RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Excerpt: "Senator Bernie Sanders would begin a 2020 presidential bid with 2.1 million online donors, a massive lead among low-dollar contributors that is roughly equivalent to the donor base of all the other Democratic hopefuls combined."

Bernie Sanders. (photo: Antonella Crescimbeni)
Bernie Sanders. (photo: Antonella Crescimbeni)


Bernie Sanders Has a Massive Lead in Online Donors

By Shane Goldmacher, Lisa Lerer and Rachel Shorey, The New York Times

09 February 19

 

enator Bernie Sanders would begin a 2020 presidential bid with 2.1 million online donors, a massive lead among low-dollar contributors that is roughly equivalent to the donor base of all the other Democratic hopefuls combined.

Beto O’Rourke, the former Texas congressman who narrowly lost a Senate race last year, is also poised to be a fund-raising phenom if he runs for president: He has twice as many online donors as anyone eyeing the race besides Mr. Sanders.

Three senators who are already running have their own solid track records with small donors. Senator Elizabeth Warren, with the third-highest number, has notable strength in New Hampshire, even topping Mr. O’Rourke there. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has built up broad national support among small donors, despite a reputation as a big-money fund-raiser, while Senator Kamala Harris raised $1.5 million online in her first 24 hours as a presidential candidate.

Email This Page

READ MORE

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
-30 # pegasus4508 2019-02-09 19:43
I'm on Bernie's donor list and he won't get a dime from me. Not this time...
 
 
+12 # USADUDE 2019-02-09 21:23
Guess I’ll double my contribution.
 
 
-1 # jimallyn 2019-02-13 13:43
Quoting USADUDE:
Guess I’ll double my contribution.

Me too.
 
 
+2 # economagic 2019-02-09 21:24
So who ya backin'?

I'm not sending anyone one red cent until I've read the entire health care bill and something more substantial on the GND than the resolution. I love most everything there, but right now it's strictly aspirational, pie in the sky (by and by), and with zip on how we actually achieve the "Great Mobilization," which if it occurs will make that for the "Second World War" (actually Part II of the First) look like a Sunday School Picnic in scope and scale and in "blood, toil, tears, and sweat" (what Churchill actually said).

In the meantime I have a tall stack of solicitations from Pelosi and Company. As soon as I finish MY draft of a Green New Deal I'm going to start sending them to her,with the "surveys" redacted and a copy of my version of a GND tucked inside. I would even be willing to pay the postage on a few of them.
 
 
+6 # Moxa 2019-02-09 22:08
Why not?
 
 
+9 # pushingforpeace 2019-02-09 23:06
Already donated and would again.
 
 
+3 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2019-02-10 07:38
The NYT would like us to focus on fundraising. It has always promoted the idea that money is speech. The one who raises the most money should and will win.

Political elections are not about money. They are about issues and political positions. What does Sanders stand for? That is the only question that matters.

The US needs to get money out of politics. Media like the NYT are the biggest obstacle to that. The NYT is the mouthpiece for American oligarchs and they win when everything is about money. By keeping the focus on money, the NYT swings the attention of voters to the candidates the oligarchs want to win.


Political positions are all that matter. The media should be forced by law to cover all candidates equally, no matter how much money they have raised.
 
 
-1 # Thomas Martin 2019-02-11 22:05
"The US needs to get money out of politics." Yes, I know you're talking about fundraising in politics, but its worth emphasizing, and feeling good about, our growing movement for achieving economic fairness (as well as a lot more.) How about Bernie Sanders for President, with one of the special people mentioned in the article, as VP?
 
 
+9 # Wise woman 2019-02-10 09:05
This is very good news so early in the game when Bernie hasn't even announced his candidacy. It really shows how much the American people want him to be president. I hope this wittles down the present aspirants so we don't have a rerun of the Republican side show!
 
 
+8 # Forbes 2019-02-10 09:50
Got my $2700 ready for the day he announces. I would like Elizabeth Warren for VP, so expect I will be contributing to her also.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN