RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Levin writes: "California shopping centers are sending data from license plate readers to a private surveillance technology company that partners with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), according to a new report."

The U.S. immigration enforcement agency has faced an outcry over aggressive policies. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)
The U.S. immigration enforcement agency has faced an outcry over aggressive policies. (photo: Alex Wong/Getty)


California Malls Are Sharing License Plate Data With ICE-Linked Surveillance Firm

By Sam Levin, Guardian UK

12 July 18


Private company’s work with immigration authorities raise fears data could be used to track undocumented shoppers

alifornia shopping centers are sending data from license plate readers to a private surveillance technology company that partners with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), according to a new report.

The revelation comes at a time of increasing scrutiny of tech firms and private companies that build tools and provide services for the Trump administration’s increasingly aggressive immigration policy. A new research paper this week has also exposed the ways in which prison companies appear to be influencing immigration policy and profiting from expanding partnerships with Ice.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation found that Irvine Company, a real estate developer that operates dozens of malls throughout California, has been conducting vehicle license plate reader surveillance for Vigilant Solutions, a firm that maintains databases and works with law enforcement. The automated license plate recognition technology allows cameras to capture images of plates and link them to GPS locations.

The EFF uncovered a December 2016 disclosure on Irvine Company’s website that it was collecting license plate information along with location and time data and sending it to a “searchable database” operated by Vigilant.

Earlier this year, US officials confirmed that Ice had developed a contract with Vigilant that would give immigration authorities access to the company’s vast database during investigations, sparking privacy concerns and protests. Vigilant has refused to comment on its relationship with Ice.

After the EFF published its report on Tuesday, Irvine Company officials said the firm’s contract with Vigilant specified that the data was “only shared with local police departments”. A spokesman told the Guardian that the technology was in use at three southern California shopping malls – Irvine Spectrum Center in the city of Irvine, Fashion Island in Newport Beach, and the Market Place in Tustin.

Dave Maass, the author of the EFF report, told the Guardian he was skeptical of the claims from Irvine Company, which previously had disclosed few details of its surveillance efforts.

“You could imagine a hypothetical situation if a mall has the Vigilant system … somebody pulls into that parking lot. Maybe Ice gets an immediate alert: ‘Here’s the person, go get them,’” he said, noting that the mechanisms of data sharing are unclear since the companies have been secretive.

It’s difficult to know whether the Vigilant contract actually protects shoppers’ data from ending up in the hands of Ice.

Maass noted that in the past, some agencies have claimed they were only sharing data with local police, but later revealed that this included local Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offices, meaning they were working with Ice. Even liberal California cities that have sanctuary policies restricting cooperation with Ice have also been caught working with federal immigration authorities.

Beyond the shopping malls, there is growing concern about how the license plate tracking could affect immigrant communities, said Maass.

“My worry has been that this will be used to track suspected undocumented people in real time, that it may be used to identify visitors to places that are frequented by undocumented immigrants … or if they find one person who is undocumented, they use the system to reveal their entire network.”

Some municipalities have rejected Vigilant contracts due to its relationship with Ice, and the ACLU has sued the federal agency for more information about how it is using the license plate database.

Vigilant did not initially respond to an inquiry, but after publication of this article issued a lengthy statement threatening to take legal action against the not-for-profit.

The company does not share Irvine mall data with Ice, Vigilant said in the statement, adding that law enforcement agencies “do not have the ability” in the Vigilant system to “electronically copy this data or share this data” with other people or agencies such as Ice.

A Vigilant spokeswoman did not respond to a request for the copy of the Irvine contract. Asked about the status of Vigilant’s relationship with Ice, she said the company would not disclose details of “commercial relationships”, but confirmed that it would continue to provide license plate reader “access” to Ice.

Scott Starkey, an Irvine Company spokesman, said in a statement that “Vigilant is required by contract, and have assured us, that [license plate] data collected at these locations is only shared with local police departments”.

Asked for a copy of the contract, Starkey sent the Guardian a one-page letter from an Irvine executive to Vigilant saying it was confirming that Vigilant had not shared any of its data with Ice. The document was dated 11 July, one day after the EFF report was released.

Ice said it “uses information obtained from license plate readers as one tool in support of its investigations” and said it is “not seeking to build” its own database.

Kim Mohr, a spokeswoman for the city of Irvine’s police department, said in an email that the department uses the license plate data for its own investigations and “never shares the information”, adding that the investigations do not involve Ice or DHS. “We have made numerous arrests thanks to this technology,” she said.

A Newport Beach police spokeswoman said the department had access to Vigilant’s database for “routine patrol operations and criminal investigations”, but that it was not a dataset police could “peruse at large”. She also said the department does share information with other law enforcement agencies, but not with Ice or DHS.

A spokesperson for the Tustin police department, the third agency using the data, did not respond to an inquiry.

Also this week, a study from Loren Collingwood, a political scientist at the University of California, Riverside, raised further questions about private corporations aiding Ice and benefiting from Trump’s ramped-up enforcement efforts.

The paper found there was increased support for punitive immigration legislation in districts with privately owned or managed Ice detention centers. That suggests that there is a significant link between the presence of these private prisons and lawmakers’ efforts to pass anti-immigrant policies that could fill the facilities in their districts with more detainees.

Collingwood said that lawmakers may perceive these prisons to be a boon for local economies, despite evidence to the contrary, and thus support policies that allow the government to “capture and contain more people”.

“This really strikes at a moral issue,” he said, noting how expanding prison companies targeted rural communities and treated undocumented people as a “good”. “Given Trump’s very harsh immigration policies, these prison companies are at an all-time high in terms of their potential to cash in on these policies.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+1 # krallison 2018-07-13 00:34
Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
 
 
+1 # Texas Aggie 2018-07-13 14:42
If their malls are anything like the ones along the TX border, Irvine Co. is shooting itself in the foot. When drumpf started making things so difficult for Mexicans to come to the US to shop, the malls along the border took a tremendous hit to the point that there are billboards all over northeast Mexico with the pictures of the mayors from Laredo and McAllen begging Mexicans to come and shop.

Even so, where normally on weekends the parking lots at the malls would be full of cars with Mexican license plates, now they are empty and Dillards, Penney's, Macy's, Sears, and all the little stores are suffering. If Irvine continues to make Mexicans unwelcome, their stores will take the same hit.
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN