RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment

Zhang writes: "A new study finds that air pollution caused by fossil fuel emissions is killing millions and disrupting the water cycle."

Air pollution hangs over the heart of London in this view along the River Thames. (photo: Mike Hewitt/Getty)
Air pollution hangs over the heart of London in this view along the River Thames. (photo: Mike Hewitt/Getty)

Air Pollution Is Killing More People Than Smoking - and Fossil Fuels Are Largely to Blame

By Sharon Zhang, Pacific Standard

19 April 19

A new study finds that air pollution caused by fossil fuel emissions is killing millions and disrupting the water cycle.

ir pollution causes up to 8.8 million premature deaths each year around the globe, surpassing worldwide deaths from smoking. A new study, published late last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, finds that about 65 percent of those deaths are caused by emissions from fossil fuel-related activities, and that we can prevent about 3.6 million premature deaths every year if we phase out fossil fuels.

The study's authors make use of epidemiological studies that follow cohorts of people around the world to model causes of mortality and thereby calculate the role of fossil fuel-caused air pollution. If we reduced the impact of all sources of anthropogenic pollution (including things like agriculture), the researchers calculate, the number of deaths prevented per year would jump to 5.6 million.

"Considering that this is a factor of 3 higher than the mortality rate from other avoidable environmental risks such as unsafe water, sanitation, and hygiene, reducing air pollution is clearly an effective and urgent health intervention," the authors write. They find that, in particular, rapidly reducing fine particulate matter in the atmosphere could greatly reduce health impacts of exposure to air pollution, which include cardiovascular disease, asthma, and lung cancer.

The study also finds implications for the climate when fossil fuel emissions are ramped down thanks to a decrease in the use of aerosols. "By removing aerosol pollution, we find substantial regional invigoration of the hydrologic cycle," leading to an increase in precipitation, they write.

This "invigoration" would have an especially significant impact in areas like northern China and Mexico, where record-setting droughts caused by climate change have been devastating agricultural productivity.

While aerosols have interrupted the Earth's hydrologic cycles, they've also had a cooling effect on the planet. Those particles in the atmosphere reflect sunlight back into space, reducing the amount that is absorbed by the oceans and surfaces of Earth.

The study finds that aerosols have masked (that is, dampened the effect of) global warming by about 0.5 degrees Celsius. That effect has been particularly pronounced in areas of North America and northeast Asia, where researchers find that up to two degrees of warming has been masked. While carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are warming up the atmosphere, those aerosols have also been forestalling some of the worst impacts.

Aerosols have a shorter lifespan in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, so "overall, the warming effect dominates," says lead author Jos Lelieveld of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Germany. "But in some areas which are very polluted, the cooling effect can be quite substantial."

"The bottom line of this study is that we really need to do something quickly, especially if you want to meet these targets that we have all agreed upon at the Paris Agreement," Lelieveld says. Signatories to the Paris Agreement have pledged to keep warming below two degrees Celsius by 2100, which, the study's authors say—optimistically—could be possible.

If "within the next decade or so, say by mid-century," we stop emitting greenhouse gases, Leliveld says, "it would still be possible to meet the two-degree target."

Email This Page your social media marketing partner


A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

+3 # tedrey 2019-04-20 10:10
The one legislation that should be passed
immediately is to declare NOW that if these predicted results DO eventuate, criminal penalties against those who have not ceased
those activities by then will be imposed THEN.

This will mean no claims of "not having known" can prevail, while no time will be wasted and lives wasted in unneeded litigation before closing them down.

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.