US.
Pretend the First Amendment is still in force and assemble peacefully, petition the government for a redress of grievances and never, never, not ever give up. The generations that follow us deserve nothing less.
The US government will sometime soon either facilitate or indirectly enable some manner of "terrorist attack" within the US, in an effort to shut-up or at minimum embarrass domestic opposition to its unconstitutiona l spying activities.
I sincerely hope I'm wrong in this prediction, of course.
But if new "terrorist attack" does happen anytime in the near future, no matter who perpetrates it, you can be sure it will have this useful and likely-desired effect on public debate.
Wouldn't be far better for the US government's presently corporate-drive n, Empire-oriented foreign policy to simply stop making so many enemies around the world?
The unquestioned pretext for all of this ruinous spying, both domestic and foreign, is allegedly "to protect US citizens from foreign enemies who hate us enough to want to harm us."
But the question is never asked or seriously debated: WHY does the US government have such an abundance of allegedly deadly enemies?
.
i'm proud to be an american but if i want superior and inexpensive dental work, i'll go to costa rica. if i want a new hip or knee, i'll head for thailand where they've been doing less invasive surgeries for over 15 years at about 1/3 of the cost in the u.s.a. and, with longer lives for their implants and less recovery time. we're just now catching up-sort of, with those surgery styles.
.
manufacturing? almost anywhere else.
.
and, through all of this, we're ticking off even our friends around the world by many of our actions. that's when they're not laughing at us for considering the bachmanns/palin s and their ilk that seem to be speaking for us now.
.
And we now are starting another new one in Syria!
This lot must be smoke blinded by heavy inhalation and gasping for air during exhalation. The may yet explode by holding their breaths to keep the heavily doped fug in as long as possible.
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/terrorism/80601pdb.html
this link is one of many to the briefing given bush while he was on one of his many vacatons. this briefing showing bin laden was poised to strike was ignored among other warnings.