RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Crunden writes: "Environmental and health advocates want more information about the Trump administration's plans to house detained immigrants, including children, at two Texas military posts with a history of toxic contamination."

Fort Bliss, Texas. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty)
Fort Bliss, Texas. (photo: Joe Raedle/Getty)


Advocates Probe White House Plans to House Immigrants at Toxic Waste Sites

By E.A. Crunden, ThinkProgress

09 August 18


Detained immigrants would be kept near or on toxic waste sites slated for government cleanup.

nvironmental and health advocates want more information about the Trump administration’s plans to house detained immigrants, including children, at two Texas military posts with a history of toxic contamination.

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed Wednesday morning by the nonprofit legal group Earthjustice is asking the government for details about plans to keep immigrants at Fort Bliss in El Paso and Goodfellow Air Force Bases in San Angelo.

Fort Bliss is a source of particular concern for advocates — the area is listed as a Superfund, meaning that areas have been designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a priority for cleanup due to the dangers they pose to human health and the environment. At Goodfellow, tents meant to house people will be constructed directly over a former firing range, not far from an uncapped landfill.

“These waste sites have the potential to cause dangerous human exposure to toxic chemicals via air, water and soil to migrants housed in tent encampments and to workers constructing the detention camps,” the FOIA request reads.

“Because the Trump Administration plans to construct and house immigrant children and families on a greatly expedited schedule,” it continues, “timely receipt of the following information is required to inform the public of potential adverse impacts and to ensure the safety of those detained and those constructing the encampments.”

In addition to seeking information about where specifically immigrants will be held at Fort Bliss and Goodfellow, the FOIA is seeking data about 10 different polluted sites on the bases. The groups have also probed other potential bases under consideration for housing detained persons.

The request has been filed on behalf of health, labor, and environmental organizations including Alianza Nacional de Campesinas (Alianza), GreenLatinos, and the Southwest Environmental Center (SWEC). Lisa Evans, an attorney with Earthjustice who specializes in hazardous waste law, told ThinkProgress that advocates are unlikely to learn anything from the Department of Defense (DoD) without FOIA requests, prompting Earthjustice’s action on Wednesday.

“The public has a right to know what pollutants are in the base and where will innocent children be detained,” said David Baake, an attorney with SWEC, in a statement accompanying the FOIA announcement. “The surrounding community steadfastly opposes the Family Detention Policy, and should not be forced to contribute to suffering by hosting new detention centers in their backyard.”

Earthjustice has requested a response to the FOIA within 10 days given the expedited processing used by the group. Other organizations represented by Earthjustice in the request include the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), the National Hispanic Medical Association (NHMA), and the Hispanic Federation (HF).

Evans, the attorney, said Earthjustice is unclear what the FOIA will unearth at this stage, but that the organization is concerned about the proximity of immigrants to deadly toxins. Hazardous chemicals are scattered around Fort Bliss. There are also concerns that polyfluorinated compounds, or PFAS, could be in the area. In 2017, water testing at Fort Bliss found that certain sites had chromium and radiological contaminants.

Goodfellow, meanwhile, contains remediated sites, which are also a source of concern. Evans said it is not uncommon for sites that have been cleaned to require additional attention following remediation, after they are found to still pose a health and environmental hazard.

She pointed to an infamous 2005 housing development constructed at Fort Wainwright in Alaska, which has historically been Superfund-listed. Construction ultimately paused after workers reported strange odors and residue; cleanup of residual contaminants ultimately cost the military upwards of $15 million.

Immigrants housed at Goodfellow will seemingly be situated directly above a remediated area. Their accommodations are likely to mirror the same large tents previously used by the government to house detained immigrants, which offer minimal protection from outside elements.

At both Fort Bliss and Goodfellow, detained people — including very young children — could be in perilous proximity to toxins, posing an extreme health hazard.

“Lead-contaminated soil or lead dust could be a huge danger for young children, and lead (as well as arsenic and mercury) are often found on Superfund sites,” Evans said.

“Thus depending on the route of exposure, the substance involved, and the sensitivity of the victim, immigrants on Superfund sites could suffer from anything from asthma, to neurological damage, to organ damage, to cancer,” she explained. “It really depends on the chemical and extent of exposure.”

The Trump administration’s hardline immigration policies have been the source of extreme debate. The policy of separating children from their families met with national outrage several months ago, resulting in a pause on the practice. But immigrants are still being mass-detained, part of policies that date back through numerous Republican and Democratic administrations.

They’ve also been held at Superfund sites before now — at least one detention center, based in Tacoma, Washington, has held as many as nearly 1,500 detainees dating back to the Obama and Bush administrations.

Evans said legal protections are few and far between when it comes to protecting detained immigrants from hazards like Superfund sites. But she said demands for accountability from the public will be critical going forward.

“It’s important that this be a public process,” she said. “These plans should not be developed in secrecy. The more eyes that are on this, the more likelihood that the families will be protected.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+6 # Citizen Mike 2018-08-09 09:22
The only possible explanation is a desire to do maximum harm to people they hate. The Republicans have discovered the power of politicizing hatred, which served Hitler so very well.
 
 
+4 # ddd-rrr 2018-08-09 12:43
Just when we think this "administration " has hit the bottom in its "pit of evil-doing",
it manages to prove us wrong! The last "move" (with its separation of families)
was excruciatingly disgusting, but then this one comes along to add to it!
Really, 'Bublicans, it’s time to WAKE UP and STOP this trumpian mess!
 
 
+3 # Kootenay Coyote 2018-08-09 17:15
The same proven policy of the Trail of Tears & President Jackson’s loving gift of Yellow Fever blankets. Think about the implications.
 
 
+1 # dotlady 2018-08-10 20:05
Sounds like desperation to me - coupled with ignorance, incompetence and a complete lack of caring.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN