RSN Fundraising Banner
FB Share
Email This Page
add comment
Print

Barnes writes: "Republican Congressmen have introduced legislation that would make it a crime, punishable by more than a decade in prison, for protesters to cover their faces during demonstrations."

Antifa activists. (photo: AP)
Antifa activists. (photo: AP)


Anti-Antifa Bill Would Punish Masked Protesters With Up to 15 Years in Prison

By Luke Barnes, ThinkProgress

11 July 18


Republican Congressmen are feeding the far-right's dream.

epublican Congressmen have introduced legislation that would make it a crime, punishable by more than a decade in prison, for protesters to cover their faces during demonstrations.

The “Unmasking Antifa Act,” introduced in June by Rep. Dan Donovan (R-NY) and co-sponsored by Reps. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) and Ted Budd (R-NC), states anyone who “while wearing a mask, injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person” could be sentenced to up to 15 years in prison.

The broader aim of not allowing masked protesters at demonstrations isn’t that unusual. Since the 1950s, 18 states have introduced legislation making it illegal to wear masks at protests. Those laws, which were ironically put in place to combat the KKK, have since been flipped on their head to target leftist protesters. In April for instance, counter-protestors at a Nazi rally in Georgia were forced at gunpoint by police to remove their masks.

What makes this latest piece of legislation so troubling is that it specifically targets the constitutionally protected rights of leftist counter-protestors to free assembly rather than, say, the neo-Nazi who killed one and injured dozens more during last year’s Unite the Right white supremacist rally.

The legislation also ignores the massive disparity in violence between Antifa and far-right groups. As HuffPost noted, there has been precisely one death at the hands of Antifa in more than 30 years, while individuals affiliated with the far-right have been responsible for dozens of police fatalities in the last decade alone.

Curiously, the legislation introduced by Donovan has a specific clause that exempts law enforcement. So while normal citizens could face a decade and a half in prison for wearing a ski mask at a protest, police will still be free to hide their appearance — both at demonstrations and on day-to-day patrol. This is perhaps unsurprising bearing in mind that Rep. Donovan, a former prosecutor, failed to win an indictment to prosecute the police officer who killed Eric Garner in 2014.

It’s possible that the Unmasking Antifa Act will stall in Congress and never make it to the floor for a vote, serving only as an ideological campaign advertisement for Donovan, who represents a very Republican, law enforcement-friendly district in Staten Island.

If it were enacted, however, it would put any leftist counter-protester at far-right rallies in an incredibly precarious position: risk the possibility of 15 years in prison for covering up your face, or expose your identity and face the very real threat of a far-right harassment and stalking campaign.

Since last year’s Unite the Right rally the far-right media ecosystem has been steadily pushing the idea that it is Antifa, and not white supremacists or neo-Nazis, who are the real “terrorists” that America needs to worry about. In the immediate aftermath of the Sutherland Springs shooting last November for instance, Mike Cernovich suggested that it may have been an “Antifa terrorist attack” (it was not). “Crying Nazi” Chris Cantwell, too, claimed in March that he was actually working with the FBI to help “bust Antifa.”

Speaking with the Daily Beast this week, one New York-based Antifa member claimed the latest “anti-Antifa” bill followed that same pattern, “criminaliz[ing] people fighting fascism” rather than cracking down on violent right-wing extremism or abusive government policies.

“The point of these laws is always to protect the status quo of inequality and to use the power of the state to enforce compliance to this inequality,” they said. “This particular law follows this same pattern: it wants to criminalize people fighting fascism, whether that be the kind of scum involved in torchlit marches in Charlottesville, or the ones who rip children away from their parents.”


e-max.it: your social media marketing partner
 

Comments   

A note of caution regarding our comment sections:

For months a stream of media reports have warned of coordinated propaganda efforts targeting political websites based in the U.S., particularly in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We too were alarmed at the patterns we were, and still are, seeing. It is clear that the provocateurs are far more savvy, disciplined, and purposeful than anything we have ever experienced before.

It is also clear that we still have elements of the same activity in our article discussion forums at this time.

We have hosted and encouraged reader expression since the turn of the century. The comments of our readers are the most vibrant, best-used interactive feature at Reader Supported News. Accordingly, we are strongly resistant to interrupting those services.

It is, however, important to note that in all likelihood hardened operatives are attempting to shape the dialog our community seeks to engage in.

Adapt and overcome.

Marc Ash
Founder, Reader Supported News

 
+2 # Rodion Raskolnikov 2018-07-11 20:11
I agree with this. Such a law targets a particular gropu. And why shouldn't a protester do all he/she can to defend against the police, who have face recognition software and all manner of cameras.

DC banned any sort of face covering during the IMF/World Bank protests. We were all wearing gas masks because of the heavy use of tear gas and pepper spray. Bacically, the city government said we have to take the tear gas in the eyes and nose with no protection. The cops aimed directly for everyone's eyes. Our view was that we would not take the masks off for anything. The police were wearing masks.

I'm not a supporter of Antifa but I do support them on this issue. The issue is civil liberties and the right to protest and to protect oneself from police violence. Everyone also wears headgear, shoulder pads, and other body armor, since the cops can really swing those truncheons. And rubber bullets hurt a lot.

The great irony is that all these protests are "civil disobedience." What makes these dumb legislators think anyone will obey this law.
 
 
0 # janie1893 2018-07-12 01:31
When I am protesting, I want my opponents to see my face so they know just who disagrees with them. !Make eye contact and stare them down!
 
 
0 # lfeuille 2018-07-12 22:27
Does it apply to the KKK also. I doubt this is constitutional. To keep demonstratins peaceful, all they have to do is ban guns, stick, knives and any other conceivable weapons. If you let the jerks bring their guns, there will be violence.
 
 
0 # Robbee 2018-07-13 10:43
Anti-Antifa Bill Would Punish Masked Protesters With Up to 15 Years in Prison, 11 July 18

THERE OUGHTA BE A LAW AGAINST CORPORATIONS AND OTHER PRIVATE SOURCES BRIBING OR OTHERWISE FUNDING MEMBERS O CONGRESS!

- OOPS? THAT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

THEN THERE OUGHTA BE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION!

HOW CAN CONGRESS N O T PUNISH "DARK MONEY? THEN WORRY ABOUT FACE MASKS?"

IF TTHERE WERE ANY JUSTICE? WE WOULD LOCK UP CONGRESS! UNTIL THEY DO THEIR JOB !- PROTECT US FROM MASKED BANDITS?AND CONGRESS?
 

THE NEW STREAMLINED RSN LOGIN PROCESS: Register once, then login and you are ready to comment. All you need is a Username and a Password of your choosing and you are free to comment whenever you like! Welcome to the Reader Supported News community.

RSNRSN