RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Israel writes: "While the bill's provisions to ensure a paper trail for American's ballots, give accessibility and privacy for citizens with disabilities, and avoid foreign rigging would seem fairly non-controversial, just one Republican voted for the bill, along with all 224 Democrats present."

Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX). (photo: Drew Angerer/Getty)
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX). (photo: Drew Angerer/Getty)


184 House Republicans Just Voted Against Securing Elections

By Josh Israel, ThinkProgress

28 June 19


So much for the House GOP's stated concern for safeguarding the political process.

he House of Representatives passed the Securing America�s Federal Elections Act (SAFE Act) on Thursday, on a 225 to 184 vote. While the bill�s provisions to ensure a paper trail for American�s ballots, give accessibility and privacy for citizens with disabilities, and avoid foreign rigging would seem fairly non-controversial, just one Republican voted for the bill, along with all 224 Democrats present.

Back in 2018, the Republican majority on the House Intelligence Committee issued a report following its investigation into whether Russia interfered in the 2016 election and whether President Donald Trump�s campaign illegally coordinated with Russia�s meddling efforts. The investigation and report � which drew criticism from the committee�s Democrats, who called it �superficial� � were led by Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX).

While Conaway and his team said they did not find any illegal coordination by Trump, they did find significant meddling by Russia and criticized both 2016 campaigns for �poor judgment� in how they handled it. They also wrote that, �The U.S. government�s subsequent response to the Russian active measures campaign during the 2016 election was slow and inconsistent,� and urged �several solutions to help safeguard U.S. and allies� political processes from nefarious actors, such as the Russians,� including more spending on secure elections systems.

On Thursday, the House considered a bill that aimed to address these very problems and to ensure easier access for voters. It included �requirements for voting systems, including that systems (1) use individual, durable, voter-verified paper ballots; (2) make a voter�s marked ballot available for inspection and verification by the voter before the vote is cast; (3) ensure that individuals with disabilities are given an equivalent opportunity to vote, including with privacy and independence, in a manner that produces a voter-verified paper ballot; and (4) be manufactured in the United States.�

Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL), who lost both legs while serving in Afghanistan and has made advocacy for wounded veterans a priority, joined the Democratic majority in supporting the bill. Conaway, along with 183 other Republican colleagues, voted no.

In a statement, Conaway said the bill would pour money �into the wrong solutions for serious problems facing our nation.�

�This bill does nothing to secure our elections, but instead wastes over a billion dollars from the taxpayers on hyper partisan federal mandates aimed at affecting election outcomes,� he wrote, adding, �Injecting more mandates from the federal government and blindly spending money will not solve our election security problems.�

The bill faces an uphill battle, given that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has blocked votes on virtually all major legislation passed in the House and has dubbed himself �the grim reaper,� killing progressive bills.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
+7 # RMDC 2014-07-23 19:23
What else would anyone expect from Florida. I wish they would pass a law banning Jeb Bush from showing his ugly face in public. I'd much prefer to see someone underwear than Bush's mug.

Who cares about this issue. Style in clothes always pushes some boundaries. It often represents some "statement" that someone wants to make. So Florida is going to outlaw some styles now but not others. The clothes police will be out in full force, cracking the heads of kids who wear their pants a little too low.

In the past, there have been attempts to outlaw short skirts on women. They said it was indecent or some nonsense. These prudes like Councilwoman Mary Rich just need to get laid. That would give her something else to think about. If she does not like seeing people's underwear, then don't look at it. Why is she staring at men's underwear anyway?

Thank god I will never have to go to Florida (or Mississippi).
 
 
+8 # SundownLF 2014-07-23 23:40
Somehow, Councilwoman Rich's 'getting laid' is NOT the answer here! Getting laid is no cure for bigotry and stupidity. (And it's so often men who wouldn't know how to provide a 'decent lay' who are the quickest to suggest it...)

No, just see her for what she is: a woman with too much power who can negatively affect the lives of young - yes, usually black - men.

Bu I can't help but smile at the image of Florida senior men who wear their pants practically up to their chins! (Remember the Martin Short character of many years ago?) No one is making their clothing choices illegal.
 
 
+3 # Henry 2014-07-24 07:57
I'm really tired of looking at guys' underwear frankly. It's a ******* stoopid fad. I'm also sick of watching them fondle themselves constantly, in the real world (?) and on television. Adolescents though most of them are, hellow can you just do whatever in private? It's embarrassing and degrading to yourselves and everyone else who can't avoid watching you. Jeez. And finally, it's "aggressive" idn't it? Actively aggressive and flaunting. Jerks.
 
 
0 # Henry 2014-07-24 08:00
Quoting SundownLF:
Somehow, Councilwoman Rich's 'getting laid' is NOT the answer here! Getting laid is no cure for bigotry and stupidity. (And it's so often men who wouldn't know how to provide a 'decent lay' who are the quickest to suggest it...)


Right on.
 
 
0 # RMDC 2014-07-24 14:52
Sorry about that comment. I just could not resist saying something idiotic in response to this idiocy. I wonder what Councilwoman Mary Rich wore when she was a teenager. Old people are constantly complaining about the way teens wear their clothes and they completely forget that they did something similar when they were teens. I wonder if there are any photos of Mary Rich as a teen on the net? Do you think she's of the age to have followed the Madonna fashion of wearing only a bra and no shirt?
 
 
+13 # Activista 2014-07-23 19:38
Half of big belly fat Americans are wearing their their trousers two inches below their 50" waist ...
 
 
+13 # RMDC 2014-07-23 21:18
That's right. And when they bend down to pick up another six pack, you can see the crack of their fat asses. Now Councilwoman Mary Rich will want to ban ass cracks.
 
 
+1 # MJnevetS 2014-07-24 11:29
Nope, those are white ass cracks
 
 
+4 # jwb110 2014-07-24 00:07
It was only a matter of time before the GOP/TP would set a dress code for America.

Don't these people have bigger fish to fry, like more jobs at good wages in Ocala. Let their precious free market fix this.
Low pants are not a uniform for the average job except maybe in WalMart. That store is full of ass-cracks and very few teeth.
 
 
+2 # ericlipps 2014-07-24 04:42
 
 
+4 # hd70642 2014-07-24 05:05
While to me the baggy pants look is a defeatist celebration of ignorance since it originated in prison . This came about since The prison industrial complex has created a populace all too familiar with incarceration for the most,meager / pettiest violations in same vein the military industrial complex has lead to a populace all too familiar with war !

There are real threats to public safety that needs to be enforced no matter how stupid you might find somebody is dressed ! ! What is next excessive tattoos piercing shaven heads Mohawks and pink and orange hair or long hair or miss mated socks or T-shirts with holes being ticketed as well Maybe going after leather or wearing white after labor day . Everybody is going wear something somebody finds stupid.!
 
 
+3 # NAVYVET 2014-07-24 07:45
Ocala's inland, not on the ocean or gulf, but there are plenty of lakes for swimming and sunbathing. Go someplace else, gals in bikinis!
 
 
+2 # Kootenay Coyote 2014-07-24 07:57
 
 
+1 # Buddha 2014-07-24 08:02
"Land of the Free". We need to update our marketing brochures me thinks.
 
 
0 # born1929 2014-07-24 09:17
ya gotta hand it to Florida .... a most advanced state at so
many levels
 
 
+2 # lyman 2014-07-24 09:38
I always thought it was a prudent public safety measure to let rambunctious adolescents voluntarily hobble themselves in their running ability.

Besides, it's good for us older folks to keep up to date with the fashions in patterns for underwear fabrics. They're lots more lively than what us old guys wear in the way of golf and fishing shirts -- at least here in Orlando (but maybe things are different up north in Ocala).
 
 
+3 # reiverpacific 2014-07-24 10:37
Well, I'm tired of immaculately-su ited and coiffed thugs running the country into the ground, similarly-attir ed Owner-Media anchors, pundits and especially members of the neocon club gang who should be in Super-max or Abu Grahib for crimes against humanity, abusing, polluting and dominating OUR airwaves. Also suited and robed Theocrats disguised as SCOTUS injustices and judges in the lower courts, military uniform-attired war-hawks being practically worshipped and imitated by marching bands across the country while they wreak havoc around the globe.
How many of you went through a Hippy tie-dye disheveled-hair spell, the Beatles hair, suits winkle-pickers, or the Carnaby Street "Twiggy" look, Dreadlocks and bags, the ghastly "Disco-plastic" trend of the 80's, Afros, or further back, the drainpipe, Ducks-arse "Teddy-boy" trend of the early-rock late 50's and the "Angry young Beatnik" alternative of the same era.
Most were in "dubious" taste in their time but were in truth, statements of resistance to conformity, imposed tastes and mores of the post WW11 "square" powers, Cold War/McCarthy era fear-mongering and doomsday scenario which our leaders chose to visit on their populaces.
I suspect that these kids are giving the corrupt, often stupid and almost invariably self-serving makers of laws and dictators of lifestyle in the dominant, PC, bland Corporate/milit ary culture that squeezes the life out of everything creative, the vertical finger!
We don't HAVE to like it!
 
 
0 # Joe Bob 2014-08-02 11:56
Reiver you nailed it....
Best comment of the day...
excuse me a sec,,, "Hey Kid !!! get off my lawn"
 
 
0 # MJnevetS 2014-07-24 11:52
 
 
-1 # skylinefirepest 2014-07-24 14:49
Geez, would you listen to the liberals complain to the point of stupidity. Do you really want to see anybody's underwear?? DO YOU REALLY??? I didn't think so.
 
 
+1 # phrixus 2014-07-25 07:48
Disregarding all other relevant issues, I think the baggy, saggy, falling-down pants fashion is so lame that it's beyond laughable. Guys that do this simply look retarded. It's even worse than the absurd Goth craze that blew through. Idiots that do this apparently either don't own a mirror or never read the user manual that came with it. Grow up, guys. Save that crap for Halloween. There's enough visual pollution in the world without you adding to it.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN