RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "The 1943 Bengali famine was caused by then-British Prime Minister Winston Churchill's policies and not drought, a group of Indian and American researchers have found in a study published in the journal, Geophysical Research Letters."

A destitute mother and child on the sidewalk in Calcutta during the Bengal famine of 1943-44. Courtesy Kalyani Bhattacharyee, and Sj. Manoj. (photo: Sarbadhikar/Wikimedia Commons)
A destitute mother and child on the sidewalk in Calcutta during the Bengal famine of 1943-44. Courtesy Kalyani Bhattacharyee, and Sj. Manoj. (photo: Sarbadhikar/Wikimedia Commons)


Bengal Famine Caused by Winston Churchill's Policies, Not Drought, Study Confirms

By The Scroll

31 March 19


A group of Indian and American researches simulated soil moisture content during major Indian famines to come to the conclusion.

he 1943 Bengali famine was caused by then-British Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s policies and not drought, a group of Indian and American researchers have found in a study published in the journal, Geophysical Research Letters.

The researchers came to this conclusion by using weather data to simulate the amount of moisture present in the soil during six major Indian famines, those of 1873-’74, 1876, 1877, 1896-’97, 1899 and 1943. Deficit of soil moisture is a key indicator of poor rainfall and high temperatures.

According to the study, the first five famines were a result of drought, as concluded by the soil moisture study, but not the one that happened in 1943.

“There have been no major famines since independence,” Vimal Mishra told CNN, “And so we started our research thinking the famines would have been caused by drought due to factors such as lack of irrigation.”

Mishra, an associate professor of Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, has co-authored the study, along with Amar Deep Tiwari, Saran Aadhar, Reepal Shah, Mu Xiao, DS Pai and Dennis Lettenmaier.

The 1943 Bengal famine led to the deaths of an estimated three million people, and is widely believed by several historians to have been caused or made worse by British policies of the time.

The study showed that though the eastern region of India experienced severe drought in the early-1940s, the amount of rainfall was above average in late-1943, a period considered to be the peak of the famine.

The British policies alleged to be the cause of the famine were the heavy distribution of food and vital necessities to the military during the second world war, halting import of rice, and the British government not declaring famine in India.

According to the study, another factor that exacerbated the mortality count of the 1943 famine was the Japanese capture of Burma (now Myanmar), which was a major source of rice imports in India. The study noted that in the past, famines, despite being deadly, could not cause much damage due to rice imports from Myanmar and the British government’s relief aid.

Speaking to CNN, Mishra said that during the 1873-’74 famine, the Bengal lieutenant governor, Richard Temple, saved many lives by importing and distributing food. But the British government criticised him and dropped his policies during the drought of 1943, leading to countless fatalities.

That the 1943 Bengal famine was a result of wilful negligence by the British government was accepted and believed strongly across India for quite a while. In 1981, Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen said that supplies should have been in abundance during 1943 to control the deaths brought about by the famine.

Madhushree Mukherjee’s 2011 book, Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II, notes that the famine was caused by heavy exports of food from India. As the famine got worse, she wrote, 70,000 tons of rice were exported from India between January and July, 1943.

Despite Churchill’s War Cabinet being warned about the famine at the time, Mukerjee wrote, the British Prime Minister was reluctant to devote time and resources to fix the Indian problem, and instead, strengthen his military operations and accumulate stocks at home.

“A concession to one country at once encourages demands from all the others,” Churchill commented in a memo on March 10, 1943, as quoted in Mukerjee’s book. “They must learn to look after themselves as we have done. The grave situation of the UK import programme imperils the whole war effort and we cannot afford to send ships merely as a gesture of good will.”

In 2017, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said about Churchill, “This is a man the British would have us hail as an apostle of freedom and democracy, when he has as much blood on his hands as some of the worst genocidal dictators of the 20th century.” He chronicled the havoc wreaked by the British empire on India in his book, Inglorious Empire.

Since independence, India’s population has increased manifold, but famine deaths have been brought under control. “Expansion of irrigation, better public distribution system, rural employment, and transportation reduced the impact of drought on the lives of people after the independence,” Mishra’s study said.

The revelations of Mishra and his fellow researchers’ study vindicated several Indians as well as others, as seen on Twitter. One user questioned the validity of a study complimenting Churchill as a human rights crusader.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # laborequalswealth 2019-04-01 08:33
Nothing new. Read “Late. Victorian Holocausts”. Multiple famines in India and Asia in the late 19th centuries while the Brits exported their food. Just like the Irish potato famine.

The rich never give a shit about the poor.
 
 
0 # Dastidars@oldwestbury.edu 2019-04-02 08:19
In the city of colonial resistance, Calcutta or Kolkata, and the center of Churchill's genocide, a neocolonialist regime of West Bengal State of India has built a "London Tower." Here is an effort to rename it in honor of those killed.
https://www.change.org/p/honorable-srimati-mamata-banerjee-cm-west-bengal-india-e-mail-cm-wb-gov-in-rename-london-tower-in-kolkata-to-kolkata-memorial-tower-of-london-created-bengal-famine-5334d7b1-b43f-47c5-9b32-399c12b79784?recruiter=925522&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition&utm_term=tap_basic_share

for signing the Petition
www.change.org
Rename London Tower in Kolkata to Kolkata Memorial Tower of London-Created Bengal Famine
Sachi G. Dastidar
 
 
0 # Robbee 2019-04-02 16:31
bengal history makes my mind wander to south america? (Bengal Famine Caused by Winston Churchill's Policies, Not Drought, Study Confirms, The Scroll, 31 March 19)

- in my world, i wish we could study, in real time, how much of venezuela's economic problems are caused by bush2cheney, obama and dickhead? sanctions? and predatory capitalism?

and the same for el salvador, guatemala and all the other "mexican" countries? as faux news calls them?

lately n p r has been on a mission to effectively denounce policies of medicare for all and education for all, by ignoring them, and the huge effect of american sanctions, it seems?

to paraphrase dickhead? "WHAT HAVE average venezuelans GOT TO LOSE FROM a return to american-style, predator-corpor ations "take all" capitalism?" - PLENTY!

what happens if and once poor venezuelans return to "all the healthcare and education they can afford?"

IF NOT MADURO? WHO SPEAKS FOR THEM?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN