Poulsen writes: "Russian oligarchs and Kremlin apparatchiks may find the tables turned on them later this week when a new leak site unleashes a compilation of hundreds of thousands of hacked emails and gigabytes of leaked documents."
Vladimir Putin. (image: Lyne Lucien/The Daily Beast)
Major Leak of Russian Documents Expected Soon
26 January 19
The Russian oligarchs and Kremlin apparatchiks spared by WikiLeaks in the past will not be so lucky this week, when transparency activists drop a massive archive of leaked docs.
ussian oligarchs and Kremlin apparatchiks may find the tables turned on them later this week when a new leak site unleashes a compilation of hundreds of thousands of hacked emails and gigabytes of leaked documents. Think of it as WikiLeaks, but without Julian Assange�s aversion to posting Russian secrets.
The site, Distributed Denial of Secrets, was founded last month by transparency activists. Co-founder Emma Best said the Russian leaks, slated for release Friday, will bring into one place dozens of different archives of hacked material that, at best, have been difficult to locate, and in some cases appear to have disappeared entirely from the web.
�Stuff from politicians, journalists, bankers, folks in oligarch and religious circles, nationalists, separatists, terrorists operating in Ukraine,� said Best, a national-security journalist and transparency activist. �Hundreds of thousands of emails, Skype and Facebook messages, along with lots of docs.�
Distributed Denial of Secrets, or DDoS, is a volunteer effort that launched last month. Its objective is to provide researchers and journalists with a central repository where they can find the terabytes of hacked and leaked documents that are appearing on the internet with growing regularity. The site is a kind of academic library or a museum for leak scholars, housing such diverse artifacts as the files North Korea stole from Sony in 2014, and a leak from the Special State Protection Service of Azerbaijan.
The site�s Russia section already includes a leak from Russia�s Ministry of the Interior, portions of which detailed the deployment of Russian troops to Ukraine at a time when the Kremlin was denying a military presence there. Though some material from that leak was published in 2014, about half of it wasn�t, and WikiLeaks reportedly rejected a request to host the files two years later, at a time when Julian Assange was focused on exposing Democratic Party documents passed to WikiLeaks by Kremlin hackers.
�A lot of what WikiLeaks will do is organize and re-publish information that�s appeared elsewhere,� said Nicholas Weaver, a researcher at the University of California at Berkeley�s International Computer Science Institute. �They�ve never done that with anything out of Russia.�
There�s no shortage of information out there. While barely known in the West, hacker groups like Shaltai Boltai, Ukrainian Cyber Alliance, and CyberHunta have been penetrating and exposing Russian secrets for years. Those leaks can be hard to find, though, particularly if you can�t read Russian.
Last year, Best agreed to help another journalist locate a particular Shaltai Boltai leak, a hunt that sent her into the world of Russian hacktivism. �Later I�m talking to some hackers�this is after DDoS� public launch�and they hooked me up with a few archives,� Best told The Daily Beast. �A couple gigabytes, something like that. I do some digging, ask around, and manage to stir up a good bit more.�
Once word got around that Best was collecting Russian hacks, the floodgates opened. In late December, the project was on the verge of publishing its Russia collection when �middle of the night, more files come in,� Best said. Then an organization with its own collection of Russia leaks opened its archives to Best and her colleagues.
The DDoS project compiled more than 200,000 emails into a spreadsheet for ease of searching. In all, its cache now contains 61 different leaks totaling 175 gigabytes, dwarfing, by quantity at least, Russia�s leaks against the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign.
The collection includes files from Alexander Budberg, a Russian columnist married to Dmitry Medvedev�s press secretary; Kirill Frolov, vice-director of the Kremlin-backed Institute for CIS Countries; and Vladislav Surkov, a top aide to Vladimir Putin who was hacked by CyberHunta in October 2016. The Surkov files contained documentary evidence of the Kremlin�s covert coordination with pro-Russia separatists within Ukraine, and though the Kremlin denounced the leak as a fake, several independent forensics examiners agreed the emails were the real deal.
DDoS differs from WikiLeaks in that it doesn�t solicit direct leaks of unpublished data�its focus is on compiling, organizing, and curating leaks that have already appeared somewhere in public. �Emma Best, I think, is someone who will actually do a good job,� said Weaver, citing Best�s aggressive use of the Freedom of Information Act to extract documents from recalcitrant U.S. agencies. �Things get so scattered that putting it all into one place is a huge benefit.�
In an age where leaks and counterleaks have become geopolitical blood sport, any secret-spilling organization has to weigh the risks of a hoax or a leak that�s been maliciously tampered with. DDoS mitigated that danger in its Russian email leaks using the same technique WikiLeaks employed to authenticate the DNC emails�verifying the cryptographic signatures added by the receiving mail server under a security standard called DKIM. �In order to fake that, post hoc, you need the mail server�s private key,� said Weaver. �So when you deal with mail dumps where you have DKIM signatures, tampering can only act to remove entries. You can�t add or modify.�
The DDoS project received some pushback ahead of its December launch over plans to include the 2015 Ashley Madison leak, which exposed thousands of users of the infidelity dating site. Best rethought the plan and now keeps that leak offline, along with other sensitive database breaches primarily affecting people who aren�t public figures.
Though the project is less than two months old, Best is already feeling the creeping paranoia that comes with publishing secrets. At one point, while compiling the Russia leaks, she and her colleagues thought they detected signs of potential �cyber shenanigans� aimed at interfering with the release. They reacted quickly.
�We moved things up and sent copies to several servers and arranged for some secure offline storage by third parties,� she said. It may have been nothing, Best added. �We opted for caution.�
THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community. |
Comments
We are concerned about a recent drift towards vitriol in the RSN Reader comments section. There is a fine line between moderation and censorship. No one likes a harsh or confrontational forum atmosphere. At the same time everyone wants to be able to express themselves freely. We'll start by encouraging good judgment. If that doesn't work we'll have to ramp up the moderation.
General guidelines: Avoid personal attacks on other forum members; Avoid remarks that are ethnically derogatory; Do not advocate violence, or any illegal activity.
Remember that making the world better begins with responsible action.
- The RSN Team
Thank you, Frank Rich.
I used to love 60-Minutes. I watched Mike Wallace and Dan Rather do REAL reporting and I felt like I actually learned about something important after watching it. I felt that the story about Tora Bora was very believable but nothing came of it. Supposedly, Cheney himself told them to stand down when they had OBL trapped and in their sites. Now; I don't know if anything they've reported is true or just a "made for T.V. drama".
They fired Dan Rather for having a shady source for his expose' on GWB but never denied the validity of any of the data.
All I can say is, America needs a news service that actually uncovers real information and one that can be trusted. I won't be watching 60-Minutes anymore. A mistake can be overlooked but a hoax is something different.
It seems that FOX has set a new standard for "success" in the "news" business in America. And all of America has lost because of that.
I suspect that Karl Rove, in a moment of pure genius, decided the best way to defuse Bush's lost year on AWOL would be to trap a well-known correspondent with easily forged and easily exposed papers.
It if was Karl, you've got to hand it to the sleazy bastard, it worked!
Isn't it amazing how the media is simply a political toy now?
A friend recently told me he believes being a whore is the only real legitimate profession: because whores admit to being whores.
A hoax indeed, in the spirit of the New York Times' WMD reports about Iraq.
Isn't it amazing how the media is simply a political toy now?
A friend recently told me he believes being a whore is the only real legitimate profession: because whores admit to being whores.
Sometimes, fredboy, you are prevented from even whore legitimacy: I was told that I was not a real prostitute by a member of a sexworkers association:SWO P. I had ( or so I thought) been a prostitute for 3 months back in 1986 when I was homeless and desperate. "You were not a real prostitute", this SWOP member told me, to my great surprize. I sure do get REAL "stigma" though, because I went public with what I did to survive for those 3 months in 1986 (what did I do, if not sell sex for money, I wonder????)
I believe that Bush II had planned for the catastrophe he created to blow up on the next president's watch. He just planned it incorrectly, like he did everything else.
I see that your hard time happened during the Reagan administration too. I'm glad you made it. A lot of people don't make it through these planned catastrophes that profit the rich and destroy the poor.
As for myself, I remember being out of work for months and couldn't find a job to save my life.
We in California had to put up with Reagan 8 years longer than the rest of the nation. He was a B rated actor but an A++, award winning political actor.
Our political class and most journalists are obvious whores. The only surprise is what cheap whores they are.
CBS was founded by William Paley, who was head of propaganda for the Army Psychological Warfare Division during WW II.
CBS was owned by Westinghouse, which was one of the world's largest military contractors.
CBS was then merged with Viacom, which was founded by Summer Redstone who was in "Special Branch Military Intelligence" during WW II.
"Consider the source" remains a relevant proscription.
Ooops ! You are placing your own ignorance on display, here, ptalady - no wonder our schools are being so dumbed down.
As a bit of a Grammar Nazi myself, may I suggest that, at a minimum, you take a few seconds to consult the dictionary before you presume to "correct" a word regarding which you are apparently clueless yourself ?
Look up "proscription", and you will discover that, not only is it a proper word, but that (as the author obviously knew), it makes *loads* more sense in the context to which it was applied than did your risible Church Lady insistence upon the word : "prescription".
Next we had her self-serving cries of victimization when she was attacked in Tahir square, easily targeted because she was obviously part of a well funded mainstream american media crew. The "Democracy Now" journalists, led by an egyptian national, far more skillfully and selflessly embedded themselves among the demonstrators and at far less cost.
She has at last, no credibility and no relevancy on issues of national importance. Meanwhile, where's Dan Rather?
The report was basically a right-wing dream. It implied that it was easy to get benefits and that there was widespread fraud. This is in spite of the fact that the approval rating is very low and that it often requires an attorney and at least one appeal to eventually get approved. And this is in spite of the fact that the average monthly benefit is around $1000.
So 60 Minutes recently has quite definitely fallen short of accurate and professional journalism. But it's amazing that, while the Benghazi story got all the attention, everyone seems to have forgotten the hatchet job piece on SSDI they ran about a month or so ago.
Her coochy-coo voice sickens me.
Whether he was there or not,... ultimately,... does it really matter?
Of course, what matters is "inventing the news and various phony crisises", which 60 Minutes is not usually known for;....that "news distortion" is usually done by Republicans . But, is this Dylan Davies guy - all there is - to the "Story of Bengazi?" What is the big deal? They didn't have enough security is what it boils down to. Republicans wouldn't "foot the bill". Shit happens.
60 Minutes made a terrible mistake, not vetting this guy & his story more (and perhaps even Lara Logan); especially since 60 Minutes was considered the "gold standard" so to speak, of reporting.
Bengazi to me, was a tragedy. Cutting off of people's hands in Sierra Leon was a tragedy. Sandy Hook was a tragedy. Wall Street's derivatives & the $700 Billion Dollar "no-regulations , no accountability" bank-give-away was a tragedy, 9/11 was a tragedy. And if we don't wake up, smell the coffee, and get personally involved in at least one issue, to help our country, our people, our planet and the world,.... then the dream of this country - will become the greatest "American Tragedy".
Yeah, it looks like we are at the tipping point and sliding toward despair.
So for me, CBS now has the credibility of Fox; as defined by their Benghazi coverage. I.e., lies presented as news reports.
I don't fault the reporter so much here as the CBS Management. The reporter is clearly only "reporting" what MANAGEMENT TOLD her to say!!!
CBS certainly knew what they were getting when they hired a Fox News guy to run their news programming.
The VERY LEAST response any RESPONSIBLE news source would make here would be to issue an entirely new program CONTAINING THE FACTS.
Apparently, that's not happening here.
So in essence, CBS is lying. And I can only assume they will continue to do so. It seems their policies now align with those of Fox News.
Walter Cronkite must be turning over in his grave to see CBS promulgating such OBVIOUS lies.
So basically, I expect the lies will get worse and more pervasive until they infect all of CBS' news programming.
Sad to see such a great news broadcaster turn to such a pitiful demise.
I saw the program. After 2-3 minutes I was sure it was a hoax not a mistake. CBS is the shadow of its past. I watched Walter Cronkite from day one until he passed away. It makes me sick to my stomach that CBS dishonored Walter Cronkite's memory. What can you expectfrom CBS/Fox News? As for Lara Logan she should be dumped in the waste bin. At least Ann Coulter is a "bimbo with a brain". Lara is neither a bimbo nor brainy. You wonder what "research" she carried with the "mercenary" whistleblower? Well, they must have tried a number of positions from the Kama Suthra and invented some new ones. Personally, I woulsn't touch her with a 10 foot pole.
Aygen,
Istanbul, Turkey
Wow ! Isn't perception an amazing thing ?
From my perspective, seeing Ann Coulter as being possessed of any more intelligence than it takes to be a bitchy, snarky, sniping Queen of the "Mean Girls" table in a seventh Grade lunchroom, is to vastly overestimating her intellect even more so than she herself is constantly doing.
Coulter knows how to sell attitude, that's all. So perhaps she, like Madonna, is a marketing genius. Blessed only with mediocre talent, both women have managed to build wildly undeserved financial fortunes. As does Paris Hilton on even less intelligence and talent.
Really, if Coulter wasn't promoted by Bill Maher and a few other acolytes, we would remain pleasantly unaware of her existence as long as we are not drawn to the "bomb thrower" section of bile-spewing logorrhea that passes in some circles for "books" these days.
Coulter angrily insists (at the drop of a hat) that she is a "best selling author". She herself is oblivious to the fact that peddling putrid bile does not place one in the same category as "authors", no mater how much people pay to hear her regurgitate her political porn.
If Ann Coulter is an example of a "bimbo with a brain" I would sorely grieve what that would say about human intelligence in general.
Can we now bury once and for all the myth of "liberal bias in the media"?