Excerpt: "Taser death is a form of police violence that is claiming lives in the United States despite being called non-lethal."
Taser poses real risk to people's lives and at least 49 died from it in 2018. (photo: Jim Slosiarek/The Gazette/Canadian Press)
Tasers Claimed 49 Lives in 2018 Through Police Violence
04 February 19
There have been a total of at least 1,081 deaths after the use of Tasers since the weapon began coming into widespread use in the early 2000s.
aser death is a form of police violence that is claiming lives in the United States despite being called non-lethal, a recent Reuters report revealed.
Warren Ragudo died after two Taser shocks by police intervening in a family altercation. Ramzi Saad died after a Taser shock by police during a dispute between Saad and his mother. Chinedu Okobi died after police used a Taser to subdue him in a confrontation they blamed on his refusal to stop walking in traffic.
All three were unarmed. All three had histories of mental illness. And all three died last year in a single northern California county, San Mateo.
They were among at least 49 people who died in 2018 after being shocked by police with a Taser, a similar number as in the previous two years, according to a Reuters review of police records, news reports, and court documents.
The deaths typically draw little public scrutiny � no government agency tracks how often Tasers are used or how many of those deployments prove fatal, and coroners and medical examiners use varying standards to assess a Taser's role in the death. But some communities now are considering more restrictive Taser policies following allegations that the weapons were used excessively or deployed against people with physical or mental conditions that put them at higher risk of death or injury.
Among 14 police departments, five are reviewing their Taser policies; three had conducted reviews and made no changes, and five declined to comment because investigations into the incidents were still ongoing.
A total of at least 1,081 U.S. deaths following the use of Tasers, almost all since the weapons began coming into widespread use in the early 2000s have been documented. In many of those cases, the Taser, which fires a pair of barbed darts that deliver a paralyzing electrical charge, was combined with other force, such as hand strikes or restraint holds.
The California county board of supervisors and the district attorney launched ongoing reviews of the use and safety of Tasers, which were touted by police and the weapon�s manufacturer as a near-perfect, �non-lethal� weapon when they began coming into widespread use more than a decade ago.
There is a need to reevaluate �the proper role for Tasers and how and when they are engaged,� Dave Pine, a member of the Board of Supervisors said. Until then, �I personally think it would be appropriate to have a moratorium on their use.�
Most independent researchers who have studied Tasers say deaths are rare when they are used properly, but in a series of reports in 2017, it was found that many police officers are not trained properly on the risks and weapons are often misused.
Axon Enterprise Inc., the Taser�s manufacturer argues that most cause-of-death rulings implicating its weapons are misinformed and said that Tasers, while "not risk-free," are "the most safe and effective less-lethal use of force tool available to law enforcement.�
Many cases involved high-risk subjects, such as people agitated by drugs or mental illness, people with heart problems, people who are very young or very old or very frail.
At least half those who died after Taser shocks last year fell into one or more of those categories. As in previous years, about 90 percent were unarmed and nearly a quarter had a history of mental illness.
As police departments have become more aware of Tasers� risks and limitations, a growing number have restricted their use, said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) think tank. Still, many officers remain unaware of the hazards when they encounter those vulnerable to a Taser's shock, Wexler warns.
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/266-32/12778-in-hiroshimas-shadow
Brilliant! But I think they'd stand a better chance of getting one from the Pakistanis, who are fellow Muslims. A Halal bomb, if you will.
How the Islamic bomb saga plays out is a question discussed in strategic think tanks around the world. Anyone with some initiative can gain insights to the Muslim Mullah mission by reading George Grant's "The Blood Of The Moon".
Lacking nukes; because high school biology & chemistry enables WMD proliferation, getting off oil ASAP is best US course to step back from foreign conflicts, at a minimum. Chem/bio smuggled in containers and used in an attack shall seal commerce across US borders & spell end of the globalization Ponzi scheme.
This plays out with a disastrous war in the Middle East, and a "Fortress America" era while the rest of the world ebbs and flows until the residual conflicts play out. America's ability to maintain societal cohesion on 1/2 current oil consumption depends on how quickly US pre-1950's railway capacity & reach is put back together.
No coincidence Mein Kampf and Qur'anic threats center on Jews. Because the world does not defang Iran/Pakistan/N orth Korea, we all share inevitable consequences. Happy motoring!
I'm concerned about nuclear issues, and I am more concerned about Iraq than I am about the US, but it is not THE major issue of the day.
We need to get all the information out, as well as the solutions, and stop flitting from one minor issue to another, what's important is the future of this nation. The future of social security, medicare, medicaid, education, health care, housing, etc.
Yes, it's true that even the 2,500 or so currently deployed are enough to decimate the planet, but what is being recommended here is unilateral disarmament. If you think that will work, ask your local terrorist cell what they think.
There is an obvious contradiction built into our official rationalization for these weapons. If nuclear weapons deter war, why do we insist on preventing some nations from obtaining them? Obviously because WE do not wish to be deterred.
Right now, war is highly likely in the Near East exactly because Israel has the bomb and Iran does not. If Iran did have it, then the two nations could revert to Cold War status, satisfied with incursions, assassinations, economic warfare, and such standard stuff.
Getting rid of them all would be far preferable. But if Oppenheimer and Garwin are right, we (or our leaders) are not sane enough to do that.
just about everything these days can be
hacked by computers perhaps such weapons could be rendered inoperable by a computer hacker.
Who knows maybe that has already happened.
Why? Because no country could ever be sure that somne other country had really gotten rid of its stockpile. And in any case, even a "near zero" regime would leave countries with the capacity to kill millions instantly.