RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Viser writes: "When Joe Biden was a freshman senator in the mid-1970s, his home state of Delaware, like other hotspots across the country, was engulfed in a bitter battle over school busing, debating whether children should be sent to schools in different neighborhoods to promote racial diversity."

Joe Biden. (photo: Sun Sentinel)
Joe Biden. (photo: Sun Sentinel)


Joe Biden Has a History of Racist Comments

By Matt Viser, The Washington Post

09 March 19

 

hen Joe Biden was a freshman senator in the mid-1970s, his home state of Delaware, like other hotspots across the country, was engulfed in a bitter battle over school busing, debating whether children should be sent to schools in different neighborhoods to promote racial diversity.

Biden took a lead role in the fight, speaking out repeatedly and forcefully against sending white children to majority-black schools and black children to majority-white schools. He played down the persistence of overt racism and suggested that the government should have a limited role in integration.

�I do not buy the concept, popular in the �60s, which said, �We have suppressed the black man for 300 years and the white man is now far ahead in the race for everything our society offers. In order to even the score, we must now give the black man a head start, or even hold the white man back, to even the race,� � Biden told a Delaware-based weekly newspaper in 1975. �I don�t buy that.�

In language that bears on today�s debate about whether descendants of slaves should be compensated, he added, �I don�t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather. I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation. And I�ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.�

Biden�s statements 44 years ago represent one of the earliest chapters in his well-documented record on racial issues, during which he generally has worked alongside African American leaders and been embraced by them. He supported the extension of the Voting Rights Act, amendments to the Fair Housing Act, sanctions against apartheid South Africa and the creation of a holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr. In 2010, he pushed to roll back sentencing that many believed exacerbated racial disparities.

But Biden and civil rights leaders also have occasionally parted ways, and his career probably would be viewed through a new lens if he decides to run for president in a Democratic Party that has moved to the left and grown more ethnically diverse, even in the years since he was elected vice president.

African American voters are expected to play a pivotal role in the party�s nomination in 2020, and groups such as Black Lives Matter are pressing candidates to confront difficult questions about race. Although many civil rights leaders agree that busing did not play out in an ideal way, they often say it was a necessary effort, given that white-run school districts were doing little to integrate even 20 years after the Supreme Court�s 1954 landmark desegregation ruling in Brown v. Board of Education.

Cornell William Brooks, a former president of the NAACP, said in an interview that he has personal affection for Biden, but that he was taken aback upon being read portions of the 1975 interview.

�If you said something like that in 2019, there would be a response to that that would be pretty harsh,� said Brooks, a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School. �Having served as vice president to the first African American president in U.S. history, and given all that he�s seen in the intervening years, I would be stunned if he would stand behind that.�

Biden, 76, declined to be interviewed for this article. But his spokesman, Bill Russo, said the former vice president still believes he was right to oppose busing.

�He never thought busing was the best way to integrate schools in Delaware � a position which most people now agree with,� Russo said. �As he said during those many years of debate, busing would not achieve equal opportunity. And it didn�t.�

Russo said Biden has a distinguished history of working for civil rights and against segregation. As a young man, Russo said, Biden fought to desegregate a movie theater in Delaware, and worked as the only white employee at a largely black swimming pool.

�Joe Biden is today � and has been for more than 40 years in public life � one of the strongest and most powerful voices for civil rights in America,� Russo said. �His long commitment to civil rights has repeatedly been recognized by many of the most important civil rights organizations in America.�

Biden�s office provided a statement from Ralph G. Neas, former executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, who said: �We disagreed on busing .?.?. but I always looked to Biden as a leader in the field of civil rights in other critical areas.�

Beyond particular policies, Biden�s supporters say he has established trust with civil rights leaders and earned considerable goodwill from serving as vice president to the nation�s first black president.

But the 1975 interview highlights how the landscape has shifted since Biden entered national politics, capturing a Senate seat in 1972 at age 29.

Biden in recent years has expressed regret for several episodes in his past, such as what many women�s rights advocates considered his weak efforts in 1991, as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, to protect Anita Hill after she accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Biden also has voiced contrition for pushing a tough-on-crime bill in 1994 that many African Americans viewed as unfair and overly harsh.

Although civil rights leaders may object to Biden�s past statements about busing, his decision to stand by his views on the issue illustrate what some of his supporters think would be his advantage in the 2020 field: his ability to appeal beyond the Democratic base to some working-class white voters who voted for Donald Trump in 2016.

Biden, after all, was a vocal opponent of busing as the issue was raging nationwide � including in his hometown.

He wrote columns for local newspapers and pushed legislation requiring courts to consider solutions besides busing, often siding with conservatives such as Sen. Jesse Helms (N.C.), who welcomed Biden �to the ranks of the enlightened.�

Biden�s 1975 interview, which covered a range of topics, was conducted by a publication based in Newark, Del., referred to as the People Paper. It was printed in the Congressional Record at the request of Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho), who praised Biden�s comments, and went largely unnoticed thereafter. A Democrat who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic pointed out the original interview to The Washington Post, citing a concern that Biden�s positions could be problematic for the party.

In the interview, Biden dismissed government efforts to impose diversity in schools. �We�ve lost our bearings since the 1954 Brown vs. School Board desegregation case,� he said. �To �desegregate� is different than to �integrate.� .?.?. I am philosophically opposed to quota systems. They insure mediocrity.�

If anything, he said, it was busing plans that were racist.

�The new integration plans being offered are really just quota systems to assure a certain number of blacks, Chicanos, or whatever in each school. That, to me, is the most racist concept you can come up with,� Biden said. �What it says is, �In order for your child with curly black hair, brown eyes, and dark skin to be able to learn anything, he needs to sit next to my blond-haired, blue-eyed son.� That�s racist! Who the hell do we think we are, that the only way a black man or woman can learn is if they rub shoulders with my white child?�

Russo said Biden�s argument was that everyone deserves the same opportunity. �Regardless of what Zip code you�re born in, you should be entitled to a good education,� he said. �That�s the point he�s making here.�

Biden�s election to the Senate came eight years after the Civil Rights Act was passed, at a time when states and cities nationwide were wrestling with how to handle segregated schools. Although the Supreme Court had declared segregation unconstitutional in 1954, many schools remained divided because their surrounding neighborhoods were racially monolithic. And majority-black schools generally had far fewer resources.

Courts ordered some cities to bus children across town to create a more balanced education system. But what black families called �integration� many white families called �forced busing,� complaining of long bus rides that severed the link between kids and their local schools. Violence over the issue broke out in cities such as Boston.

Against that backdrop, Biden, a rising political star, took aim at a 1974 court order directing Delaware to submit plans for desegregating Wilmington-area schools � an edict that was highly unpopular with many of his constituents.

Ultimately, Wilmington schools in 1978 implemented a plan merging one urban district with 10 suburban ones, and busing students so that they spend nine consecutive years in what had been a historically white school and three years in what had been a historically black school. By 1995 a federal court determined the schools were no longer segregated.

�The courts have gone overboard in their interpretation of what is required to remedy unlawful segregation,� Biden said in the 1975 interview. �It is one thing to say that you cannot keep a black man from using this bathroom, and something quite different to say that one out of every five people who use this bathroom must be black.�

Biden�s stance put him at odds with Sen. Edward Brooke (R-Mass.), the chamber�s only African American, who called one of Biden�s amendments �the greatest symbolic defeat for civil rights since 1964.�

Jeffrey A. Raffel, who was executive director of the Delaware Committee on the School Decision in the 1970s, said it was hard for any political leader in the state to be pro-busing at the time, given the public passions against it.

�The political situation there was poison in terms of supporting busing � it was really, really tough,� he said. �There were very few people going around saying, �Busing is a good thing, we should support busing.� In that atmosphere, Biden was the center. How do you deal with that when 85 percent of your constituency is against it?�

Biden�s statements in the People Paper appear to be among his most aggressive on the subject.

�I oppose busing. It�s an asinine concept, the utility of which has never been proven to me,� he said. �I�ve gotten to the point where I think our only recourse to eliminate busing may be a constitutional amendment.�

Biden recognized that such comments could prompt some to lump him in with racists. �The unsavory part about this is when I come out against busing, as I have all along, I don�t want to be mixed up with a George Wallace,� he said, referring to the segregationist governor of Alabama.

�The real problem with busing,� he said, was that �you take people who aren�t racist, people who are good citizens, who believe in equal education and opportunity, and you stunt their children�s intellectual growth by busing them to an inferior school .?.?. and you�re going to fill them with hatred.�

He contended that being bused, while bad for white students, hurts black children, too. An African American child is sent to a white school in a wealthy neighborhood, then �back to the ghetto. How can he be encouraged to love his white brothers? He doesn�t need a look at �the other side,� he needs the chance to get out of the ghetto permanently,� Biden said.

Civil rights leaders have largely considered Biden a strong ally, but there have also been disputes, especially during his long tenure heading the Senate Judiciary Committee. When Biden chaired the 1991 confirmation hearings for Thomas, now a Supreme Court justice, Hill�s supporters criticized him for allowing her to be attacked and declining to allow witnesses who might have bolstered her account. Biden has said he owes Hill an apology.

At an event on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in January, Biden repeated earlier statements of regret for supporting tough-on-crime measures in the 1990s, which included provisions now widely considered racially discriminatory and at least partly responsible for current incarceration rates, in which African Americans are significantly over-represented.

�The bottom line is we have a lot to root out, but most of all the systematic racism that most of us whites don�t like to acknowledge even exists,� Biden said during a breakfast held by the Rev. Al Sharpton and the National Action Network. �We don�t even consciously acknowledge it. But it�s been built into every aspect of our system.�

Forty-four years earlier, Biden was challenged during the interview on whether he believed he was a liberal despite his anti-busing stance. He said that he was, and that he favored other ways to help African Americans, including more spending.

�It is true that the white man has suppressed the black man, and continues to suppress the black man. It is harder to be black than to be white,� Biden said. �But you have to open up avenues for blacks without closing avenues for whites; you don�t hold society back to let one segment catch up. You put more money into the black schools for remedial reading programs, you upgrade facilities, you upgrade opportunities, open up housing patterns. You give everybody a piece of the action.�

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
Email This Page

 

Comments  

We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.

General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.

Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.

- The RSN Team

 
-13 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-12-15 10:20
Chicken Little

Chicken Little
Stood around
Underneath a tree.
Something fell and
Hit her head.
She said, "Goodness me!"

"Oh my goodness!"
She did screech.
"The sky is falling!"
She ran around
Yelling out,
"We must tell the king!"

Goosey Loosey
Was the first
To hear Chicken's tale.
I think they both
Must have been
Drinking too much ale.

Goosey Loosey,
Chicken, too,
Saw Ducky Lucky.
They told him, and
Then he said,
"That is quite sucky."


I'm just tired of the "sky is falling" kind of journalism when it comes to the republican party. It is not. The republicans are indeed divided but they know how to come together when they needs. Sadly, the same cannot be said for democrats, whose divisions are really driving the party into national political irrelevance. OK, the republican lost in Alabama, but the was a terrible candidate who'd lost twice for governor and was removed from the supreme court.

The republican party is not the party of Trump. It is the party of big money and of winning. It will use whatever wedge issues it needs to win. And it has mearly perfect the techniques to voter suppression and vote rigging.

The Trump-Gillibran d spat is something both want. Before this most people never heard of Gillibrand. And Trump get to be seen as standing up to a liberal.
 
 
+15 # Wally Jasper 2017-12-15 12:50
I agree, Rodion. Don't know why you're getting negatives. Americans across the board are tired of establishment politics driven by the billionaire class and their corporate greed. Frank Rich doesn't even want to mention the divide within the Democratic Party, as he is equally adverse to a true progressive as he is to the alt-right end of the spectrum. Corporate Dems. will not offer the fix that is needed in our country, no matter that they are way more appealing than the scummy gang of thieves now in charge of government. By the way, if you missed it, take a look at Jeremy Corbyn's fine speech to the UN Conference in Geneva that was carried by RSN. This is where the global majority wants to go.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/47306-time-for-a-fundamental-break-with-the-world-order
 
 
+9 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-12-16 08:13
Yes I read the Corbyn speech. It was excellent. This is the direction that the Demo party needs to take. But it is not. It is purging members who hold these views and solidifying the control of the corporate faction. These Demos seem content to be the junior party to Republicans in the oligarchic control of the US government.
 
 
+5 # vicnada 2017-12-16 09:57
 
 
+1 # vicnada 2017-12-16 10:53
Jeremy Corbyn's is the speech for Advent 2017. Thanks for posting.
 
 
+9 # RMF 2017-12-15 13:50
Your apology for the GOP, whether intendced or not I cannot say, does not in any way change the metrics outlined above by Mr. Rich -- that is, Trump remains 85 percent popular with GOP voters, but the GOP party itself only commands about a 30+ percent favorable rating among all voters.

In contrast the Dems, rather than being divided as you claim, appear to be presenting a united political alternative to Trumpism, and in this respect is the direct and forceful opposite of sliding into "national political irrelevance" as you maintain.

Indeed, the Dems defining opposition to sex harassment will energize women voters from the independent group, as well as chip away at the 15 percent or so of GOP voters who still seem to have a brain.

In short, the GOP has made such a mess for their own party's outlook that all the Dems need do is avoid any big mistakes -- the rest of the work and all the heavy lifting has been done by the GOP on behalf of the Dems.
 
 
+12 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2017-12-16 08:20
RMF -- I definitely don't intend an apology for the GOP. Sorry it sounds that way. I'm just tired of so-called liberals telling us that Trump or the republicans are on the brink of collapse. They have been doing this now for nearly 2 years and the republicans or Trump is not collapsing.

Why not talk about the 1000 elected offices that democrats have lost to republicans just since Obama took office. Here's a map showing how much of the nation is controlled by republicans:

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/11/14/1598918/-Republicans-now-dominate-state-government-with-32-legislatures-and-33-governors


An honest assessment shows the democratic party in collapse. This is what I care about. The republican party is the party of big business and banks. In the 1980s, the Democratic Leadership Council decided that if the Democratic party could also become the party of big business and banks, it would begin to win elections again. It has only lost steadily.

If the Democratic party were an honest progressive or democratic socialist party and gave up its support for war, the CIA, and the like, it would easily be the majority party in the US.

That's what I care about. You can't change the democratic party by telling people the republicans are about to collapse. That is as much as to tell democrats that they don't need to change. They are fine.
 
 
0 # Depressionborn 2017-12-19 04:20
yep a Trump action plan for good old USA!

"The strategy repudiates many of the security and foreign policies of the former President Barack Obama who sought to subordinate American power and influence in seeking greater comity with foreign states and international organizations.

The strategy reflects many of Trump's presidential campaign statements and promises that brought him to power, such as the need for tighter immigration controls, including a border wall, adopting trade policies more directly favorable to U.S. interests, increasing defense spending, and for the first time since the end of the Cold War, aggressively promoting American ideals such as liberty, constitutional democracy, and free trade."
 
 
-3 # gdsharpe 2017-12-15 13:59
"mearly"?
 
 
+11 # futhark 2017-12-15 21:03
The Republican Party is doomed by demographics. Their policies insult and assault younger voters, people who have no first-hand memories of when America was "great", leading the world in military power and in being able to bully and exploit other nations without fear of blow back. The rising generation wants a society in which one doesn't have to live in fear of poor health, massive student loan debt, or a degraded natural environment. The Republicans seem to want to turn the clock back to the days of President "Silent Cal" Coolidge in the 1920s, when prosperity was being delivered by an overvalued stock market and unregulated corporate greed. Pick up any U.S. history textbook to discover the result.

I've worked with adolescents as a high school teacher for almost 40 years and am confident that, while they may do foolish things occasionally, they are not so dumb as to sacrifice their futures to the stupidity of the Cheeto Mussolini.

We are looking to the Democrats to produce a sensible alternative that inspires hope and action. Defending and extending the New Deal looks to me the next step forward.
 
 
+1 # DongiC 2017-12-17 13:01
I heartily agree with your position and, I too, taught high school students for almost 40 years. Today's kids are not so dumb as to tie their future to the true deplorables in our society - the GOP.
 
 
+2 # kyzipster 2017-12-16 09:53
If the Republican Party is not the party of Trump, how do you account for 86% approval within the party? I understand what you're saying about the GOP establishment, reflected in Trump's agenda, but his white supremacy and the rest of his 'populism' very much reflects the GOP base.

I think the article is one of the best analysis of where we find ourselves that I've seen. A realistic take on strengths and weaknesses of both sides. I think the midterms will be devastating for Republicans but as the article points out, Democrats could still screw it up.

Trump is the biggest motivator of Republican opposition I've seen. Once he's gone, Republicans will regain their strength unless Democrats do something to move in a progressive direction, I don't see that happening.

Living in the south, I've always been mystified by Republicans strength here. Huge percentages of African Americans, a growing immigrant population. Parts of my city are beginning to look like California when I lived there, very diverse. Almost every urban area votes 'blue', reflecting a decent percentage of white liberals.

Virginia and Alabama revealed that there are enough more liberal voters but they don't vote normally. We can rightfully blame Democrats but I think we can rightfully blame voters also. If we did put Democrats in office, we could challenge the establishment in the primaries with progressive candidates. That's what the Tea Party has done, that's how Trump won the nomination.
 
 
-9 # Enoch E Birch 2017-12-15 11:31
So even Pence is preferable?
 
 
+6 # Jim Young 2017-12-15 13:32
Looking back, I would have preferred impeachment investigations of G.W. Bush, whether they removed him from office or not.

I think most feared Cheney as much as many now fear Pence, but that can not be allowed to prevent real investigation (actually impeachment like all the previous ones that did not result in direct removal from office, just one resignation).

"People have to know whether or not their President is a Crook." ~ Richard Nixon ~

The impeachments did force major changes in behavior.

Even though they did not result in the conviction (and removal directed by the Senate) of Andrew Johnson, Nixon (who technically admitted guilt with the Pardon he accepted after resigning), nor Bill Clinton, they did very much to change future behavior of (only elected as Vice President succeeding Lincoln when he was assassinated)An drew Johnson in particular, and many others under Presidents who's certain behaviors they could not risk legal consequences or moral dilemmas in continuing to serve while meeting their oaths.

There is a credible case to be made for removal for impaired Mental Health, too (which in cases like Woodrow Wilson, and perhaps Warren Harding, could apply under Mental or Physical Health limitations for however long required).
 
 
+1 # kyzipster 2017-12-16 13:18
I heard a really good argument by a conservative Constitutional scholar that at the very minimum, Bush/Cheney should have been censured. It sounds like a wimpy compromise but he made a good case for it. A way to hold them accountable if Congress was unwilling to impeach, the main outcome would have been a thorough investigation of criminality. I left the Democratic Party in those years, refusing to even hold hearings. A few Dems did it, they were put in a room in a basement, only broadcast on Cspan.
 
 
+9 # elizabethblock 2017-12-15 14:52
Trump won't resign unless he can frame it as a victory. He never loses, after all.
And no, I do NOT want President Pence! He would be able to do all the horrible stuff that Trump has been unable to. He looks respectable, and the country would be so relieved that we would give him free rein.
 
 
+12 # Farafalla 2017-12-15 16:28
" It remains essential that NBC and the producer Mark Burnett release any evidence of Trump criminality contained in videos or files from The Apprentice."

Yes, his tirades against black people, his utter contempt for women. Had NBC released just a tiny bit of the outtakes at the Apprentice, Trump would not be president right now.
 
 
+1 # ReconFire 2017-12-17 11:56
Agree, NBC is not going to cook their golden goose, he's too good for ratings and their wallets.
 
 
+18 # GeorgePenman 2017-12-15 19:10
Republicans are not doing what people want, nor are they doing anything to fix our problems.

Instead they are attempting to pass large tax cuts for their donors, They pay for it by running up the deficit and extracting
wealth from the underclass. They have no problem removing millions from
health insurance, but say thy are 'pro-life'.

As they run up debt, they will work to cut back Social Security, Medicare, and other programs that vulnerable depend on.

Because their agenda is unpopular they need to suppress voters, gerrymander, and in a variety of ways suppress democracy.

They deserve to lose big time.

http://gopiswrong.com/democracy.htm
 
 
+3 # futhark 2017-12-15 20:46
"...his (President Trump's) diet of junk food and Diet Coke."

Is the president getting ready for a twinkie defense if he is ever held accountable for ordering an irresponsible military action, such as starting a nuclear war?
 
 
+1 # ReconFire 2017-12-17 11:59
Who will hold him accountable after a nuclear war, we will all be gone?
 
 
+1 # LionMousePudding 2017-12-18 02:20
The Twinkies will undoubtedly survive
 
 
+1 # chapdrum 2017-12-16 19:46
The GOP is not "about to tumble" anywhere, to the lasting regret of every sane person in the country.
 
 
0 # Depressionborn 2017-12-17 19:57
Trump is anti-establishm ent, both parties are re pleat with Globalist profiteers and anti
constitution.

" President Trump is just a man that believes in the majority of U.S. constitutional issues, common sense issues, U.S. sovereignty, real authentic science, a strong growing U.S. economy and America exceptionalism, but to many Americans and Western leaders Trump is the devil and the anti Christ who is a super threat to all secular globalist aspirations and a threat to global elitist and their power grab for a global tyrannical rule."

follow the money and expect war.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN