RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Davidson writes: "So little time, so much damage done. That's the legacy left by Bill Wehrum who spent only one and a half years as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) top air quality official before announcing that he will step down this weekend under the cloud of a federal ethics investigation over possible conflicts of interest."

Bill Wehrum. (photo: WP/Getty Images)
Bill Wehrum. (photo: WP/Getty Images)


EPA Air Quality Chief Resigns Over Ethics Investigation

By Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch

29 June 19

 

o little time, so much damage done. That's the legacy left by Bill Wehrum who spent only one and a half years as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) top air quality official before announcing that he will step down this weekend under the cloud of a federal ethics investigation over possible conflicts of interest. His resignation follows conflicting statement he made to Congress about his industry connections, according to Politico.

Mr. Wehrum worked as a lobbyist and lawyer for the oil, gas and coal industries before joining the Trump administration, but did not relinquish ties to his clients. The House Energy and Commerce Committee opened an inquiry into whether he improperly worked to reverse an enforcement action in order to help DTE Energy, a former client. Watchdog groups also said he crossed a line when he gave presentations to former clients and when he worked on policy that affected litigation in which his former firm, Hunton & Williams, was involved, as The New York Times reported.

"William Wehrum was emblematic of the administration's struggles to remain ethical," said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, in a statement reported by The Washington Post. "While it's a good thing that Wehrum's potential ethics problems will no longer affect the agency, the tone is set at the top, and if the EPA is to clean up the mess started by Scott Pruitt, the Trump administration needs to get serious about policing its ethical failures."

In his short tenure in the EPA, which started in November 2017, Wehrum has proven himself a nimble deregulator. He was instrumental to shrinking the EPA's reach, rolling back Obama-era rules meant to lower greenhouse gas emissions, slowing fuel-efficiency requirements for cars and trucks, and rewriting the way the EPA calculates costs and benefits to favor the fossil fuel energy sector � essentially rewriting the way the agency measures the health consequences of air pollution, as The Washington Post reported. He was also the chief architect of the Affordable Clean Energy rule, which eased the path for more coal-fired power plants to open, according to The New York Times.

"Mr. Wehrum oversaw the most relentless rollback of clean air, climate and health safeguards in E.P.A.'s history," said John Walke, clean air director for the Natural Resources Defense Council, as The New York Times reported. "E.P.A. strengthened not a single meaningful air quality or climate safeguard during his tenure."

Environmental activists are pleased to see him leave.

"Wehrum did more damage to the Clean Air Act than any other person in the last 40 years," said Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, as Politico reported. "His legacy will be more premature deaths, more hospital visits and more asthma attacks to our most vulnerable citizens."

Wehrum's ethical mishaps follow a pattern of behavior from senior Trump administration officials who have resigned while under investigation, including four Cabinet members � EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, and Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin � along with other senior staffers such as Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator William "Brock" Long.

Also, the Department of Interior's Office of Inspector General is currently investigating Secretary David Bernhardt and six current or former top appointees for actions similar to Wehrum's � improper dealings with their former employers or clients on department-related business, as The Washington Post reported.

As for Wehrum's life after the EPA, one Senate Democrat who asked for an investigation into Wehrum predicted a profitable future with the fossil fuel industry.

"I can't wait to see where Bill Wehrum lands once he's out the door," said Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) in a statement, as reported by The Washington Post. "What do you bet it's with one of the fossil fuel interests he has served so well as air chief, delivering one big handout after another?"

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+15 # readerz 2012-11-10 11:09
Thank you for posting this article, although it should be the top headline on the e-mails. I lived through the era of the Civil Rights marches, and by sheer luck, I happened to see then Sen. Hubert Humphrey's speech in the Senate that introduced the Civil Rights Act of 1965. If there was ever an Act of Congress that should have been a Constitutional Amendment, and applying to all states not just a few, that should have been it. Everybody who was born after that time has no idea what things were like before that Act was passed, and not just in the south.

If key provisions are overturned, that means the "majority" of southern voters will immediately revert to non-black and non-Hispanic voters. There used to be literacy questions for those who wanted to vote (to a white: "Spell cat." to a black: "Spell terrestrial.") There was also a poll tax that made it expensive to vote: now that tax is hidden in the costs of obtaining voter I.D.s for the elderly. There was severe voter intimidation, such as the coal company that fired people after Pres. Obama was reelected.

We need the Civil Rights Act extended to cover all 50 states and protect the vote for all citizens, including U.S. citizens who live in U.S. territories. America's election system is a disgrace, and does not need any more reductions in the right to vote.
 
 
+10 # bingers 2012-11-10 11:35
Time for Thomas, Scalia, Alito and Roberts to have massive heart attacks before they screw us again. ;o)
 
 
+21 # panhead49 2012-11-10 11:36
Chief Justice Roberts - have you ever ventured into the south? Racism is still alive, well and thriving. And spreading. As should the authority of the Voting Rights Act. Yeah, I know, this conflicts with OMG white is no longer the only color that matters.

Your ruling on Citizens United blew up in your face - messing with the Voting Rights Act may well blow this country up. If anything it should be expanded. Yeah Arizona, I'm looking at you.
 
 
+2 # readerz 2012-11-10 22:00
I love it: change the name of the GOP to the OMG.

Lots of people sent in their dollars that they could not afford to send to try to match the billionaires' millions. This is no way to run a government, and there needs to be some overall better Constitutional Amendments on the definition of adults and their voting and contribution rights; expand the Civil Rights Act and get rid of Citizens United.
 
 
+12 # reiverpacific 2012-11-10 12:27
Well, I can't wait to read (if released) the twisted logic from on high by this crowd, especially Scalia and his echo-chamber lapdog Thomas.
May whatever powers that rule over us get some of them replaced in this coming term and restore a balance of progressive sanity.
 
 
+12 # Regina 2012-11-10 14:19
This is the next campaign, after Citizens United, that Roberts and his cohorts will conduct to undo laws that have benefited the
people of the United States. Those provisions embody the people's efforts to elect governments that serve them rather than privately vested interests. In turn, we see the prime long-term benefit of Obama's reelection, and the incoming Senate's composition, in that he may be called upon to name one or more new Justices during the coming four years, subject to the Senate's confirmation. I fervently hope we can succeed in enacting a constitutional amendment that would negate CU. I hope we won't need another amendment to preserve voting rights against yet another judicial travesty.
 
 
0 # whichLawIsJudeLaw 2012-11-15 01:17
I would definitely agree that Racism is alive in the South - but I wonder, at what point in the distant future do we no longer consider the south to be described "racist in the past"

Just curious what you guys think, I certainly think that SCOTUS will need to uphold the voting act - it would be really bad timing considering all the things that have been discussed recently about a more powerful minority group in America in regard to the election.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN