RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Cheney writes: "President Donald Trump's longtime political ally Roger Stone invoked the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination as he declined to share documents and testimony with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to a letter posted Tuesday by the committee's top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein."

Roger Stone. (photo: Joe Raedle)
Roger Stone. (photo: Joe Raedle)


Stone Pleads the Fifth to Snub Senate Document Request

By Kyle Cheney, Politico

05 December 18


Longtime Trump ally Roger Stone is under scrutiny in special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

resident Donald Trump's longtime political ally Roger Stone invoked the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination as he declined to share documents and testimony with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to a letter posted Tuesday by the committee's top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

"Mr. Stone's invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege must be understood by all to be the assertion of a Constitutional right by an innocent citizen who denounces secrecy," Stone's attorney, Grant Smith, said in the letter, dated Dec. 3.

Stone is under scrutiny in special counsel Robert Mueller's probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, in part over allegations that he had foreknowledge of WikiLeaks' dump of Clinton campaign emails the month before the election. Stone has denied any advance knowledge, despite a series of tweets foreshadowing the contents of the emails, which he attributed to educated guesses and indirect information provided through an intermediary with WikiLeaks.

Stone told POLITICO on Monday that he doesn't have a pact with Trump's legal team to share defense strategies, unlike former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who is in jail after being convicted of tax and bank fraud. But Stone has largely aligned his public messaging on Mueller with the president's, frequently bashing the special counsel's tactics.

Stone's approach earned him a supportive tweet from Trump this week, when the president praised Stone for having the "guts" to refuse to testify against him.

In his letter to Feinstein, Stone's attorney said his client simply wants his information aired in public, and not subject to selective leaks that marked his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee last year. Stone had asked for that appearance to be public, but the committee declined and interviewed him privately.

Smith also said Feinstein's request for documents was "far too overbroad, far too overreaching, far too wide ranging."

"Mr. Stone respectfully declines to produce any documents and declines the invitation for an interview," Smith wrote.

Smith noted he expects Stone's House Intelligence Committee testimony to be posted publicly in the next few weeks.

Robert Buschel, another Stone attorney, told POLITICO that his client's decision to spurn Feinstein's request was not a reflection of increasing legal peril from Mueller. Rather, he said, it's because the Senate Democratic minority "leaks too much."

"The Ranking minority member tweeted out Mr. Stone's letter without as much as contacting his counsel to discuss. This proves Mr. Stone's point," Buschel said.

Email This Page

e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
0 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-12-05 13:27
"his client simply wants his information aired in public, and not subject to selective leaks that marked his closed-door testimony to the House Intelligence Committee last year. "


Gee, Stone is saying the same thing that Comey said. Comey got a promise that transcripts of the whole testimony would be made public in hours after the testimony this Friday. Stone should get the same deal.

But the bigger issues is that so far all or almost all of the people indicted have been indicted because of their own words. In short, they incriminated themselves by taking to the police (Mueller, Senate, FBI). You have a constitutional right to prevent your own words and papers (emails, texts, etc) from being used against you. The constitutional thing to do is remain silent. Don't talk to them, don't give them any papers or records, don't give them anything. If there was a crime committed, they will know it without your having spoken at all.

All the crimes Mueller has discovered are products of his discovery (Manafort is somewhat of an exception). If there were no Mueller, there would be no crimes and no indictments.


From my perspective, leaking is good but it has to e complete and honest as Assange does. Selective leaking is the same as lying. That should be a crime in itself
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN